Safety and One-Year revascularization outcome of excimer laser ablation therapy in treating in-stent restenosis of femoropopliteal arteries: A retrospective review from a single center




Abstract


Background


Treatment of in-stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal (FP) arteries is challenging with a high rate of restenosis. Excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) has a theoretical advantage of ablating restenotic tissue and reducing or delaying the need for repeat revascularization. We present a retrospective analysis from our center on the outcomes of ELA in the treatment of in-stent restenosis of the FP arteries.


Methods


Demographic, clinical, angiographic and procedural data were collected on all patients that underwent ELA for in-stent restenosis from February 2005 to April 2010 at a single medical center. Major adverse events and one-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were obtained by reviewing of medical records. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for TLR were plotted.


Results


40 consecutive patients (mean age 67.7 ± 9.0 years, 57.5% males) were included and followed for 1 year. Adjunctive balloon angioplasty was performed in 100% at a mean pressure of 12.4 ± 2.9 atm. Acute procedural success (< 30% angiographic residual narrowing) occurred in 92.5% of patients. Embolic filter protection (EFP) was used in 57.5% of patients. Bailout stenting was 50.0%. Macrodebris was noted in 65.2% of filters. The following adverse events were reported: distal embolization (DE) requiring treatment 2.5% (1 patient with no EFP); planned minor amputation 2.6%, planned major amputation 2.6%, total death 7.7% (all cardiac related). One perforation occurred treated successfully with stenting and balloon inflation. At one year, TLR and TVR occurred in 48.7% and 48.7% respectively.


Conclusion


ELA has an overall favorable acute result in treating in-stent restenosis of the FP arteries. At one year TLR and TVR remain clinically significant. DE also occurs significantly with ELA and is effectively prevented with EFP.



Introduction


Several studies have shown that stenting of the femoropopliteal artery (FP) leads to higher long term patency and less target lesion revascularization (TLR) . Stenting however, has several disadvantages including a continued high rate of restenosis and stent fractures . Treatment of these in-stent restenotic (ISR) lesions has a high procedural success rate but distal embolization (DE), the need for additional stenting and recurrent restenosis remain prevalent . Several methods have been proposed to treat in-stent FP lesions including plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) , PolarCath (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass) cryoplasty , cutting balloons , drug-eluting self-expanding stents (Zilver X) (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) , atherectomy with (Rotarex S) (Staub Medical AG, Wangs, Switzerland) or without (SilverHawk) (Covidien, Mansfield, MA) embolectomy, and laser ablation (Excimer laser) (Spectranetics, Colorado Springs, Co, USA) with adjunctive covered stents (Viabahn) (W.L. Gore and Associates, Newark, DE) .


Debulking of in-stent restenotic FP lesions have been attempted to reduce restenotic tissue burden and theoretically delay or reduce the rate of repeat revascularization. The off label use of SilverHawk atherectomy (Covidien, Mansfield, MA) in these lesions has been shown to have high procedural success but skills and techniques of the operator are important to avoid complications . To our knowledge there are no published randomized data to date on angioplasty versus stenting or debulking (with the SilverHawk or the Excimer laser) of in-stent restenotic FP lesions.


Coronary studies have shown that laser effectively ablates restenotic tissue and thrombus, commonly found in occlusive in-stent restenosis of FP lesions . Excimer laser also suppresses platelet aggregation and therefore potentially reduces the chance of platelet mediated thrombotic reocclusion . Although acute results appear to be satisfactory in ablating restenotic tissue, the long term outcome has been variable and may be related to the extent of tissue debulking . In this study, we evaluate the acute procedural and long term outcome of ISR FP lesions treated with the excimer laser. Secondary endpoints included the safety of the laser within stented segments, bail-out stenting and distal embolization.





Methods


457 patients with FP disease were treated by 2 operators at our medical center from February 2005 to April 2010. Patients were included if their index lesions were restenotic, in-stent and were only in the FP arteries. Patients were excluded if they had de novo lesions or non FP segments treated during the index procedure or if they were treated with a non excimer laser atherectomy device. There were no prespecified guidelines to the choice of the device which was based on operator’s judgment.


Demographics, clinical, procedural and angiographic variables were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective peripheral vascular database developed at our institution. One-year follow up was achieved on all patients by reviewing medical records by a dedicated research coordinator. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).


In-hospital and 1-year major adverse events including amputation (major and minor, planned and unplanned), death, vessel perforation, distal embolization (as captured by an embolic filter or distally embolized and requiring further treatment with pharmacologic or mechanical means), major bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, access complications, acute renal failure, and acute or subacute vessel closure. Major bleeding was defined as a drop of > 3 gm/dl Hb with a clear source of bleed, retroperitoneal bleed, or intracranial bleed. Acute renal failure was defined as an increase in creatinine within 48–72 h of the procedure by > 0.5 mg per dl. The Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC I) was used to classify lesion complexity.


The primary effectiveness endpoint was acute procedural success defined as obtaining angiographically less than 30% residual narrowing respectively with no serious adverse events at the end of the procedure . Secondary endpoints included acute device success defined as a residual narrowing of < 50% by the ELA device alone and before adjunctive treatment, DE, clinically driven TLR and TVR at one year based on symptom recurrence, ankle brachial indices (ABI) and Rutherford–Becker class at one month, 6 months and one year in TLR-free patients, death, and amputation. Patients were followed up at approximately 1 month, 6 month and one year intervals in the office. Follow-up ABI testing was not part of a mandatory protocol but was generally done on the majority of patients.


Descriptive analysis was done on all variables. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD and dichotomous variables as percentages. Kaplan–Meier survival curve for TLR was plotted.





Methods


457 patients with FP disease were treated by 2 operators at our medical center from February 2005 to April 2010. Patients were included if their index lesions were restenotic, in-stent and were only in the FP arteries. Patients were excluded if they had de novo lesions or non FP segments treated during the index procedure or if they were treated with a non excimer laser atherectomy device. There were no prespecified guidelines to the choice of the device which was based on operator’s judgment.


Demographics, clinical, procedural and angiographic variables were retrospectively reviewed from a prospective peripheral vascular database developed at our institution. One-year follow up was achieved on all patients by reviewing medical records by a dedicated research coordinator. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).


In-hospital and 1-year major adverse events including amputation (major and minor, planned and unplanned), death, vessel perforation, distal embolization (as captured by an embolic filter or distally embolized and requiring further treatment with pharmacologic or mechanical means), major bleeding, myocardial infarction, stroke, access complications, acute renal failure, and acute or subacute vessel closure. Major bleeding was defined as a drop of > 3 gm/dl Hb with a clear source of bleed, retroperitoneal bleed, or intracranial bleed. Acute renal failure was defined as an increase in creatinine within 48–72 h of the procedure by > 0.5 mg per dl. The Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC I) was used to classify lesion complexity.


The primary effectiveness endpoint was acute procedural success defined as obtaining angiographically less than 30% residual narrowing respectively with no serious adverse events at the end of the procedure . Secondary endpoints included acute device success defined as a residual narrowing of < 50% by the ELA device alone and before adjunctive treatment, DE, clinically driven TLR and TVR at one year based on symptom recurrence, ankle brachial indices (ABI) and Rutherford–Becker class at one month, 6 months and one year in TLR-free patients, death, and amputation. Patients were followed up at approximately 1 month, 6 month and one year intervals in the office. Follow-up ABI testing was not part of a mandatory protocol but was generally done on the majority of patients.


Descriptive analysis was done on all variables. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± SD and dichotomous variables as percentages. Kaplan–Meier survival curve for TLR was plotted.





Results


Of 457 FP treated patients, 123 were treated with excimer laser. 83 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria (de novo lesions = 67; devices used other than balloon or stent post laser = 7; use of balloon or an atherectomy/embolectomy device before laser = 2; non-index procedure in patients treated with 2 separate procedures with the laser in the same FP segment = 7). 40 patients met the inclusion criteria and formed the cohort of this study.


Demographic and clinical variables are presented in Table 1 . Patients had multiple comorbidities with a high frequency of hypertension (85.0%), hyperlipidemia (80.0%), smoking history (82.5%) and diabetes (47.5%). The majority of the patients were claudicants (73.7%) and with subacute ( < 1 month, > 24 h) (55%) or chronic symptoms (> 1 month) (40.0%). Angiographic and procedural variables are presented in Table 2 . The mean lesion length was 210.4 ± 104.0 mm and 47.5% of lesions were TASC D. Procedural and device successes were achieved in 92.5% and 52.0% of patients respectively. Bail out stenting was performed in 50% of patients. Macroembolization occurred in 65.2% of filters. One patient with DE required additional treatment successfully.



Table 1

Demographics and clinical characteristics.
































































































n mean ± SD
Age 40 67.7 ± 9.0
Body Mass Index 39 28.9 ± 5.6
Baseline ABI of treated Leg at rest 35 0.63 ± 0.2
Baseline ABI of treated leg with exercise 25 0.38 ± 0.2
Percentage
Gender-male 23/40 57.5
Prior percutaneous coronary intervention 22/40 55.0
Prior coronary bypass surgery 9/40 22.5
Previous myocardial infarction 7/40 17.5
Family History Premature CAD 14/40 35.0
Renal Failure (Creatinine > 2.0) 2/40 5.0
Chronic obstructive lung disease 1/40 2.5
Hypertension 34/40 85.0
Cerebrovascular disease 9/40 22.5
Hyperlipidemia 32/40 80.0
history of smoking 33/40 82.5
Diabetes Mellitus 19/40 47.5
Onset of symptoms-Subacute 22/40 55.0
Onset of symptoms-chronic 16/40 40.0
Claudicants (Rutherford Becker 1–3) 28/38 73.7
Limb ischemia (Rutherford Becker 4–5) 10/38 26.3

ABI = ankle brachial index.


Table 2

Angiographic and procedural characteristics.
































































































































































n mean ± SD
Number of runoff vessels of treated leg 40 1.7 ± 1.0
Prestenosis severity (%) 40 93.9 ± 8.9
Poststenosis severity (%) 40 14.0 ± 13.0
Lesion length (mm) 35 210.4 ± 104.0
Lesion diameter (mm) 40 5.6 ± 0.7
Balloon pressure (mmHg) 39 12.4 ± 2.9
Laser parameters
Fluency (mJ/mm 2 ) 21 56.2 ± 13.6
Repetitions (Hz) 27 60.0 ± 20.6
Total Pulses 24 11476 ± 9063
Total laser time (s) 24 188.6 ± 138.6
Laser catheter size (mm) 38 2.2 ± 0.3
Percentage
Intraprocedural anticoagulant-bivalirudin 39/40 97.5
Adjunctive Balloon use 40/40 100.0
Bailout Stent 20/40 50.0
Reason for Bailout stent
> 30% residual 15/20 75.0
> 30% residual and type C or higher dissection 2/20 10.0
Investigator discretion 2/10 10.0
Perforation 1/20 5.0
Device success (< 50% residual with laser alone) 13/25 52.0
Procedural success (< 30% residual at end of treatment) 37/40 92.5
In-hospital major adverse events 0/40 0
TASC type
FP-B 5/40 12.5
FP-C 16/40 40
FP-D 19/40 47.5
Laser type
Elite 30/35 85.7
Booster or tandem 5/35 14.3
Embolic filter use 23/40 57.5
Debris
None 6/23 26.1
Microembolization 2/23 8.7
Macroembolization 15/23 65.2
Distal Embolization requiring treatment a 1/40 2.5

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 16, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Safety and One-Year revascularization outcome of excimer laser ablation therapy in treating in-stent restenosis of femoropopliteal arteries: A retrospective review from a single center

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access