The Role of Multiple Imaging Modalities to Disclose the Mechanism of ACS Angioscopy in Comparison to Other Imaging Modalities Including OCT, IVUS and CTA

 

RFC-ACS

IFC-ACS

Stable angina

p-value

Patients (n)

25

10

22
 
Age (years)

63.7 ± 10.1

61.5 ± 8.2

62.6 ± 8.2
 
Male (n, %)

25 (100)

8 (80)

22 (100)

0.007

Clinical presentation (n, %)

NSTEMI

15 (60)

4 (40)



UAP

10 (40)

6 (60)



Stable angina pectoris



22 (100)


Diabetes (n, %)

8 (32)

3 (30)

8 (36)

0.922

Hypertension (%)

12 (48)

6 (60)

13 (59)

0.692

Hypercholesterolemia (%)

12 (48)

6 (60)

10 (45)

0.739

Smokers (n, %)

Nonsmoker

10 (38)

1 (9)

7 (35)

0.001

Ex-smoker

9 (46)

2 (18)

12 (60)


Current smoker

6 (17)

7 (73)

3 (5)


Culprit lesions (n)

25

10

22
 
Coronary artery (n, %)

RCA/ LAD/ LCX

11/13/1

4/5/1

5/14/3

0.522

ACC/AHA lesion type (n)

A/B1/B2/C

0/13/12/0

1/4/5/0

2/11/9/0

0.839

QCA

RD pre (mm)

2.55 ± 0.52

2.46 ± 0.46

2.64 ± 0.58

0.666

MLD pre (mm)

0.94 ± 0.20

1.09 ± 0.22

0.96 ± 0.25

0.179

Lesion length (mm)

20.7 ± 7.0

22.5 ± 7.2

22.9 ± 9.4

0.647

Non-culprit lesions in non-culprit vessel assessed by CT angiography

Non-culprit lesions (n)

19

8

12
 
Average lesion severity (%)

42 ± 19 %

32 ± 12 %

46 ± 20 %

0.265

NCP ≤ 30 HU (n, %)

7 (37 %)

2 (25 %)

1 (8 %)

0.208

Spotty calcification (n, %)

5 (26 %)

2 (25 %)

2 (16 %)

0.815

Positive remodelling (n, %)

10 (53 %)

1 (13 %)

2 (16 %)

0.044




Table 2.2
Comparison of OCT, coronary angioscopy, IVUS and CTA findings in 57 lesions with RFC-ACS, IFC-ACS and stable plaque aetiology













































































































































































 
RFC-ACS

IFC-ACS

Stable Angina

p-value

Lesion (n)

25

10

22


OCT

Fibrous cap thickness (μm)

45 ± 12A1)*

131 ± 57B1)*

321 ± 146C1)*

0.001

Lipid angle >2 quads (n, %)

23 (92 %)

4 (40 %)

5 (23 %)

0.001

TCFA (n, %)

23 (92 %)

2 (20 %)

2 (9 %)

0.001

Thrombus (n, %)

25 (100 %)

10 (100 %)

4 (18 %)

0.001

Coronary angioscopy

Thrombus (n, %)

22 (88 %)

10 (100 %)

3 (14 %)

0.001

Mural thrombus (n, %)

13 (52 %)

7 (70 %)

3 (14 %)


Protruding thrombus (n, %)

9 (36 %)

3 (30 %)

0 (0 %)


Yellow plaque (n, %)

21 (84 %)

7 (70 %)

12 (55 %)

0.088

Light yellow plaque (n, %)

5 (16 %)

3 (30 %)

5 (23 %)


Deep yellow plaque (n, %)

18 (68 %)

4 (40 %)

7 (31 %)


White plaque (n, %)

4 (16 %)

3 (30 %)

10 (45 %)

0.088

IVUS

Vessel area pre (mm2)

14.8 ± 3.2

12.8 ± 2.1

12.6 ± 5.1

0.133

Lumen area pre (mm2)

2.0 ± 0.8

2.5 ± 0.8

1.9 ± 0.8

0.132

Plaque area pre (mm2)

12.9 ± 3.0

10.2 ± 2.1

10.7 ± 4.9

0.083

Prox. ref. vessel area (mm2)

14.3 ± 2.9

13.5 ± 1.9

14.1 ± 5.0

0.862

Distal ref. vessel area (mm2)

11.7 ± 2.9

11.8 ± 1.8

12.6 ± 5.3

0.781

Remodelling index

1.14 ± 0.12A2)*

1.00 ± 0.08B2)*

0.95 ± 0.11C2)*

0.001

CTA

NCP ≤30 HU (LAP; n, %)

22 (88 %)

4 (40 %)

4 (18 %)

0.001

NCP from 30 to 150 HU (n, %)

25 (100 %)

10 (100 %)

22 (100 %)


Spotty calcification (n, %)

20 (80 %)

2 (20 %)

5 (23 %)

0.001

Large calcification (n, %)

3 (12 %)

1 (10 %)

13 (59 %)

0.001

Remodelling index (%)

1.15 ± 0.06A3)*

1.02 ± 0.08B3)*

0.99 ± 0.09C3)*

0.001

Positive remodelling (PR; n, %)

24 (96 %)

2 (20 %)

3 (14 %)

0.001

LAP and PR (n, %)

22 (88 %)

1 (10 %)

0 (0 %)

0.001


Multiple comparisons also revealed significant differences in fibrous cap thickness; p < 0.05 in A1)* vs. B1)*, A1)* vs. C1)*, B1)* vs. C1)*: Remodelling index by IVUS; p < 0.05 in A2)* vs. B2)*, A2)* vs. C2)*: Remodelling index by CTA; p < 0.05 in A3)* vs. B3)*, A3)* vs. C3)*




2.3.2 Culprit Lesion Characteristics by OCT in RFC-ACS, IFC-ACS and Stable Angina


Intracoronary imaging findings are shown in Table 2.2. Whilst OCT revealed that fibrous cap thickness was significantly thinner in RFC lesions than other lesions (45 ± 12, 131 ± 57, 321 ± 146 μm, respectively; p < 0.001), the prevalence of lesions with lipid pools greater than 2 quadrants was higher in RFC lesions than in IFC and stable angina lesions (92 %, 40 %, 23 %; p < 0.001). TCFA was more commonly observed in the RFC group than in the IFC or stable angina groups (92 %, 20 %, 9 %; p < 0.001). Thrombus was more frequently observed in RFC and IFC lesions compared with the stable lesions by OCT (Table 2.2) (Figs. 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3).

A322462_1_En_2_Fig1_HTML.gif


Fig. 2.1
Ruptured fibrous cap (RFC-ACS) plaque. OCT (a1, a2), coronary angioscopy (b), IVUS (c), angiography (d), volume rendering (e), curved MPR (f1) and the cross-sectional images (f2) were obtained in a culprit lesion with plaque rupture in 67-year-old male presenting with ACS. OCT revealed fibrous cap disruption (a1) and thrombus formation in adjacent slices (a2). Coronary angioscopy (b) showed yellow plaque and red thrombus formation through the blue coronary angioscopy guide catheter. IVUS (c) indicates two focal calcium deposits <90°. Angiography (d) and volume-rendered CT images (e) disclose a significant stenosis in the middle segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Curved MPR CT images (f1) reveal positive remodelling associated with focal calcium deposits. Curved MPR and the cross-sectional images (f2) display the presence of soft plaque with an attenuation of <30 HU [13]


A322462_1_En_2_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 2.2
Intact fibrous cap (IFC-ACS) plaque. OCT (a), coronary angioscopy (b), IVUS (c), angiography (d), volume-rendered (e) and curved MPR (f) images were derived from a culprit lesion with intact fibrous caps in a 63-year-old male presenting with an ACS. OCT revealed no evidence of fibrous cap rupture (a) but the presence of thrombus formation. Coronary angioscopy (b) showed red thrombus formation through the blue coronary angioscopy guide catheter. IVUS (c) reveals a soft and homogenous plaque with poor echo-reflectivity. Angiography (d) and the volume-rendered CT images (e) disclose a significant stenosis in the proximal segment of the right coronary artery. Curved MPR CT images (f) indicate the absence of positive remodelling and a non-calcified plaque [13]

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 26, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on The Role of Multiple Imaging Modalities to Disclose the Mechanism of ACS Angioscopy in Comparison to Other Imaging Modalities Including OCT, IVUS and CTA

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access