Renal Function in a Patient with Acute Heart Failure and Volume Overload


Fig. 10.1

Forrest plots of worsening versus improved renal function, defined as a change in serum creatinine >0.3 mg/dL. The graph demonstrates the wide range of hazard ratios, both statistically significant and insignificant, which has led to the questioning of serum creatinine’s use as a valid surrogate marker for outcomes. (a) Hazard ratios in the setting of elevated serum creatinine. (b) Hazard ratios in the setting of decreasing serum creatinine



In contrast, elevations in Cr in the setting of hemoconcentration, which often occurs with more aggressive diuretic regimens, have been shown to lead to a substantially lower risk of mortality, owing to greater fluid and weight loss, greater reduction in right atrial and pulmonary arterial wedge pressures [40]. Similarly, when occurring in the setting of aggressive diuresis or during the introduction of RAAS blockade, there was a paradoxical association between rising Cr and improved outcomes [15]. Thus, Cr may not be a reliable prognosticating tool, and may lead to the exclusion of many beneficial AHF therapies (Fig. 10.1a, b, Table 10.1) [41].


Table 10.1

Hazard of all-cause mortality with worsening versus improving renal function in heart failure











































































Group


Year


Ref #


Study


HR, 95%CI


Worsening renal function


Brisco et al.


2016


15


Post-hoc analysis of the DOSE trial with 301 acute heart failure patients


1.17 (0.77–1.78)


Testani et al.


2010


40


Post-hoc analysis of the ESCAPE trial with 433 heart failure patients with ejection fraction <30% and elevated creatinine levels


1.40 (0.78–2.40)


Damman et al.


2007


38


Meta-analysis of 18,634 heart failure patients with worsening renal function


1.65 (1.42–1.88)


Smith et al.


2006


27


Meta-analysis of 80,098 hospitalized and non-hospitalized heart failure patients with renal impairment


1.56 (1.53–1.60)


Brisco et al.


2014


39


Post-hoc analysis of the INTERMACS registry with 3363 patients on mechanical support for heart failure with renal function followed up to 1 year post device implantation


1.63 (1.15–2.13)


Improving renal function


Brisco et al.


2016


15


Post-hoc analysis of the DOSE trial with 301 acute heart failure patients


2.52 (1.57–4.03)


Testani et al.


2010


40


Post-hoc analysis of the ESCAPE trial with 433 heart failure patients with ejection fraction <30% and elevated creatinine levels


0.38 (0.18–0.78)


de Silva et al.


2006


24


Observational prospective study of 1216 heart failure patients


0.80 (0.60–1.00)


Brisco et al.


2014


39


Post-hoc analysis of the INTERMACS registry with 3363 patients on mechanical support for heart failure with renal function followed up to 1 year post device implantation


1.64 (1.19–2.26)



Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, Ref reference, DOSE Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation, ESCAPE Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness; HR hazard ratio, INTERMACS Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support


Alternative Markers of Renal Function in Heart Failure


Due to the inability of Cr alone to accurately predict renal injury in the setting of AHF, several alternative markers of renal injury have been proposed that identify renal injury sooner and more reliably. Elevated levels of specific urinary markers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and interleukin-18 (IL-18), have been shown to correlate with renal injury and impairment in natriuresis and diuresis in patients with acute HF but did not necessarily predict AKI or persistent renal impairment [44]. In the ROSE (Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation) sub-study, urinary levels of NGAL, NAG (N-acetyl-β-d-glucosaminidase) and KIM-1 did not track with changes of either Cr or cystatin C [45]. Furthermore, WRF and rise in tubular injury biomarkers following aggressive diuresis was associated with a paradoxical trend toward improved outcomes [45]. Meanwhile, newer renal function biomarkers, such as insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2), have demonstrated a higher overall sensitivity and ability to differentiate between AKI and non-AKI conditions including CKD, when compared with NGAL or KIM-1, even though in this critical care study population only 17% patients have HF (Table 10.2) [46].


Table 10.2

Novel biomarkers for detection of renal injury

































Markers of acute kidney injury


Function


AUC, 95%CI


Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7)


Inducer of G1 cell cycle arrest


0.77


(0.71–0.82)


Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2)


Inducer of G1 cell cycle arrest


0.75


(0.70–0.80)


Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL)


Synthesized in renal tubular tissue and upregulated during kidney injury


0.66


(0.60–0.71)


Kidney injury molecule-1(KIM-1)


Transmembrane protein, upregulated during proximal tubular injury


0.66


(0.61–0.72)


Interleukin-18(IL-18)


Cytokine and mediator of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury


0.65


(0.60–0.71)



The univariate area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve was based on RIFLE I or F occurring between 12–36 hours after sample collection


AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval


Treatment Strategies When a Rise in Serum Creatinine Is Observed During Diuresis in Acute Heart Failure with a Focus on Renal Preservation


The pathogenesis of AHF centers around congestion, which ultimately leads to organ dysfunction via persistently elevated central venous pressures and hypoperfusion of the kidneys [47]. During severely decompensated AHF, markedly reduced renal blood flow and extremely elevated renal vascular resistance generates a drop in GFR without a compensatory activation of the RAAS that preserves perfusion to vital organs including the brain and heart via an increase in filtration fraction [48].


The current treatment of AHF with diuretics, which acts to reduce arterial volumes, predisposes patients with more severe heart failure exacerbations to elevations in Cr levels [48]. In order to address the issue of reduced intravascular volumes leading to elevations in Cr, several small studies have looked at the combination of hypertonic saline with high-dose loop diuretics to augment decongestion and its effects on mortality and readmissions rates. In a small, single-blinded study involving 107 patients with refractory congestive heart failure, the use of hypertonic saline along with high-dose loop diuretics was associated with lower mortality (45.3% versus 87% in conventional treatment), which was attributed to the instantaneous mobilization of fluids into the intravascular space via the increased oncotic pressure of hypertonic saline [49]. This combination of hypertonic saline with high-dose loop diuretics lead to an overall reduction in atrial natriuretic peptide, B-type natriuretic peptide, and immune-inflammatory markers and achieved more rapid weight reduction and reduced hospitalization duration and 30-day readmission rates [5052].


Another potential adjunct may be the use of serelaxin in the prevention of WRF. By acting as a vasodilator, serelaxin reduces end-organ damage by improving renovascular blood flow during AHF exacerbations, which may work to prevent diuretic-induced WRF [53]. Additionally, there is a rationale for the supplementation of thiamine to a patient on prolonged diuretic use. Loop diuretics, specifically furosemide, lead to increased urinary excretion of thiamine [54]. Thiamine supplementation was associated with an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction, which translated into improved cardiac function and urine output [55].


In patients with AHF and WRF, renal adjuvant therapy with the use of low-dose dopamine has been used to augment decongestion while preserving renal perfusion during diuresis, leading to more electrolyte homeostasis, reduced hospital lengths of stay and decreased rates of 30-day readmissions [56, 57]. However, in a large, multicenter, randomized study looking at a population with CKD, it was shown that the addition of low-dose dopamine to diuretic therapy did not lead to enhanced decongestion nor improvement in renal function when compared to isolated diuretic therapy [58].


Inappropriately elevated levels of arginine-vasopressin during AHF lead to increased water retention, contributing to both congestive symptoms and electrolyte abnormalities. Tolvaptan, a V2 receptor antagonist, blocks the antidiuretic effects of this hormone and leads to improved fluid excretion and improved renal function [59, 60]. Although useful in achieving additional diuresis, the use of tolvaptan was not associated improved long-term mortality benefits nor heart failure-related morbidity [60].


Diabetes is associated with a substantial risk for the development of renal disease [33, 61]. Inhibition of the sodium glucose transporter-2 (SGLT-2) promotes fluid excretion via blockage of glucose reabsorption in the proximal tubules and promoting glycosuria [62]. In addition to aiding with glucose control and body weight, treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure, progression of albuminuria, and loss of kidney function compared to placebo groups as well as a significant reduction in death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarctions, and non-fatal strokes (HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.75–0.97) [63].


An additional method for achieving diuresis in the setting of worsening Cr levels is to augment diuresis through the blockade of aldosterone via mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Via competitive binding of receptors at the aldosterone-dependent sodium-potassium exchange site in the distal convoluted tubules and collecting ducts, spironolactone increases sodium and free water excretion while retaining potassium. However when compared to placebo, upfront high-dose spironolactone (100 mg daily for 96 hours) for patients with acute HF was well tolerated but did not improve change in NT-proBNP levels, clinical congestion score, dyspnea assessment, net urine output, or net weight change [64].


Treatment Pearls for the Case Vignette


Loop diuretics remain the cornerstone of therapy for the management of AHF, with their appropriate use, as in the case vignette, leading to resolution of symptoms as well as achieving clinical and subclinical decongestion. Commonly, AHF patients develop elevations in Cr as a consequence of diuretic use, which has led to cautious use of this vital therapy. Numerous studies have shown however that the poor outcomes associated with WRF are actually attributable to baseline kidney dysfunction, with higher incidences and poor outcomes associated with more severe CKD. Given this fact, the use of Cr as a marker of prognosis in AHF may not be accurate without taking into account the overall clinical picture, specifically whether or not WRF is taking place in the setting of appropriate decongestion. Therefore, we are confident Mr. Y is ready for discharge.

Oct 30, 2020 | Posted by in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Renal Function in a Patient with Acute Heart Failure and Volume Overload

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access