Summary
Background
Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) provides an estimation of body oxygen consumption/delivery ratio. Its use has been suggested for monitoring treatment of patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) but the optimal target value has never been clearly reported.
Aims
We aimed to address the prognostic value of ScvO 2 in ADHF requiring inotrope support.
Methods
ScvO 2 was prospectively assessed in 60 patients with ADHF requiring inotrope support (mean age 62 ± 16 years; 45 men; left ventricular ejection fraction 25 ± 7%) and was compared with major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as heart transplantation, cardiac assistance and death.
Results
MACE occurred in 22 (35%) patients (14 deaths; eight referred for heart transplantation or cardiac assistance). Admission ScvO 2 (mean 57 ± 13%) did not differ between patients with and without MACE. At 24 hours ScvO 2 (mean 62 ± 7%) increased only in patients without MACE (65 ± 6% vs. 58 ± 7%; p < 0.0001) and was associated with urine output, vena cava diameter and oxygen consumption reduction. No correlation was observed between ScvO 2 and cardiac output or catecholamine rate. Multivariable analysis showed that ScvO 2 at 24 hours remained an independent predictor of MACE. Using the optimal cut-off of 60% derived from receiver operating characteristic curves, MACE were observed in 81% of patients (17/21) with ScvO 2 ≤ 60% at 24 hours vs. 13% (5/39) with ScvO 2 > 60% at 24 hours.
Conclusion
In patients admitted for ADHF requiring inotrope support, ScvO 2 ≤ 60% despite optimal treatment is a marker of poor outcome and might be an indicator for considering more aggressive therapy.
Résumé
Contexte
La saturation veineuse centrale en oxygène (ScvO 2 ) permet une estimation de l’adéquation entre l’apport en oxygène et la consommation tissulaire. Son utilisation pour le monitoring des patients hospitalisés pour insuffisance cardiaque aiguë est préconisée mais sa valeur optimale et l’influence de ses variations sur le pronostic n’ont jamais été étudiées.
Objectifs
L’objectif est d’étudier la valeur pronostique de la ScvO 2 chez les patients hospitalisés pour insuffisance cardiaque aiguë sévère.
Méthodes
La ScvO 2 a été recueillie de façon prospective chez 60 patients (moyenne 62 ± 16 ans ; 45 hommes ; FEVG 25 ± 7 %) hospitalisés pour une poussée d’insuffisance cardiaque avec nécessité de recours à un traitement inotrope positif. Le critère de jugement incluait la survenue d’évènements cardiovasculaires majeurs (décès, assistance ou transplantation cardiaque).
Résultats
Un évènement est survenu chez 22 (35 %) patients (14 décès ; huit assistances ou transplantation cardiaque). Il n’y avait pas de différence concernant la ScvO 2 à l’admission (moyenne 57 ± 13 %) chez les patients avec et sans évènements. Après 24 heures de traitement, la ScvO 2 (moyenne 62 ± 7 %) n’augmentait que chez les patients sans évènement (65 ± 6 % vs 58 ± 7 % ; p < 0,0001) et était corrélée à la diurèse, au diamètre de la veine cave inférieure et à la réduction de la consommation en oxygène. La ScvO 2 n’était ni corrélée aux doses de catécholamines ni au débit cardiaque. En analyse multivariée, la ScvO 2 restait associé au pronostic. La survenue d’un évènement était observé chez 81 % (17/21) des patients ayant une ScvO 2 ≤ 60 % à 24 heures contre 13 % (5/39) lorsque la ScvO 2 était inférieure à 60 % à 24 heures.
Conclusion
Chez les patients hospitalisés pour insuffisance cardiaque aiguë avec indication à un traitement inotrope positif, une ScvO 2 ≤ 60 % malgré un traitement médical maximal est associé à un mauvais pronostic. Cette valeur pourrait faire considérer des options thérapeutiques plus agressives.
Background
Despite improvements in medical treatment, acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) with cardiogenic shock remains associated with high mortality (50–80%) . In clinical practice, conventional treatment includes catecholamine and intravenous diuretic support, monitored by echocardiography and clinical data. European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend the use of central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) for monitoring these patients. ScvO 2 (i.e. the oxygen saturation from a blood sample taken from the superior vena cava) provides an estimation of the body oxygen consumption/delivery ratio. According to Fick’s equation, ScvO 2 is determined by organ oxygen consumption (VO 2 ; mL/minute) and supply, which depends on arterial oxygen saturation (SaO 2 ; %), haemoglobin concentration (Hb; g/L) and cardiac output (CO): ScvO 2 = SaO 2 – (VO 2 /1.34*Hb*CO).
In patients admitted for a severe sepsis or an acute myocardial infarction, ScvO 2 correlates with CO; low ScvO 2 is associated with poor prognosis. The use of ScvO 2 appears superior to clinical markers for monitoring patients with haemodynamic instability and treatment adjusted to ScvO 2 seems to provide a better outcome. However, the impact of ScvO 2 in patients admitted for ADHF remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to address the optimal target of ScvO 2 for monitoring patients admitted for ADHF requiring inotropic support.
Methods
Population study
We prospectively included 60 consecutive patients (mean age 62 ± 16 years; 45 men) admitted from November 2008 to March 2010 to the Intensive Care Unit of Henri Mondor University Hospital for ADHF requiring inotrope support. Inotropic support was added when low CO (cardiac index less than 2.2 L/minute per meter square) or impaired left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (< 40%) was associated with low blood pressure (BP) (systolic BP < 90 mmHg or a drop in mean BP of more than 30 mmHg) or when persistent signs of low organ perfusion or oligoanuria (< 0.5 mL/kg per hour) were reported. Patients were excluded when a palliative care decision was taken, when superior vena cava catheterization failed or when associated hypovolaemic or septic shock was suspected. Patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction were excluded.
Of the 60 patients included, six had no heart failure history or known LV dysfunction and 27 (45%) had ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Admission LV ejection fraction and cardiac index averaged 25 ± 7% and 1.9 ± 0.7 L/minute per meter square (confidence interval 1.1–2.7), respectively. Current medications before hospitalization included beta-blocker therapy (70%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (79%) and oral loop diuretics (84%). The study was approved by our local (Henry-Mondor Hospital) ethics committee and all patients gave informed consent to participate.
Catecholamine and diuretic infusion
Patients admitted for ADHF received standard care according to our local protocol, which follows current guidelines . All drugs were systematically delivered through a central venous catheter positioned via the jugular or subclavian vein. Optimal positioning of the central venous catheter was confirmed using chest radiography. The catheter had to be at the junction between the superior vena cava and the right atrium. The radiological landmark used to determine the appropriate position was the carina. Intravenous loop diuretics and vasodilator drugs were first recommended before inotropic support when the mean BP was more than 65 mmHg. In patients with low BP and clinical signs of low organ perfusion or with persistent oligoanuria, dobutamine infusion was recommended at a starting rate of 5 μg/kg per minute. Dobutamine was increased by 2.5 μg/kg per minute to a maximum of 20 μg/kg per minute, according to the physician’s clinical judgement. In patients with severe haemodynamic instability or under beta-blocker therapy at admission, dobutamine was started at the rate of 20 μg/kg per minute. Norepinephrine was given if the mean BP remained less than 65 mmHg. Intravenous loop diuretics were systematically delivered with a starting dose adjusted to the severity of volume overload, renal function and previous diuretic oral dose used. The diuretic rate was titrated to obtain euvolaemia assessed using clinical (right ventricular congestion reduction) and echocardiography data (vena cava dilatation and LV pressure reduction). Dobutamine infusion was decreased progressively (0.1 μg/kg per minute per hour) when euvolaemia and haemodynamic stability were reached. No patient needed mechanical ventilation support and, when required, oxygen was delivered through an oxygen mask to obtain an arterial oxygen saturation greater or equal to 95%.
Transthoracic echocardiography
Transthoracic echocardiography was systematically performed at admission and after 24 hours. CO was assessed using the conventional pulsed Doppler method positioned at the LV outflow tract. LV volumes and ejection fraction were quantified using Simpson’s biplane method. Early and late diastolic filling flows were assessed using conventional pulsed Doppler. Right ventricular function was quantified by the amplitude of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). The inferior vena cava diameter was assessed from the subcostal view by M mode during the expiration period .
Haemodynamic monitoring
Invasive BP monitoring was performed using a radial arterial catheter. BP and urine output were monitored every hour during the first 12 hours and every 3 hours thereafter. ScvO 2 assessment was performed by a standard gas analyser using a blood sample taken from the central venous catheter. ScvO 2 was assessed before and every 12 hours after inotropic support was initiated.
Clinical outcomes
The primary endpoint was defined by the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) that included death, heart transplantation or cardiac assistance during the hospitalization period. Heart transplantation and cardiac assistance were indicated in eligible patients (age less than 65 years without severe comorbidity) with a maximal catecholamine dose (dobutamine 20 μg/kg per minute) despite an optimal volume load or a maximal diuretic dose (furosemide 1 g/24 hours); the decision was made by an expert committee that included cardiac surgeons and cardiologists not involved in the study. The French Transplantation Agency (Agence de la Biomédecine) guidelines do not include ScvO 2 as a criterion for patient referral for heart transplantation or cardiac assistance.
Statistical analysis
Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and nominal variables as percentages. Comparisons between patients with and without MACE were done using Student’s t test or variance analysis for continuous variables and the chi-square test for dichotomous values. Paired analysis was performed for repeated values. Multivariable analysis by stepwise regression was used to identify the independent predictor of outcome. For the first step, all variables with p < 0.1 were included in the model. Statistical difference was considered as significant when p < 0.05.
Results
Admission dobutamine and furosemide rates averaged 8.7 ± 4.3 μg/kg per minute (range 3–20) and 529 ± 366 mg/24 hours, respectively. Norepinephrine was added in 23 (38%) patients with persistent low BP at the rate of 0.22 ± 0.11 μg/kg per minute. Overall, CO (3.2 ± 1.3 L/minute to 3.6 ± 1.2 L/minute; p = 0.06), systolic BP and renal function improved under treatment ( Tables 1 and 2 ).
Event free ( n = 38) | MACE ( n = 22) | p | |
---|---|---|---|
ScvO 2 (%) | 57 ± 13 | 57 ± 14 | 0.9 |
SaO 2 (%) | 96.8 ± 1.9 | 96.2 ± 3.8 | 0.4 |
Lactates (mmol/L) | 2.2 ± 2.0 | 3.1 ± 3.4 | 0.2 |
pH | 7.43 ± 0.1 | 7.41 ± 0.1 | 0.4 |
BUN (mmol/L) | 15 ± 9 | 19 ± 8 | 0.1 |
Creatinine (μmol/L) | 172 ± 98 | 194 ± 95 | 0.4 |
Bilirubin (μmol/L) | 20 ± 11 | 29 ± 20 | 0.02 |
BNP (pg/L) | 3663 ± 3431 | 6841 ± 7856 | 0.03 |
Sodium (mmol/L) | 131 ± 4 | 129 ± 6 | 0.2 |
Potassium (mmol/L) | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 0.5 |
Haemoglobin (mg/dL) | 12.0 ± 2.0 | 11.6 ± 2.3 | 0.4 |
SBP (mmHg) | 97 ± 16 | 98 ± 19 | 0.8 |
Mean BP (mmHg) | 72 ± 11 | 69 ± 13 | 0.3 |
Heart rate (beats/minute) | 84 ± 17 | 94 ± 20 | 0.1 |
Cardiac index (L/minute per square meter) | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 2.0 ± 0.9 | 0.4 |
LVEF (%) | 26 ± 6 | 23 ± 9 | 0.3 |
EDV (mL) | 208 ± 84 | 229 ± 95 | 0.5 |
ESV (mL) | 156 ± 68 | 174 ± 81 | 0.5 |
E/A | 2.7 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 1.1 | 0.3 |
SPABP (mmHg) | 45 ± 12 | 41 ± 8 | 0.4 |
TAPSE (mm) | 13 ± 5 | 15 ± 7 | 0.3 |
IVC (mm) | 20.3 ± 3.9 | 21.1 ± 5.4 | 0.7 |
Dobutamine (μg/kg per minute) | 8.7 ± 4.6 | 8.6 ± 3.7 | NS |
Furosemide (mg/24 hours) | 499 ± 408 | 510 ± 355 | NS |
Noradrenaline | 10 (26) | 9 (41) | |
Rate (mg/hour) | 0.9 ± 0.25 | 0.9 ± 0.7 |