Thoracic stent grafts
Fabric
Stents
Min Ø
Max Ø
Min Fr
Max Fr
Cook ZenithTX2
Woven polyester
Steel
28
42
20
22
Cook Zenith Alpha
Woven polyester
Nitinol
18
48
16
20
Bolton Relay
Woven polyester
Nitinol
22
46
22
26
Gore TAG
ePTFE
Nitinol
26
45
20
24
Medtronic Valiant
Woven polyester
Nitinol
22
46
22
25
Jotec E-vita
Woven polyester
Nitinol
24
44
20
24
Table 16.2
Most commonly used abdominal stent graft in Europe
Abdominal stent grafts | Fabric | Stents | MB Min Ø | MB Max Ø | MB Min Fr | MB Max Fr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cook Zenith LP | Woven polyester | Nitinol | 22 | 36 | 16 | 17 |
Medtronic Endurant | Woven polyester | Nitinol | 23 | 36 | 18 | 20 |
Gore Excluder | ePTFE | Nitinol | 23 | 35 | 14 | 18 |
Bolton Treovance | Woven polyester | Nitinol | 20 | 36 | 18 | 19 |
Cordis Incraft | Woven polyester | Nitinol | 22 | 34 | 14 | 16 |
Trivascular Ovation | Woven polyester | Nitinol | 20 | 34 | 14 | 15 |
16.2.4 Compliant Balloons
Balloons are currently used to expand vascular stent graft once deployed, to stabilize primary graft and overlap attachment. Several models are available on the market; there are some differences in balloon material which can be found in polyurethane or latex. Diameters have a very wide range from 10 to 46 mm; some models are semicompliant and offer more than one size to adapt to various anatomies; compliant balloon instead can expand to the desired diameter up to 46 mm with only one size.
An alternative type, specific for the thoracic aorta, is represented by a particular compliant tri-lobed polyurethane balloon catheter (Gore Tri-lobe). The lobed design of the balloon catheter allows for inflation without complete blockage of aortic blood flow.
In all these devices, a guidewire lumen allows introduction of a 0.035 in. diameter guidewire for over-the-wire access, and radiopaque markers indicate the balloon edges.
16.3 Endovascular Techniques for Standard Cases
All the procedures are performed in the operating room, using a portable digital C-arm image intensifier with road-mapping capabilities.
Intraoperative trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) monitoring is routinely used during all the thoracic procedures. In our experience TEE is useful under many aspects as it allows to double check for the most appropriate landing zone of the endograft (in particular when the LSA origin has to be spared). As a second instance TEE is capable of documenting thrombosis or the presence of slow flow inside the aneurysm sac after deployment of the endograft, thus avoiding repeated angiography and the use of high doses of contrast media [3].
Cerebrospinal fluid drainage has been shown to have a protective role in open surgical repair of DTAs and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, while its role in TEVAR is less defined.
Our current indications for CFSD in TEVAR include:
- 1.
Long coverage (predicted use of more than one endograft)
- 2.
Coverage of high risk area including T10-T12
- 3.
Previous abdominal or thoracic aortic surgery
- 4.
Compromised subclavian and hypogastric arteries supply
- 1.
In our series, the overall CSFD institution rate was 28 %.
No difference between men and women has been never identified in this field and we use this kind of approach in both male and female patients.
For TEVAR our preferred choice is to perform the endovascular procedure, when not contraindicated, under general anesthesia. In selective cases, depending of the patient general condition and comorbidity, we also perform local anesthesia, avoiding as frequent as possible, spinal anesthesia. The opportunity to perform local or general instead of spinal anesthesia allows us to have early diagnosis of spinal cord injury that may be obtained by early awakening and neurological conditions evaluation.
For EVAR instead, we perform the endovascular procedure preferably under spinal or local anesthesia, but we also perform general anesthesia in selected cases.
Patients are placed in the dorsal decubitus position, and the operative field is prepared and draped. It is mandatory that the operating field is prepared in such a way to allow a laparotomy for access and abdominal aorta and/or iliac arteries control that may be useful in such cases of iliac tortuosity and severe calcifications that could avoid stent graft navigation.
In the last years we started to use totally percutaneous approach for both thoracic and abdominal endovascular procedures.
Percutaneous femoral artery punctures are performed under ultrasound guidance and then the procedures are performed trough a very small skin incision that allows the insertion of the endovascular devices without a direct artery control.
In these cases, percutaneous different closure devices are used at the end of the procedure in order to obtain a valid hemostasis.
This less invasive approach still presents several limitations and could be performed safely only in patients with precise anatomical criteria.
The common femoral artery is normally exposed through a small inguinal incision.
In case of extremely diseased (calcific) bilateral external iliac arteries, or small-caliber vessels, we use the common iliac through a paramedian extraperitoneal approach as the access site; we use to directly puncture the artery through a purse string or we perform a surgical conduit to avoid the extremely diseased iliac axis. In rare cases the abdominal aorta has been used as the access site, with direct puncture and then closure with a purse-string suture. Surgical conduits are mainly used in female patients due to generally smaller access vessels [4] (Fig. 16.1).
Fig. 16.1
In case of small femoral arteries or diseased external iliac arteries (a) a surgical approach to the common iliac artery may be considered (b). Otherwise, a surgical conduit could be performed in order to overcome femoral and iliac pathologies (c) (in this particular case the conduit is then anastomosed at the end of the endovascular procedure to the femoral artery in an iliofemoral bypass). These approaches are particularly important in female due to generally smaller access vessels