Sleep, Driving, and the Law



Sleep, Driving, and the Law


Brian Boehlecke



Drowsy driving is recognized as a serious public health problem. In the 1990s, the National Highway Safety Transportation Safety Administration estimated that 100,000 drowsy driving crashes were reported annually to police, with 1500 fatalities and 76,000 injuries representing 1% to 3% of all reported crashes and 4% of fatalities (1). That this is likely an underestimate is indicated by a naturalistic study of 241 drivers over the course of 12 months with in-car video cameras, which showed that drowsy driving was a contributing factor in 20% to 24% of crashes and near crashes (2). A Gallup Poll in 2002 found that 37% of drivers admitted to having nodded off at some time while driving, 29% of these in the past year and 10% in the past month, yielding an estimate of approximately 7.5 million drowsy drivers during one month (3). Finally, the National Sleep Foundation (NSF) 2009 Sleep in America Poll found that 28% of respondents who drive reported having ever fallen asleep while driving and 1% having had a crash or near crash due to drowsiness in the past year (4).

Numerous studies have indicated that persons with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at increased risk for motor vehicle crashes (MVCs), with an estimated cost of $15.9 billion and 1400 lives lost attributable to crashes involving persons with OSA in 2000 (5,6). Whether drowsy driving should be a criminal off ense remains controversial (7,8). All states have statutes under which drivers can be charged with reckless driving (Table 22.1), but in most states to be found guilty requires that the driver be shown to have been aware of the consequences of his actions (legal concept of [mens rea]). If a driver can show it was reasonable that he did not think he would fall asleep while driving, he may avoid conviction (9).

As discussed below, patients’ perceptions of their risk of involuntarily falling sleep are often inaccurate and thus may contribute to their continuing to drive when at high risk for a drowsy driving crash. Only New Jersey has a statute (Maggie’s Law) that specifically labels driving while knowingly “fatigued” due to lack of sleep for 24 hours as reckless driving for which a driver may be charged with negligent homicide should a death result from a crash (10,11).


PHYSICIAN RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY

Involvement of a patient with OSA in a drowsiness-related MVC resulting in serious injury or death poses a risk to their physician of being charged with negligence if it could be shown that the patient was not adequately warned of the risk of involuntarily falling asleep while driving or should have been reported to authorities as being at increased risk for drowsy driving. The latter situation may be especially pertinent if the patient is nonadherent to treatment. Physicians have been held liable in state courts for injuries to third persons caused by patients who were not adequately warned of the risks of drowsy driving due to medications (12) or driving with a medical condition that could cause loss of consciousness (13, 14 and 15). An American Medical Association policy (H-15.958 Fatigue, Sleep Disorders and Motor Vehicle Crashes) recommends that physicians “… inform patients about the personal and societal hazards of driving or working while fatigued …” and that they “… become familiar with the laws and regulations concerning drivers and highway safety in the state(s) where they practice” (16). Physicians have an ethical responsibility to attempt to mitigate risk of harm to their patient and to the public when they detect a condition that may impair the patient’s ability to drive safely, but legal requirements for reporting such patients vary by state (10,17). Some states require physicians to report to motor vehicle authorities all patients diagnosed with a condition on a specified list regardless of level of impairment present (mandatory reporting), while others require reporting only if the physician concludes that the condition is causing significant impairment of the capacity to drive ( functional reporting). Others have no mandatory reporting requirements but do allow reporting without risk of liability for breach of confidentiality if the physician considers the patient or the public to be at significant risk of harm (permissive reporting). An example of the latter is the author’s home state of North Carolina, which has a law (NC General Statutes, Chapter 20 Motor Vehicles, Article 2—Uniform Driver’s License Act) that states, “A physician or psychologist disclosing or not disclosing information pursuant to this section is immune from any civil or criminal liability that might otherwise be incurred or imposed based on the disclosure or lack of disclosure provided that the physician or psychologist was acting in good faith and without malice” (18). The American Medical Association has published a discussion of the ethical and legal obligations of physicians related to reporting of unsafe drivers to their state’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) with a summary of requirements for reporting in each state (19). The current regulations for the state in which a physician practices should be obtained from the appropriate state DMV. A report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the AMA citing Opinion 5.50 states, “The obligation to safeguard patient confidences is subject to certain exceptions which are ethically and legally justified because of overriding social considerations” (20). Although indicating that physicians should make an effort to encourage patients to voluntarily report impairments to the DMV, the report states, “There may be situations, however, where clear evidence of substantial driving impairment implies a strong threat to the patient and public safety, and where the physician’s advice to discontinue driving is ignored. In these unusual cases, it is desirable and ethical for physicians to notify the Department of Motor Vehicles about medical conditions that may impair safe driving to enable the Department of Motor Vehicles to determine whether or not the patient can continue to drive.” HIPAA regulations regarding Individually Identifiable Health Information indicate that there are “uses and disclosures for which an authorization or opportunity to agree or object is not required” (21). Protected health information may be disclosed “… if the covered entity, in good faith, believes the disclosure: A. is necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety of a person or the public; and B. is to a person or persons reasonably able to prevent or lessen that threat …”.








TABLE 22.1 National Sleep Foundation, State of the States Report on Drowsy Driving: Summary of Findings (November 2008)






































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 20, 2016 | Posted by in RESPIRATORY | Comments Off on Sleep, Driving, and the Law

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access

State


Grade


Q1: Potential Charges Against Drowsy Driver in Sleep-Related Motor Vehicle Crash?


Q2: Potential Charges Against Drowsy Driver Causing Fatality?


Q3: Provisions Limiting Person’s Right to Drive with Medical Conditions?


Are Sleep Disorders Specifically Mentioned?


Q4: Regulations Requiring Physicians to Report Patients’ Medical Conditions Possibly Affecting Driving Performance?


Q5: Code Related to Sleepiness/Fatigue on Police Report Form?


Q6: Training for Police Regarding Impact of Fatigue on Driving Performance?


Q7: Does the State have a Graduated Driver Licensing System?


Does the State have a Night-Time Driving Restriction Provision?


Q8: Does the State Mandate that Sleep/Drowsy Driving Information be Included in Driver Education Curricula?


Q9: Does the State have Information Related to Drowsy Driving in Its Driver Licensing Manual?


AL


C


Reckless driving if conduct shows awillful and wanton disregard for safety.


Manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide, depending on if actions are deemed reckless or negligent.


Yes


No


No


Doctors cannot be sued if they do report a patient.


Yes




  • Fatigued



  • Apparently asleep


No


Yes


Yes


12 AM-6 AM


No, but it is mentioned.


Yes


AK


C−


Reckless endangerment or reckless driving


Manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide.


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fell asleep



  • Loss of consciousness


Yes


Yes


Yes


1 AM-5 AM


No


Yes


AZ


C−


Reasonable and prudent speed


Vehicular homicide


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fell asleep


Yes


No, but intermediate license stage


Yes


12 AM-5 AM curfew


No


Yes


AR


C


Careless driving


Misdemeanor version of negligent homicide


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigued


Yes, but limited


Yes


No


Yes


Yes


CA


C−


Moving violation


Vehicular manslaughter


Yes


Yes


Sleep apnea


Narcolepsy


Yes


Yes




  • Sleepy/Fatigued


No


Yes Yes


11 PM-5 AM


Yes


Yes


CO


C


Careless Driving


Careless driving caused death


No


No


Yes




  • Asleep at the wheel



  • Driver fatigue


No


Yes


Yes


12 AM-5 AM curfew


Yes


Yes


CT


D


General statutes; Most likely a moving or other type violation


Misconduct with a motor vehicle or negligent homicide


Yes


Yes


Sleep apnea


Narcolepsy


Yes


Yes




  • Fell Asleep


No


Yes


Yes


11 PM-5 AM curfew


No


Yes


DE


C−


Inattentive driving


Vehicular homicide (if negligent)


Inattentive driving (if not negligent)


Yes


No


Yes


Yes




  • Fatigued/Asleep


No


Yes


Yes


10 PM-6 AM curfew


No


Yes


DC


C−


Failure to pay full time and attention


Manslaughter or second degree murder


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigued



  • Apparently asleep


Yes


Yes


Yes


Sep-Jun: Mon-Thu


11 PM-6 AM


Fri-Sat


12 AM-6 AM


Jul-Aug: everyday


12 AM-6 AM


No


No


FL


C


Careless driving


Would only charge a moving or other violation that contributed to the crash.


Yes


No


No


Physicians cannot be prosecuted.


Yes




  • Fatigue/Asleep


Yes


Yes


Yes


11 PM-6 AM curfew


No, but it is mentioned


Yes


GA


C−


Distracted driving or whatever other violation that may have resulted from the occurrence.


2nd Degree vehicular homicide


Yes


No


Yes


Yes




  • Apparently fell asleep


Yes


Yes


Yes


12 AM-6 AM curfew


No


Yes


HI


F


No response


No response


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigue


No response


Yes


Yes


11 PM-5 AM curfew


No response


No


ID


C


Inattentive driving


Manslaughter


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Asleep/Drowsy



  • Fatigued


Yes


Yes


Yes


“Sunsetsunrise.”


No


Yes


IL


C


Improper lane usage, failure to reduce speed to avoid an accident


Improper lane usage, failure to reduce speed to avoid an accident


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Asleep/Fainted



  • Fatigued


No


Yes


Yes


10 PM-6 AM curfew


No


Yes


IN


C−


Reckless driving


Reckless driving or involuntary manslaughter


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Driver asleep or fatigued


No


Yes


Yes


Sun-Thu


11 PM-5 AM


Fri & Sat


1 AM-5 AM


No


Yes


IA


F


No charge


No charge


No


No


No


Yes




  • Asleep, fainted, fatigued, etc.


No


Yes


Yes


12:30 AM-5 AM


No


Yes


KS


C


Failure to maintain a single lane or reckless driving


Anything up to vehicular manslaughter


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fell asleep


No response


Yes


No curfew


No, but it is mentioned.


Yes


KY


C−


Moving violation to reckless driving depending upon the severity of the crash and other factors.


Charge could be anything from reckless driving to manslaughter depending upon the severity of the crash and other factors.


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigue



  • Fell asleep



  • Lost consciousness/fainted


Yes, but minimal


Yes


Yes


12 AM-6 AM


No


Yes


LA


D


Reckless driving or careless operation


Vehicular homicide


Yes


No


No


Physicians cannot be sued if they do report.


Yes




  • Fatigued


No


Some local training, but not state wide.


Yes


Yes


11 PM-5 AM curfew


No


Yes


ME


C−


No charge


No charge


Yes


Yes


Sleep apnea


Cataplexy


Narcolepsy


Yes


Yes




  • Asleep



  • Fatigued


No


Yes


Yes


12 AM-5 AM curfew


Yes


Yes


MD


C+


Negligent Driving


Manslaughter


Yes No


No, but does call for discretionary reporting for “disorders characterized by lapses of consciousness“


Yes




  • Fatigue


Yes


Yes


Yes


12 AM-5 AM curfew


Yes


Yes


MA


C+


Negligent operation or operating to endanger


Motor vehicle homicide or negligent operation


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigued/Asleep


Yes


Yes


Yes


12 AM-5 AM for learners permit (under 18)


12:30 AM-5 AM Junior


Operator, ages 16.5-18


No, but it is mentioned.


Yes


MI


C+


Reckless driving, careless driving, felonious driving


Negligent homicide or manslaughter


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigue



  • Asleep


Yes, but limited and sporadic


Yes


Yes


12 AM-5 AM curfew


Yes


Yes


MN


C


Inattentive driving, careless driving, reckless driving


Criminal vehicular operation (if gross negligence)


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigue


No


Yes


Yes


12 AM-5 AM curfew


Yes


Yes


MS


B−


Reckless driving or careless driving


Homicide, excusable homicide, grounds for suspension/revocation of licenses


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fell asleep, fainted, or fatigued


Yes


Yes


Yes


10 PM-6 AM curfew


Yes


Yes


MO


D+


Careless and imprudent driving


Involuntary manslaughter, 2nd degree (if proven negligent)


Yes, but up for interpretation (not explicit).


No


No


Physicians are immune from prosecution.


No


Includes box for physical impairment, which could from fatigue.


No


Yes


Yes


1 AM-5 AM curfew


Yes


Yes


MT


C


Careless driving, reckless driving, or negligent homicide


Negligent homicide


Yes


Yes Narcolepsy


No


Voluntary reporting


Yes




  • Fell asleep, fainted, etc.


Yes


Yes


Yes


11 PM-5 AM curfew


Yes


Yes


NE


D


Careless or reckless driving


Motor vehicle homicide


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigued/Sleep


Yes, but minimal


Yes


Yes


12 AM-6 AM curfew


No


No


NV


D+


No charge


Vehicular homicide


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigued/Asleep


No


Yes


Yes


10 PM-6 AM curfew


No


Yes


NH


D


Negligent driving or reckless operation


Negligent homicide


No


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigue



  • Asleep


No


Yes


Yes


1 AM-5 AM curfew


No


No


NJ


C+


Reckless driving or careless driving


Death by auto or vessel (criminal homicide statute applies if there is proof that the defendant fell asleep while driving without sleep for a period in excess of 24 consecutive hours – “Maggie’s Law”)


Yes


No


Yes


Yes




  • Fatigue


No


Yes


Yes


12 AM-5 AM curfew


No


Yes


NM


D+


Careless driving


Vehicular homicide or great bodily harm by careless driving


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigue/Asleep


No


Yes


Yes


12 AM-5 AM curfew


No


Yes


NY


C+


Moved from lane unsafely


Moved from lane unsafely


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigue/drowsy



  • Fell asleep


No


Yes


Yes


9 PM-5 AM curfew


Yes


Yes


NC


C+


Careless driving, reckless driving


Misdemeanor, death by motor vehicle


Yes


Yes


Narcolepsy


Cataplexy


No


Yes




  • Fatigue



  • Fell asleep, fainted, loss of conciousness


Yes


Yes


Yes


9 PM-5 AM curfew


No response


Yes


ND


D+


Failure to drive with due care


Reckless endangerment


Yes


No


No


Physicians immune from legal prosecution.


Yes




  • Fatigue



  • Asleep


No


No


No


No


Yes


OH


C+


Failing to maintain reasonable control of your automobile


Vehicular manslaughter or aggravated vehicular assault


Yes


No


No


Yes




  • Fatigue/Asleep



  • Fell asleep, fainted, fatigued, etc.


Yes


Yes


Yes


12-6 AM for 16-yr olds


1-5 AM for 17-yr-olds


Yes


Yes


OK


C−


Failure to devote time and attention, probably failure to operate vehicle properly


Negligent homicide and manslaughter


Yes


No


No


Yes


Driver/Pedestrian Condition:




  • Very tired



  • Sleepy


Unsafe/Unlawful Contributing Factors:




  • Apparently sleepy