Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement



Fig. 34.1
(a) Balloon expandable Edwards Sapien three valve (b) Fluoroscopic image of deployed Edwards Sapien three valve



A111453_1_En_34_Fig2_HTML.jpg


Fig. 34.2
(a) Medtronic Evolut R CoreValve (b) Fluoroscopic image of deployed medtronic Evolut R CoreValve



Table 34.1
Procedural equipment



































































 
Equipment

Comments

Basic essentials

Hybrid suite

Capable of full catheterization and surgical needs

Anesthesia setup

General or conscious sedation

Surgical setup
 

Perfusion pump

Not necessarily primed, but available

Transvenous pacemaker
 

Transesophageal echocardiography

As appropriate, not necessary for all cases

PCI equipment

Standard guides, wires, stents available

Covered stents

Available for vascular complication

Sheaths

Standard access equipment

May require longer sheaths

Specialty sheath

Multiple types available – based on specific procedure and access site

Catheters

JR4, AL1

For crossing valve (others as appropriate)

2 Pigtail catheters

For exchange, aortography and hemodynamic evaluation

Wires

0.035″ angiographic

Both 150″ and 260″

0.035″ straight tip

For crossing – we prefer hydrophilic wire

0.035″ extra/super stiff

Depends on valve type, dedicated pre-curved wires available

Specialty

Valvuloplasty balloon

Size chosen by purpose (i.e. priming, sizing,)

Transcatheter valve

As appropriate




Techniques


Current ACC/AHA guidelines recommend the use of a hybrid operating theatre for implantation of the transcatheter aortic valve, although at some centers, there has been a transition to procedural performance in appropriately outfitted catheterization laboratories. Current guidelines also mandate that both an interventional cardiologist and cardiothoracic surgeon be present for the procedure [1].

The preoperative evaluation is summarized in Fig. 34.3, and it is essentially congruent with a surgical evaluation with the addition of Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT). This modality is of particular importance for TAVR as it enables one to choose the appropriate device size based on aortic annular area/perimeter, evaluate left ventricular outflow tract and valvular calcification, assess coronary heights, sinus width, sinotubular junction diameters/calcification, angiographic views and potential access routes (Fig. 34.4). While many of these variables can be assessed through alternative modalities, MDCT is a singular, detailed and three-dimensional modality with dedicated software systems allowing for reliable and reproducible analyses and pre-TAVR planning.

A111453_1_En_34_Fig3_HTML.jpg


Fig. 34.3
Procedural evaluation


A111453_1_En_34_Fig4_HTML.jpg


Fig. 34.4
MDCT assessment. (a) Annulus measurement. (b) Coronal angle at level of annulus. (c) Sagittal angle at level of annulus. (d) Left coronary height. (e) Right coronary height. (f) Sinus of Valsava measurements. (g) Right iliofemoral minimums. (h) Iliofemoral scout. (i) Left iliofemoral minimums

Regarding access, the transfemoral route is generally favored for patients with suitable iliofemoral anatomy to accommodate currently available devices, and approximately 80 % of procedures are now performed via transfemoral access. For patients with iliofemoral disease precluding device delivery, alternative access routes are possible. These alternative sites include open iliac (via conduit), subclavian, direct aortic or transapical. Additionally, direct carotid or transcaval access (with crossover from the inferior vena cava to the aorta) may be of utility in appropriately selected patients.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 3, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access