Key Points
- 1.
The rate of maternal heart disease is increasing and complicates up to 4% of pregnancies. It is a leading cause of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
- 2.
The diagnosis of new cardiovascular disease during pregnancy may be challenging because both symptoms and physical signs often overlap with normal healthy pregnancy.
- 3.
The preferred test during pregnancy to screen for structural cardiac abnormalities and to monitor ventricular and valvular functions and pulmonary pressures is transthoracic echocardiography.
- 4.
A woman with known preexisting cardiac disease should receive preconception assessment and counselling with a rigorous, standardized risk assessment to make informed decisions regarding pregnancy. A number of risk assessment tools have been developed.
- 5.
The normal physiologic hemodynamic changes of pregnancy increase myocardial oxygen demand as a result of increases in heart rate and preload and decrease myocardial oxygen supply caused by a decrease in coronary perfusion pressure, dilutional anemia, and a shortening of diastole.
- 6.
The severity of the valvular heart disease and the prepregnancy New York Heart Association functional class are the main predictors of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes.
- 7.
Because of the enormous risk of maternal morbidity and mortality, women with pulmonary hypertension should be advised against pregnancy.
- 8.
During labor, uterine contractions, pain, anxiety, and exertion from pushing during the second stage further increase heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and left atrial pressure stressing a cardiovascular system already strained by the hemodynamic changes of pregnancy, which can lead to heart failure.
- 9.
When a pregnant woman with significant cardiac disease requires nonobstetric surgery, both the mother and fetus are at a greater risk, the extent of which depends on the specific cardiac disease, its interaction with the hemodynamic changes of pregnancy, and its interaction with the hemodynamic changes caused by the surgery and anesthesia.
- 10.
The primary anesthetic goals in peripartum cardiomyopathy are avoidance of drug-induced myocardial depression, maintenance of normovolemia, prevention of increased or rapidly decreased ventricular afterload, and blunting of the sympathetic stimulation induced by pain and anxiety.
- 11.
Resuscitation of a pregnant woman is a rare event, which contributes to a lack of knowledge about the unique modifications to the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines.
- 12.
Modifications to ACLS in pregnancy include performing chest compressions higher on the sternum and with manual left uterine displacement. Intravenous access should be placed above the diaphragm.
- 13.
Voltage for defibrillation and doses of medications during ACLS should not be altered.
Introduction
Maternal heart disease complicates up to 4% of pregnancies and is a leading cause of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in women of childbearing age is increasing for a number of reasons. As the management and treatment of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) have improved, there are a growing number of women with palliated or corrected CHD surviving into adulthood who may become pregnant. Advanced maternal age along with other risk factors such as obesity has led to an increase in women presenting with ischemic heart disease. Furthermore, although the incidence of rheumatic heart disease has decreased in developed countries, it remains significant in developing countries and in immigrants from these countries. Cardiomyopathy presenting during pregnancy or in the first few months after delivery is uncommon but accounts for approximately 10% of maternal deaths.
The anesthesiologist involved in the perioperative care of these complex patients must be well versed both in the physiology of pregnancy and the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease and their interactions to optimize anesthetic management and improve patient outcome. Successful management requires early diagnosis and advanced planning by a multidisciplinary team of obstetricians, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, intensivists, and nurses to optimize outcome.
This chapter reviews the expected hemodynamic changes of pregnancy; the etiology, underlying pathophysiology, and peripartum risk of obstetric patients with cardiovascular disease; and the management issues faced by the anesthesiologist caring for these patients who present for noncardiac surgery during the pregnancy and for labor and delivery.
Diagnosis of Heart Disease During Pregnancy
Diagnosis Including Cardiovascular Imaging
The diagnosis of cardiovascular disease during pregnancy may be challenging because symptoms and physical signs often overlap with the physiologic changes of pregnancy. Pregnant women frequently complain of dyspnea and fatigue, and exercise tolerance is often decreased. Tachypnea, peripheral edema, and lower extremity venous stasis also may occur during pregnancy in women without cardiac disease. Even in women with known preexisting cardiovascular disease, it is important to differentiate expected pregnancy changes from pathologic exacerbations of underlying disease. The distinction is extremely important because it may trigger unnecessary modifications in management on the one hand or may lead to a failure to change management on the other.
A pregnant woman who presents with symptoms consistent with possible cardiovascular disease or exacerbation of known cardiovascular disease requires a careful medical history, family history, and physical examination ( Box 18.1 ) interpreted in the context of the physiologic changes of pregnancy. Many disorders such as cardiomyopathy, Marfan syndrome, CHD, or Brugada syndrome can be identified by taking a careful personal and family history. In women who are already in the second trimester, blood pressure should be measured either upright or in the left lateral position to prevent compression of the inferior vena cava and aorta. The pulse often has a rapid upstroke and collapse (a “bounding” character) because of the reduced systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and increased cardiac output. Resting heart rate is generally increased in pregnancy, but rates greater than 100 beats/min or bradycardia (heart rate <50 beats/min) require further evaluation for an underlying cause. Jugular venous pressure should be normal, so elevated jugular venous pressure and pulmonary rales are the most reliable signs of heart failure. A loud and widely split S 1 heart sound caused by the early closure of the mitral valve and the presence of a third heart sound (S 3 ) are normal in pregnancy. Soft ejection systolic murmurs are heard in more than 90% of pregnant women, usually over the left upper sternal border and the right side of the heart, because of increased cardiac output and increased flow through cardiac valves. These murmurs generally disappear by about 6 weeks postpartum. However, very loud murmurs or a palpable thrill suggest underlying pathology. Furthermore, diastolic murmurs are almost always caused by a pathologic process. The murmurs of aortic and mitral regurgitation commonly decrease during pregnancy because of the decrease in SVR, but the murmurs of mitral or aortic stenosis increase because of increased flow through the valves. Auscultation of new or changed murmurs is a reason for further investigation. Oximetry is an important diagnostic tool in patients with cyanotic CHD or patent shunt lesions. Many pregnant women show some degree of peripheral edema and lower extremity venous stasis because of uterine compression of the inferior vena cava impeding venous return. However, it should be symmetric and decrease with leg elevation and the left lateral decubitus position.
- •
Heart rate >100 beats/min or <50 beats/min at rest
- •
Pulmonary rales
- •
Systolic murmur louder than 3/6, especially with palpable thrill
- •
Any diastolic murmur
- •
Murmur that persists beyond 6 weeks postpartum
- •
Asymmetric lower extremity edema
A woman with suspicious findings in the history and physical examination will often need cardiovascular testing during pregnancy. Additionally, pregnant women with known cardiac disease may need testing to judge how they are handling the added stress imposed by pregnancy. Pregnancy may impact the safety, application, and interpretation of several diagnostic cardiac procedures. Additionally, choosing the optimal diagnostic procedure requires consideration of safety for the mother and the fetus. Imaging modalities that do not use ionizing radiation are preferred as long as the required diagnostic information can be obtained. If the necessary information requires a study that uses ionizing radiation, the radiation dose to the fetus should be kept as low as possible.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) often changes during pregnancy. These changes may include a 15- to 20-degree left-axis deviation caused by diaphragmatic elevation, nonspecific ST-segment and T-wave changes (e.g., T-wave inversion in leads III and aVF and ST depression), supraventricular and ventricular ectopic beats, and the presence of small Q waves in lead aVF. If a pregnant woman has a suspected arrhythmia not captured on an ECG or in women with previous documented symptomatic arrhythmias and in women with palpitations, a Holter monitor is indicated because it is noninvasive and safe to use in pregnancy. It is important, however, to correlate symptoms with any abnormality and not treat asymptomatic arrhythmias during pregnancy because the treatments may be detrimental to the fetus. Exercise testing may be useful in the context of early pregnancy to establish functional capacity and assess heart rate, blood pressure, and ischemic changes to exercise. Exercise testing should be used with caution in women with an incompetent cervix, bulging membranes, recent vaginal bleeding, placenta previa or abruption, or preeclampsia. Women with symphyseal-pubic dysfunction, common during pregnancy, may be unable to perform the test because of limited movement. The procedure must be stopped if hypotension develops because this can lead to fetal distress. Performing submaximal exercise tests to reach 80% of predicted maximal heart rate in asymptomatic pregnant patients with suspected cardiac disease does not increase the risk of spontaneous abortion. Dobutamine stress tests should be avoided in pregnant women because there are limited data on their safety in pregnancy.
The preferred test during pregnancy to screen for structural cardiac abnormalities and to monitor ventricular and valvular functions and pulmonary pressures is transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Many echocardiographic measurements require adjustment for pregnancy, including measurement of chamber dimensions, left ventricular (LV) mass, and in quantifying velocities across valves as these will all be increased in pregnancy. The use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) allows for more detailed examination but is more invasive than TTE and may be associated with pulmonary aspiration, which is a greater risk during pregnancy than in the nonpregnant state. TEE may still be indicated in the diagnosis of endocarditis, mechanical valve thrombosis, and complex CHD. However, the use of general anesthesia with tracheal intubation may be necessary to protect the airway.
Although it is preferable not to perform chest radiography during pregnancy because of the ionizing radiation risks, if other tests fail to diagnose the cause of dyspnea or cough, it may be necessary. The chest radiography findings in pregnancy may have a number of seemingly pathologic changes, including prominent vascular markings, a horizontal position of the heart, a flattened left heart border, and a raised diaphragm caused by the gravid uterus. Pulmonary edema, however, should not be seen.
In the setting of suspected acute pulmonary embolus, a computed tomography pulmonary angiogram should be performed because the risk to the fetus is outweighed by the danger of missed pulmonary emboli and can be minimized by lead shielding. Although echocardiography may aid in the diagnosis by identifying raised pulmonary artery pressures and impairment and dilatation of the right ventricle, it is less specific.
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide information on cardiac anatomy and function without the use of ionizing radiation. However, it is generally only used if other investigations such as echocardiography cannot provide the relevant information because the safety of MRI in the early stages of pregnancy has not yet been determined. The safety of gadolinium during pregnancy has not been demonstrated and should be avoided if possible.
The use of cardiac catheterization for visualization of coronary arteries and measurement of intracardiac pressures gives high radiation exposure to the fetus and should only be used if absolutely clinically required. However, it is the diagnostic tool of choice in the management and treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) in pregnancy. To reduce fetal radiation exposure, catheterization via the radial artery is preferred to the femoral artery approach, and lead shielding of the uterus should be used. Although heparin is required for the procedure, an activated clotting time not exceeding 300 seconds is preferable to minimize risk of placental bleeding.
It is unclear what dose of radiation constitutes a danger to fetuses, but there is likely a very low risk of congenital malformations, neurobehavioral or intellectual abnormalities, fetal growth restriction, or pregnancy loss at doses of radiation less than 50 mGy (milligray) (10 mGy = 1 rad).
Cardiac Risk Stratification During Pregnancy
Ideally, a woman with known preexisting cardiac disease should undergo a preconception evaluation and counseling with a rigorous, standardized risk assessment (see later) to make informed decisions regarding pregnancy, to adjust to the possibility of not having a pregnancy, and to address any correctable lesions before pregnancy. Evaluation should include a careful history, physical examination, assessment of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, a 12-lead ECG, and TTE. A right heart catheterization may be necessary for women with CHD or pulmonary hypertension. Medications that are contraindicated during pregnancy should be discontinued or changed to acceptable alternatives when possible. Many women present after they are already pregnant and should undergo immediate cardiac evaluation as already described. Although women found to be at low risk can often be managed by their primary cardiologist and obstetrician; women who are considered to be at medium or high pregnancy risk should be referred to a tertiary care referral center with expertise in pregnancy and cardiac disease for highly specialized management by a multidisciplinary team.
Several risk assessment tools have been proposed to stratify cardiac risk during pregnancy. Using these risk scores, it may be possible to predict whether the woman will tolerate the pregnancy. Three risk assessment tools commonly used to predict maternal cardiovascular events during pregnancy are the CARPREG (Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy) ( Table 18.1 ), the ZAHARA (Zwangerschap bij vrouwen met een Aangeboren HARtAfwijking-II, translated as Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease II) ( Table 18.2 ), and one developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) ( Table 18.3 ). It is also important to note that pregnancy-related risks are additive, meaning that a patient with a cardiac condition who is considered low risk (WHO 1 or 2) may move up a risk category if there are other cardiac or noncardiac risk factors such as poor ventricular function or diabetes to consider. Serum levels of the biomarker brain natriuretic peptide early on in pregnancy may also be used to stratify risk. It is important to stratify risk based on specific lesions as the risks of pregnancy depends on the specific cardiac condition and ranges from as high as a 50% risk of death for women with severe pulmonary hypertension to about equal to the general population for some minor lesions.
| |
CARPREG Points | Cardiac Complication Rate (%) |
0 | 5 |
1 | 27 |
2 | 75 |
a Points are added, and the total score reflects the predicted cardiac event rate.
| |
ZAHARA Points | Cardiac Complication Rate (%) |
0–0.5 | 2.9 |
0.51–1.50 | 7.5 |
1.51–2.50 | 17.5 |
2.51–3.50 | 43.1 |
≥3.51 | 70.0 |
a Points are added, and the total score reflects the predicted cardiac event rate.
Class I (No Increase or a Mild Increase in Morbidity From the General Population; Follow-up During Pregnancy May Usually Be Limited to One or Two Visits) |
|
Class II (Small Increase in Maternal Mortality; Moderate Increase in Maternal Morbidity; Follow-up Every Trimester Is Indicated) |
|
Class III (Significant Increase in Maternal Mortality and Severe Increase in Maternal Morbidity; Expert Cardiac and Obstetric Care Required Prepregnancy, Antenatal, and Postnatal; Women Need Frequent [Monthly or Bimonthly] Follow-up During Pregnancy, Both by a Cardiologist and an Obstetrician) |
|
Class IV (Pregnancy Is Not Recommended or Is Contraindicated Because of an Extremely High Risk of Maternal Morbidity and Mortality; Termination Should Be Discussed if Already Pregnant but When a Patient Chooses to Carry on With the Pregnancy, her Follow-up Is Similar as for Women With WHO Class III) |
|
Because maternal cardiac disease is associated with an increased incidence of neonatal complications such as prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation, and fetal death, it is necessary to also determine the fetal risk of the pregnancy ( Box 18.2 ). Neonatal complications occur in 20% to 28% of pregnant women with heart disease. Neonatal risks increase with NYHA functional class greater than II, presence of a mechanical valve prosthesis, cyanosis, anticoagulation use during pregnancy, multiple gestation, smoking during pregnancy, aortic or mitral stenosis, and use of cardiac medications before pregnancy.
- •
New York Heart Association functional class >II
- •
Presence of a mechanical valve prosthesis
- •
Cyanosis (oxygen saturation <85%)
- •
Anticoagulation use during pregnancy
- •
Multiple gestation
- •
Smoking during pregnancy
- •
Aortic or mitral stenosis
- •
Use of cardiac medications before pregnancy
Pregnancy and Cardiac Disease
Cardiovascular Physiologic Changes of Pregnancy, Labor, and Delivery
Cardiovascular physiologic changes of pregnancy are summarized in Table 18.4 .
Variable | Change a |
---|---|
Blood volume | +35%–50% |
Plasma volume | +40%–45% |
Heart rate | +15%–20% |
Stroke volume | +30% |
Cardiac output | +30%–50% |
Contractility | Variable |
Central venous pressure | Unchanged |
Pulmonary vascular resistance | –15% |
Pulmonary arterial pressure | Unchanged |
Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure | Unchanged |
Systemic vascular resistance | –15% to 20% |
Systemic blood pressure | –5% |
Myocardial oxygen demand | Increased |
Systolic flow murmur | 2/6 |
a Peaks in the early third trimester (at about 32 weeks’ gestation).
Coronary Artery Disease
The incidence of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in pregnancy is not known, although the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during pregnancy or the postpartum period is 3 to 6 per 100,000 deliveries, with a 5% to 37% mortality rate. Fetal death after maternal AMI is 12% to 34%.
Whereas myocardial oxygen demand is increased during pregnancy because of increases in heart rate and preload, myocardial oxygen supply is decreased secondary to a decrease in coronary perfusion pressure, dilutional anemia, and shortening of diastole. This will present a challenge to women with known or previously undiagnosed CAD. This challenge becomes greater during labor and delivery and especially immediately after delivery because of further increases in cardiac output. Although CAD in pregnancy is relatively uncommon, it has increased with the increasing maternal age and increased risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and smoking among women of reproductive age.
Pregnancy-related hypertensive diseases are also associated with an increased incidence of AMI. Additionally, the hypercoagulable state of pregnancy may lead to coronary thrombosis or embolism in women without underlying CAD. Severe postpartum hemorrhage may result in myocardial ischemia, and the use of methylergonovine for postpartum bleeding can cause coronary vasospasm.
The diagnostic principles for myocardial ischemia during pregnancy are the same as for the nonpregnant patient and are based on angina symptoms, ECG changes, and increase in cardiac biomarkers (e.g., troponin). Creatine phosphokinase and its MB isoenzyme may not be helpful in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia during pregnancy because these enzymes are often elevated during pregnancy, particularly during labor. The differential diagnosis of chest pain includes common pregnancy symptoms (e.g., gastroesophageal reflux disease, nausea and vomiting), musculoskeletal pain, aortic dissection, and preeclampsia.
The hemodynamic goals with an acute coronary syndrome during pregnancy are to prevent further ischemia by avoiding increases in myocardial oxygen demand or decreases in supply. Medical management is similar to nonpregnancy, with medical therapy consisting of β-blockers for tight heart rate control and low-dose aspirin, both of which have been found safe and effective in pregnancy. However, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and statins are known teratogens and should be avoided in pregnancy. The preferred approach for women with either acute ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) or non–ST segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) with risk factors is percutaneous coronary angiography with intervention and reperfusion through stenting if needed. The radiation exposure to the fetus when shielding is used is minimal, and the benefits outweigh the risks. Clopidogrel should only be used for the shortest duration as possible because of the risk of placental bleeding during pregnancy and postpartum, and thus the use of bare-metal stents is preferred over drug-eluting stents. If clopidogrel is still being used at the time of vaginal or cesarean section delivery, the possibility of increased postpartum bleeding must be anticipated. The use of coronary artery bypass grafting is rarely needed during pregnancy and is associated with high fetal mortality rate. In women with NSTEMI without risk factors, conservative management with medical therapy and watchful waiting can be applied. Women with CAD should have the early institution of neuraxial anesthesia during labor to prevent pain and the increase myocardial oxygen demand that accompanies it. In the case of an AMI, labor and delivery should be delayed for at least 2 weeks if possible because maternal mortality rates are significantly increased during this time.
Valvular Heart Disease
The most common causes of valvular heart disease (VHD) in women of childbearing age are rheumatic heart disease and CHD (e.g., bicuspid aortic valve), with mitral stenosis the most common lesion encountered. VHD is a significant cause of maternal cardiac disease because rheumatic heart disease accounts for more than 90% of maternal cardiac disease cases worldwide. Pregnant women with VHD have an increased incidence of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes, with severe mitral stenosis forming a particularly high-risk group, with a reported maternal mortality rate of greater than 10% and a cardiac event rate of 67%. The most commonly encountered maternal cardiac complications are congestive heart failure and arrhythmias, and the most common fetal complications are prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation.
Women with known VHD before pregnancy should undergo preconception counseling. Women with moderate or severe mitral stenosis unless corrected before pregnancy or with moderate or severe aortic stenosis who are symptomatic or have LV dysfunction should be advised against pregnancy. Women at high risk who have a desire to pursue pregnancy should be managed by a multidisciplinary team in centers with expertise in the management of these patients. The hemodynamic changes of pregnancy can exacerbate mild symptoms. Symptoms tend to worsen with increasing gestational age. The severity of VHD and the prepregnancy NYHA functional class are the main predictors of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Many women with VHD are first diagnosed during pregnancy when the hemodynamic changes of pregnancy precipitate symptoms.
In general, regurgitant lesions are much better tolerated in pregnancy than stenotic ones because the decrease in SVR favors forward flow. In the absence of LV dysfunction, these lesions pose only a minor threat. Symptomatic patients may be treated with diuretics and afterload reduction with close monitoring for uteroplacental insufficiency. Afterload reduction should be provided with nitrates and hydralazine because ACE inhibitors and ARBs are contraindicated in pregnancy. However, the increases in preload, cardiac output, and heart rate during pregnancy cause a significant increase in the transvalvular gradient produced by stenotic lesions. In the case of mitral stenosis, it also compromises LV filling and increases left atrial pressure, which is then transmitted to the pulmonary veins. The decrease in LV filling and the increase in pressure in the pulmonary veins lead to deterioration in functional class with increased dyspnea, decreased exercise tolerance, and possibly pulmonary edema. Atrial arrhythmias (e.g., atrial fibrillation) associated with ventricular rate acceleration are a common cause of worsening symptoms and must be treated aggressively with rate control and possibly cardioversion.
In general, mitral stenosis is more of a management challenge than aortic stenosis because in aortic stenosis the increase in pressure is reflected initially to the hypertrophied left ventricle rather than the pulmonary veins as in mitral stenosis. Women with mild or moderate aortic stenosis generally tolerate pregnancy well. Medical therapy for stenotic lesions in symptomatic women consists of heart rate control with β-blockers and restriction of physical activity and preload reduction with diuretics. Metoprolol is the preferred β-blocker because atenolol has been linked to adverse fetal outcomes, including intrauterine growth retardation and preterm delivery. Heart rate control leads to improved LV filling and lower left atrial pressure. Diuretic use, in particular, must be accompanied by monitoring for signs of uteroplacental insufficiency. Patients with mitral or aortic stenosis who are refractory to medical therapy may be candidates for percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty, which should be done with abdominal shielding and delayed until after the first trimester if possible to minimize the radiation risks to the fetus.
Women with valve replacements, particularly mechanical prostheses, are at an increased risk for pregnancy complications and pose a particular challenge because of the risk of valve thrombosis and anticoagulation management. The presence of a mechanical prosthesis, particularly in the mitral position, is a contraindication to pregnancy. Warfarin should be continued until 36 weeks’ gestational age with the possible exception of weeks 6 to 12 because it is teratogenic, when a changeover to either unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) may be recommended, particularly if the dose of warfarin is greater than 5 mg/day. After 36 weeks, a changeover to heparin is recommended. Alternatively, these women can be switched from warfarin to LMWH from the beginning of pregnancy. These women require weekly monitoring of a postdose anti-Xa level.
Pulmonary Hypertension
The incidence of pulmonary hypertension in pregnancy is approximately 1.1 in 100,000 pregnancies. The hemodynamic changes of pregnancy are not well tolerated by women with pulmonary hypertension, with an overall mortality rate of 25% to 38%. The risk of maternal morbidity and mortality in women with pulmonary hypertension from any cause makes pregnancy particularly dangerous in these women, who should be advised against pregnancy. Those who present already pregnant should be offered termination. Death generally occurs in late pregnancy or in the first month after delivery and results from right heart failure, pulmonary hypertensive crisis, pulmonary thromboembolism, or arrhythmias. Although there is some evidence of better outcomes in women with mild pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic pressure <50 mm Hg), there is no specific safe cutoff. Furthermore, pulmonary hypertension generally is exacerbated by the physiologic hemodynamic changes of pregnancy, including increased cardiac output and circulating blood volume and decreased SVR because the vascular remodeling present in women with pulmonary hypertension prevents them from being able to compensate with the pulmonary vasodilatory mechanisms of pregnancy. This results in increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), overload of the right ventricle, and right ventricular strain with even mild forms of pulmonary hypertension possibly becoming severe.
When termination is refused and the patient chooses to continue with the pregnancy, care should be managed in a facility with expertise in high-risk pregnancies and pulmonary hypertension management under the care of a multidisciplinary team. Recent treatment advances and the use of a multidisciplinary team have led to an improvement in survival. Management during pregnancy involves finding a balance between systemic and pulmonary pressures because decreased systemic pressures compromise right ventricular perfusion. Pulmonary hypertension therapy should generally be continued other than the endothelin-1 receptor blocker, bosentan, which is teratogenic in animal studies. Prostacyclin analogs such as epoprostenol, inhaled nitric oxide, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors such as sildenafil have not been found teratogenic. Initiating women who were not previously on targeted therapies at the beginning of the third trimester of pregnancy is recommended. It is also critically important to avoid conditions that will increase the pulmonary vascular pressures, including hypoxia, hypercarbia, acidosis, and sympathetic stimulation, because they may lead to right ventricular failure. Inotropic support may be needed in the setting of right ventricular failure. Maternal hemodynamic decompensation will generally occur in the second or third trimesters and shortly after delivery of the fetus. Early planned delivery, usually at 32 to 34 weeks’ gestational age, may contribute to improved outcomes.
Congenital Heart Disease
Congenital heart disease has become the most prevalent chronic maternal heart disease in pregnancy, accounting for 66% to 80% of cases. This has stemmed from an increased number of patients with CHD living into their childbearing years because of advances in surgical repair and palliation procedures. Although many women with CHD tolerate the expected hemodynamic changes of pregnancy, maternal cardiovascular complications occur in approximately 5% to 25% of such pregnancies. The most common complications are congestive heart failure, thromboembolism, and arrhythmias.
Because most women with CHD are known before pregnancy, preconception counseling with a thorough risk assessment (see previous section) is indicated. CHD encompasses a wide array of diseases from mild to extremely complex, so the risk of pregnancy varies greatly and also depends on if the congenital defect has been repaired and if permanent damage occurred before the repair. Pregnancy should not be discouraged in patients who have had successful surgical repair with good exercise tolerance and functional status because they have only a very small increased risk, provided no mechanical valve has been implanted. Patients who have moderate or complex disease who choose to continue with pregnancy should be managed in a facility with expertise in high-risk pregnancies and CHD under the care of a multidisciplinary team.
In the absence of pulmonary hypertension, women with repaired shunt lesions, including atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, atrioventricular canal defect, and patent ductus arteriosus tolerate pregnancy well without a significant increase in cardiovascular risk. They are, however, at increased risk for preeclampsia. With unrepaired shunt lesions, there is a risk of paradoxical embolism, particularly during labor, when a Valsalva maneuver is used during the second stage of labor. Patients with unrepaired atrioventricular canal defects are at greater cardiovascular risk than those with either atrial septal defects or ventricular septal defects because severe atrioventricular valve regurgitation or ventricular dysfunction may cause failure during pregnancy. Additionally, if patients with unrepaired shunt lesions develop Eisenmenger syndrome, the maternal mortality rate increases to 28% to 52%, with a fetal mortality rate of 28%. The reduction in SVR exacerbates the right-to-left shunt and increases cyanosis while the increase in cardiac output leads to heart failure. Severe cyanosis (oxygen saturation <85%) makes the chance of a live birth extremely unlikely. Management goals include maintenance of SVR and PVR, with strict avoidance of hypoxia, acidosis, hypercarbia, and sympathetic stimulation.
Women who have unrepaired cyanotic heart disease such as tetralogy of Fallot should be counseled against pregnancy because these pregnancies have a maternal complication rate greater than 30%. Complications include heart failure, thromboembolism, and arrhythmias. When maternal resting oxygen saturation is less than 85%, the maternal risk is extremely high, and the chance of a live birth is only 12%. Such women should be advised against pregnancy. Women with corrected tetralogy of Fallot generally tolerate pregnancy fairly well, with cardiac complications such as arrhythmias and heart failure in 12% of patients. Risk factors for complications are preexisting right ventricular dysfunction or dilation, pulmonary hypertension, severe pulmonic valve regurgitation, and right ventricular track outflow obstruction.
The presence of a systemic right ventricle, such as in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries, after an atrial switch operation for complete transposition of the great arteries, or in hypoplastic left heart syndrome after a Fontan operation, is independently associated with adverse cardiac and pregnancy outcomes. These patients are at increased risk for heart failure and life-threatening arrhythmias. Women with severe right ventricular dysfunction or severe atrioventricular valve regurgitation or who are NYHA class III or IV patients should be counseled against pregnancy. Women with Fontan physiology are at risk to experience deterioration in functional status. Hemodynamic goals should include the maintenance of pulmonary blood flow by minimizing PVR and maintaining intravascular volume, SVR, and sinus rhythm.