Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in men with stable coronary heart disease in France and Spain




Summary


Background


Cigarette smoking, raised blood pressure, unfavourable lipid concentrations, diabetes and – more indirectly – obesity, are responsible for most coronary heart disease events in developed and developing countries.


Aims


The objective of our study was to compare prevalence, treatment and control of cardiovascular risk factors in two samples of men with stable coronary heart disease, recruited in France and Spain.


Methods


Standardized measurements of body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, plasma lipids, glycaemia, and smoking were collected and drug use was registered. Cross-sectional comparisons were made between French and Spanish samples.


Results


Data from 982 individuals were analysed (420 French and 562 Spanish men). Current smoking was more frequent in Spain ( p < 0.001), whereas hypertension and uncontrolled blood pressure were more frequent in France ( p < 0.001). Mean concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly higher in France ( p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed regarding obesity, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and diabetes. More than 97% of participants presented with at least one of the following conditions: hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, obesity or smoking. Antiplatelet agents, calcium inhibitors, diuretics and hypoglycaemic drugs were used more frequently in France, whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and lipid-lowering treatments were used more frequently in Spain.


Conclusion


Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors is high among French and Spanish patients with stable coronary heart disease, with differences between countries regarding the distribution of the various risk factors. A great proportion of patients do not reach the recommended levels for risk factor control.


Résumé


Contexte


Le tabagisme, l’hypertension artérielle, les dyslipidémies, le diabète et plus indirectement, l’obésité sont à l’origine de la plupart des événements coronariens.


Objectifs


Le but de ce travail était de comparer la prévalence, les traitements et le contrôle des facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire, dans une population d’hommes coronariens, recrutés en France et en Espagne.


Méthodes


Des mesures standardisées de l’indice de masse corporelle, de la pression sanguine artérielle, des lipides plasmatiques, de la glycémie et du tabagisme ont été réalisées et les traitements médicamenteux ont été recueillis.


Résultats


Un groupe de 982 patients de sexe masculin a été constitué (420 français et 562 espagnols). Le tabagisme actif était plus fréquent en Espagne ( p < 0,001), l’hypertension et le non-contrôle des chiffres de pression sanguine artérielle se rencontraient plus fréquemment en France ( p < 0,001). Les niveaux plasmatiques moyens de cholestérol-LDL et de triglycérides étaient plus élevés en France ( p < 0,001). Aucune différence significative n’a été mise en évidence sur l’obésité, le cholestérol-HDL ou le diabète. Plus de 97 % des patients présentaient une hypertension, une dyslipidémie, un diabète, une obésité ou un tabagisme. Les médicaments antiagrégants plaquettaires, inhibiteurs calciques, diurétiques et hypoglycémiants étaient plus fréquemment utilisés en France. Les inhibiteurs de l’enzyme de conversion de l’angiotensine et les hypolipémiants étaient plus fréquents en Espagne.


Conclusion


La prévalence des facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire est élevée parmi les patients coronariens, en France comme en Espagne, mais la répartition des facteurs de risque est différente selon le pays. Une proportion importante de patients est insuffisamment contrôlée.


Abbreviations



ACE


angiotensin-converting enzyme


ARA II


angiotensin II receptor antagonist


BMI


body mass index


CHD


coronary heart disease


HDL


high-density lipoprotein


LDL


low-density lipoprotein





Background


Understanding the crucial role of cardiovascular risk factors has established new paradigms in the epidemiological approach to CHD. In the past decades, many potential new precursors of CHD have been identified, such as thrombotic, inflammatory or genetic factors, infectious agents, early life exposures, oestrogen deficiency and psychosocial factors . However, cigarette smoking and traditional risk factors (raised blood pressure, unfavourable lipid concentrations, diabetes and obesity [which is linked more indirectly to cardiovascular risk]), partially promoted by inappropriate diet and physical inactivity, are the most prevalent cardiovascular risk factors in both developed and developing areas of the world, and also have the highest impact on CHD incidence .


The literature has often reported that major cardiovascular risk factors can only explain half of the burden of CHD incidence, based on the observation that many individuals with significant levels of cardiovascular risk factors never experience CHD events and, conversely, that some individuals with CHD lack any of the major cardiovascular risk factors . However, this hypothesis is no longer supported by epidemiological studies, which show that only 15–20% of stable CHD patients lack all of the major cardiovascular risk factors . These major modifiable risk factors are largely uncontrolled .


Populations in Southern Europe, where the incidence and mortality from CHD is low, have shown a prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors close to the prevalence observed in countries characterized by much higher CHD incidence and mortality . France and Spain are two adjacent Southern European countries that share high life expectancy despite different lifestyle habits, dietary patterns and healthcare systems. Treatments and hospitalizations for acute coronary syndromes are funded entirely by the national healthcare system in each country. However, while expenditures for secondary prevention treatments and complementary tests are covered totally by the French system, with no prepayment required from patients, the Spanish healthcare system pays for secondary prevention drugs only in patients older than 65 years, whereas younger patients are partially reimbursed.


Data on cardiovascular risk factors at discharge after acute myocardial infarction have already been reported in France and Spain , but prevalence and long-term management of cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with stable CHD have not been studied in detail, especially with regard to lipid disorders. The aim of the present study was to compare prevalence, treatment and control of cardiovascular risk factors in two samples of men with stable CHD recruited in France and Spain.




Methods


Population setting


This analysis was designed to compare the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with stable CHD living in two regions of South-West Europe: France and Spain. In France, participants were recruited as part of the Génétique et Environnement en Europe du Sud (GENES) study, a case-control study designed to assess the role of gene–environment interactions in the occurrence of CHD. Participants were men living in the Toulouse area (Haute-Garonne, South-West France, bordering on Spain), a region of 1.1 million inhabitants (540,000 men). Participants were included from 2001 to 2004. For the present analysis, only cases with a history of acute myocardial infarction were taken into account. Eligible participants were French male CHD patients, aged 45–74 years, living in the area of Toulouse and hospitalized in the Toulouse University Hospital for follow-up of stable CHD. Prior acute myocardial infarction had to be documented in the medical file of the patient and be determined from evidence of new pathological Q-waves on electrocardiogram, imaging evidence of healed acute myocardial infarction or evidence of a region of loss of viable myocardium that was thinned and failed to contract, in the absence of a non-ischaemic cause. Patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction, electrocardiogram changes or rise in cardiac enzymes (> 1.5 times the upper limit) in the past 2 months, were excluded.


In Spain, the Registre Gironi del Cor Project (REGICOR) records all acute myocardial infarctions occurring in local inhabitants in six counties in Gerona. This province is located in North-East Spain, bordering on France, with a reference population of approximately 600,000 subjects. The registry process is done prospectively, and encompasses those patients admitted to the only referral hospital in the area. In order to be eligible, subjects have to be clinically diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction. Once identified, patients are classified according to the MONItoring of trends and determinants in CArdiovascular diseases (MONICA) project algorithm, which takes into account type of symptoms, electrocardiogram findings and enzymes . Selected patients were part of the definite non-fatal acute myocardial infarction group, defined as: definite electrocardiogram; or typical, atypical or inadequately described symptoms, together with probable electrocardiogram and abnormal enzymes; or typical symptoms and abnormal enzymes with ischaemic or non-codeable electrocardiogram or electrocardiogram not available . The inclusion period lasted between 1995 and 2004, although 75% of patients were recruited after 2001. A 6-month follow-up was done to measure blood lipid concentrations in patients with stable status.


In summary, men aged 45–74 years, with stable CHD, who reported a history of acute myocardial infarction were selected in both studies for the purpose of our analysis. The sample size (420 and 562 individuals in France and Spain, respectively), allowed us to detect differences between centres in the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors of greater than 10 percentage-points, with a statistical power of at least 87.5%. Authorization from the local ethics committees was obtained in accordance with the French and Spanish laws and the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants were informed about the aim of the study and informed consent was signed by each subject.


Questionnaires


Age and socioeconomic variables were collected through standardized interviews. Smoking status was classified as smokers (current smokers or smokers who had quit for < 1 year), former smokers (those who had quit for > 1 year) and non-smokers. All medications taken were also recorded. Antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, nitrates, calcium inhibitors, ACE inhibitors, diuretics, ARA II and lipid-lowering treatments were taken into account for the purposes of the study. In the REGICOR project, information on the last two drugs was only available from 2001.


Clinical measurements


Examinations were performed by a team of trained nurses, physicians and interviewers, who used equivalent standard questionnaires and measurement methods in both surveys . Anthropometrical measurements, including height and body weight were taken according to standardized procedures. BMI was determined as weight divided by height squared (kg/m 2 ). Participants were classified into three groups according to BMI: normal weight, BMI < 25 kg/m 2 ; overweight, BMI ≥ 25 and < 30; obese, BMI ≥ 30. Blood pressure was measured with a periodically calibrated mercury sphygmomanometer in Spain and an automatic sphygmomanometer (OMRON 705 CP) in France. A cuff adapted to the upper arm perimeter was selected for each participant. Measurements were performed after at least a 5-minute rest. Two measurements were taken and the lower value was recorded for the analysis. The cut-off points to define hypertension followed the criteria proposed in the Second Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Coronary Heart Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice and in the 2000 recommendations from the French Health Product Safety Agency . These guidelines were chosen as they were in current use in Spain and France when the studies were carried out. The guidelines recommended identical goals and methods for cardiovascular prevention, except regarding the target goal for cholesterol, which was lower in the European guidelines than in the French guidelines, as described in the next paragraph. The following definitions were used for hypertension and its treatment and control: history of hypertension (when participants reported a previous diagnosis or treatment for hypertension); real hypertension (history of hypertension or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg); treated hypertension (patients with a history of hypertension on drug treatment); controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure < 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg among treated patients). Reference values were systolic blood pressure < 130 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg for diabetic patients.


Blood sample collection and biological analyses


In both centres, blood was withdrawn after a 10–14-hour fast, with less than 60 seconds duration, at least 2 months after acute myocardial infarction (6 months in Spain). Serum sample aliquots were stored at −80 °C. Briefly, total cholesterol, glucose and triglyceride concentrations were determined enzymatically. HDL cholesterol was measured as cholesterol after precipitation of apoprotein B-containing lipoproteins with phosphotungstic-Mg ++ . LDL cholesterol was calculated in both centres by the Friedewald equation whenever triglycerides were less than 3.4 mmol/L (389 and 544 individuals in France and Spain, respectively). Biological measurements were performed in a core laboratory in Barcelona for Spanish participants and in a core laboratory in the Toulouse University Hospital for French subjects . The cut-off points to define dyslipidaemia followed the criteria used in the Second Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Coronary Heart Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (LDL cholesterol ≥ 3.0 mmol/L or HDL cholesterol ≤ 1.0 mmol/L) in Spain , and the 2000 recommendations from the French Health Product Safety Agency (LDL cholesterol ≥ 3.4 mmol/L or HDL cholesterol ≤ 1.0 mmol/L) in France .


Glucose metabolism disturbances were classified as follows: history of diabetes (participants already diagnosed by a physician); impaired fasting glycaemia (fasting glycaemia ranging from 6.1–6.9 mmol/L in participants not previously diagnosed with diabetes); real diabetes (participants with a history of diabetes or with fasting glycaemia ≥ 7 mmol/L); treated diabetes (patients with a history of diabetes under drug treatment).


Statistical analyses


Initially, the analyses were performed on the whole sample, then age-stratified analyses were done (45–59 years; 60–74 years). Continuous variables are summarized as means and standard deviations, and categorical variables are presented as proportions. Student’s t test was used to compare means of continuous variables. A logarithmic transformation was done to compute the p -value for variables whose distribution departed from normal (i.e., glycaemia and triglycerides). The χ 2 -test was used to compare proportions. Statistical analysis was done with STATA software, version 9.2 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA).




Results


We included 982 individuals aged 45–74 years (420 French and 562 Spanish participants). The mean age was 60 years. The proportion of smokers was higher in Spanish participants whereas French subjects had a higher proportion of former smokers ( Table 1 ). The prevalence of obesity did not differ significantly between France and Spain ( Table 1 ). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly higher in French participants in all age strata, and real hypertension occurred more frequently. In addition, among French subjects treated for hypertension there was significantly lower percentage of people with blood pressure below recommended levels ( Table 1 ).



Table 1

Prevalence of obesity, smoking and hypertension in France and Spain, by age.

























































































































































































45–59 years 60–74 years All
France ( n = 222) Spain ( n = 272) p France ( n = 198) Spain ( n = 290) p France ( n = 420) Spain ( n = 562) p
BMI (kg/m 2 ) 27.2 ± 4.1 27.4 ± 4.0 0.718 27.0 ± 3.8 27.3 ± 3.8 0.370 27.1 ± 4.0 27.3 ± 3.8 0.395
Overweight and obesity 0.556 0.137 0.770
BMI < 25 kg/m 2 67 (30.2) 65 (28.3) 58 (29.3) 70 (29.2) 125 (29.8) 135 (28.7)
25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m 2 100 (45.1) 115 (50.0) 106 (53.5) 111 (46.3) 206 (49.1) 226 (48.1)
BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 55 (24.8) 50 (21.7) 34 (17.2) 59 (24.6) 89 (21.2) 109 (23.2)
Smoking < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Non-smokers 48 (21.6) 36 (13.3) 46 (23.2) 67 (23.3) 94 (22.4) 103 (18.5)
Smokers 78 (35.1) 199 (73.7) 24 (12.1) 107 (37.2) 102 (24.3) 306 (54.8)
Former smokers 96 (43.2) 35 (13.0) 128 (64.7) 114 (39.6) 224 (53.3) 149 (26.7)
SBP (mmHg) 129 ± 20 112 ± 16 < 0.001 139 ± 22 115 ± 19 < 0.001 134 ± 21 114 ± 18 < 0.001
DBP (mmHg) 82 ± 11 66 ± 12 < 0.001 82 ± 10 66 ± 12 < 0.001 82 ± 10 66 ± 11 < 0.001
History of hypertension 82 (36.9) 107 (41.0) 0.362 85 (42.9) 162 (57.5) 0.002 167 (39.8) 269 (49.5) 0.003
Real hypertension a 133 (59.9) 114 (42.5) < 0.001 147 (74.2) 172 (59.3) 0.001 280 (66.7) 286 (51.3) < 0.001
Treated hypertension b 78 (95.1) 102 (98.1) 0.257 84 (100.0) 158 (97.5) 0.146 162 (97.6) 260 (97.7) 0.918
Controlled hypertension c 38 (48.7) 70 (68.6) 0.007 30 (35.7) 118 (74.7) < 0.001 68 (42.0) 188 (72.3) < 0.001

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 17, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in men with stable coronary heart disease in France and Spain

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access