Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians




Abstract


Background


The transradial approach is associated with fewer bleeding complications during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) but is more technically challenging and associated with prolonged times during intervention. The aim of this study is to retrospectively compare the results of radial vs. femoral approach in patients ≥80 years old undergoing primary or rescue PCI.


Methods


Between January 2002 and December 2007, 354 interventions were performed in our institution with the indication of primary or rescue PCI in patients over 80 years old, without history of previous bypass operation or cardiogenic shock on presentation. Thirteen patients required a change of the approach during the procedure and were not enrolled in the final analysis. Forty (12%) interventions were performed through the transradial approach and 301 (88%) through the femoral approach. In-hospital major adverse cerebral and cardiac events and access site bleeding complications as well as 30- and 365-day mortality, procedural times, and contrast volume were evaluated.


Results


The two groups had similar clinical characteristics, with the exception of serum creatinine that was higher in the transfemoral approach group. There were no differences in procedural times and clinical outcomes, although the transfemoral group had numerically more access site bleeding complications (12/301 vs. 0/40, P =.41). The transradial approach had a higher conversion rate compared with the transfemoral approach (18.3% vs. 1.3%, P <.001).


Conclusion


The transradial approach is feasible and safe in the octogenarians undergoing primary and rescue PCI, but it is associated with a high conversion rate to another approach.



Background


The transradial approach is associated with fewer bleeding complications during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), but it is more technically advanced and in some studies it was associated with prolonged intervention times compared with the transfemoral approach . This was the main concern in applying transradial approach in patients undergoing primary PCI because prolonged times to establish flow in the occluded artery are associated with adverse outcomes. Elderly patients are a growing part of population treated with PCI . Despite that, they are seldom participating in randomized trials and are often undertreated . They also represent a high-risk population for primary PCI with a higher rate of complications and adverse outcomes .


The aim of this study is to retrospectively compare the results of radial vs. femoral approach in patients ≥80 years old undergoing primary or rescue PCI.





Methods



Patients’ selection


Patients over 80 years old who underwent primary or rescue PCI between January 2002 and September 2007 were considered eligible for this study. Patients with persistent (more than 20 minutes) ST segment elevation >2 mm in two or more contiguous leads, with new left bundle-branch block or true posterior myocardial infarction, were enrolled. Patients with previous bypass operation or cardiogenic shock on presentation were excluded from the study since the transfemoral procedure was preferred in these patients and they represent a higher-risk population. Patients in whom a conversion of the access site was performed during the procedure were also excluded from the data analysis, but the conversion rate was recorded. All operators were familiar with the transradial procedure and performed more than 100 PCIs per year.


The decision for the approach was on the operator’s discretion.



Antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment


All patients received a bolus dose of aspirin (320 mg) and clopidogrel (300 or 600 mg) if not already on these medications, followed by a 75-mg daily aspirin dose and 75-mg clopidogrel dose for a period from 1 to 6 months.


The three following main treatment strategies were anticipated during PCI: heparin only, heparin plus a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, and only bivalirudin. The heparin-only patient group received a 100 U/kg bolus intravenous dose, followed by additional doses during PCI in order to maintain ACT more than 250 s. The heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor received 60 U/kg heparin and abciximad or eptifibatide (abciximab group, 0.25 mg/kg bolus dose intravenously followed by 0.125 μg/kg per minute intravenous infusion for 12 h; eptifibatide group, 180 μg/kg bolus dose followed by a second bolus dose intravenously after 10 min and by a 10 μg/kg per minute intravenous infusion for 18 h). Additional doses of heparin were administered in order to maintain ACT over 200 s. The bivalirudin patient group received a 0.75 mg/kg bolus dose followed by a 1.75-mg/kg per hour intravenous infusion, which was terminated immediately after the end of the procedure. Antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment was on operator’s discretion.



Vascular access and hemostasis


An Allen test indicating a well-functioning ulnar artery was necessary in order to consider a patient eligible for the transradial approach. The arm and forearm were extended and, after local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, the radial artery was cannulated with a 19-gauge needle, through which a 0.022″ guidewire was advanced and a 6F radial sheath (Terumo, Japan) was introduced over it. The use of vasodilating medical cocktail containing 20 mg lidocaine, 2.5 mg verapamil, and 0.25 mg nitroglycerin was an option in patients with excessive spasm in the radial artery. Hemostasis was achieved with external compression either with TR band (Terumo, Japan) or with Radistop (Radi Medical Systems Inc, Uppsala, Sweden).


For the transfemoral approach, after local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, a 6F sheath (Cordis Corp, Warren, NJ) was advanced over a 0.035″ guidewire, using the Seldinger technique. The use of closure devices was on the operator’s discretion. The following closure devices were used under the study period: Angioseal (St Jude Medical Inc., Minnetonka, MN), Starclose (Abbott Vascular Devices, Redwook City, CA), and Perclose (Abbott Vascular Devices, Redwook City, CA). Alternatively, the femoral sheath was removed 3–6 h after the intervention, and external compression was applied with Femostop (Radi Medical Systems Inc, Uppsala, Sweden).


The patients were allowed to ambulate 1 h after intervention in the transradial group and after 12–24 h in the femoral group, unless indicated otherwise by their clinical condition.



Intervention


All interventions were performed for both approaches using 6F guiding catheters (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA), according to the medical standards and the routine use of bare metal stents. The use of drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction was not a clinical routine in our institution during the study period.



End points


Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events were recorded during hospitalization, as well as 30- and 365-day mortality. Access site bleeding complications, divided as major and minor, were also recorded. Major access site bleeding was defined as those leading to hemoglobin drop >2 mmol/l, those leading to administration of blood transfusions, requiring vascular repair or prolonging hospital stay. Minor access site bleeding was defined as those leading to hematoma formation not needing a specific treatment. Procedural times (needle to balloon time, total procedure time, fluoroscopy time), contrast volume, and the conversion rate for both the radial and the femoral approach were recorded.





Methods



Patients’ selection


Patients over 80 years old who underwent primary or rescue PCI between January 2002 and September 2007 were considered eligible for this study. Patients with persistent (more than 20 minutes) ST segment elevation >2 mm in two or more contiguous leads, with new left bundle-branch block or true posterior myocardial infarction, were enrolled. Patients with previous bypass operation or cardiogenic shock on presentation were excluded from the study since the transfemoral procedure was preferred in these patients and they represent a higher-risk population. Patients in whom a conversion of the access site was performed during the procedure were also excluded from the data analysis, but the conversion rate was recorded. All operators were familiar with the transradial procedure and performed more than 100 PCIs per year.


The decision for the approach was on the operator’s discretion.



Antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment


All patients received a bolus dose of aspirin (320 mg) and clopidogrel (300 or 600 mg) if not already on these medications, followed by a 75-mg daily aspirin dose and 75-mg clopidogrel dose for a period from 1 to 6 months.


The three following main treatment strategies were anticipated during PCI: heparin only, heparin plus a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, and only bivalirudin. The heparin-only patient group received a 100 U/kg bolus intravenous dose, followed by additional doses during PCI in order to maintain ACT more than 250 s. The heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor received 60 U/kg heparin and abciximad or eptifibatide (abciximab group, 0.25 mg/kg bolus dose intravenously followed by 0.125 μg/kg per minute intravenous infusion for 12 h; eptifibatide group, 180 μg/kg bolus dose followed by a second bolus dose intravenously after 10 min and by a 10 μg/kg per minute intravenous infusion for 18 h). Additional doses of heparin were administered in order to maintain ACT over 200 s. The bivalirudin patient group received a 0.75 mg/kg bolus dose followed by a 1.75-mg/kg per hour intravenous infusion, which was terminated immediately after the end of the procedure. Antiplatelet and anticoagulation treatment was on operator’s discretion.



Vascular access and hemostasis


An Allen test indicating a well-functioning ulnar artery was necessary in order to consider a patient eligible for the transradial approach. The arm and forearm were extended and, after local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, the radial artery was cannulated with a 19-gauge needle, through which a 0.022″ guidewire was advanced and a 6F radial sheath (Terumo, Japan) was introduced over it. The use of vasodilating medical cocktail containing 20 mg lidocaine, 2.5 mg verapamil, and 0.25 mg nitroglycerin was an option in patients with excessive spasm in the radial artery. Hemostasis was achieved with external compression either with TR band (Terumo, Japan) or with Radistop (Radi Medical Systems Inc, Uppsala, Sweden).


For the transfemoral approach, after local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, a 6F sheath (Cordis Corp, Warren, NJ) was advanced over a 0.035″ guidewire, using the Seldinger technique. The use of closure devices was on the operator’s discretion. The following closure devices were used under the study period: Angioseal (St Jude Medical Inc., Minnetonka, MN), Starclose (Abbott Vascular Devices, Redwook City, CA), and Perclose (Abbott Vascular Devices, Redwook City, CA). Alternatively, the femoral sheath was removed 3–6 h after the intervention, and external compression was applied with Femostop (Radi Medical Systems Inc, Uppsala, Sweden).


The patients were allowed to ambulate 1 h after intervention in the transradial group and after 12–24 h in the femoral group, unless indicated otherwise by their clinical condition.



Intervention


All interventions were performed for both approaches using 6F guiding catheters (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA), according to the medical standards and the routine use of bare metal stents. The use of drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction was not a clinical routine in our institution during the study period.



End points


Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events were recorded during hospitalization, as well as 30- and 365-day mortality. Access site bleeding complications, divided as major and minor, were also recorded. Major access site bleeding was defined as those leading to hemoglobin drop >2 mmol/l, those leading to administration of blood transfusions, requiring vascular repair or prolonging hospital stay. Minor access site bleeding was defined as those leading to hematoma formation not needing a specific treatment. Procedural times (needle to balloon time, total procedure time, fluoroscopy time), contrast volume, and the conversion rate for both the radial and the femoral approach were recorded.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Nov 16, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access