Safety of “Bridging” With Eptifibatide for Patients With Coronary Stents Before Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Surgery




Patients with previously implanted coronary stents are at risk for stent thrombosis if dual-antiplatelet therapy is prematurely discontinued. Bridging with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor has been advocated as an alternative, with few supporting data. The aim of this study was to determine the safety of such a strategy by retrospectively analyzing bleeding in 100 consecutive patients with previously implanted coronary stents who were bridged to surgery with eptifibatide after discontinuing thienopyridine therapy. A propensity-matched control comparison was performed for a subgroup of 71 patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery. Blood transfusions were required in 65% in the bridged group versus 66% in the control group (p = 0.86). The mean numbers of units transfused were 4.84 ± 6.93 and 3.65 ± 7.46, respectively (p >0.25). Rates of return to the operating room for bleeding or tamponade were 10% and 2.9%, respectively (p = 0.085). Increased rates of transfusion were noted for patients who received concomitant aspirin and/or intravenous heparin infusion. In conclusion, there does not appear to be any increase in the need for blood transfusions or rate of return to the operating room for patients being bridged with eptifibatide when thienopyridines are discontinued in the perioperative period, but concomitant use of additional antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents may increase transfusions and delays to surgery. Clinicians who are considering this strategy must weigh the risks of stent thrombosis versus bleeding.


Stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare but catastrophic event that usually occurs <30 days after stent implantation and is associated with a mortality rate of 9% to 45%. Cases of late and very late ST have been described, particularly in the era of drug-eluting stents (DES). The most important predictor of ST is premature cessation of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAT). Current guidelines recommend 12 months of DAT for DES and ≥1 month for bare-metal stents. Additionally, elective surgeries should be postponed until DAT is complete, and aspirin therapy should be continued throughout surgery when possible. Despite these recommendations, 4% to 5% of patients who have DES undergo noncardiac surgery in the first year after stent implantation. Case reports and anecdotal evidence suggest that the risk for ST can be minimized through the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors while thienopyridine therapy is discontinued in the perioperative period. We sought to evaluate the safety of this strategy with respect to bleeding outcomes given the paucity of data available.


Methods


Two groups of patients were included in this study. The first group was identified retrospectively using our pharmacy database and consisted of 100 consecutive patients at Cleveland Clinic from January 2008 to August 2010 who had previously implanted coronary stents and were bridged to surgery using eptifibatide, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, after discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy. Patients who were bridged to cardiovascular surgery were included in a model to create a propensity-matched analysis. The second group consisted of 492 potential controls identified from the Cleveland Clinic Cardiovascular Information Registry, a prospectively collected registry of all cardiovascular surgeries at Cleveland Clinic. Potential controls underwent cardiac surgery from January 2008 to December 2010, discontinued thienopyridine therapy >5 days before surgery, did not receive perioperative glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and had previously implanted coronary stents. Electronic and paper charts were reviewed for each of the 100 subjects in the bridging group by 2 independent reviewers. Reporting discrepancies were reviewed and adjudicated by a third reviewer. Similar data were obtained for the control group by extracting information from the Cardiovascular Information Registry database. The 2 matched groups were compared to evaluate outcomes. The Cleveland Clinic institutional review board approved the study.


Patients in the bridged group discontinued thienopyridine therapy (either clopidogrel or prasugrel) before surgery. An infusion of eptifibatide was used to provide platelet inhibition while patients were not receiving thienopyridine therapy, which was stopped 6 to 12 hours before surgery. After surgery, patients were either restarted on thienopyridines or temporarily placed back on eptifibatide infusion, with eventual thienopyridine resumption. Decisions regarding the timing of thienopyridine discontinuation before surgery, initiation of the eptifibatide infusion and admission for bridging, and how to restart thienopyridine therapy after surgery were determined by the individual practices of the patient’s physicians. Patients in the matched control cohort did not receive any thienopyridine therapy within ≥5 days of surgery. All continued to receive aspirin therapy (dose determined by treating physician) through surgery and received similar preoperative and postoperative care, with the exception that they did not receive any perioperative eptifibatide. For patients in the 2 groups, all concomitant medications, including anticoagulants, were determined by the treating physicians’ discretion and were often influenced by co-morbidities such as atrial fibrillation and mechanical valves.


The primary end point was the transfusion of units of blood during the hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included transfusion of units of platelets or fresh frozen plasma and major adverse cardiac events such as death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and ischemic stroke. Deaths were classified as cardiac (including death from undetermined cause) and noncardiac. Myocardial infarction was defined as a clinical event consistent with myocardial ischemia with an increase in serum troponin T or creatine kinase-MB concentration >2 times the upper limit of normal with or without ST-segment deviation ≥1 mm or T-wave flattening or inversion on electrocardiography. Urgent revascularization was defined as the need for coronary intervention or bypass surgery on the basis of evidence of myocardial ischemia. Ischemic stroke was defined by the presence of a neurologic deficit secondary to infarction of central nervous system tissue with or without radiographic confirmation. Secondary bleeding end points included the presence of a bleeding complication such as intracranial hemorrhage (neurologic deficit with radiographic evidence of hemorrhage), intraocular hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding (defined by clinical or endoscopic evidence), bleeding requiring return to the operating room (defined by the need to keep the wound open after surgery or the presence of bleeding on reexploration), severe epistaxis (defined by bleeding requiring a blood transfusion, resulting in a surgical delay, requiring a specialized intervention to treat, or requiring discontinuation or decreased dose of eptifibatide; minor epistaxis cases were excluded), surgical wound bleeding or hematoma (defined by bleeding requiring a blood transfusion, requiring discontinuation or decreased dose of eptifibatide or access site hematomas resulting in a delay of surgery). Our study was not powered to detect a statistical significant difference in secondary end points (bleeding or ischemic); therefore, secondary end points were collected only for descriptive analysis of the unmatched 100 bridged patients.


All continuous variables were summarized as means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges. All categorical data were summarized by the percentage of nonmissing data. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to develop a parsimonious model identifying factors that were associated using eptifibatide as a bridging strategy. This model was augmented with additional patient factors to form the propensity model and calculate propensity scores. Patients were then matched on the basis of the propensity score to form a matched subgroup for analyses. The greedy matching algorithm was used to match a case with a control with the nearest propensity score. The largest distance to be considered as a valid match was 0.1. Distance was calculated as the absolute case minus the control difference in propensity score. Group comparisons for categorical variables were made using chi-square tests. Continuous variables were compared between groups using Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test.




Results


Of the 100 patients who were bridged, most had DES previously implanted in the left anterior descending artery (32.7%) and underwent elective surgery (86.9%). Table 1 lists baseline characteristics of study participants in the bridged, unmatched group. Concomitant medical therapy included aspirin (62%) and heparin infusion (30%). Of the 100 patients who were bridged, 7 ultimately did not undergo surgery (5 of the 7 were intended to have cardiovascular surgery and 2 to have noncardiovascular surgery). In the matched analysis, the bridged group consisted of 71 patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery. A parsimonious model was developed using patient characteristics from the bridged group and potential control group (C statistic = 0.692). Logistic regression identified a history of cardiac surgery, patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and lower preoperative creatinine as being significantly associated with the bridged group. The parsimonious model was augmented using other patient baseline characteristics (C statistic = 0.753). Using greedy matching from the pool of 492 potential control cases described previously, 68 matches were found for 68 of the 71 bridged patients, leaving 3 unmatched cases ( Figure 1 ). An overlaid mirrored propensity histogram plot stratified by the bridged group and the control group before and after matching demonstrates a more similar distribution of propensity scores between groups after matching ( Figure 2 ). The standardized differences for selected patient characteristics before matching and after matching were used to generate the covariate balance plot ( Figure 3 ). There were no significant differences in either the variables used for the construction of the propensity model or baseline characteristics after matching seen between the 2 matched groups ( Table 2 ).



Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the unmatched bridged group (n = 100)


































































































































Variable Value
Age (years) 63.2 ± 10.58
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 30 ± 6.64
Men 77 (77%)
White 88 (88%)
Active smoker 20 (20%)
Hypertension 95 (95%)
Hyperlipidemia 96 (96%)
Diabetes mellitus 36 (36%)
Previous myocardial infarction 55 (55%)
Peripheral arterial disease 11 (11%)
Previous stroke or transient ischemic attack 8 (8%)
Previous open-heart surgery 45 (45%)
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) 1.0 ± 0.37
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 12.9 ± 3.26
Platelets (g/dl) 212.7 ± 65.68
Ejection fraction (%) 49.7 ± 11.67
Bare-metal stent 11 (11%)
DES 89 (89)%
Noncardiovascular surgery 22 (22%)
Cardiovascular surgery 71 (71%)
CABG 43% (43%)
CABG and valve surgery 14% (14%)
Valve surgery 9% (9%)
Myectomy and valve surgery 2% (2%)
Left ventricular assist device surgery 2% (2%)
Heart transplantation 1% (1%)
Time from PCI to surgery (days)
Median 118
Mean 156.8 ± 154.1
Range 7–906
IQR 62–196
Days off thienopyridine (days)
Median 6
Mean 7.4 ± 3.4
Range 2–18
IQR 5–9
Duration of eptifibatide therapy (days)
Median 5
Mean 5.3 ± 2.7
Range 0.5–16
IQR 3–6

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as number (percentage), except as indicated.

IQR = interquartile range.



Figure 1


Study flow diagram of participants. CV = cardiovascular.



Figure 2


Mirrored histogram of distribution of propensity scores for the control group (bars above zero line) and for the bridged group (bars below zero line) . Matched patient pairs (darkened area) cover the complete spectrum of cases.



Figure 3


Covariate balance description before and after matching between the control and bridged groups. Percentage standardized differences between the control and bridged groups (x axis) are shown. AV = aortic valve; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MV = mitral valve; N = no; NYHA = New York Heart Association; Preop = preoperative; regurg = regurgitation; TV = tricuspid valve; Y = yes.


Table 2

Baseline characteristics of matched bridged and control groups























































































Variable Bridged Group Control Group p Value
(n = 68) (n = 68)
Age (years) 64.3 ± 10.3 64.9 ± 12.8 0.46
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 29.2 ± 5.98 28.9 ± 5.8 0.81
Men 52 (76%) 49 (72%) 0.56
White 62 (91%) 64 (94%) 0.51
Active smoker 46 (65%) 44 (68%) 0.72
Hypertension 60 (88%) 61 (90%) 0.78
Diabetes mellitus 21 (31%) 22 (32%) 0.85
Previous myocardial infarction 42 (62%) 41 (60%) 0.86
Peripheral arterial disease 10 (15%) 8 (12%) 0.61
Previous stroke or transient ischemic attack 2 (3%) 7 (10%) 0.09
Previous open-heart surgery 35 (51%) 35 (51%) 1.0
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) 1.09 ± 0.46 1.18 ± 0.85 0.62
Hemoglobin (g/dl) 13.2 ± 1.69 12.2 ± 2.39 0.36
Platelets (g/dl) 172 ± 33.1 198 ± 61 0.19
Ejection fraction (%) 40.8 ± 10.2 47.4 ± 14.5 0.21

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or as number (percentage).


Among the original 100 patients in the bridged group, the mean decrease in hemoglobin during the index hospitalization was 4.6 ± 2.3 g/dl. Transfusion data for the 100 bridged, unmatched cohort and propensity-matched analysis are listed in Tables 3 and 4 respectively. Of the 100 patients bridged, there was 1 intracranial hemorrhage, 4 cases of severe epistaxis, 4 cases of surgical wound bleeding or hematoma, 8 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, and 10 patients requiring return to the operating room for bleeding. Eptifibatide infusions were discontinued prematurely in 6 patients, 5 because of bleeding and 1 because of thrombocytopenia. Of the 5 patients who required early cessation of eptifibatide for bleeding, 3 resulted in cancelations of surgery (1 case of intracranial bleeding and 2 cases of gastrointestinal bleeding) and 2 had postponement in the surgical date (1 case of gastrointestinal bleeding and 1 case of a groin hematoma). One additional patient had severe epistaxis that resolved with a lower dose of eptifibatide, resulting in postponement in the surgical date. Rates of cardiac tamponade and return to the operating room are listed in Table 4 for the propensity-matched analysis.


Dec 7, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Safety of “Bridging” With Eptifibatide for Patients With Coronary Stents Before Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access