The annual American Journal of Cardiology ( AJC ) editorial board meeting was held on March 15, 2015, at the time of the Annual Scientific Sessions of the American College of Cardiology in San Diego, California. The major purposes of the meeting are to bring the board members up to date on activities during the previous year and to thank them for reviewing manuscripts. The meeting began with a discussion by the new publisher, Ms. Joan Anuels, who described several initiatives that Elsevier has introduced during the past year for many of the journals, including the AJC . Mr. Brian Jenkins, also of Elsevier, discussed some upcoming supplements planned for 2015. The following editorial matters were then discussed:
- 1)
Introduction of new 2014 editorial board members ( Table 1 ). These new board members, most of whom I do not know personally, have been appointed to the board because of supplying excellent and timely reviews for the journal during recent times. We are always looking for good prompt reviewers so suggestions are always welcomed. The proven non-board reviewers are the obvious ones to replace “resting” board members, a number of whom were replaced in 2014.
Table 1
Olivier François Bertrand
Danny Chu
Eugene H. Chung
Fabrizio D’Ascenzo
Roberto Elosua
Dmitriy N. Feldman
Gemma Figtree
Akira Fujiki
Philip Green
Matthew E. Harinstein
Thomas Kahan
Tomoko Sugiyama Kato
Malte Kelm
Miklos David Kertai
Alexander Mazur
Robert John Mentz
Roger M. Mills
Gjin Ndrepepa
Giampaolo Niccoli
Parin J. Patel
Augusto Pichard
Fadi N. Salloum
- 2)
AJC board members reviewing the most manuscripts in 2014 ( Table 2 ). These board members will receive a certificate from the publisher indicating their top performance during 2014.
Table 2
Monty M. Bodenheimer
James C. Blankenship
Akira Fujiki
Matthew E. Harinstein
Malte Kelm
Lars Berglund
Danny Chu
Eugene H. Chung
Marc Cohen
Fabrizio D’Ascenzo
Stephen P. Glasser
Donald Carey Harrison
Tomoko Sugiyama Kato
Roger M. Mills
Gjin Ndrepepa
- 3)
Manuscripts submitted to the AJC in 2014 . A total of 3,057 manuscripts were submitted in 2014: 14 were withdrawn and a total of 670 (22%) were accepted. Of the 3,036 submitted and not withdrawn, 930 came from the USA and 356 (38%) were accepted; 2,106 were submitted from non-USA countries and 314 (15%) were accepted. The non-USA countries submitting the most manuscripts in 2014 were China (382), Japan (258), Italy (251), Turkey (113), Korea (107), Spain (86), Canada (76), France (72), Germany (70), United Kingdom (62), Israel (59), and The Netherlands (59). Fifty-one other countries submitted a total of 511 manuscripts. The acceptance rate among them ranged from 0% to 45%.
- 4)
Numbers of manuscripts submitted and published in the AJC 1983-2014 (32 years) during the present editorship ( Table 3 ). During these 32 full years 69,640 manuscripts were submitted and 22,191 were accepted. The acceptance rate has declined significantly in recent years. The reason the acceptance rate is as high as it is is because most manuscripts are shortened considerably and therefore space exists to publish more manuscripts. Subheadings, for example, are not used in the methods, results and discussion portions, and that saves space, and references, except in reviews, are limited to no more than 30. The AJC publishes more manuscripts each year than any other cardiology journal in the world.
Table 3
Year
Number of Manuscripts Submitted
Number of Manuscripts Published or Accepted
Percentage Accepted
1983
1,234
643
52%
1984
1,605
747
46%
1985
1,707
645
38%
1986
1,574
616
39%
1987
1,525
695
46%
1988
1,496
636
42%
1989
1,740
699
40%
1990
1,717
662
38%
1991
1,615
680
42%
1992
1,873
664
35%
1993
1,997
619
31%
1994
1,783
604
34%
1995
1,844
668
36%
1996
1,930
701
36%
1997
1,898
768
40%
1998
1,992
631
31%
1999
2,170
703
32%
2000
2,226
630
28%
2001
2,068
682
33%
2002
2,171
683
31%
2003
2,190
783
36%
2004
2,109
842
39%
2005
2,661
984
37%
2006
3,061
653
21%
2007
3,184
710
22%
2008
2,888
709
25%
2009
2,864
728
25%
2010
2,893
684
24%
2011
2,951
702
24%
2012
2,713
685
25%
2013
2,904
665
23%
2014
3,057 (5%↑)
670
22%
Total
69,640
22,191
32% Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree