Ventricular Tachycardia
Justin Hayase
Jason S. Bradfield
INTRODUCTION
Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important cause of sudden cardiac death that is estimated to affect between 230,000 and 350,000 people in the United States annually.1 VT is defined as greater than or equal to 3 beats originating from the ventricles at a rate greater than 100 beats per minute. Sustained VT is defined as lasting longer than 30 seconds or VT requiring intervention for termination because of hemodynamic compromise. Nonsustained VT is defined as lasting less than 30 seconds and self-terminating. VT can be either monomorphic (having the same beat-to-beat electrocardiographic [ECG] morphology) or polymorphic (changing QRS morphology beat to beat). Ventricular fibrillation is defined as rapid and disorganized, irregular electrical activity, typically at a rate greater than 300 bpm (Figure 57.1).
PATHOGENESIS
Monomorphic VT and polymorphic VT typically have different underlying mechanisms/pathophysiology. Polymorphic VT may often be driven by ischemia, whereas monomorphic VT is rarely due to an ischemic insult. A form of polymorphic VT, known as torsades de pointes, can be precipitated by a long QT interval. There are many causes of a long QT interval including electrolyte abnormalities, drug effects, or inherited channelopathies. Monomorphic VT is most commonly due to either focal mechanisms (either triggered activity or automaticity) or scar-based reentry (most often in the setting of structural heart disease).2 Focal mechanisms are often implicated in idiopathic VT entities, such as outflow tract VTs or Purkinje fiber-associated VTs, which can occur in the absence of structural heart disease; however, their occurrence does not exclude structural heart disease. In contrast to focal VT, the presence of scar promotes a macro-reentrant mechanism for myocardial VT. The heterogeneous conduction properties of scarred myocardium create the critical isthmuses that promote wave break and create excitable gaps, which can sustain a macro-reentrant circuit for monomorphic VT3 (Figure 57.2).
FIGURE 57.1 Different types of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. (A) Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia characterized by a wide QRS complex rhythm, rate greater than 100 bpm, with the same beat-to-beat electrocardiographic (ECG) morphology. (B) Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia with beat-to-beat variability in QRS morphology. Prolonged QT interval can be appreciated at the beginning of the rhythm strip, which predisposes to torsades de pointes. (C) Ventricular fibrillation with disorganized, irregular electrical activity at a rate greater than 300 bpm. |
CLINICAL PRESENTATION
Patients can present with a variety of symptoms depending on the VT characteristics, comorbidities, and underlying etiology. Symptoms can include chest pain, shortness of breath,
palpitations, dizziness, diaphoresis, weakness, and/or syncope. Symptoms are typically abrupt in onset, and if the VT rate is fast, then hemodynamic compromise can be sudden.4 Less commonly, if the VT rate is much slower, symptoms can be more subacute if the VT has been ongoing for some time.
palpitations, dizziness, diaphoresis, weakness, and/or syncope. Symptoms are typically abrupt in onset, and if the VT rate is fast, then hemodynamic compromise can be sudden.4 Less commonly, if the VT rate is much slower, symptoms can be more subacute if the VT has been ongoing for some time.
DIAGNOSIS
As always, a history and physical examination must initiate every patient evaluation. Attention to the patient’s general appearance and vital signs is critical because hemodynamic collapse can occur rapidly in a patient with VT. Tachycardia, weak and thready pulse, pallor, diaphoresis, and marginal blood pressure are important signs to note. A basic assessment according to advanced cardiac and life support algorithms is imperative, with prompt intervention to maintain support of the patient’s airway, breathing, and circulation (Algorithm 57.1).
The most important tool for establishing a diagnosis of VT, however, is the 12-lead ECG. The presence of a wide complex tachycardia on ECG should immediately raise the clinician’s concern for VT, although there are other possibilities that should also be considered. Multiple criteria have been developed to differentiate VT from other causes of wide complex tachycardia with a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. Brugada and colleagues developed an algorithm in which an absence of an RS complex in all precordial leads, an R to S interval of greater than 100 ms, the presence of atrioventricular (AV) dissociation, or morphology criteria in leads V1 and V6 can identify VT with a sensitivity of 98.7% and specificity of 96.5%.5 Another algorithm utilizing only lead aVR can also distinguish VT from supraventricular tachycardia with aberrancy with sensitivity of 96.5% and specificity of 95.7%6 (Algorithm 57.2). The presence of structural heart disease also greatly increases the probability that the wide complex tachycardia is VT.1
MANAGEMENT OF VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA
As previously mentioned, management of VT initially should follow the algorithm provided by advanced cardiac life support recommendations, with an emphasis on circulatory support and airway protection. Electrical cardioversion is often recommended if VT does not self-terminate. If VT remains refractory to supportive measures, medications should be administered, typically via intravenous formulation. Guideline recommendations suggest the use of amiodarone, sotalol, or procainamide.1 In the guidelines, procainamide received a stronger recommendation than did amiodarone or sotalol1; however, this is based on limited data,7 and procainamide use is associated with toxicities that require close monitoring. For this reason, in our practice, we prefer the use of amiodarone as an initial agent in cases of refractory VT in the acute setting. Lidocaine has fallen out of favor as a primary agent for management of VT; however, it may still have a role where ischemia is suspected, or when used in combination with other antiarrhythmic agents such as amiodarone.8 Lidocaine can also be useful in suppressing arrhythmias in the short term, owing to its short half-life, when subsequent electrophysiology procedures are planned, whereas other agents with longer half-lives could affect arrhythmia inducibility and thus decrease procedural efficacy.
Once stabilized, an evaluation for underlying causes of VT should be performed, such as electrolyte imbalances, drug toxicities, endocrine disorders, inherited channelopathies, or acute coronary syndromes (Algorithm 57.3). If patients continue to have ongoing ventricular arrhythmias in spite of addressing any underlying causes and initiation of antiarrhythmic medications, consideration for intubation and sedation should be made. Advanced imaging such as a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be performed to assess for myocardial scar, and a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan may also be useful in identifying inflammatory conditions such as myocarditis that could be contributing to the arrhythmias.9
The management of VT also varies greatly depending on whether it is an idiopathic versus a scar-mediated mechanism. The surface ECG morphology of VT is critical in guiding management because certain 12-lead ECG features can suggest an idiopathic etiology.10 In cases of scar-mediated VT, the 12-lead ECG can also localize exit sites and direct future invasive procedural management.11
Medical Approach
Management approaches vary depending on whether the VT is idiopathic and occurs in a structurally normal heart, or whether it is a scar-mediated one in the case of a structurally abnormal heart. Idiopathic VT or premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) commonly originate from the outflow tract, AV annular regions, papillary muscles/moderator band, or the fascicular conduction system.1 Medication management commonly includes beta-blockers or non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers. Antiarrhythmic medications may also be considered. If patients remain refractory to medical therapy or do not tolerate medications, then catheter ablation should be offered, which is discussed further in the section “Percutaneous Interventions.”
Patients with sustained monomorphic VT and structural heart disease should receive an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) as a class I recommendation.1 Particularly in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, the ICD has demonstrated mortality benefit in multiple clinical trials.12,13 However, although the ICDs can abort potential life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, they do not prevent VT from occurring, and ICD shocks have been associated with poorer outcomes as well as reduced quality of life.14 Certain cardiac device programming parameters, such as the use of anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP), can decrease the likelihood of ICD shocks and improve quality of life.15 Nonetheless, the management options for patients who continue to experience VT include (1) medications, (2) catheter-based interventions, or (3) surgical therapies.