The Role of Electrocardiographic Imaging in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
The Role of Electrocardiographic Imaging in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Niraj Varma
Ping Jia
Yoram Rudy
In patients with heart failure, mortality is increased in the presence of an ECG QRS pattern of left bundle branch block (LBBB) occurring during intrinsic conduction or provoked by right ventricular (RV) pacing.1,2 In contrast, overall survival in these patients may improve with pre-excitation of the inferolateral left ventricle (LV) by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).3 Thus, the electrical activation sequence in LV dysfunction imparts important prognostic effects. However, descriptions of cardiac electrical activation normally or in the presence of LV pathology, or during pacing, are remarkably scarce.4,5,6,7 This information may be necessary to better understand effects of perturbed electrical activation on prognosis and also the diverse clinical responses observed in response to pacing. For example, RV pacing may increase mortality in heart-failure patients with LBBB despite similar QRS patterns on the surface ECG, and up to one third of patients may not respond to CRT.8,9 Surface ECG recordings do not provide sufficient resolution to address these issues. Investigation requires detailed electrical mapping of ventricular activation. A method to perform this noninvasively, called electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI), has been recently described.10
ECGI provides noninvasive high-resolution electrical mapping of cardiac excitation on the epicardial surface.10,11 ECGI images epicardial potentials, electrograms, isochrones (activation sequences), and repolarization patterns from body surface electrocardiographic measurements. The system has been validated extensively in animal models,12,13,14,15,16,17 and in humans by comparison to direct epicardial mapping during open-heart surgery18 and to catheter mapping.19,20 Reconstruction accuracy superior to 10 mm was consistently obtained in human subjects. ECGI may therefore be used as a noninvasive imaging modality for evaluation of human ventricle cardiac activation under differing conditions. The methodology has been detailed previously.10 Briefly, ECGI acquires more than 200 channels of body surface electrocardiograms using a multi-electrode vest. Epicardial geometry and body-surface electrode positions are registered simultaneously by a thoracic CT scan. The body surface potential data and the geometry data are processed with algorithms developed to compute epicardial potentials over the entire epicardium, from which epicardial electrograms (typically 600 over the heart surface), isochrones, and repolarization patterns are constructed. All images are obtained during a single beat. This chapter is based on the authors’ previously published study21 where we tested the hypothesis that, during LV dysfunction, disease process may alter electrical substrate and modulate effects of LBBB and pacing.
This study evaluated eight patients (72 ± 11 years, 6 male) treated with CRT (Table 16.1). Using ECGI, intrinsic conduction (present in six patients) was compared to RV pacing and to biventricular pacing with optimal atrio-ventricular intervals (defined echocardiographically by the Ritter method22). Ventricular activation times and sequences during intrinsic and paced rhythms were examined. Time zero was set at the beginning of QRS for all native rhythm episodes and at ventricular pacing stimuli for all paced episodes. Patients were categorized as responders if there was evidence of reverse modeling defined by more than 10% improvement in echocardiographic measures of LVEF (increase) and LV internal dimension (decrease). Echocardiographic assessment was performed at least 6 months after implantation to permit time for remodeling to occur in response to CRT.
INTRINSIC CONDUCTION
In all six patients with preserved atrioventricular conduction with LBBB, epicardial activation first occurred in the RV free wall (Fig. 16.1). Following this, there was a radial pattern of spread of activation from the zone of breakthrough. The wave of excitation spread rapidly. This is similar to RV activation described in normal human hearts4,10 and experimentally.23,24 The entire duration of RV activation was 37 ± 8 ms after QRS onset.
LV activation in these patients with LBBB was revealed in detail. Mean LV activation time was 113 ± 25 ms. This is significantly longer than normal,10 reflecting effects of LBBB. However, LV activation sequences differed in different patients. For example, in patient #1 multiple wavefronts contributed to overall LV activation, which ended posterolaterally. In patient #3 (not illustrated here; see reference 21), activation could not spread directly to the inferior LV but slowly propagated transseptally from the RV to reach the LV lateral and posterior walls by spreading inferoposteriorly from anterior LV. In three patients (4, 7, and 8) (not illustrated here; see reference 21) LV epicardial activation started from the septoapical region, spreading laterally and ending at the lateral or posterolateral base. In patient #5, the activation wavefront spread superiorly from inferior LV rather than from the apical region, ending at the midanterolateral wall.
TABLE 16.1 Patient Characteristics
Patient
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Disease
CAD
CAD
CAD
DCM
CAD
CAD
CAD
DCM
LVEF %
20
10
25
15
25
30
15
15
Response
R
NR
R
NR
R
NR
NR
NR
Native Rhythm: Intrinsic Conduction (ms)
QRS
160
180
140
180
140
130
RV Activation
40
51
30
29
38
32
LV Activation
90
144
101
141
111
88
RV Pacing (ms)
QRS
200
150
190
190
160
170
RV Activation
70
36
90
88
63
64
LV Activation
130
124
133
149
139
135
CRT (ms)
QRS
120
160
120
200
150
160
120
140
RV Activation
68
75
42
69
88
61
60
52
LV Activation
79
148
87
130
68
134
59
78
CAD, coronary artery disease; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; LVEF, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction; R, responder to CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy); NR, nonresponder; RV, right ventricular; Activation, mean ventricular activation time from the beginning of QRS (for intrinsic beats) or pacing artifact (for paced beats). (Compiled with permission from Oster HS, Taccardi B, Lux RL, Ershler PR, Rudy Y. Electrocardiographic imaging: Noninvasive characterization of intramural myocardial activation from inverse-reconstructed epicardial potentials and electrograms. Circulation. 1998;97:1496-1507.)
Propagation of wavefronts was determined sometimes by line(s)/region(s) of conduction block or slowed conduction. These were visualized by ECGI. In patients 4, 5, 7, and 8, activation that crossed the septum from RV was prevented from spreading directly to the LV by an anterior line(s)/region(s) of block. It reached the lateral wall by way of either apical or inferior LV. Latest activation was at the inferoposterior base. This “U-shaped” activation was also reported based on endocardial mapping.5 Some lines remained unchanged with change of pacing mode, suggesting fixed boundaries of anatomical origin. On other occasions, line(s)/region(s) of block shifted to other locations, disappeared, or emerged later during pacing (see next page). This phenomenon pointed to a functional mechanism. Lines of block were sometimes multiple, generating complex conduction barriers. For example, in patient #6 (Fig. 16.2
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue