Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard treatment for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) across most surgical risk categories. Despite its minimally invasive nature, transfemoral TAVI requires both a primary and a secondary arterial access site. While the femoral artery is most commonly used for secondary access, vascular and bleeding complications remain frequent and are associated with adverse outcomes. Observational evidence from TAVI cohorts suggests that radial secondary access may reduce such complications compared to femoral access. The RADIAL-TAVI trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label study designed to compare radial versus femoral secondary access in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI. A total of 434 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint is the incidence of vascular and bleeding complications at the secondary access site within 30 days, adjudicated according to VARC-3 criteria. Secondary endpoints include early safety, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), quality of life, and health economic aspects up to 30 days, as well as long-term mortality up to 12 months. The study is powered to detect a reduction in the primary endpoint from 8% with femoral to 2% with radial access. The RADIAL-TAVI trial will provide the first randomized evidence on the optimal secondary access strategy in transfemoral TAVI. If radial access proves superior, it has the potential to redefine standard practice, reduce complication rates, and improve patient safety and outcomes.
The clinical course of severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) is characterized by a high risk of morbidity and mortality without timely valve replacement. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is providing a proven, safe, and effective therapeutic option for most patients regardless of age and or surgical risk, as established in major randomized trials. , The transfemoral route is the predominant procedural strategy, chosen for its technical ease and low incidence of access-related complications.
Despite its minimally invasive nature, TAVI necessitates 2 distinct arterial access sites: a primary, large-diameter access for the valve delivery system and a secondary access for the visualization of the implantation procedure. The most commonly used method for this secondary access is a second puncture of the femoral artery. However, vascular complications are the most commonly observed complications in transfemoral TAVI and are associated with an impaired procedural outcome. There is growing evidence to suggest that the secondary arterial access site can contribute significantly to the overall burden of these complications. , In other endovascular fields, particularly percutaneous coronary intervention, the radial artery has been established as the preferred access site due to its well-documented superiority in reducing vascular access-site complications compared to the femoral approach.
Prompted by this success, recent observational studies have investigated the radial artery as a safer alternative for secondary access in TAVI. A large retrospective comparison involving over 8,800 patients reported a significantly lower rate of secondary access-related complications with the radial approach (0.3%) versus the femoral approach (3.2%). While these data are highly encouraging, their retrospective nature introduces the potential for confounding factors such as selection bias and incomplete event capture. We therefore designed the prospective, randomized RADIAL-TAVI trial to determine the clinical benefit and safety of utilizing a transradial approach for secondary arterial access in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI.
Methods and Results
Study organization
The RADIAL-TAVI study (DRKS-trial DRKS00035968, NCT 07399392) is an investigator-initiated trial designed and conducted by the University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen. The academic research institution Cardiovascular Center for Clinical Research (CCRC) at the University Heart Center Freiburg · Bad Krozingen and the Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung supported trial coordination and management. The study protocol adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional ethic committees at each participating center. Each subject will provide written informed consent prior to randomization.
Study hypothesis
The study is designed to investigate whether radial secondary access is superior to femoral access regarding vascular and bleeding complications in patients in the first 30 days after undergoing transfemoral TAVI.
Study design, population, and randomization
The RADIAL-TAVI trial is a prospective, controlled, randomized, parallel group, open-label, multicenter trial and will be conducted at 7 centers in Germany and Switzerland. Patients with aortic valve stenosis who have been deemed eligible by the heart team and are scheduled for transfemoral TAVI will be included in the study. A total of 434 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either radial or femoral secondary access. The study flowchart is shown in Figure 1 . Random permuted blocks will be employed to ensure approximate balance of treatment allocation within each site.
Study flow chart of the RADIAL-TAVI trial.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
For eligibility, all participants must be diagnosed with aortic valve stenosis and scheduled for a transfemoral TAVI procedure. The decision for TAVI must have been reached and approved by a multidisciplinary heart team. Additionally, all patients must be 18 years of age or older and must provide written informed consent to participate in the study. Patients will be excluded from the study if a radial artery is deemed inaccessible by the TAVI team, or if the femoral arteries are not considered viable for secondary access. Additionally, individuals with anticipated difficulties in achieving primary femoral access (e.g., a “hostile access” anatomy) will be excluded. The study will not include patients who are in a state of hemodynamic instability or cardiogenic shock, or those currently enrolled in another investigational drug or device trial. Finally, individuals who are unable to provide informed consent or who refuse to undergo TAVI will also be ineligible. A complete overview of inclusion and exclusion criteria is shown in Table 1 .
Table 1
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
|
Inclusion criteria
•Patients scheduled for transfemoral TAVI •Heart team agrees on eligibility of TAVI •Written informed consent •Age >18 years |
|
Exclusion criteria
•Non accessible radial arteries as judged by the TAVI team •Non accessible femoral arteries as judged by the TAVI team •Foreseeable problems to achieve primary transfemoral access (hostile access) •Hemodynamic instability or cardiogenic shock •Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study •Lack of capability to give informed consent •Patient refuses TAVI |
TAVI procedure
The transfemoral access will be used for the procedure, following current guidelines and the standard techniques of the center. The recommended antithrombotic therapy during the TAVI procedure is unfractionated heparin at a dosage of 50 to 70 IU/kg of body weight, though this can be adjusted to meet the specific medical needs of the patient. Following the procedure, the post-TAVI antithrombotic regimen will be managed according to the institution’s standard protocols.
Follow-up
All patients enrolled in the study will be scheduled to complete the follow-up to evaluate long-term results.
Clinical monitoring at hospital stay
No study-specific procedures will be conducted after the TAVI. Instead, patients will be monitored according to the standard institutional protocols, which include regular clinical and laboratory assessments. Routine monitoring will include a 12-lead ECG, performed immediately after the procedure, again at 24 hours, and prior to discharge. Laboratory tests will cover a full spectrum of blood work, including a complete blood count (hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, white blood cell count), markers for liver and kidney function (bilirubin, albumin, GOT, GPT, creatinine, GFR), and cardiac-specific enzymes (CK, CK-MB, troponin, NT-proBNP). C-reactive protein (CRP) and INR will also be measured. In addition, a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiogram will be performed to evaluate both valve and left ventricular function. This will include measurements of valve gradients, aortic valve area (AVA), regurgitation, prosthesis orifice area, and stroke volume index (SVI). The patient’s vital status, functional status (using the NYHA classification), and current cardiac medication regimen will also be assessed. Finally, the clinical team will monitor for any serious adverse events (SAEs), with a specific focus on bleeding and vascular complications.
Clinical follow-up at 30 days
Following hospital discharge, all patients will be clinically followed with a phone call at 30 days after randomization. This telephone interview will assess for symptoms such as shortness of breath, chest pain, fatigue, and syncope. The call will also inquire about any adverse events of special interest, including rehospitalizations, bleeding episodes, vascular complications, and compliance with cardiac medication. Additionally, the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire will be completed during this interview to evaluate the patient’s health status.
Clinical follow-up at 12 months
All patients will be followed by telephone call at 12 months after randomization to obtain the vital status.
Study endpoints
The primary endpoint is the incidence of vascular and bleeding complications according to the VARC-3 criteria at the secondary vascular access site until 30 days after randomization. Key secondary endpoints are VARC-3 early safety, cardiovascular mortality, mortality related to vascular and bleeding complications, quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at 30 days and freedom from Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) at 30 days. A complete list of all endpoints is provided in Table 2 .
Table 2
Study endpoints
|
Primary study endpoint
•Incidence of vascular and bleeding complications according to the VARC-3 criteria at the secondary vascular access site until 30 days after randomization |
|
Secondary endpoints
•Endpoints until day 30: ○VARC-3 early safety ○Cardiovascular mortality ○Noncardiovascular mortality ○Mortality related to vascular and bleeding complications ○Incidence of new neurological events after randomization (TIA/Stroke) ○Quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at 30 days ○Health economic aspects, i.e., cost-effectiveness until day 30 ○Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE): myocardial infarction, cardiac or vascular surgery, clinically-driven revascularization (PCI/CABG), and stroke at 30 days ○Vascular complication as defined by VARC 3 at 30 days ○Bleeding complications at 30 days as defined by VARC 3 ○Incidence of acute kidney injury as defined by VARC 3 •Endpoints until 1 year ○Total mortality ○Cardiovascular mortality ○Noncardiovascular mortality |
Sample size calculation and statistics
The required sample size was determined to achieve a statistical power of 80% (1−β = 0.8) to detect a significant difference in the primary endpoint between the study groups. The calculation assumed a 1:1 randomization ratio and was performed using a 2-sided chi-squared test with a significance level (α) of 0.05. Based on these parameters, and assuming an incidence of the primary endpoint of 8% in the control (femoral) arm and 2% in the interventional (radial) arm, a total sample size of 412 patients is required. To account for a projected 5% dropout rate, a total of 434 patients will be randomized, with the expectation that 412 patients will be available for the primary analysis. The sample size was calculated using the POWER procedure in SAS/STAT software. The primary analysis of the study will be conducted on the intention-to-treat population.
We will analyze patient data using descriptive statistics. Continuous variables will be summarized with either means and standard deviations or medians and interquartile ranges, as appropriate. Categorical variables will be presented as absolute numbers and percentages. The primary hypothesis will be tested using a 2-sided chi-squared test, with a significance level of 5%. All analyses of secondary endpoints will be exploratory. We will estimate cumulative incidences for event-based endpoints at 30 days and 12 months after randomization, accounting for competing risks. The effect of the intervention on these secondary endpoints will be reported using hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. To assess safety, we will summarize all SAEs that occur during or after randomization. SAEs will be presented as frequencies and percentages, stratified by their severity and causal relationship to the procedure. Additional details regarding these statistical methods will be provided in a formal Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), which will be finalized before the completion of patient recruitment.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree