The Genesis of Health: Evolution of the Concept of Health-Related Quality of Life


Pain and discomfort

energy and fatigue, sexual activity, sleep and rest and sensory functioning

Positive feelings

thinking, learning, memory, and concentration; self-esteem; bodily image and appearance; and negative feelings

Mobility

activities of daily living; dependence upon medicinal substances and medical aids; dependence upon non-medical substances; communication capacity; and work capacity

Social relations

practical social support and offering active support to others, social participation

Physical safety and security

one’s home environment; work satisfaction; financial resources; health and social care (accessibility and quality); opportunities for acquiring new information and skills; participation in and opportunities for recreation/leisure activities; physical environment; and transport to health-care institutions

Spirituality

religion, and personal beliefs


According to the WHOQOL Group [23].





1.4 Conceptualizing QoL in CVDs


Determinants of HRQoL include the illness or disability itself as well as the type of medical intervention [18]. The main goal of any intervention in CVDs is to improve the patient’s HRQoL by eliminating or reducing the influence of the disease. When constructing a HRQoL study, one should be mindful of whether the measurement is reflective of one patient or groups of patients, and whether the HRQoL measurement expresses a patient’s status from the viewpoint of medical or social expectations.

Several dimensions are included in most studies examining HRQoL in CVDs. The first step is to define the physical, psychological, and social consequences of CVD, and to determine the influence of physical disability on changes to QoL. The second step is to identify individual reactions to disease-related dysfunctional states. Finally, the progress of rehabilitation is measured, with respect to minimizing psychosocial restrictions, and the effects of medical interventions and health education for the patient.

Studies examining HRQoL in CVDs should analyze a series of dimensions (Table 1.2).


Table 1.2
Health-Related Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Diseases



























Dimensions

Indicators

Physical status

mobility, potential for self-care and independent everyday functioning

Emotional status

mood changes, anger, guilt, ambivalence, depressive symptoms, despair, preserving one’s role as a patient, and expectations for the future

Social interactions

participation in different types of social activities, family relations, sexual activity, and marital satisfaction

Economic status

ability to ensure decent living conditions (i.e., standard of living), income, and employment

Intellectual status

memory, vigilance, ability to concentrate and learn

Perception of health status

self-rating of the severity of symptoms and degree of disability


Based on different studies [2732].


1.5 Future of QoL Studies


QoL studies will continue to develop dynamically despite conceptual difficulties or theoretical uncertainties. The focus of future studies should be to develop QoL models which may shed light on uncertainties connected with research. Future studies will probably be geared towards strengthening basic theoretical concepts and tailoring the definitions used to meet cultural requirements. One may also expect further development of the scales used to measure different dimensions of QoL. This will probably involve connecting the influence of disease and medical interventions with psychosocial determinants and resources from the period preceding changes in health status.

One may expect QoL to be universally applied in everyday clinical practice. It will begin to constitute the basic model for patient interaction and allow for a new quantification of therapeutic success, moving from a purely biological model to a more integrated bio-psycho-social model.


References



1.

Bowling A (1995) Measuring disease: A review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales. Open University Press Buckingham, Philadelphia


2.

Bowling A (1995) What things are important in people’s lives? A survey of the public’s judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life. Soc Sci Med 41:1447–1462PubMedCrossRef


3.

Ebrahim S (1995) Clinical and public health perspectives and applications of health-related quality of life measurement. Soc Sci Med 41:1383–1394PubMedCrossRef
< div class='tao-gold-member'>

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 10, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on The Genesis of Health: Evolution of the Concept of Health-Related Quality of Life

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access