Protruding Fat from the Posterior Atrioventricular Groove: A Novel Echocardiographic Finding Useful in Distinguishing Pericardial Effusions from Left Pleural Effusions




The echocardiographic distinction between pericardial effusion and left-sided pleural effusion is made using the descending thoracic aorta (DTA) as a landmark. When imaged in the parasternal long-axis view, pericardial fluid tracks anterior to the DTA, with its superior (basal) extent limited by the reflection of the oblique sinus ( Figure 1 , Video 1 ; available at www.onlinejase.com ). By contrast, left pleural effusions track posterior to the DTA ( Figure 2 ). It is, however, important to note that the position of the DTA is not fixed. Although it is normally located posterior to the posterior atrioventricular groove, its position can be altered by tortuosity and left atrial enlargement. Such anatomic alterations could potentially limit the utility of the DTA as a landmark in distinguishing pericardial from left pleural effusions.




Figure 1


Parasternal long-axis view obtained from a patient with a large pericardial effusion (PE). Fluid can be seen tracking anterior to the aorta (Ao) and is delimited superiorly by the reflection of the oblique sinus (OS). Fat from the posterior atrioventricular groove is seen protruding into the pericardial space. The asterisk indicates the coronary sinus. LA , Left atrium; LV , left ventricle.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 21, 2018 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Protruding Fat from the Posterior Atrioventricular Groove: A Novel Echocardiographic Finding Useful in Distinguishing Pericardial Effusions from Left Pleural Effusions

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access