Relationships in Lower Extremity Arterial Bypass Surgery


Volume–Outcome Relationships in Lower Extremity Arterial Bypass Surgery


Moxey PW, Hofman D, Hinchliffe RJ, et al (St George’s Vascular Inst, London, UK; St George’s Univ of London, UK) Ann Surg 256:1102-1107, 2012§



J. Black, MD



Evidence Ranking


B



Expert Rating


2



Abstract





Results


A total of 27,660 femoropopliteal bypass and 4161 femorodistal bypass procedures were identified.


As volume increased, in-hospital mortality after popliteal bypass decreased from 6.5% to 4.9% (P = 0.0045), with a corresponding odds ratio of 0.980 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.929–0.992; P = 0.014] for every increase of 50 patients per year. Major amputation decreased from 4.1% to 3.2% (P = 0.006) in high-volume hospitals, with a reduction in risk of 0.955 (95% CI, 0.928–0.983; P = 0.002) at 1 year.


For distal bypass, in-hospital mortality decreased from 9.8% to 5.5% (P = 0.004) and 1-year major amputation decreased from 25.4% to 18.2% (P < 0.001), with a corresponding odds ratio of 0.658 (95% CI, 0.517–0.838; P < 0.0001) as the volume increased.


An increase in the chance of revision surgery (10.6% vs 8.2%, P < 0.001) was seen with higher volume, with an increased odds ratio of 1.031 (95% CI, 1.005–1.057; P = 0.018).

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 3, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Relationships in Lower Extremity Arterial Bypass Surgery

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access