Cardio-rheumatology clinics facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration by integrating advanced imaging techniques and systemic retrieval and analysis of complex data to improve understanding of disease mechanisms, guide therapy, and support personalized medicine. For women of childbearing potential, preventive cardiology requires careful consideration of medication toxicity and appropriate screening strategies. This narrative review examines how cardio-rheumatology clinics address cardiovascular disease risk reduction in individuals with rheumatic diseases, particularly for women of childbearing potential. A comprehensive search of published cardio-rheumatology literature using the term “cardio-rheumatology” was performed, and the articles were reviewed in detail for specific recommendations for women of childbearing potential. Although current cardio-rheumatology publications discuss traditional risk assessments, imaging, and laboratory screening, we found no specific clinical practice guidelines for women of childbearing potential with rheumatic diseases. Similarly, while reproductive health guidelines for this population are available, they do not offer dedicated preventative cardio-rheumatology recommendations, underscoring the critical role of cardio-rheumatology clinics.
Advances in cardiovascular imaging have transformed preventive cardiology by shifting risk assessment beyond luminal stenosis toward a more integrated evaluation of plaque burden, composition, vascular biology, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve to assess lesion-specific functional significance ( Figure 1 ). Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scoring and coronary computed tomography angiography now permit earlier identification of subclinical atherosclerosis and more refined cardiovascular risk stratification, yet their application in patients with systemic autoimmune disease remains incompletely defined. Individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases experience accelerated and often clinically silent atherosclerosis that is not fully explained by traditional cardiovascular risk factors, highlighting the need for disease-specific approaches to prevention within dedicated cardio-rheumatology clinics.
Coronary plaque analysis integrating anatomic, compositional, and functional assessment using coronary computed tomography angiography with CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRct). A three-dimensional coronary reconstruction demonstrates the distribution of total plaque burden along the left anterior descending artery with corresponding vessel-specific FFRct values. Longitudinal vessel views illustrate plaque contours and luminal narrowing across multiple rotational angles, consistent with moderate stenosis and a borderline FFRct value of 0.80. Cross-sectional plaque analysis and vessel territory quantification show a predominance of noncalcified plaque with a smaller calcified component. This example highlights how plaque burden and composition, rather than stenosis severity alone, contribute to functional impairment and may better capture inflammation-driven atherosclerosis relevant to cardio-rheumatology populations. Image courtesy of HeartFlow, Inc.
#Figure created by Bruno Lima, MD, PhD (Vanderbilt University Medical Center).
In patients with detectable coronary artery calcification, contemporary preventive strategies increasingly emphasize intensified lipid lowering and targeted anti-inflammatory therapy, including the combined use of statins and colchicine, to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events. While reduction of cardiovascular events remains the primary goal of preventive cardiology, these therapies introduce important considerations in rheumatology practice, where patients frequently experience musculoskeletal adverse effects or require concomitant medications such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, corticosteroids, and Janus kinase inhibitors that may independently modify cardiovascular risk. Defining vascular calcification and inflammation, and distinguishing atherosclerosis from aberrant vascular repair, therefore, represents a critical step in risk assessment for patients with rheumatic disease.
Beyond calcification, inflammation has emerged as a central driver of atherogenesis in autoimmune conditions, prompting the development of imaging techniques capable of visualizing vascular inflammatory activity directly. Perivascular and pericoronary adipose tissue (PVAT) attenuation derived from coronary CT has emerged as a reproducible surrogate marker of coronary inflammation that reflects local cytokine signaling and immune cell activation. As demonstrated in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune diseases, elevated perivascular fat attenuation can identify an inflammatory coronary phenotype even in the absence of significant calcific plaque ( Figure 2 ). These findings underscore the limitations of relying solely on calcium-based metrics in autoimmune disease populations and support the incorporation of inflammation-sensitive imaging within cardio-rheumatology clinics.
Perivascular adipose tissue attenuation in a lupus patient compared with a healthy control. ( A ) Right coronary artery (RCA) PVAT color map in a 38-year-old patient with lupus, showing warmer attenuation values within the 5 mm perivascular sampling layer. ( B ) Corresponding PVAT map in an age-matched control without coronary plaque or systemic inflammation, demonstrating cooler and more negative adipose attenuation. ( C ) Histogram of voxel-wise PVAT attenuation around the RCA for both subjects. The lupus case shows a right-shifted peak centered near −69 HU, consistent with an inflammatory PVAT phenotype, whereas the control exhibits a left-shifted peak near −92 HU (Normal average PVAT −85 to −95 HU). Dashed vertical lines mark mean PVAT values for each subject. *Normal PVAT values in low-risk individuals typically range from approximately −85 to −95 HU, reflecting a noninflamed perivascular fat environment. This reference range is based on previous CT-based characterization of coronary inflammation using perivascular fat attenuation mapping (Oikonomou EK et.al. 2018).
#Figure created by Bruno Lima, MD, PhD (Vanderbilt University Medical Center).
Among women with autoimmune disease who are of childbearing potential, pregnancy represents a critical window during which underlying vascular vulnerability may become clinically apparent. Gestational diabetes has been associated with future coronary artery calcification, reinforcing the importance of cardiovascular risk reduction early in life. In parallel, placental pathologies such as maternal vascular malperfusion, characterized by decidual arteriopathy, villous infarction, retroplacental hemorrhage, and placental calcification, reflect systemic endothelial dysfunction, immune dysregulation, and impaired vascular remodeling. These lesions mirror mechanisms implicated in atherosclerosis and provide a biologically plausible link between adverse pregnancy outcomes and long-term cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in women with rheumatic disease ( Figure 3 ).
Placental pathology as a link between autoimmune rheumatic diseases, preeclampsia, and future cardiovascular disease risk.
*Rheumatic diseases are associated with an increased risk of placental maternal vascular malperfusion, a lesion pattern associated with preeclampsia and dysregulated angiogenic signaling. Through shared pathways of systemic endothelial injury, oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation, these placental abnormalities provide a link between rheumatic diseases, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and future cardiovascular disease risk.
Given the teratogenic potential of many cardiovascular and immune-targeted therapies, primary prevention strategies in women of childbearing age require particular caution. Cardio-rheumatology clinics offer a unique opportunity to integrate advanced imaging, mechanistic insight, and medication toxicity screening within an interdisciplinary framework. This narrative review examines current preventive cardiology practices in cardio-rheumatology clinics, with a specific focus on medication toxicity and cardiovascular screening considerations in women of childbearing age, and highlights critical gaps where evidence-based guidance is currently lacking.
Methods
A structured literature search was conducted to identify published cardio-rheumatology clinic guidance relevant to cardiovascular risk reduction in women of childbearing age. Searches were performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, and Scopus from database inception through October 1, 2025, using the indexed term “cardio-rheumatology.” Duplicate records were removed before screening. Titles and abstracts were independently reviewed by two investigators, followed by full-text assessment of eligible articles. Studies were evaluated for the presence of clinic-based recommendations addressing cardiovascular screening or medication-related considerations in women of childbearing potential. Data extraction and qualitative assessment were performed independently by both reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by consensus. Given the narrative scope of this review, formal PRISMA guidelines were not applied.
Results
The articles identified by the search term “cardio-rheumatology” were reviewed in detail for preventative care recommendations specific to women of childbearing potential. No publications provided dedicated cardio-rheumatology clinic guidelines for primary CVD prevention in this population.
Primary prevention treatment considerations in cardio-rheumatology clinic
Primary prevention aims to modify atherogenesis, a process governed by a complex interplay of inflammation, tissue remodeling, and cellular transdifferentiation, which can make attempts at delineating the cell type a challenge. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), degrades platelet-activating factor and oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL). Most of the circulating Lp-PLA2 is produced by macrophages within the vascular wall, but whether statins can reduce Lp-PLA2 is still inconclusive. Colchicine may attenuate Lp-PLA2 production by inhibiting leukocyte adhesion and infiltration, providing a mechanistic rationale for combination therapy with statins to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events. However, both agents are substrates and inhibitors of cytochrome p – 450 (CYP) 3A4 and P-glycoprotein, and their combined use may substantially increase the risk of musculoskeletal toxicity, including life-threatening rhabdomyolysis and neuromyopathy.
Accurate characterization of coronary atherosclerosis in rheumatic disease requires assessment beyond luminal stenosis alone. Defining plaque burden, composition, and lesion-specific functional significance represents a critical step in cardiovascular risk stratification and is optimally achieved within dedicated cardio-rheumatology clinics using advanced imaging modalities. Figure 1 illustrates contemporary coronary plaque analysis integrating anatomic plaque quantification, compositional assessment, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve, highlighting how noncalcified plaque burden may contribute to functional impairment even in the absence of severe stenosis.
Inflammation-driven vascular pathology may further escape detection by traditional calcification-based metrics. Figure 2 demonstrates perivascular adipose tissue attenuation as a marker of coronary inflammation, illustrating that vascular changes in autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus may reflect active inflammatory remodeling rather than conventional atherosclerotic calcification. Together, these imaging approaches underscore the limitations of relying solely on calcium scoring in autoimmune populations and support inflammation-sensitive, multimodal assessment strategies.
Prepregnancy counseling in rheumatic disease should include delineation of current functional and structural cardiovascular status and appropriate adjustment of medications. Pulmonary hypertension screening is standard for prepregnancy planning in systemic sclerosis; there may be value in additional screening with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. When imaging is required during pregnancy, gadolinium-based contrast agents are contraindicated, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocols should rely on noncontrast techniques, including cine imaging and precontrast parametric mapping, when clinically indicated. The role of standardized cardiac imaging in cardio-rheumatology clinics for women of childbearing potential is not currently incorporated into guidelines.
Assessing risk factors for primary prevention medication toxicity
Promotion of health education, such as dietary goals for body weight control, tobacco cessation, stress management, and regular exercise, is appropriate for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk modification in all patients regardless of sex or childbearing potential. However, medication additions have important considerations in rheumatic disease. For example, blood pressure management may benefit from agents also used to treat Raynaud’s phenomenon, such as calcium channel blockers or angiotensin receptor blockers. , Other agents, such as angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors, may be avoided in patients at high risk for renal crisis, since prophylactic use is associated with worse outcomes. In patients with rheumatic disease, one should assess for underlying myopathy before statin addition and renal insufficiency before colchicine addition. Medication screening is especially critical in women of childbearing potential ( Figure 4 ). Medications including ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are contraindicated for use in pregnancy, particularly during the second and third trimesters.
Medication review in cardio-rheumatology clinic.
Mild myalgia may affect 5% to 10% of statin users; however, the documentation of a baseline creatinine kinase (CK) before the addition of a statin can be helpful as a myopathy screen. If CK is noted to be significantly elevated while a patient is on a statin, autoimmune necrotizing myopathy should be considered, and an anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase should be checked. If the anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase is positive, statin-associated cardiomyopathy should be considered, and a CMR image should be obtained to assess for subacute cardiac toxicity. When CMR imaging is required in women who are pregnant or may be pregnant, gadolinium-based contrast agents are contraindicated, and noncontrast protocols should be used when clinically indicated.
Colchicine is taken up by leukocytes and, due to its ability to bind to tubulin, interferes with microtubular function and the expression of cytokines and interleukins, which impedes the ability of neutrophils to marginate, express superoxide, release neutrophil extracellular traps, and interact with platelets. Colchicine at a dose of 0.5 mg daily led to a significantly lower risk of ischemic cardiovascular events than placebo in a randomized, double-blind trial involving patients recruited within 30 days after a myocardial infarction, but did not reduce the incidence of the composite primary outcome (death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned ischemia-driven coronary revascularization). , The 0.5-mg colchicine tablet is not available in some countries, including the United States, where only 0.6-mg tablets are available. About 90% of ASCVD patients, in the absence of advanced renal or liver disease, can tolerate colchicine, gastrointestinal tract adverse effects can be problematic. , Notably, colchicine-induced rhabdomyolysis can occur and is a consideration in patients with elevated CK on this drug, , which further illustrates the consideration of baseline CK and aldolase laboratories before drug initiation, especially if used in addition to statin primary prevention therapy. While colchicine can be used during pregnancy, its role for CVD prevention in this situation is not established. On the other hand, women of childbearing potential should be on an effective contraception while on statins, and its use is not recommended during pregnancy. The role of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) in autoimmune disease patients with ASCVD is also uncertain and controversial due to potential pleiotropic immunomodulatory effects; however, it is a consideration in patients requiring lipid lowering with autoimmune necrotizing myopathy. ,, The use of PCSK9 inhibitors (medications like alirocumab and evolocumab) during pregnancy should be avoided due to potential risks of fetal malformations involving multiple systems.
Rheumatologists and cardiologists must carefully assess the risks and benefits of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, corticosteroids, and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with ASCVD, and the use of biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, Lp(a), and CAC screening may help refine risk stratification. Similarly, the adverse cardiac effects of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) used for rheumatic disease deserve mention when patients are seen in cardio-rheumatology clinics. While HCQ is safe during pregnancy, physicians should be mindful of its potential cardiac adverse effects and consider an electrocardiogram for QTc monitoring on patients receiving HCQ for the treatment of systemic autoimmune disease. Cardiomyopathy has been documented in patients with chronic HCQ toxicity and is thought to arise from lysosomal dysfunction and accumulation of toxic phospholipids within cardiomyocytes. Characteristics of cardiac biopsy findings include enlarged and vacuolated cells on light microscopy as well as the presence of myelinoid and curvilinear bodies on transmission electron microscopy. Peripartum cardiomyopathy assessments are aided by incorporating tissue-based analyses, with optimal management in cardio-rheumatology clinics.
Cardiovascular mechanistic considerations in rheumatic disease
Immune mechanisms play an important role in the development, progression, and vulnerability of atherosclerotic lesions. There is marked heterogeneity of immune cells in atherosclerotic plaques as well as in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in subjects with atherosclerosis. Immune responses to foam cells may be variable, but ultimately foam cells and macrophages die to give rise to cholesterol-rich necrotic cores that can rupture to stimulate thrombus formation. Thus, while environmental exposures and genetic susceptibility are important in the evolution of atherosclerosis, a well-recognized heterogeneity in inflammation within the atherosclerotic lesions is appreciated. Unfortunately, the progressive vasculopathy of atherosclerosis is not symptomatic until damage restricts perfusion. Hypoxia further contributes to an additional inflammatory response and is critical for vascular calcification. Risk for ASCVD shows considerable heterogeneity. While atherosclerotic intimal calcification is traditionally associated with increasing age, male sex, smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, systemic and local vascular inflammation in rheumatic diseases can also accelerate atherosclerosis. , Chronic inflammation promotes endothelial dysfunction and leukocyte transmigration, driving oxidation of apoB-containing lipoproteins and their subsequent uptake by activated macrophages. Calcification occurs very early in atherosclerosis and is detectable by computed tomography when it accumulates in the vasculature, and provides direct evidence of coronary artery disease. The presence and severity of coronary artery calcification are associated with increased risk of mortality independently of age and comorbidities in rheumatic disease. , Accordingly, CT-derived fractional flow reserve and CAC screening for subclinical atherosclerosis can refine cardiovascular risk stratification and further inform treatment decisions. , The role of statin therapy to modify inflammation on new coronary plaque formation and impact the calcification of prevalent noncalcified lesions is suggested in rheumatoid arthritis. Statins seem to promote a type of “beneficial” atherosclerotic calcification through suppressing atherosclerotic lesion expansion and impacting vulnerability to plaque rupture. However, the underlying biological mechanisms remain incompletely understood, and more research is required to clarify the underlying mechanisms of the stabilizing effect of statins on calcific plaques in both the general population and those with rheumatic diseases.
Advances in atheroma transcriptomic analysis identified that lesions from clinically symptomatic patients had higher fractions of proinflammatory M1 macrophages and pericytes, but lower fractions of classical and modulated smooth muscle cells compared with asymptomatic patients, particularly women. Of interest, the presence of diabetes or statin treatment did not affect the cell fraction distribution. Pericytes are multipotent cells wrapping microvascular capillaries, which are essential for vessel stabilization and immune cell trafficking across the vessel wall. The pericyte shares a common basement membrane and partially surrounds the endothelial cell, playing a fundamental role in maintaining local and tissue homeostasis and contributing to calcification. Pericytes share some properties and markers with multipotent mesenchymal stem cells and smooth muscle cells, and can transdifferentiate into other cells of the mesenchymal lineage (such as myocytes, osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes) and neural cells, making precise characterization and in vivo tracking challenging. Nonetheless, advances in tissue diagnostics offer the potential to uncover mechanisms of vascular pathology in rheumatic disease.
Placental analysis in rheumatic disease offers an additional opportunity for understanding significant vascular pathology, , especially related to maternal vascular infarction and calcification. Such insights may help improve outcomes for subsequent pregnancies and identify a high-risk group for postpartum screening. For instance, preeclampsia, when associated with placental maternal vascular malperfusion, was associated with higher odds of screening as high-risk for lifetime CVD at 6 months postpartum than women without these lesions; a finding relevant to rheumatology, given a significantly higher burden of preeclampsia among women with rheumatic disease. Thus, in addition to standardized imaging in cardio-rheumatology clinics, tissue analysis, including placental tissue, may help risk stratification.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree