Summary
Background
Dual antiplatelet therapy, comprising aspirin and clopidogrel, is recommended in patients undergoing coronary stenting to avoid the occurrence of stent thrombosis and others ischaemic events. Interindividual response to clopidogrel varies, however, with poor response associated with an increased risk of ischaemic events. New assays are available for testing aspirin and clopidogrel response routinely at the bedside.
Aim
To evaluate the prognostic value of testing antiplatelet response in an intermediate-risk population undergoing stent implantation.
Methods
We prospectively assessed clopidogrel and aspirin response using the VerifyNow assay at the time of coronary stenting in 1001 patients who presented with stable coronary disease or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. The main ischaemic endpoint was the composite of definite and probable stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death or spontaneous myocardial infarction at one year. The safety endpoint was major bleeding.
Results
Overall, 36.0% of patients had high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (OCR) and 8.6% had high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (OAR). The main ischaemic composite endpoint occurred in 3.9% of patients with high vs. 2.3% of patients with normal OCR (hazard ratio 1.66, 95% confidence interval 0.78–3.54; P = 0.18). Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 1.1% of patients with high vs. 0.3% of patients with normal OCR ( P = 0.86). There was no significant difference in ischaemic endpoints according to OAR and there was no difference in rates of major bleeding between patients with high versus normal on-treatment platelet reactivity.
Conclusions
On-treatment platelet reactivity was not associated with 1-year ischaemic or bleeding events in an intermediate-risk population undergoing stent implantation.
Résumé
Rationnel
La bithérapie antiplaquettaire, comprenant l’aspirine et le clopidogrel, est recommandée chez tous les patients après stenting coronaire pour prévenir les évènements ischémiques dont la thrombose de stent. La réponse individuelle au clopidogrel est très variable et une faible réponse est associée à une augmentation des évènements ischémiques. De nouveaux tests sont maintenant disponibles pour évaluer cette réponse à l’aspirine et au clopidogrel de manière routinière et délocalisée.
Objectif
Évaluer la valeur pronostique de ces tests de réponse aux antiplaquettaires chez une population à risque intermédiaire bénéficiant d’un stenting coronaire.
Méthode
Nous avons mesuré de façon prospective la réponse à l’aspirine et au clopidogrel par VerifyNow lors de la procédure de stenting coronaire chez 1001 patients présentant un angor stable ou un syndrome coronarien aigu sans sus-décalage du segment ST. Le critère composite principal d’évaluation des événements ischémiques était l’apparition d’une thrombose de stent certaine ou probable et/ou d’un décès cardio-vasculaire et/ou d’un infarctus spontané du myocarde à 1 an. Le critère d’évaluation de sécurité était les saignements majeurs.
Résultats
Sur l’ensemble de la population, 36 % des patients gardait une hyperréactivité plaquettaire sous clopidogrel (HPC) et 8,6 % gardait une hyperréactivité plaquettaire sous aspirine (HPA). Le critère composite d’évaluation principal a été observé dans 3,9 % des cas chez les patients avec hyperréactivité vs 2,3 % avec normoréactivité plaquettaire sous clopidogrel (NPC)(hazard ratio 1,66, 95 % intervalle de confiance 0,78–3,54 ; p = 0,18). La thrombose de stent certaine ou probable a été observée dans 1,1 % des HPC vs 0,3 % chez les NPC ( p = 0,86). Il n’a pas été observé de différence significative tant des évènements ischémiques que hémorragiques entre le groupe des hyper- vs normorépondeurs au traitement antiplaquettaire.
Conclusion
La réactivité plaquettaire sous clopidogrel et aspirine n’est pas corrélée à l’incidence des évènements ischémiques et hémorragique à 1 an d’un stenting coronaire dans une population à risque intermédiaire.
Background
Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is recommended in patients undergoing coronary stenting to avoid the occurrence of stent thrombosis and ischaemic events . Interindividual response to clopidogrel varies widely, however, due to drug-related factors and genetic mutations, but also to several other clinical factors including diabetes mellitus, acute coronary syndrome and high body mass index . Several studies have demonstrated a relationship between clopidogrel and/or aspirin poor response and increased risk of ischaemic events after coronary stenting . Most were performed using light transmission aggregometry, an assay that is not widely available in practice due to laboratory constraints. New and reliable assays are now available for testing aspirin and clopidogrel response routinely at the bedside, including the VerifyNow™ P2Y12 assay (Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA) .
The aim of the multicentre VerifyNow French Registry (VERIFRENCHY) was to assess the prognostic value of testing on-treatment platelet reactivity using aspirin and clopidogrel with the VerifyNow assay at the time of coronary stenting.
Methods
Study population
VERIFRENCHY was a multicentre prospective observational study that recruited patients in 20 high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centres in France. The study population included adults (≥ 18 years) with stable angina, silent ischaemia or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS; unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) undergoing planned PCI with stenting. Exclusion criteria were periprocedural glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, bivalirudin treatment before PCI, contraindications to aspirin or clopidogrel, use of oral anticoagulation and lack of available clopidogrel response at inclusion. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before the index procedure. The study was approved by the French Authorities (AFSSAPS [2008-A00411-54] and CPP [n° 2008-N2]).
Procedures
Eligible patients were screened at the time of the coronary angiogram. Patients were loaded with clopidogrel 600 mg ≥ two hours before PCI unless they had been on a maintenance clopidogrel dose of 75 mg for > one week. An intravenous loading dose of aspirin was given according to the investigators’ usual practices in patients in whom aspirin was started < one week before angiography. Patients were tested for both aspirin and clopidogrel response before stent implantation. A valid biological measure of clopidogrel/aspirin response was requested before inclusion in the study.
After stent implantation, aspirin (75–160 mg) and clopidogrel (75 mg) maintenance doses were recommended for one month after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation and for one year after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation or if the clinical presentation was an ACS. In this registry, we compared the rate of primary and secondary endpoints at one year according to treatment response to both clopidogrel and aspirin.
Data were collected prospectively on-site and analysed by the Peter Holmes Company . Blood samples were drawn both before PCI and 24 hours after PCI to measure troponin concentrations. Follow-up data were obtained by clinical examination at hospital discharge and by telephone contact at one month and one year after discharge.
Whole blood was obtained at the time of catheterization. Platelet function testing was performed with the VerifyNow assay after the decision was made to perform stenting, but before starting PCI . The selection of VerifyNow platelet inhibition (%PI) with a cut-off of ≤ 15% was based on data from Bouman et al., who demonstrated a good correlation between P2Y12 reaction unit values and %PI with plasma concentrations of active metabolite clopidogrel . High on-aspirin platelet reactivity (OAR) was defined as an aspirin reaction unit (ARU) ≥ 550, and normal OAR was defined as ARU < 550 . High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (OCR) was defined as %PI ≤ 15% and normal OCR as %PI > 15%, based on data from Godino et al. . Investigators were strongly encouraged not to modify antiplatelet therapy according to the results of platelet function tests.
Patients were also classified according to the VerifyNow %PI and ARU quartiles to assess bleeding events; the lowest platelet reactivity quartiles of clopidogrel and aspirin were compared with the other three quartiles.
Endpoints
Ischaemic endpoints were defined as definite and probable stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction (spontaneous and/or periprocedural), all-cause death, cardiovascular death and stroke. The main ischaemic composite endpoint was a combination of definite and probable stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death and spontaneous myocardial infarction at one year. The secondary composite ischaemic endpoint included the combination of definite and probable stent thrombosis, all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (spontaneous and periprocedural) and stroke.
Periprocedural myocardial infarction was defined as a postprocedural increase in troponin concentration > three times the 99th percentile upper reference limit in patients with normal baseline concentrations of troponin (type 4a ); in patients with an ACS and raised baseline troponin concentrations, the definition of a subsequent elevation ≥ 20% of the baseline value was applied . Spontaneous myocardial infarction was defined as ≥ 1 value of troponin > 99th percentile upper reference limit together with evidence of myocardial ischaemia (type 1) . Stent thrombosis included definite, probable and possible stent thrombosis . Ischaemic stroke was defined as focal loss of neurological function caused by an ischaemic event.
The main safety endpoint was defined according to the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis definitions . Major bleeding was defined as: fatal bleeding; symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ (i.e. intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial), or intramuscular bleeding with compartment syndrome; and bleeding causing a fall in haemoglobin concentration of ≥ 20 g/L or leading to transfusion of ≥ two units of whole blood. Minor bleeding was defined as any clinically overt sign of haemorrhage that was actionable, but did not meet the criteria for major bleeding.
Statistical analysis
A power calculation was performed to determine the study sample size. Anticipating a 35% rate of high OCR and an annual stent thrombosis rate of 1.7% (α risk at 5% and error at 80%, bilateral test), 800 patients would be needed; allowing for loss to follow-up, a population of 1000 patients was chosen.
Continuous variables and categorical variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviations and counts and percentages, respectively. Student’s t test was used to compare continuous variables and the Chi 2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan–Meier method with a log-rank test-group comparison. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corp, Somers, NY, USA).
Results
A total of 1053 patients were pre-treated with clopidogrel and aspirin and underwent PCI with stenting. A VerifyNow test result was not available in 52 (4.9%) patients due to technical issues (bubbling or calibration problem); consequently, 1001 patients were included in the analysis. In 29 (2.9%) of these patients, the aspirin test result was not available; therefore 972 patients were included in the comparison of aspirin response ( Fig. 1 ). Among the 1001 patients with P2Y12 VerifyNow test results available, 360 (36.0%) had high OCR and 641 (64.0%) had normal OCR. Among the 972 patients with aspirin test results available, 84 (8.6%) had high OAR and 888 (91.4%) had normal OAR.
Patients with high OCR were on average older, had a higher body mass index, were more often diabetic and less frequently smokers compared to patients with normal OCR ( Table 1 ). High OAR patients were more frequently men and displayed a higher creatinine clearance than patients with normal OAR.
Variables | On-clopidogrel platelet reactivity | On-aspirin platelet reactivity | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total cohort n = 1001) | High ( n = 360) | Normal ( n = 641) | P | Total cohort ( n = 972) | High ( n = 84) | Normal ( n = 888) | P | |
Age (years) | 66.5 ± 11.4 | 68.3 ± 11.6 | 65.5 ± 11.2 | < 0.001 | 66.6 ± 11.5 | 66.1 ± 12.4 | 66.6 ± 11.4 | 0.69 |
Men | 833 (83.2) | 298 (82.8) | 535 (83.5) | 0.78 | 809 (83.2) | 78 (92.9) | 731 (82.3) | 0.01 |
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) | 26.5 ± 4.0 | 27.2 ± 4.4 | 26.2 ± 3.7 | < 0.001 | 26.5 ± 4.1 | 27.0 ± 4.2 | 26.5 ± 4.0 | 0.30 |
Current smoker | 181 (18.1) | 49 (13.6) | 132 (20.6) | 0.02 | 177 (18.2) | 17 (20.2) | 160 (18.0) | 0.38 |
Hypertension | 594 (59.3) | 223 (61.9) | 371 (57.9) | 0.20 | 579 (59.6) | 51 (60.7) | 528 (59.5) | 0.80 |
Family history | 312 (31.2) | 100 (27.8) | 212 (33.1) | 0.08 | 304 (31.3) | 21 (25.0) | 283 (31.9) | 0.19 |
Diabetes mellitus | 261 (26.1) | 127 (35.3) | 134 (20.9) | < 0.001 | 249 (25.6) | 23 (27.4) | 226 (25.5) | 0.69 |
Hypercholesterolemia | 665 (66.4) | 227 (63.1) | 438 (68.3) | 0.09 | 649 (66.8) | 52 (61.9) | 597 (67.2) | 0.33 |
Creatinine clearance (mL/min/m 2 ) | 81.8 ± 31.2 | 79.5 ± 31.3 | 83.1 ± 31.1 | 0.08 | 81.6 ± 31.0 | 88.1 ± 32.5 | 81.0 ± 30.8 | 0.04 |
Acute coronary syndromes | 216 (21.6) | 82 (22.8) | 134 (20.9) | 0.49 | 208 (21.4) | 16 (19.0) | 192 (21.6) | 0.58 |
No differences were observed in the angiographic and procedural characteristics between high and normal OCR patients, except for less frequent use of DES in high OCR patients ( Table 2 ). Despite strong recommendations not to change treatment, patients with high OCR were more frequently given glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and reloaded with clopidogrel during the post-PCI period compared with those with normal OCR. In addition, almost one-quarter of the patients had a double maintenance clopidogrel dose at discharge from hospital, with no statistically significant difference between the high versus normal platelet reactivity groups ( Table 2 ).
Variable | On-clopidogrel platelet reactivity | On-aspirin platelet reactivity | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total cohort ( n = 1001) | High ( n = 360) | Normal ( n = 641) | P | Total cohort ( n = 972) | High ( n = 84) | Normal ( n = 888) | P | |
Radial access | 767 (76.6) | 279 (77.5) | 488 (76.1) | 0.88 | 745 (76.6) | 67 (79.8) | 678 (76.4) | 0.86 |
Number of diseased vessels | ||||||||
One | 434 (43.4) | 155 (43.1) | 279 (43.5) | 0.88 | 423 (43.5) | 40 (47.6) | 383 (43.1) | 0.43 |
Two | 345 (34.5) | 114 (31.7) | 231 (36.0) | 0.16 | 329 (33.8) | 20 (23.8) | 309 (34.8) | 0.04 |
Three | 199 (19.9) | 81 (22.5) | 118 (18.4) | 0.12 | 197 (20.3) | 23 (27.4) | 174 (19.6) | 0.09 |
Left main disease | 32 (3.2) | 11 (3.1) | 21 (3.3) | 0.85 | 32 (3.3) | 2 (2.4) | 30 (3.4) | 0.62 |
Number of lesions per patient | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 0.26 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 0.79 |
Lesion type B2/C | 573 (57.2) | 199 (55.2) | 374 (58.3) | 0.68 | 559 (57.5) | 51 (60.7) | 508 (57.2) | 0.53 |
Thrombus-containing lesion | 42 (4.2) | 19 (5.3) | 23 (3.6) | 0.20 | 42 (4.3) | 5 (6.0) | 37 (4.2) | 0.40 |
Number of vessels treated per patient | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.11 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.99 |
Number of stents per patient | 1.5 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 0.8 | 0.68 | 1.5 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 1.5 ± 0.8 | 0.55 |
At least one DES/patient | 573 (57.2) | 190 (52.8) | 383 (59.8) | 0.03 | 557 (57.3) | 44 (52.4) | 513 (57.8) | 0.34 |
Minimal stent diameter (mm) | 3.7 ± 16.2 | 3.9 ± 18.6 | 3.6 ± 14.7 | 0.76 | 3.7 ± 16.5 | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 3.8 ± 17.2 | 0.63 |
Maximal length of stent (mm) | 21.7 ± 12.4 | 22.0 ± 14.9 | 21.5 ± 10.7 | 0.61 | 21.6 ± 12.4 | 23.2 ± 21.7 | 21.5 ± 11.1 | 0.47 |
Thrombectomy | 6 (0.6) | 4 (1.1) | 2 (0.3) | 0.19 | 5 (0.5) | 0 | 5 (0.6) | 0.49 |
Rotablator | 10 (1.0) | 1 (0.3) | 9 (1.4) | 0.10 | 9 (0.9) | 0 | 9 (1.0) | 0.35 |
Post stent inflation | 208 (20.8) | 78 (21.7) | 130 (20.3) | 0.60 | 202 (20.2) | 14 (16.7) | 188 (21.2) | 0.33 |
GPI peri or post PCI | 42 (4.2) | 18 (5.0) | 24 (3.7) | 0.05 | 42 (4.3) | 4 (4.8) | 38 (4.3) | 0.83 |
GPI reloading dose post PCI | 92 (9.2) | 55 (15.3) | 37 (5.8) | < 0.001 | 90 (9.3) | 16 (19.0) | 74 (8.3) | 0.001 |
Clopidogrel maintenance regimen post PCI | ||||||||
75 mg | 776 (77.5) | 273 (75.8) | 503 (78.5) | 0.33 | 754 (77.6) | 63 (75) | 691 (77.8) | 0.55 |
≥ 150 mg | 225 (22.5) | 87 (24.2) | 138 (21.5) | 0.33 | 218 (22.4) | 21 (25.0) | 197 (22.2) | 0.55 |