Special Tools in Cardiac Evaluation

2 Special Tools in Cardiac Evaluation


A number of special tools are available to the cardiologist in the evaluation of cardiac patients. Noncardiologists have access to some noninvasive tools, such as echocardiography, exercise stress test, and ambulatory ECG (e.g., Holter monitor). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) are other noninvasive tools that have become popular in recent years. Cardiac catheterization and angiocardiography are invasive tests. Although catheter intervention procedures are not diagnostic, they are included here because they are usually performed with cardiac catheterization.



I. ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY


Echocardiography (echo) is an extremely useful, safe, and noninvasive test used in the diagnosis and management of heart disease. Echo studies, which use ultrasound, provide anatomic diagnosis as well as functional information, especially with the incorporation of Doppler echo and color flow mapping.



A. M-MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY


The M-mode echo provides an “ice-pick” view of the heart. It has limited capability in demonstrating the spatial relationship of structures but remains an important tool in the evaluation of certain cardiac conditions and functions, particularly by measurements of dimensions and timing. It is usually performed as part of two-dimensional echo studies.


Figure 2-1 shows three important structures of the left side of the heart that are imaged using the M-mode echo. The following are some applications of the M-mode echo.







1. Normal M-mode echo values. The dimensions of the cardiac chambers and the aorta are measured during diastole, coincident with the onset of the QRS complex; the LA dimension and LV systolic dimension are exceptions (see Fig. 2-1). Table 2-1 shows normal M-mode values of cardiac chamber size, wall thickness, and aortic size, according to the patient’s weight. More detailed normal values of chamber dimensions and LV wall thickness by stand-alone M-mode echo are shown according to body surface area in Appendix D (Table D-1). M-mode echo measurement of the aortic annulus, LA, and LV dimensions as part of a two-dimensional study are shown by age in Table D-2. Table D-3 shows M-mode echo measurements of the LA and LV dimensions by height.


2. Left ventricular systolic function









(1) The method of measuring left preejection period (LPEP) and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) is shown in the lower right panel of Figure 2-1. The preejection period usually reflects the rate of pressure rise in the ventricle during isovolumic systole (i.e., dp/dt). The ratio of preejection period to ventricular ejection time for both right and left sides is little affected by changes in the heart rate.



B. TWO-DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY


The two-dimensional (2D) echo has an enhanced ability to demonstrate the spatial relationship of cardiovascular structures. The Doppler and color mapping study has added the ability to easily detect valve regurgitation and cardiac shunts during the echo examination. It also provides some quantitative information such as pressure gradients across cardiac valves and estimation of pressures in the great arteries and ventricles.


Routine 2D echo is obtained from four transducer locations: parasternal, apical, subcostal, and suprasternal notch positions. Sometimes, abdominal and subclavicular views are also obtained. Figures 2-2 through 2-10 illustrate selected standard images of the heart and great vessels. Selected normal dimensions of cardiac chambers and the great arteries are presented in Appendix D. Table D-4 shows the dimensions of the aorta and pulmonary arteries. Table D-5 shows the aortic root dimensions. Table D-6 shows the mitral and tricuspid valve annulus dimensions, and Table D-7 shows the valve annulus in the neonate.













D. DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY


A Doppler echo combines the study of cardiac structure and blood flow profiles. Doppler ultrasound equipment detects frequency shifts and thus determines the direction and velocity of blood flow with respect to the ultrasound beam. By convention, velocities of red blood cells moving toward the transducer are displayed above a zero baseline; those moving away from the transducer are displayed below the baseline. The Doppler echo is usually used with color flow mapping (see following) to enhance the technique’s usefulness.


The two commonly used Doppler techniques are continuous wave and pulsed wave. The pulsed wave (PW) emits a short burst of ultrasound, and the Doppler echo receiver “listens” for returning information. The continuous wave (CW) emits a constant ultrasound beam with one crystal, and another crystal continuously receives returning information. The pulsed-wave Doppler can control the site at which the Doppler signals are sampled, but the maximal detectable velocity is limited, making it unusable for quantification of severe obstruction. In contrast, continuous-wave Doppler can measure extremely high velocities (e.g., for the estimation of severe stenosis), but it cannot localize the site of the sampling; rather, it picks up the signal anywhere along the Doppler beam. When these two techniques are used in combination, clinical application expands.


Normal Doppler velocities in children and adults are shown in Table 2-2. Normal Doppler velocity is less than 1 m/sec for the pulmonary valves, but it may be up to 1.8 m/sec for the ascending and descending aortas. With stenosis of the atrioventricular valves, the flow velocity of the E and A waves increases (Fig. 2-11). Normally, the E wave is taller than the A wave, except for the first 3 weeks of life, during which the A wave may be taller than the E wave. In normal subjects 11 to 40 years of age, mitral Doppler indexes are as follows (mean ± SD). The average peak E velocity is 0.73 ± 0.09 m/sec, the average peak A velocity is 0.38 ± 0.089 m/sec, and the average E:A velocity ratio is 2.0 ± 0.5.


TABLE 2-2 NORMAL DOPPLER VELOCITIES IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS: MEAN (RANGES) (IN M/SEC)



























  CHILDREN ADULTS
Mitral Flow 1.0 (0.8–1.3) 0.9 (0.6–1.3)
Tricuspid Flow 0.6 (0.5–0.8) 0.6 (0.3–0.7)
Pulmonary Artery 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 0.75 (0.6–0.9)
Left Ventricle 1.0 (0.7–1.2) 0.9 (0.7–1.1)
Aorta 1.5 (1.2–1.8) 1.35 (1.0–1.7)

From Hatle L, Angelsen B: Doppler ultrasound in cardiology, ed 2, Philadelphia, 1985, Lea & Febiger.





1. Measurement of pressure gradients





2. Prediction of intracardiac or intravascular pressures.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 18, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Special Tools in Cardiac Evaluation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access