Abstract
Stent loss during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a rare event, which however has been associated with devastating consequences. Adequate management of this complication requires an exact understanding of the location of the lost stent and underlying mechanisms. Our case reports on a 55-year-old man who underwent PCI to a chronic total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery, complicated by stent loss. Successful management involved crushing and trapping of the stent behind a newly implanted stent. The use of optical coherence tomography proved invaluable, clarifying the relationship of the lost stent with side branches, allowing choosing a larger balloon for stent crushing, and suggesting a possible cause for stent loss. Finally, we provide a review on recent literature on stent loss during PCI and offer an algorithm to guide its management.
Highlights
- •
Stent loss needs to be promptly diagnosed and exact situation understood.
- •
Various techniques of managing stent loss are available and operators need to be familiar with these.
- •
Intracoronary imaging is invaluable, especially if stent is lost in proximal vessels.
1
Introduction
Stent loss is currently an infrequent complication during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) . However, it can have devastating consequences, including stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction and death . Here we describe a case of stent loss during chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI that was successfully managed by meticulous optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided stent crushing and trapping. We additionally review the incidence and possible mechanisms of stent loss during PCI, and provide a set of recommendations to manage such complication.
2
Case description
A 55-year-old man presented with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Three-vessel disease was diagnosed. Since the patient categorically refused surgical revascularization, percutaneous management of his coronary artery disease (CAD) was pursued. He underwent PCI to the right coronary artery with one drug-eluting stent (DES), as well as on the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and first diagonal (D1) branch, with two non-overlapping DES ( Fig. 1 A ). Residual CAD after the initial procedure included a mid LAD CTO and a proximal circumflex CTO. Transthoracic echocardiogram and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed mildly reduced left ventricular systolic function with viability in all coronary territories. The patient was then scheduled for mid LAD CTO PCI ( Fig. 1 A).
Dual femoral access was secured with 7Fr sheaths. The occlusion was long (>20 mm) and calcified, with an ambiguous proximal cap and epicardial interventional collaterals from the D2. According to the hybrid algorithm , a retrograde approach was undertaken. Due to difficulty in navigating the tortuous epicardial collaterals, the procedure was switched to an antegrade approach. The lesion was crossed with an UltimateBROS3 guidewire (Asahi Intecc, Nagoya, Japan) over a Turnpike LP microcatheter (Vascular Solutions, Minneapolis, MN), in a true-to-true fashion ( Fig. 1 B). The lesion was therefore predilated with 2.5 × 20 mm non-compliant (NC) balloon ( Fig. 1 C). However, when a 3.0 × 33 mm Ultimaster DES (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) was advanced into the proximal-to-mid LAD, resistance was encountered, and the decision was made to perform additional predilatation with a larger balloon. It soon became apparent that the stent got dislodged from the delivery system between the circumflex ostium and the LAD segment just distal to D1, most likely due to angulation and calcification of this segment ( Fig. 1 D).
It was clear that the dislodged stent was partially overhanging over the ostium of the circumflex artery and, additionally, appeared distorted in its proximal portion: for these reasons, we decided not to not to implant it and to attempt retrieval instead. The ‘small balloon technique’ (in which a small balloon is advanced onto the stent wire and inflated, and the two are pulled back into the guiding catheter) was applied to no avail. Therefore, the decision to crush the stent was taken. A second guide catheter was then used to engage the left main. Two Runthrough guidewires (Terumo) were passed to the distal LAD and D1 from the second guide catheter (ping-pong technique) . A 3.0 × 20mm NC balloon was inflated onto the LAD guidewire to crush the dislodged stent and further optimize lesion preparation, while the D1 branch was protected performing kissing balloon inflation (KBI), to prevent ostial D1 compromise (3.0 mm NC balloon to LAD and 2.5 mm NC balloon to D1). A 3.5 × 33mm Ultimaster DES was successfully advanced to cover the crushed stent, and implanted from the left main to the mid LAD ( Fig. 1 E). Further optimization was achieved with a 4.0 mm NC balloon high-pressure postdilatation in the proximal LAD. OCT confirmed acceptable apposition of the crushed stent to the vessel wall, and interestingly also revealed concomitant crushing of the stent deployed across the LAD-D1 bifurcation during the previous procedure (3.5 × 9 mm Ultimaster), most likely due to stent malapposition with subsequent easy crossing of the Runthrough guidewire “behind” the stent struts ( Fig. 2 B–E, a–f). Further optimization, confirmed with OCT assessment, was performed with high-pressure inflation of a 4.5 mm NC balloon in the proximal LAD, T-and-protrusion (TAP) stenting into the ostial-proximal circumflex, and final KBI on both the left main-LAD-circumflex and LAD-D1 bifurcations. Finally, an overlapping Ultimaster was implanted from the mid to distal LAD ( Fig. 2 A, F).
Optimal angiographic result was confirmed also on OCT grounds ( Fig. 2 A, F, a–f). The patient maintained a normal renal function, was discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor for 12 months, and was asymptomatic on subsequent follow-up.