Pulse Pressure and Type A Acute Aortic Dissection In-Hospital Outcomes (from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection)




Little is known about the relation between type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) and pulse pressure (PP), defined as the difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In this study, we explored the association between PP and presentation, complications, and outcomes of patients with TAAAD. PP at hospital presentation was used to divide 1,960 patients with noniatrogenic TAAAD into quartiles: narrowed (≤39 mm Hg, n = 430), normal (40 to 56 mm Hg, n = 554), mildly elevated (57 to 75 mm Hg, n = 490), and markedly elevated (≥76 mm Hg, n = 486). Variables relating to index presentation and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed. Patients with TAAAD in the narrowed PP quartiles were frequently older and Caucasian, whereas patients with markedly elevated PPs tended to be male and have a history of hypertension. Patients who demonstrated abdominal vessel involvement more commonly demonstrated elevated PPs, whereas patients with narrowed PPs were more likely to have periaortic hematoma and/or pericardial effusion. Narrowed PPs were also correlated with greater incidences of hypotension, cardiac tamponade, and mortality. Patients with TAAAD who were managed with endovascular and hybrid procedures and those with renal failure tended to have markedly elevated PPs. No difference in aortic regurgitation at presentation was noted among groups. In conclusion, patients with TAAAD in the third PP quartile had better in-hospital outcomes than patients in the lowest quartile. Patients with narrowed PPs experienced more cardiac complications, particularly cardiac tamponade, whereas those with markedly elevated PPs were more likely to have abdominal aortic involvement. Presenting PP offers a clue to different manifestations of acute aortic dissection that may facilitate initial triage and care.


Pulse pressure (PP) has been the focus of a number of studies in several populations of cardiovascular disease. PP, the force that a heart generates with each contraction, is defined as the difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Wide PP is strongly correlated with long standing hypertension where there is a loss of aortic elasticity in chronic disease. Wide PP has been associated with cardiovascular, coronary, and all-cause mortality in various patient populations. A narrow PP at hospital admission is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Little is known about the relation between PP and type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD). We hypothesized that patients with TAAAD who presented with a narrow PP would be more likely to have cardiac tamponade and experience negative outcomes and increased mortality compared with patients who exhibited normal and mildly elevated PPs. We also believe that patients with a wide PP might have increased age, more malperfusion, or aortic valve disruption leading to aortic valve regurgitation and worse outcomes.


Methods


The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) has collected data on patients with acute aortic dissection at 24 aortic referral centers in 11 countries since January 1, 1996. Patients are enrolled if they present with nontraumatic, spontaneous, or iatrogenic dissections within 14 days of symptom onset. They are identified prospectively by physicians or retrospectively through discharge diagnoses, imaging, and/or surgical databases. Diagnosis is based on symptom onset, patient history, imaging, surgical examination, and/or autopsy. All sites have received approval from each hospital’s institutional review board to participate in IRAD. A comprehensive description of the organization and methods of the IRAD database have been detailed previously.


A standardized form with 290 variables was used to record information on patient demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, physical findings, imaging study results, medical and interventional management, and in-hospital outcomes. Data were collected at presentation or retrospectively through medical record analysis and reviewed for face validity and completeness at the coordinating center at the University of Michigan.


This study included patients with TAAAD enrolled in IRAD from January 1, 1996 to July 26, 2012. Patients with type B dissections and/or iatrogenic dissections were excluded, resulting in 1,960 study patients. These patients were arranged into quartiles based on PP at hospital presentation: narrow (≤39 mm Hg, n = 430), normal (40 to 56 mm Hg, n = 554), mildly elevated (57 to 75 mm Hg, n = 490), and markedly elevated (≥76 mm Hg, n = 486). When patients fell between quartiles, they were assigned to the higher grouping resulting in a slightly uneven sample size between quartiles.


Categorical variables were compared across PP quartiles using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Continuous variables were examined using analysis of variance. Linear-by-linear association was used to study linear trends across quartiles. The tables are marked with an asterisk to indicate variables that have both a p value of <0.05 and a linear-by-linear association of <0.05. Variables detailing demographics, patient history, presentation, imaging results, complications, and outcomes were analyzed for their relation to PP in patients with TAAAD. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 20.0 (IBM Corp.).




Results


The study cohort consisted of 1,960 subjects with TAAAD including 21.9% of patients in the narrow quartile, 28.3% in the normal quartile, 25.0% in the mildly elevated quartile, and 24.8% in the markedly elevated quartile. Patients in the narrow quartile (PP ≤39 mm Hg) were typically aged >70 years, women, a race other than Caucasian, and had an average age of 63.6 years ( Table 1 ). Patients in the markedly elevated quartile (PP ≥76 mm Hg) had an average age of 60.8 years and tended to be Caucasian, men, and have a history of hypertension ( Table 1 ). There was no correlation seen between PP and a history of atherosclerosis, previous smoking, or any previously diagnosed aortic conditions ( Table 1 ).



Table 1

Demographics and patient history for all patients with type A aortic dissection


















































































































































Variable PP (mm Hg) p Value
≤39 40–56 57–75 ≥76
Number of patients 430 (21.9) 554 (28.2) 490 (25.0) 486 (24.8)
Demographics
Age (yrs) 63.6 ± 13.477 62.04 ± 14.848 59.74 ± 14.794 60.78 ± 13.640 <0.001
Age (≥70 yrs) 147 (34.2) 183 (33.0) 124 (25.3) 134 (27.6) 0.006
Men 276 (64.2) 361 (65.2) 339 (69.2) 357 (73.5) 0.008
White 376 (91.7) 468 (90.0) 404 (87.4) 378 (84.6) 0.006
History
Hypertension 301 (71.7) 382 (69.8) 350 (72.5) 385 (79.9) 0.002
Atherosclerosis 94 (22.7) 106 (19.8) 83 (17.5) 104 (21.7) 0.224
The Marfan syndrome 13 (3.1) 31 (5.7) 30 (6.2) 14 (2.9) 0.021
Bicuspid aortic valve 17 (4.6) 20 (4.3) 16 (3.9) 15 (3.7) 0.924
Other aortic disease 9 (2.1) 8 (1.5) 8 (1.7) 6 (1.3) 0.756
Smoker: current 34 (28.3) 54 (36.2) 46 (32.4) 54 (37.2) 0.409
Cocaine abuse 4 (1.0) 8 (1.5) 8 (1.7) 9 (1.9) 0.702
Family history of aortic disease 9 (6.2) 17 (9.2) 23 (14.3) 10 (6.1) 0.036
Known aortic aneurysm 50 (12.1) 73 (13.5) 54 (11.3) 49 (10.2) 0.403
Previous aortic dissection 13 (3.1) 20 (3.7) 22 (4.6) 19 (4.0) 0.704
Aortic aneurysm/dissection surgery 22 (5.2) 37 (6.9) 30 (6.3) 31 (6.5) 0.742
Previous cardiac surgery 41 (9.7) 69 (12.9) 58 (12.3) 69 (14.4) 0.191

Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%).

Variables that have both a p value of <0.05 and a linear-by-linear association of <0.05.



Patients who presented with a narrow PP tended to have more cardiac complications in comparison with those in the other 3 quartiles ( Tables 2 and 3 ). Specifically, they had greater incidences of periaortic hematoma, pericardial effusion, and cardiac tamponade than patients with normal, mildly elevated, and markedly elevated PPs ( Table 3 ). Patients with TAAAD in the narrow PP quartile had a greater risk of in-hospital mortality than patients in the other quartiles ( Figure 1 ). There was no relation between narrow PP and false lumen patency, coronary artery compromise, or long-term mortality ( Tables 2 and 3 ).



Table 2

Findings on diagnostic imaging for all patients with type A aortic dissection






















































































































Variable PP (mm Hg) p Value
≤39 40–56 57–75 ≥76
True intramural hematoma on first imaging study 21 (5.3) 26 (5.1) 17 (3.7) 17 (3.9) 0.567
True intramural hematoma progressing to dissection 4 (19.0) 4 (16.0) 3 (17.6) 2 (14.3) 1.000
Intramural hematoma (any study) 81 (18.8) 112 (20.2) 84 (17.1) 76 (15.6) 0.248
Pre-/postoperative extension of dissection 38 (9.4) 40 (7.7) 34 (7.3) 35 (7.6) 0.679
Any aneurysm 198 (51.0) 259 (51.8) 230 (51.3) 220 (50.2) 0.971
False lumen patency
Patent 193 (72.3) 272 (71.0) 222 (73.3) 228 (71.0) 0.905
Partial thrombosis 44 (16.5) 66 (17.2) 61 (20.1) 67 (20.9) 0.423
Complete thrombosis 30 (11.2) 45 (11.7) 20 (6.6) 26 (8.1) 0.075
Abdominal vessel involvement 94 (22.1) 95 (17.3) 101 (20.8) 133 (27.6) 0.001
Right renal 26 (6.1) 35 (6.4) 36 (7.4) 45 (9.3) 0.206
Left renal 56 (13.1) 48 (8.7) 59 (12.1) 85 (17.6) <0.001
Distal communication 69 (27.2) 92 (26.3) 73 (26.7) 83 (28.8) 0.906
Arch vessel involvement 147 (46.2) 166 (39.2) 128 (37.0) 135 (37.2) 0.052
Coronary artery compromised 32 (9.9) 53 (12.8) 35 (10.2) 48 (13.6) 0.337

Data are presented as n (%).

Variables that have both a p value of <0.05 and a linear-by-linear association of <0.05.



Table 3

Management, in-hospital pre- and/or postoperative complications, and mortality for all patients with type A aortic dissection





















































































































































































Variable PP (mm Hg) p Value
≤39 40–56 57–75 ≥76
Management
Medical 51 (11.9) 75 (13.5) 54 (11.0) 57 (11.7) 0.642
Surgical 372 (86.5) 475 (85.7) 426 (87.1) 410 (84.4) 0.639
Endovascular 4 (0.9) 1 (0.2) 7 (1.4) 9 (1.9) 0.031
Hybrid 3 (0.7) 3 (0.5) 2 (0.4) 10 (2.1) 0.047
Complications
Aortic regurgitation 194 (55.1) 239 (51.3) 231 (57.5) 241 (57.5) 0.139
Periaortic hematoma 105 (30.2) 93 (20.2) 70 (17.9) 70 (17.7) <0.001
Pericardial effusion 224 (58.8) 235 (47.2) 153 (35.1) 138 (32.2) <0.001
Cerebrovascular accident: 1-h outcome 41 (10.5) 43 (8.7) 36 (8.1) 41 (9.3) 0.653
Coma: 1-h outcome 8 (2.1) 14 (2.8) 6 (1.4) 9 (2.1) 0.478
Spinal cord ischemia 4 (1.0) 4 (0.8) 4 (0.9) 4 (0.9) 0.986
Myocardial ischemia 51 (12.4) 61 (11.6) 53 (11.3) 35 (11.3) 0.078
Myocardial infarction 33 (8.0) 33 (6.3) 29 (6.2) 20 (4.3) 0.152
Mesenteric ischemia/infarction 25 (6.1) 30 (5.7) 19 (4.1) 36 (7.7) 0.126
Pre-/postoperative renal failure 102 (24.9) 141 (26.7) 94 (20.1) 136 (29.1) 0.014
Pre-/postoperative extension of dissection 38 (9.4) 40 (7.7) 34 (7.3) 35 (7.6) 0.680
Pre-/postoperative hypotension 223 (53.9) 171 (32.4) 79 (17.0) 77 (16.6) <0.001
Cardiac tamponade 32 (7.5) 17 (3.1) 0 (0.0) 3 (0.6) <0.001
Limb ischemia 56 (13.8) 56 (10.7) 57 (12.2) 74 (15.9) 0.097
Complications (any) 34 (8.0) 33 (6.0) 27 (5.6) 44 (9.1) 0.099
In-hospital mortality 133 (30.9) 141 (25.5) 80 (16.3) 114 (23.5) <0.001
Cause of death: aortic rupture 23 (26.7) 27 (29.7) 16 (29.1) 15 (21.7) 0.700
5-yr Kaplan-Meier survival estimates (n at risk) 77.7 (19) 81.0 (21) 84.5 (19) 84.2 (16) 0.507

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 5, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Pulse Pressure and Type A Acute Aortic Dissection In-Hospital Outcomes (from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection)

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access