Reproducibility of Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Noncompaction




Background


Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) cardiomyopathy is variably defined by numerous trabeculations, deep intertrabecular recesses, and noncompacted-to-compacted (NC/C) ratio >2. Limited studies exist on the reproducibility of diagnosing LVNC.


Methods


Clinical records of patients diagnosed with LVNC by echocardiography were reviewed. Blinded review of the index echocardiogram for all patients and a 1:1 match without LVNC was performed independently by two observers, measuring the number of trabeculations and the NC/C ratio.


Results


A total of 104 patients with LVNC were included in the study, 52 with no congenital heart disease (NCongHD) and 52 with congenital heart disease (CongHD). The duration of follow-up was 7.2 years (range, 0.5–23.1 years) for NCongHD and 8.2 years (range, 0–33.3 years) for CongHD. Agreement between observers in determining zero to three versus more than three trabeculations was 59% (NCongHD) and 73% (CongHD). Agreement in measuring an NC/C ratio ≤ 2 versus > 2 was 79% (NCongHD) and 74% (CongHD). Agreement with the original reader in diagnosing LVNC was 67%. There was no association between the number of trabeculations or the NC/C ratio and the likelihood of a major event. Patients with moderate or severe left ventricular dysfunction at the time of diagnosis were more likely to undergo cardiac transplantation or die compared with those with normal or mild dysfunction (NCongHD, 22% vs 0%, P = .01; CongHD, 39% vs 3%, P = .001).


Conclusions


The reproducibility of making measurements to diagnose LVNC by accepted criteria is poor. Heart transplantation and death are associated with significant ventricular dysfunction and not with increased trabeculations or NC/C ratios.


Left ventricular (LV) noncompaction (LVNC) has been recognized as a primary, genetic cardiomyopathy by the American Heart Association, though little consensus exists on the etiology, diagnostic criteria, incidence, or clinical outcomes associated with LVNC. Multiple diagnostic schema ( Figure 1 ) have been proposed since the original description, including the following three that are most widely used: (1) Jenni et al. , noncompacted-to-compacted (NC/C) ratio ≥ 2 measured in end-systole, no coexistent cardiac abnormalities, predominant localization to midlateral, apical, and midinferior walls, and deep perfused intertrabecular recesses; (2) Chin et al. , decreasing X/Y ratio from the papillary muscle to the apex measured in end-diastole (where X is the distance from the epicardial surface to the trough of the trabecular recess, and Y is the distance from the epicardial surface to the peak of trabeculation); and (3) Stöllberger et al ., more than three prominent trabeculations apical to the papillary muscle and surrounded by intertrabecular spaces perfused from the ventricular cavity. All of these criteria have been developed on the basis of relatively small numbers of patients with limited subsequent validation studies and no independent means of verification.




Figure 1


Illustration of measurements made in blinded review. (A) End-systolic assessment of noncompacted ( double-headed arrow ) to compacted ( single-headed arrow ) ratio per Jenni et al . (B) End-diastolic assessment of X ( single-sided arrow ) to Y ( double-sided arrow ) ratio per Chin et al . (C) Counting trabeculations ( dotted arrows ) per Stöllberger et al .


There is increasing recognition of significant overlap in echocardiographic findings in LVNC and other cardiomyopathies as well as the normal population. Associated mortality, cardiac transplantation rates, LV dysfunction, thromboembolic events, and arrhythmias vary greatly in the literature, as do risk factors attributed to such outcomes. The purposes of this study were to describe a large population of patients who have been diagnosed with LVNC by echocardiography and to determine interobserver reproducibility of making such a diagnosis and the measurements proposed by the various criteria. Risk factors for adverse outcomes, including heart transplantation and death, were assessed.


Methods


Identifying Cases


The records of all patients who received coded diagnoses of LVNC or excessive trabeculations by echocardiography from 1989 to 2006 at the Children’s Hospital of Boston were reviewed. Patients were included in the study if the index echocardiogram (on which the diagnosis of noncompaction was based) and at least one other echocardiogram were available for review. Patients with congenital heart disease (CongHD) and those with no congenital heart disease (NCongHD) were included in the study. The institutional review board for clinical research approved the use of patient medical records for this retrospective review. The following data were collected for each patient: demographics, age of diagnosis, length of follow-up, reason for cardiology referral, family history of cardiomyopathy, diagnosis of Barth syndrome, New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, thromboembolic events, heart transplantation, and death.


Diagnostic Studies


The index echocardiograms of all patients were reviewed for qualitative assessment of function, dilation, hypertrophy, and distribution of trabeculations. Ejection fraction (based on systolic and diastolic volume calculated as 5/6 × area × length) and shortening fraction were recorded when available from the original report. Function on the basis of ejection fraction was defined as normal (>55%), mildly depressed (45%–55%), moderately depressed (35%–45%), or severely depressed (<35%). Subsequent and prior echocardiograms were reviewed for functional changes, phenotypic changes (i.e., ventricular dilation or hypertrophy, by Z scores on the basis of body surface area), and changes in the distribution, number, and sizes of trabeculations. When available, fetal echocardiograms were also reviewed. The results of Holter monitors, looping and event recorders, and electrophysiologic studies were recorded for all patients. The rationale for the placement of a pacemaker or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was ascertained.


Identifying Controls


Patients described above given the diagnosis of LVNC by echocardiography are referred to as cases. A matching patient without LVNC, referred to as a control, was elicited for each case on the basis of the following criteria: (1) age (acceptable limits of match, <10% difference), (2) degree of LV dysfunction (on the basis of ejection fraction as categorized above), and (3) similarity of CongHD. Blinded reviews of the index echocardiogram for all cases and the matched control echocardiograms were performed by two observers. The following were recorded: number of trabeculations from the apical and parasternal views, NC/C ratio, X/Y ratio (Figure1), study quality score (1 = excellent, 2 = good, 3 = fair, 4 = poor, 5 = nondiagnostic), and qualitative opinion on the diagnosis of LVNC.


Statistical Analysis


The percentage agreement between the two observers and between each observer and the original report were calculated for the number of trabeculations and the NC/C ratio. Initially, the number of trabeculations was dichotomized as zero to three versus more than three, and the NC/C ratio was dichotomized as ≤2 versus >2; additional cut points were also explored. Using the original cut points of more than three for the number of trabeculations and >2 for the NC/C ratio, associations between diagnostic criteria and clinical outcomes, including heart transplantation and death, were evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. Similarly, associations between moderate or severe LV dysfunction and clinical outcomes were assessed using Fisher’s exact test.




Results


A total of 104 cases with LVNC were included in the study, 52 NCongHD and 52 CongHD. The median age of diagnosis of LVNC was 11.0 years (range, 0.0–19.1 years) and 1.8 years (range, 0.0–30.4 years) in the NCongHD and CongHD groups, respectively. The duration of follow-up was 7.2 years (range, 0.5–23.1 years) in the NCongHD group and 8.2 years (range, 0–33.3 years) in the CongHD group. The most frequent reasons for initial referral in the NCongHD group included arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, positive family history of cardiomyopathy, and murmur. Specific congenital cardiac lesions in the CongHD group are listed in Table 1 . Barth syndrome was diagnosed in four cases in the NCongHD group and none in the CongHD group. Positive family histories for cardiomyopathy were reported in 16 of 52 cases (30.8%) in the NCongHD group, including dilated ( n = 10), noncompaction ( n = 3), hypertrophic ( n = 1), and unspecified ( n = 2). In the CongHD group, three of 52 patients (5.7%) had family histories of cardiomyopathy, two with noncompaction and one with an unspecified cardiomyopathy.



Table 1

Congenital heart disease ( n = 52)





















































































Diagnosis n
ASD 6
VSD 6
Ebstein’s anomaly 6
Ebstein’s anomaly, VSD 1
VSD, ASD 3
VSD, ASD, subaortic stenosis 2
VSD, ASD, cor triatriatum dexter 1
VSD, subvalvar aortic stenosis 1
CoA 3
CoA, aortic stenosis 3
CoA, VSD 1
CoA, VSD, subaortic stenosis 1
CoA, VSD, supravalvar aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis 1
CoA, VSD, coronary artery fistula 1
Aortic stenosis 2
Subaortic stenosis 1
Hypoplastic left-heart syndrome variant 1
Valvar pulmonary stenosis 2
Pulmonary atresia, intact ventricular septum 1
Double-outlet right ventricle 2
Holmes heart 2
Tetralogy of Fallot 1
Complete common atrioventricular canal, total anomalous pulmonary venous return 1
Transitional atrioventricular canal 1
Coronary fistula 1
Vascular ring 1

CoA , Coarctation of the aorta; VSD , ventricular septal defect.


Imaging


Index echocardiograms were qualitatively reviewed for all 104 cases, as well as echocardiograms at noted points of change of function, dilation, or hypertrophy per report. In total, 295 echocardiograms were reviewed. Fetal echocardiograms were obtained in two of 52 (4%) and 15 of 52 (29%) cases in the NCongHD and CongHD groups, respectively. LV hypertrabeculation was noted in utero retrospectively in two cases with CongHD, and the remaining fetal studies were considered nondiagnostic for LVNC on report and repeat review. Changes in function from the initial to the last follow-up echocardiographic study for both groups are shown in Figure 2 . No case with normal or mildly depressed function at the beginning of the study had severe dysfunction at the end. Cases with severe dysfunction at the beginning of the study showed some improvement with time, more pronounced in the NCongHD group.




Figure 2


Changes in LV function for cases from initial echocardiogram ( large pie chart ) to last follow-up ( small pie charts ).


Initial echocardiograms were reviewed for the distribution of LV trabeculations according to standard myocardial segmentation and are listed in Table 2 . Phenotypic changes with time are listed in Table 3 and illustrated in Figure 3 . Changes in LV dilation and hypertrophy correlated with removal of shunt lesions or relief of obstructions in some, but not all, cases with CongHD. New development of LVNC compared to prior echocardiography was seen in three cases (CongHD group): two with left-sided obstructive lesions after endocardial fibroelastosis removal and one after ventricular septal defect closure and coarctation repair ( Figure 4 ).



Table 2

Distribution of trabeculations on initial echocardiographic study
























LV Segments Involved NCongHD
( n = 51)
CongHD
( n = 50)
Apical segments 51 49
Midinferior/inferolateral/anterolateral 38 30
Basal inferior/inferolateral/anterolateral 30 29
Mid or basal anterior/anteroseptal/inferoseptal 2 6

One index study in the NCongHD group and two in the Cong HD group were considered insufficient to evaluate the distribution of trabeculations.



Table 3

Change in phenotype over time
















































Phenotypic Change NCongHD
( n = 52)
CongHD
( n = 52)
LV dilation developed 8 8
LV dilation resolved 8 2
LV hypertrophy developed 0 5
LV hypertrophy resolved 2 1
Number of trabeculations increased 2 3
Height of trabeculations increased 3 2
Height of trabeculations decreased 0 4
New segments of hypertrabeculation developed 2 1
Hypertrabeculation developed 0 3
Hypertrabeculation resolved 0 1



Figure 3


(A-1, A-2) A child with Holmes heart who was noted to have increased distribution of trabeculations, trabecular height, and numbers of trabeculations over a 4-year period. (B-1, B-2) A child without CongHD and changing phenotype from hypertrophic to dilated over a 13-year period.



Figure 4


(A-1) A newborn with coarctation of the aorta and a ventricular septal defect before repair without evidence for LVNC. Three months after ventricular septal defect closure and arch repair, his myocardium changed in appearance (A-2) , consistent with hypertrabeculation. (B) An infant with critical aortic stenosis and aortic coarctation who underwent fetal balloon dilation of the aortic valve, coarctation repair in infancy, and endocardial fibroelastosis (EFE) resection at 22 months. After EFE resection, a new appearance of hypertrabeculation appeared (B-1) and then resolved (B-2) several years later without further intervention.


Rhythm Abnormalities


Arrhythmias were common in both groups (NCongHD, n = 18; CongHD, n = 19; Table 4 ), often with multiple arrhythmias presenting in an individual. Tachyarrhythmias were predominantly present at the diagnosis of LVNC, although in a few patients in the NCongHD group, they presented up to 5.7 years later. In the same group, ICDs were placed for the following indications: ventricular tachyarrhythmias ( n = 3), severe LV dysfunction ( n = 2, including one case with Barth syndrome), and 2:1 atrioventricular block with congenital long-QT syndrome ( n = 1) and a history of cardiac arrest. Pacemakers were placed in two cases with LV dysfunction for resynchronization therapy, one case with sick sinus syndrome, and the case mentioned above with atrioventricular block before ICD placement.



Table 4

Rhythm disturbances and interventions












































































Disturbance/Intervention NCongHD ( n = 52) CongHD ( n = 52)
Rhythm abnormalities
VT 12 6
Ventricular fibrillation 4 2
SVT 3 7
Atrial fibrillation 1 2
Atrial flutter 0 4
EAT 1 2
Sinus node dysfunction 1 5
Atrioventricular block 1 5
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome 6 4
Electrophysiologic interventions
ICD 6 3
Pacemaker 4 7
VT ablation 3 0
SVT ablation 3 3
EAT ablation 0 1
Atrial flutter ablation 0 1

EAT , Ectopic atrial tachycardia; SVT , supraventricular tachycardia; VT , ventricular tachycardia.

Case with 2:1 block and congenital long-QT syndrome.



In the CongHD group, atrial tachyarrhythmias generally presented before the diagnosis of LVNC (up to 22 years prior) and ventricular tachyarrhythmias presented at the time of diagnosis. ICDs were placed for ventricular tachycardia ( n = 1, atrial septal defect [ASD]), severe LV dysfunction ( n = 1, ASD), and a history of cardiac arrest ( n = 1, Ebstein’s anomaly). Pacemakers were placed in seven cases for symptomatic sinus bradycardia ( n = 2) and atrioventricular block ( n = 5). In three of seven (43%), pacemakers would not be expected for underlying heart disease (ASDs, n = 2; ventricular septal defect, n = 1).


NYHA Classification, Thromboembolic Events, Heart Transplantation, and Death


In the NCongHD cohort, five cases were reported to be in NYHA class IV, four of whom underwent heart transplantation a median of 2.3 months (range, 1.5–36 months) after LVNC diagnosis. The fifth patient with class IV symptoms had Barth syndrome and mild LV dysfunction at last follow-up. There was one cardiac death (one of 52 [2%]), which occurred before transplantation. There was one thromboembolic event in the cohort, a right middle cerebral artery stroke in a patient with severe LV dysfunction.


In the CongHD cohort, NYHA class was not ascertained, because it would be confounded by the underlying congenital lesion. Severe LV dysfunction at last follow-up was present in seven cases: three died in early infancy with minor CongHD (ASD, ventricular septal defect, and valvar pulmonary stenosis), three underwent heart transplantation within the first 3 years of life (valvar pulmonary stenosis, ASDs), and one was listed for heart transplantation (Ebstein’s anomaly). One other cardiac transplantation was performed in an 8-day-old infant with pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum, right ventricular–dependent coronary circulation, and moderate LV dysfunction. In total, cardiac transplantation was performed in four of 52 (8%), and cardiac-related death occurred in three of 52 (6%). Thrombi were noted in three cases: LV thrombus after in utero balloon dilation of aortic valve for critical aortic stenosis, renal artery thrombus in a newborn with aortic coarctation, and right ventricular outflow tract thrombus with embolus to the brain in a patient with severe Ebstein’s disease and severe LV dysfunction.


Case-Control Blinded Review


A blinded review of the index echocardiograms for all cases ( n = 104) and matched control echocardiograms ( n = 100) was performed by two observers. The patient with LVNC (the case) was identified correctly 67% of the time by both observers. Median and mean quality scores were 3 and 3.1 for observers 1 and 2 and 2.1 for observer 2. Although X and Y measurements were performed on each case and control at the level of the apex, papillary muscle, and mitral valve as described by Chin et al. , too many data points were unobtainable, making the analysis uninterpretable. Agreement between observers and the original report for various measurements of trabeculations and NC/C ratios is listed in Table 5 . Generally, agreement between observers was better than agreement between either observer and the report. Combining more than three trabeculations and an NC/C ratio > 2 yielded the best agreement between observers and observer and report (66%–76%). Further analysis was performed with increasing strictness of criteria (i.e., NC/C ratio > 2.2 or 2.4; more than four, five, six, seven, or eight trabeculations), with improving agreement between observers and worsening agreement with the report with respect to diagnosis of LVNC.



Table 5

Agreement between observers and original report in blinded review


































































Measured Parameter Percentage Agreement
NCongHD CongHD
Agreement between observers 1 and 2
Number of trabeculations 0–3 vs >3 (apical) 65 77
Number of trabeculations 0–3 vs >3 (parasternal) 53 69
NC/C ratio ≤ 2 vs > 2 (apical) 73 67
NC/C ratio ≤ 2 vs > 2 (parasternal) 85 82
Agreement between observer 1 and original report
Observer trabeculations 0–3 or >3 (apical) vs report LVNC or control 51 63
Observer trabeculations 0–3 or >3 (parasternal) vs report LVNC or control 51 57
Observer NC/C ratio ≤ 2 or > 2 (apical) vs report LVNC or control 24 36
Observer NC/C ratio ≤ 2 or > 2 (parasternal) vs report LVNC or control 15 14
Agreement between observer 2 and original report
Observer trabeculations 0–3 or >3 (apical) vs report LVNC or control 55 71
Observer trabeculations 0–3 or >3 (parasternal) vs report LVNC or control 57 75
Observer NC/C ratio ≤ 2 or > 2 (apical) vs report LVNC or control 12 38
Observer NC/C ratio ≤ 2 or > 2 (parasternal) vs report LVNC or control 0 8

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 11, 2018 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Reproducibility of Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Noncompaction

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access