Symptomatic Exercise-Induced Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction without Left Ventricular Hypertrophy




Background


Left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) is most commonly seen in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Postexercise dynamic LVOTO (DLVOTO) has been infrequently identified in symptomatic patients without LV hypertrophy, and its pathophysiology is not well established. The aim of this study was to identify echocardiographic abnormalities that might explain the dynamic development of systolic anterior motion, mitral-septal contact, and LVOTO in these patients.


Methods


Patients with DLVOTO and normal wall thickness were compared with 20 age-matched and gender-matched controls with normal stress echocardiographic findings. Two other groups were also compared: patients with DLVOTO and mild segmental hypertrophy (segmental wall thickness ≤15 mm) and patients with normal left ventricles but DLVOTO after dobutamine stress.


Results


Six symptomatic patients were identified (mean age, 48 ± 9 years; range, 37–60 years; five men) with normal wall thickness who developed DLVOTO after exercise during a 6-year period. Five had been hospitalized for cardiac symptoms. The mean postexercise LV outflow tract gradient caused by systolic anterior motion mitral-septal contact was 107 ± 55 mm Hg (range, 64–200 mm Hg). All patients had echocardiographic LV wall thicknesses in the normal range (≤12 mm). Structural abnormalities of the mitral valve were identified in all six patients. These were elongated posterior leaflets (2.0 vs 1.5 cm, P < .0005), elongated anterior leaflets (3.2 vs 2.6 cm, P = .015), increased protrusion height of the mitral valve beyond the mitral annular plane (2.6 vs 0.6 cm, P < .00001), and residual protruding portions of the mitral valve leaflets (0.85 vs 0.24 cm, P < .005). There was anterior positioning of the papillary muscles in the LV cavity, with a greater distance from the plane of the papillary muscles to the posterior wall (1.8 vs 1.3 cm, P = .03). In two patients, potentially provoking medications were stopped; two patients received β-blockers, with reductions of angina. Medium-term prognosis was good; no patient had died after 3.5 years. The mitral valve abnormalities in the 10 patients with DLVOTO and mild segmental hypertrophy were qualitatively and quantitatively very similar to those in patients with DLVOTO without hypertrophy. In contrast, the valves of patients with dobutamine stress DLVOTO were not elongated, but 50% had residual mitral leaflets that protruded past the coaptation point by ≥5 mm.


Conclusions


DLVOTO after exercise can occur in the absence of LV hypertrophy and may be associated with high gradients and cardiac symptoms. Elongated, redundant mitral valve leaflets with anterior position of the papillary muscles appear to cause the postexercise obstruction.


Systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve and mitral-septal contact is the most common cause of left ventricular (LV) outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction (LVOTO) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). It is characteristically provocable, with worsening obstruction related to a decrease in preload or afterload or an increase in contractility. Exercise echocardiography has proved to be a useful tool in HCM, provoking increases in gradients in the large majority of patients and importantly in patients who would otherwise be deemed to have nonobstructive HCM. LVOTO after exercise has been infrequently identified in symptomatic patients without LV hypertrophy (LVH), and its pathophysiology is not well established; the term “dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction” (DLVOTO) is commonly used to describe this entity. In this case series, we analyzed six symptomatic patients who had structurally normal left ventricles with no LVH but who developed severe DLVOTO after exercise.


Methods


Adult inpatients and outpatients referred for the evaluation of cardiac symptoms underwent routine diagnostic stress echocardiography with symptom-limited Bruce protocol treadmill exercise, with imaging performed in the supine left lateral decubitus position immediately after the termination of exercise. Views of the left ventricle from five imaging planes were digitized within 60 sec. If SAM was noted by the sonographer, continuous wave (CW) Doppler of the LVOT was acquired, first from the five-chamber and then from the three-chamber view. During this 6-year time period, we performed 9,475 stress exercise echocardiographic studies.


Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria


Patients were included in this case series if they (1) had no LVOTO at rest but developed de novo mitral-septal contact on two-dimensional imaging and LVOTO on CW Doppler after exercise and (2) had normal LV wall thicknesses. Over a 2-year period, we also identified patients who had no significant resting gradients but DLVOTO ≥30 mm Hg after exercise and who had mild segmental LVH, with all segments ≤15 mm. We also indentified patients with normal left ventricles but who developed SAM mitral-septal contact and LVOTO after dobutamine stress. Patients with any wall motion abnormalities at rest or after exercise were excluded. Meticulous care was taken to avoid measuring mitral regurgitant jets by angling the transducer medially away from the left atrium. Only CW jets that started after isovolumetric systole and were concave to the left in contour were accepted as LVOT gradient jets. Moreover, we excluded patients with jets from complete systolic emptying of the left ventricle and patients with mid-LV obstruction. We only accepted jets for which color Doppler acceleration and aliasing occurred at the point of mitral-septal contact and not in the body of the left ventricle.


Mitral Valve and LV Measurements


We compared patients with DLVOTO without LVH with 20 age-matched and gender-matched controls with normal results on stress echocardiography. At end-diastole, using parasternal long-axis and short-axis two-dimensional views, we measured with digital calipers the LV end-diastolic diameter just below the mitral tips and the LV segmental wall thickness of four LV wall segments, the anterior septum, posterior septum, posterior wall, and anterolateral wall, as described previously. In the parasternal long-axis view, we also measured LV end-systolic diameter. On the parasternal long-axis view, at the moment of systolic mitral coaptation, we measured the diameter of the LVOT, the distance from the anterior mitral valve tip to the septum, and the distance from posterior mitral valve tip to the LV posterior wall. From the short-axis view at end-diastole, we measured the perpendicular distance from a line bisecting the papillary muscles to the septum and also to the posterior wall. From the apical three-chamber view, we measured structural variables of the mitral valve as shown in Figure 1 . In diastole, we measured the length of the anterior leaflet, from the tip of the leaflet to the insertion of the noncoronary aortic leaflet; this measurement includes the intervalvular fibrosa but offers easily identified landmarks for measurement. We also measured the length of the posterior leaflet. At the moment of coaptation in early systole, we measured the residual portion of the anterior mitral leaflet that extends past the coaptation point and is thus untethered and protruding into the LV cavity, and we measured the protrusion height of the mitral valve, the distance from the plane of the mitral annulus to the tip of most protruding mitral leaflet. This quantifies the protrusion of the mitral leaflets into the LV cavity. Chordal SAM was excluded from all measurements by observing full cine loops in multiple views and excluding patients without exercise LVOT gradients. From two-chamber and four-chamber views, we measured biplane LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes using Simpson’s rule and calculated ejection fractions.




Figure 1


Line drawing of an apical three-chamber view from a representative patient with DLVOTO showing elongated mitral leaflets, increased protrusion height above the mitral annular plane, and increased residual leaflet length. The locations of echocardiographic measurements are shown. ( Left ) Diastole, showing measurements of anterior leaflet length (AL) and posterior leaflet length (PL). ( Right ) Early systole at the moment of coaptation, showing residual leaflet length (RL) and protrusion height (PH) of the most protruding leaflet measured from the mitral annulus to the top of the most protruding leaflet.


Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed as clinically indicated. Wall thicknesses were measured in the same four LV wall segments described above, and the presence of gadolinium delayed hyperenhancement was noted. The position, thickness, and number of papillary muscles were noted, as well as their potential to contribute to SAM and LVOTO, as previously reported.


Patients’ medical records were examined, and follow-up was performed by clinic visits and phone. Pharmacologic management was determined by the referring physicians. Abstract of medical records for research purposes was approved by the institutional review board of St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center.


Statistical Analysis


Continuous variables are reported as mean ± SD. One-way analysis of variance was used to carry out an omnibus test of differences among the four groups, while mean contrasts tests were used to compare the no LVH, mild LVH, and dobutamine groups with the control patients. Echocardiographic variables corrected for body surface area were also compared between the no LVH and control patients. Bonferroni’s correction was applied to account for the number of echocardiographic variables analyzed, and P values < .05 were considered significant. Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze categorical variables. SPSS version 20 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for analyses.




Results


We identified 6 patients with DLVOTO and normal wall thickness (mean age, 48 ± 9 years; range, 37–60 years; five men). After exercise, peak systolic LVOT gradients were due to SAM and mitral-septal contact, and the mean was 107 ± 55 mm Hg (range, 64–200 mm Hg). All six patients had cardiac symptoms, and five were hospitalized (typical angina in three, atypical chest pain in one, syncope and exercise-related dyspnea in one, and exercise-related prolonged supraventricular tachycardia in one). Table 1 lists the demographic and clinical findings in the six patients. Figure 1 is a line drawing of an apical three-chamber view of a representative patient showing elongated mitral leaflets, increased protrusion height above the mitral annular plane, and increased residual leaflet length. The locations of echocardiographic measurements are shown. Figures 2 to 6 show imaging in five of the patients, both at rest and after exercise. Videos 1 and 2 (available at www.online.com ) show imaging in two patients at rest and after exercise. Table 2 compares echocardiographic measurements in the four groups.



Table 1

Demographic and echocardiographic findings in six patients with DLVOTO without LVH
























































































Patient Age (y) Gender Symptoms Maximal LV thickness on echocardiography (mm) Resting mild SAM Resting LVOT gradient (mm Hg) Postexercise SAM MS contact Postexercise gradient (mm Hg) Treatment Follow-up stress echocardiographic gradient (mm Hg)
1 37 M Hospitalized for prolonged SVT during marathon 12 No 0 Yes 64 No therapy: avoids competition 77
2 49 M Hospitalized for typical angina, palpitations, near syncope, history of HTN 12 No 0 Yes 150 Amlodipine stopped; β-blocker, clonidine added 0
3 56 M Hospitalized for typical angina 12 Yes 0 Yes 64 No therapy Not done
4 38 M Atypical chest pain 11 Yes 0 Yes 88 No therapy 85
5 49 M Hospitalized for typical angina 12 No 0 Yes 81 β-blocker prescribed; patient discontinued treatment and has exercise angina 81
6 60 F Hospitalized for syncope, DOE 10 Yes 0 Yes 200 Atomoxetine discontinued; β-blocker added 0

DOE , Dyspnea on exertion; HTN , hypertension; MS , mitral-septal; SVT , supraventricular tachycardia.



Figure 2


Patient 1. (A) Resting study, diastolic apical three-chamber view shows normal LV wall thickness and elongated anterior mitral valve leaflet that was 36 mm long. (B) Four-chamber view showing postexercise mitral-septal contact. (C) Three-chamber view showing postexercise mitral-septal contact ( arrow ). (D) LVOT CW Doppler postexercise systolic gradient of 64 mm Hg due to mitral-septal contact.



Figure 3


Patient 2. (A) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showing normal LV wall thickness. (B) Resting apical four-chamber view early in systole at the moment of mitral coaptation, showing protruding elongated mitral leaflets ( arrow ). (C) Three-chamber view after exercise showing mitral-septal contact ( arrow ).



Figure 4


Patient 3. (A, B) Two-dimensional echocardiographic views. At end-diastole, LV wall thickness is normal. (C) Four-chamber view showing postexercise mitral-septal contact. (D) LVOT CW Doppler postexercise systolic gradient of 58 mm Hg due to mitral-septal contact.



Figure 5


Patient 4. (A) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showing normal LV wall thickness. (B) Two-dimensional echocardiographic views. At end-diastole, LV wall thickness is normal. (C) Three-chamber and four-chamber views after exercise showing mitral-septal contact ( arrows ). (D) LVOT CW Doppler postexercise systolic gradient of 81 mm Hg due to mitral-septal contact. See Video 1 (available at www.onlinejase.com ).



Figure 6


Patient 5. (A) Resting study, diastolic apical three-chamber view shows normal LV wall thickness and elongated anterior mitral valve leaflet. (B) Resting apical four chamber view early in systole at the moment of mitral coaptation, showing protruding elongated mitral leaflets ( arrow ). Note normal LV wall thickness. (C) Five-chamber view after exercise showing mitral-septal contact. (D) LVOT CW Doppler postexercise systolic gradient of 81 mm Hg due to mitral-septal contact. See Video 2 (available at www.onlinejase.com ).


Table 2

Resting echocardiographic variables in patients with DLVOTO and controls


































































































































Variable DLVOTO, no LVH ( n = 6) DLVOTO, mild LVH ( n = 10) Dobutamine DLVOTO ( n = 13) Controls ( n = 20)
Anterior septum (cm) 1.1 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.3 ( P = .003) 1.2 ± 0.2 ( P < .01) 1.0 ± 0.1
PW (cm) 1.1 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.2 ( P < .0005) 1.0 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1
Posterior septum (cm) 1.1 ± 0.15 1.2 ± 0.2 ( P < .01) 1.1 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.1
Anterolateral wall (cm) 1.1 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.2 ( P < .00002) 1.1 ± 0.1 ( P < .01) 1.0 ± 0.1
LVEDD (cm) 4.7 ± 0.3 4.5 ± 0.5 4.1 ± 0.3 4.3 ± 0.4
LVESD (cm) 2.7 ± 0.2 2.4 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.4 2.6 ± 0.4
EDV (mL 3 ) 130.8 ± 55 108.8 ± 29 88.5 ± 32 99.5 ± 21
ESV (mL 3 ) 43.2 ± 16 31.6 ± 7 31.2 ± 15 35.8 ± 11
EDV/BSA (mL 3 /m 2 ) 60.8 ± 19 50.4 ± 12 45.9 ± 14 53 ± 12
ESV/BSA (mL 3 /m 2 ) 20 ± 6 14.6 ± 4 15.8 ± 7 18.9 ± 5
Volumetric EF (%) 67 ± 5 70 ± 7 65.4 ± 7 64 ± 7
AL length (cm) 3.2 ± 0.2 ( P = .015) 3.3 ± 0.6 ( P < .0002) 2.7 ± 0.3 2.6 ± 0.4
PL length (cm) 2.0 ± 0.1 ( P < .0005) 2.0 ± 0.4 ( P < .00005) 1.7 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.2
PH (cm) 2.6 ± 0.5 ( P < .00001) 2.5 ± 0.5 ( P < .00001) 0.77 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.2
RL (cm) 0.85 ± 0.13 ( P < .005) 0.83 ± .48 ( P = .0008) 0.48 ± 0.39 0.24 ± 0.19
LVOTD (cm) 2.3 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.2 2.0 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.2
AL tip-septum (cm) 2.3 ± 0.3 2.2 ± 0.3 2.4 ± 0.4 2.5 ± 0.5
PL tip-PW (cm) 1.5 ± 0.5 1.8 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.3
Anterior wall-PM (cm) 2.8 ± 0.6 2.7 ± 0.5 3.2 ± 0.5 3.0 ± 0.5
Posterior wall-PM (cm) 1.8 ± 0.3 ( P = .03) 1.9 ± 0.4 ( P < .0001) 1.5 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.3

AL , Anterior mitral leaflet; EF , ejection fraction; LVEDD , LV end-diastolic diameter; LVESD , LV end-systolic diameter; LVOTD , LVOT diameter; PH , protrusion height of mitral leaflets above the mitral annulus; PL , posterior mitral leaflet; PM , plane of the papillary muscles in the short-axis view.

Significant at P < .05 after Bonferroni’s correction.



Mitral Valve and LV Measurements


Mitral valve abnormalities were identified in all 6 patients. These were elongated posterior leaflets (2.0 vs 1.5 cm, P < .0005), elongated anterior leaflets (3.2 vs 2.6 cm, P = .015), increased protrusion height of the mitral valve above mitral annular plane (2.6 vs 0.6 cm, P < .00001), and residual protruding portions of the mitral valve leaflets that extended past the coaptation point and into the LV cavity (0.85 vs 0.24 cm, P < .005). At rest before exercise, mild degrees of SAM without mitral-septal contact were seen in three of six patients, but there was no mitral-septal contact and no LVOT gradient. We found that all patients had LV wall thicknesses in the normal range. LV wall thickness, cavity diameters in diastole and systole, volumes, ejection fraction, and LVOT diameters did not differ between patients and controls. Distance from the mitral valve tips and the septum and posterior walls, respectively, did not differ between patients and controls. There was anterior positioning of the papillary muscles in the LV cavity, manifest by a greater distance from the plane of the papillary muscles to the posterior wall (1.8 vs 1.3 cm, P = .03). Comparisons of echocardiographic variables corrected for body surface area showed differences similar to the uncorrected data.


Postexercise Echocardiography


Severe SAM and mitral-septal contact were observed in every patient. The redundancy of the mitral valve was evident in rest and postexercise images in all patients ( Figures 2–6 , Videos 1 and 2 ). The mean gradient after peak exercise was 107 ± 55 mm Hg (range, 64–200 mm Hg). In all cases, the CW Doppler jets began after isovolumetric systole, and all were late peaking, with a concave-to-the-left contour. On color Doppler echocardiography, acceleration of color flow and aliasing occurred at the point of mitral-septal contact and not in the body of the left ventricle. No patient had mid-LV obstruction. No systolic wall motion abnormalities were observed after stress. Mitral regurgitation after stress was trivial to mild and posteriorly directed.


The duration and hemodynamic response to exercise did not differ from these values in controls. Among patients with DLVOTO, three of six developed chest pain at peak exercise that subsided after the termination of exercise. Resting electrocardiographic findings were normal in all six patients, but two developed ischemic ST-segment depression with exercise. One patient reproducibly on repeat studies had inadequate blood pressure response to exercise (<20 mm Hg increase).


Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed in four patients. This showed normal segmental wall thickness ≤12 mm in two patients and normal wall thickness in all segments in the other two patients, except for isolated thickening of the basilar inferior septum of 13 mm. No patient had gadolinium delayed enhancement. One patient had an abnormal anteriorly displaced anterolateral papillary muscle similar to that previously reported; it appeared to contribute to obstruction by decreasing posterior mitral restraint. Discrete papillary muscle anomalies such as anteroapical displacement and doubly bifid papillary muscles were otherwise not seen in the other three patients.


Pharmacologic Management and Follow-Up


Two patients were advised to discontinue medications: the vasodilator amlodipine in one and atomoxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, in another. All patients were advised to refrain from athletic competition and extremes of exertion. Patients were followed up a mean of 43 ± 28 months after the initial stress echocardiographic study showing DLVOTO. None had died. Despite advice, one patient has continued to compete at the amateur tournament level in singles racquet sports, even though he routinely experiences exertion-related angina that causes him to stop competing. Coronary angiography in this patient and another showed no significant coronary stenoses. Three patients had ongoing symptoms of exercise intolerance or angina and were treated with β-blockers. Two patients continued therapy, while one patient self-terminated β-blockade. The remaining three patients had no ongoing symptoms and were not given pharmacologic therapy. Five patients underwent repeat stress exercise echocardiography 29 ± 26 months after diagnosis. After repeat stress exercise, no patient had systolic wall motion abnormalities. The three patients who were untreated still had LVOTO after exercise due to SAM and mitral-septal contact, with gradients of 77, 81, and 85 mm Hg. The two patients who were on β-blockers underwent follow-up stress exercise echocardiography on β-blockers and no longer showed mitral-septal contact and obstruction. Two patients had genotype analysis of 18 genes, which did not show HCM-associated mutations.


Patients with DLVOTO and Mild Segmental Hypertrophy <15 mm


Over the 2-year period, we identified 10 patients with DLVOTO and mild segmental thickening (mean segmental wall thicknesses ranged from 12 to 13 mm) (mean age, 48.6 ± 12 years; range, 31–68 years; eight men). A mild degree of SAM at rest was identified in five patients (50%), and three patients had mild resting gradients of 21, 21, and 29 mm Hg. After exercise, peak systolic LVOT gradient was due to SAM and mitral-septal contact, and the mean value was 130 ± 46 mm Hg (range, 56–196 mm Hg). Four patients had inadequate increases in blood pressure ranging from 0 to 14 mm Hg. All 10 patients had cardiac symptoms; nine had exercise-related dyspnea, four typical angina, three exercise-related dizziness, and one paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. These patients had mitral valve abnormalities qualitatively and quantitatively similar to the patients with no LVH: they had elongated protruding mitral leaflets (anterior leaflet, 3.3 cm; posterior leaflet, 2.0 cm, protrusion height, 2.5 cm), with residual portions of the leaflet, and anterior positioning of the papillary muscles in the left ventricle (see Table 2 ). Cardiac magnetic resonance was performed in five patients and confirmed modest hypertrophy in all; no patient had delayed hyperenhancement. Five patients had genotype analysis; one patient had the HCM-associated splice mutation MYBPC3 IVS30+5G>C. This 31-year-old patient’s mother had died suddenly of autopsy-documented HCM at 44 years of age. He received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden death.


Clinically, these 10 patients presented with the spectrum of symptoms seen in HCM. Symptoms were managed by increasing β-blockade in six and the addition of disopyramide in two. One of these latter patients required surgical repair for refractory symptoms; he underwent a necessarily limited myectomy and release of an anteriorly displaced anterolateral papillary muscle by dividing muscular connections between the anterior wall and papillary muscle as reported previously. He is free of obstruction and is in New York Heart Association class I. None of the patients had died after a mean follow-up period of 16 ± 9 months.


In the combined group of 16 patients with DLVOTO with either no LVH or mild LVH, there was a preponderance of men (13 of 16 [81%], P = .02).


Patients with DLVOTO after Dobutamine Stress


Over the 2-year period, we identified 12 patients with DLVOTO after dobutamine stress (mean age, 60.3 ± 11 years; range, 48–80; six men); all (100%) were hypertensive. Mild SAM at rest was identified in one patient (8%), but all had SAM mitral-septal contact after dobutamine. These patients were older ( P < .04), and more were hypertensive ( P < .0001) compared with control patients. Compared with controls, these patients had mild degrees of thickening of the anterior septum and anterior wall: mean segmental wall thicknesses were 12 and 11 mm, respectively. There was no mitral leaflet elongation, nor was there anterior positioning of the papillary muscles in the left ventricle. However, of the 12 patients, six (50%) had residual portions of the mitral leaflets that extended past the coaptation point by ≥5 mm; this was longer by 1 standard deviation than our controls ( Table 2 ).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 2, 2018 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Symptomatic Exercise-Induced Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction without Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access