Protein and Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 in Smokers and Nonsmokers of the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study

 

Never-smokers (n = 1,178)

Active smokers (n = 777)

p

Smoking status (pack-years)

0

30.0 (15.0–43.2)
 
Age (year)

65.3 ± 10.1

56.2 ± 10.3

<0.001

Male Gender (%)

45.4

77.9

<0.001

BMI

27.4 ± 4.2

27.0 ± 4.2

0.833a

LDL-C (mg/dl)

119.1 ± 36.4

117.5 ± 32.1

0.012a

HDL-C (mg/dl)

41.2 ± 11.1

36.2 ± 10.2

0.002a

Triglycerides (mg/dl)

136 (102–192)

154 (112–218)

<0.001c

Preexisting CVD (%)

68.1

80.1

<0.001b

Diabetes mellitus (%)

38.3

36

0.314b

Hypertension (%)

76.6

63.3

<0.001b

Lipid lowering drugs (%)

42.4

52.8

<0.001

hsCRP (ng/ml)

2.7 (1.2–7.0)

4.9 (1.8–10.3)

<0.001c

LpPLA2 (ng/ml)

383.8 (272.3–533.5)

424.2 (293.7–630.2)

<0.001c


BMI body mass index, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDC low density lipoprotein cholesterol, hsCRP high sensitivity C-reactive protein, LpPLA 2 lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2

a t-test

bchi-square-test

cMann-Whitney-U-test



Smoking status in the group of active smokers showed a large variability, ranging from 0.3 up to 132 pack-years. Males were more frequent in the group of active smokers and the mean age was lower. Plasma concentrations of LDL-C and HDL-C were significantly higher in never-smokers, whereas total triglycerides were higher in active smokers. However, results for LDL-C were likely affected by treatment with lipid lowering drugs (mainly statins), which was more frequent in active smokers. Preexisting CVD was also more prevalent in active smokers, whereas a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension was observed in never-smokers. However, body mass index (BMI) and prevalence of diabetes mellitus were inappreciably different between the study groups (Table 1).

Valid measurements of both hsCRP and LpPLA2 were available for 1,048 never-smokers and 685 smokers. Plasma concentrations of hsCRP and LpPLA2 were significantly higher in active smokers than in never-smokers (hsCRP, 4.9 (1.8–10.3) ng/ml vs. 2.7 (1.2–7.0) ng/ml; LpPLA2, 424.2 ng/ml (293.7–630.2) ng/ml vs. 383.8 (272.3–533.5) ng/ml, respectively; p < 0.001 for both comparisons) (Table 1).

As a next step we analyzed the proportion of concentrations higher or lower than the median value of hsCRP and LpPLA2 in either study group. Three hundred forty (49.6 %) of active smokers had plasma concentration of hsCRP and 343 (50.0 %) had LpPLA2 above the median. Concentrations above the median for both markers were found in 190 (27.7 %) and below the median in 192 (28.0 %) of active smokers. Five hundred eighteen (49.4 %) of never-smokers had plasma concentrations of hsCRP and 523 (49.9 %) had LpPLA2 above the median. Concentrations above the median for both markers were found in 277 (26.4 %) and below the median in 284 (27.1 %) of never-smokers (Table 2).


Table 2
Absolute and relative number of patients with concentrations of hsCRP and LpPLA2 higher or lower than the median






























 
Never-smokers

Active smokers

1,048

685

hsCRP low, LpPLA2 low

284 (27.1 %)

192 (28.0 %)

hsCRP low, LpPLA2 high

246 (23.5 %)

153 (22.3 %)

hsCRP high, LpPLA2 low

241 (23.0 %)

150 (21.9 %)

hsCRP high, LpPLA2 high

277 (26.4 %)

190 (27.7 %)


Chi-square p < 0.001

Within the observation time (median of 10 years), 995 patients died. From these, 221 were active smokers (28.4 % out of the 777) and 302 never-smokers (25.6 % out of the 1,178); the difference between active smokers and never-smokers did not reach here significance (log rank test p = 0.212). The Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated for both groups depending on the concentrations of hsCRP and LpPLA2 below or above the median as described above. In active smokers, the subgroup with the concentration of both markers above the median showed the worst survival compared with all other groups (Fig. 1). The survival difference in the different subgroups is compiled in Table 3.

A328039_1_En_6_Fig1_HTML.gif


Fig. 1
Survival of patients with values of hsCRP and LpPLA2 higher or lower than the median



Table 3
Dependence of survival on concentrations of hsCRP and LpPLA2 higher or lower than the median































































 
Never-smokers (NS)

Active smokers (S)

p (χ2 test)

n patients

n events

n patients

n events

NS vs. S
 
1,048

264 (25 %)

685

197 (29 %)

0.100

hsCRP low, LpPLA2 low

284

44 (15 %)

192

48 (25 %)

0.010

hsCRP low, LpPLA2 high

246

54 (22 %)

153

40 (26 %)

0.337

hsCRP high, LpPLA2 low

241

68 (28 %)

150

41 (27 %)

0.850

hsCRP high, LpPLA2 high

277

98 (35 %)

190

68 (36 %)

0.927

p (log-rank test)

<0.001
 
<0.02
   

In never-smokers, a stepwise decrease of survival was observed in patients with both hsCRP and LpPLA2 below the median, hsCRP below and LpPLA2 above the median, hsCRP above and LpPLA2 below the median, and hsCRP and LpPLA2 above the median; with the best survival in cases with a low concentration and the worst in those with a high concentration of both markers (Fig. 1, Table 3).

Comparison of mortality rates of active smokers and never-smokers demonstrated a large similarity in all groups, except for the group with low concentration of both markers. This group displayed a significant difference between active smokers and never-smokers, with a χ2 p-value of 0.010 (Table 3).

To investigate whether the observed differences in survival between the smokers and never-smokers, according to the concentration of hsCRP and LpPLA2, were influenced by a different distribution of risk factors between both groups, we conducted the Cox regression analysis with adjustment for age and sex (Model 1) or with an additional adjustment for diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, BMI, LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides (Model 2). For the analysis, we divided smokers and never-smokers according to tertiles of hsCRP and LpPLA2 concentrations and compared the groups with both markers in the lowest or highest tertile, and hsCRP and LpPLA2 each in the highest tertile. For both smokers and never-smokers, there was a significant increase in risk for patients in whom the concentration of both hsCRP and LpPLA2 was in the upper tertile. When only one marker was elevated, there was a trend toward increased risk, which became significant only in Model 2 in never-smokers (Table 4).
Jul 10, 2016 | Posted by in RESPIRATORY | Comments Off on Protein and Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 in Smokers and Nonsmokers of the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health Study

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access