Study
Study type
Aim
Main findings
Dates
Patients
Additional findings
Romo et al. [1]
Retrospective analysis mixed medical and surgical ICU
Evaluate difference in mortality between genders and between medical and surgical ICUs
Women had a higher mortality than men
1983
4420 admissions
Worse outcome especially in women >50 years
1995 (2 × 12 month periods studied)
−1587 female
−2833 male
−15% vs. 13%; OR 1.18 (95% CI 1.02–1.38; P < 0.05)
There is an interaction with gender with length of ICU stay—the difference in outcome less apparent after longer LOS OR of 1.54 (95% CI, 1.25–1.89) overall and an OR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92–0.98) for each day of increase in LOS
Belgian ICUs
Worse survival in women with cardiovascular diseases
−23% vs. 12%; OR, 2.07; (95% CI 1.50–2.87; P < 0.001)
Sathianathan et al. [2]
Retrospective single centre study: Australian ICU
Identify factors associated with survival on comatose survivors of arrest
Male gender improved survival to hospital discharge
20 years 1993–2012
582 patients
Median ICU LOS 3 days and hospital LOS 5
62% male
Shockable rhythm and shorter time to ROSC associated with survival to discharge
Samuelsson et al. [3]
Observational study—Registry date (multicentre)
? women of premenopausal age have better outcome
No survival advantage in pre-menopausal women
4 years 2008–2012
127,254 episodes
Presumed menopause at median age 45 years—arbitrary cut-off
57% male
No difference in 30 day mortality in women whether <45> years
43% female
Swedish ICU
Better outcome in men >45 years
Morrison et al. [4]
Registry data Observational study
To study the relationship between gender and outcomes in non traumatic out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)
Lower survival in women
Dec 2005–May 2007
14,690 patients
Cohort to study effect of female reproductive hormones
unadjusted OR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.77
36.4% women
64.2% men
Women more likely to achieve ROSC pre-hospital
North American and Canadian ICUs
With adjustment for Utstein predictors → women 15–45 years better survival to discharge (OR 1.66–95% CI 1.04–2.64)
Tao et al. [5]
Meta analysis
Influence of sex on outcomes in trauma patients
Protective effect of female gender on outcomes (mortality, LOS and fatal complications)
Upto 2013
Pooled data—19 studies 100,566 men 39,762 women
Mahmood et al. [6]
Observational retrospective study in American ICUs
Assess the association of gender with
Overall Survival advantage for younger women
Jan 2004–December 2008
261,255 pts
ICU mortality 7.2% men and 7.9% women
144,254 men (55.2%)
Pts <50 years—women had reduced ICU mortality vs. men: OR 0.83 (95% CI 0.79–0.91)—adjusted for physiology score, ethnicity, co-morbid conditions, pre-ICU LOS, pre-ICU location and hospital teaching status
117,001women (44.8%)
Worse outcome women post-CABG
1. ICU mortality
2. Active therapies
Better outcome after COPD
3. Outcomes in disease subgroups
No difference amongst >50 years
No difference in sepsis, ACS, trauma
Pietropaoli et al. [7]
Retrospective database cohort
Hypothesis—hospital mortality is higher in men compared to women with sepsis or septic shock requiring ICU
Hospital mortality higher in women
2003–2006
18,757 pts
Disparity in delivery and processes of care
10,055 men (54%)
Multi centre—98 ICUs in 71 US hospitals and four Canadian/Brazilian units
OR = 1.11 95% CI 1.04–1.19 p = 0.002
8702 women (46%)
Equal number of organ dysfunction between genders
No difference if >or< 50 years
Quenot et al. [8]
Prospective multicentre
Evaluate prognostic factors associated with 28 days mortality in septic shock
Same mortality men and women
Nov 2009–March 2011
1495 shocked
63.9% male
36.1% female
French units
Raine et al. [9]
ICNARC registry data
Comparison of case mix and outcomes of male and female patients admitted to ICUs
No difference in admission and mortality in cardiac arrhythmia, COPD, asthma, self poisoning, seizures. Some inequity in AMI and neurological bleeding
3 years
46,587
Demonstration of horizontal and vertical inequity in ICU
91 UK units
Vincent et al. [10]
Multi centre observational cohort
To define the incidence and characteristics of critically ill patients in Europe
Female gender independent risk factor for mortality
2 weeks
3147 patients
Numerous additional substudies published
May 2002
198 European ICUs
Physical and Pharmacological Differences
Physical differences between male and female patients largely do not affect their management in the cardiac intensive care unit except relating to physical size. Other than basic critical care considerations regarding airway and ventilatory management (endotracheal tube/tracheostomy size, ideal body weight tidal volumes) and drug dosage, there is little that is not encompassed in general critical care management, however some areas warrant specific consideration. First, women who meet nutritional goals have a lower hazard ratio of dying on the intensive care compared with men, but this benefit is lost if they meet their energy target but fail to reach their protein target (possibly due to the smaller total protein stores in women). Second, the anatomical and physiological differences between genders (including body weight, composition, GI motility, liver metabolism and glomerular filtration rate) significantly alter pharmacokinetics and dynamics of drugs, including absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination. Women are more susceptible to the effects of neuromuscular blockade, opioid receptor agonists, and beta adrenergic agents, as well as having a variable but attenuated response to pressor agents under conditions of stress. The potential response to beta adrenergic agents on cardiovascular function should also be carefully considered prior to institution of therapy. In particular, elderly female patients with basal septal hypertrophy may respond to dobutamine by developing worsening abnormalities of diastolic dysfunction and significantly increasing left-ventricular outflow tract obstruction. The condition should be suspected in case of deteriorating cardiac output in the presence of escalating inotropic support, and is readily confirmed using echocardiography. Treatment comprises cessation of beta adrenergic agents, volume and pressor resuscitation, and timely re-introduction of beta blocking agents (where right ventricular function allows).