Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Fig. 34.1
(a) Balloon expandable Edwards Sapien three valve (b) Fluoroscopic image of deployed Edwards Sapien three valve
A111453_1_En_34_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Fig. 34.2
(a) Medtronic Evolut R CoreValve (b) Fluoroscopic image of deployed medtronic Evolut R CoreValve
Table 34.1
Procedural equipment
 
Equipment
Comments
Basic essentials
Hybrid suite
Capable of full catheterization and surgical needs
Anesthesia setup
General or conscious sedation
Surgical setup
 
Perfusion pump
Not necessarily primed, but available
Transvenous pacemaker
 
Transesophageal echocardiography
As appropriate, not necessary for all cases
PCI equipment
Standard guides, wires, stents available
Covered stents
Available for vascular complication
Sheaths
Standard access equipment
May require longer sheaths
Specialty sheath
Multiple types available – based on specific procedure and access site
Catheters
JR4, AL1
For crossing valve (others as appropriate)
2 Pigtail catheters
For exchange, aortography and hemodynamic evaluation
Wires
0.035″ angiographic
Both 150″ and 260″
0.035″ straight tip
For crossing – we prefer hydrophilic wire
0.035″ extra/super stiff
Depends on valve type, dedicated pre-curved wires available
Specialty
Valvuloplasty balloon
Size chosen by purpose (i.e. priming, sizing,)
Transcatheter valve
As appropriate

Techniques

Current ACC/AHA guidelines recommend the use of a hybrid operating theatre for implantation of the transcatheter aortic valve, although at some centers, there has been a transition to procedural performance in appropriately outfitted catheterization laboratories. Current guidelines also mandate that both an interventional cardiologist and cardiothoracic surgeon be present for the procedure [1].
The preoperative evaluation is summarized in Fig. 34.3, and it is essentially congruent with a surgical evaluation with the addition of Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT). This modality is of particular importance for TAVR as it enables one to choose the appropriate device size based on aortic annular area/perimeter, evaluate left ventricular outflow tract and valvular calcification, assess coronary heights, sinus width, sinotubular junction diameters/calcification, angiographic views and potential access routes (Fig. 34.4). While many of these variables can be assessed through alternative modalities, MDCT is a singular, detailed and three-dimensional modality with dedicated software systems allowing for reliable and reproducible analyses and pre-TAVR planning.
A111453_1_En_34_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Fig. 34.3
Procedural evaluation
A111453_1_En_34_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Fig. 34.4
MDCT assessment. (a) Annulus measurement. (b) Coronal angle at level of annulus. (c) Sagittal angle at level of annulus. (d) Left coronary height. (e) Right coronary height. (f) Sinus of Valsava measurements. (g) Right iliofemoral minimums. (h) Iliofemoral scout. (i) Left iliofemoral minimums
Regarding access, the transfemoral route is generally favored for patients with suitable iliofemoral anatomy to accommodate currently available devices, and approximately 80 % of procedures are now performed via transfemoral access. For patients with iliofemoral disease precluding device delivery, alternative access routes are possible. These alternative sites include open iliac (via conduit), subclavian, direct aortic or transapical. Additionally, direct carotid or transcaval access (with crossover from the inferior vena cava to the aorta) may be of utility in appropriately selected patients.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 3, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access