Prevalence and Definition of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

 

n =

Inclusion

Mean age (years)

Quantitation of MR

Recruitement

Timing of echo/MI

MR (%)

Moderate/Severe MR (%)

Van Dantzig et al. [20]

188

Acute MI

63

Jet area

Hospitalised pts

<48 h


13 moderate or severe

Ma et al. [15]

223

Acute MI

59

Jet area

Hospitalised pts

Admission

21


1–3 months

39

Neskovic et al. [16]

131

Acute MI

55

Jet area

Hospitalised pts

1 week

26


1 year

38

18 grade ≥ 2/3

Feinberg et al. [21]

417

Acute MI

62

Jet area

Hospitalised pts

<48 h

35

6 moderate or severe

Golia et al. [22]

191

Recent MI (mean 17 days)

60

Jet area

Patients referred for dobutamine echo

Mean 17 days

59

8 grade ≥ 3/4

Bursi et al. [7]

773

Recent MI

69

Jet area

Cohort

Mean 3 days

50

12 moderate or severe

<30 days

Aronson et al. [23]

1,190

Acute MI

61

Jet area

Hospitalised pts

Median 2 days

46

6 moderate or severe

Perez de Isla et al. [24]

279

NSTEMI (<1 week)

66

Semi-quantitative

Hospitalised pts

Median 2 days

40

16 grade ≥ 3/4

Okura et al. [25]

524

Chronic IHD (12 % MI <14 days)

69

Jet area

Referred for echo



11 severe


IHD ischaemic heart disease, MI myocardial infarction, MR mitral regurgitation, NSTEMI non-ST elevation myocardial infarction




Table 1.2
Prevalence of secondary mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure with left ventricular dysfunction















































































 
n=

Mean age (years)

Mean LVEF (%)

Quantitation of MR

Recruitement

Ischaemic heart disease (%)

MR (%)

MR severity (%)

Varadarajan et al. [8]

370

65

21

Jet area + quantitative Doppler

Heart failure clinic

39

94*

15 grade 3/4

14 grade 4/4

Rossi et al. [26]

1,256

67

32

Quantitative Doppler

Hospitalised pts in 4 centres

61

73

24 with ERO ≥0.20 cm2 or reg. vol >30 ml

Agricola et al. [28]

198

66

33

Quantitative Doppler

Hospital cohort

0

65

50 with ERO ≥0.20 cm2

Bursi et al. [29]

469

60

30

Jet area

Outpatient clinic in 2 centres

36

95

30 grade 3/4

14 grade 4/4

Deja et al. [14]

1,212

60

27

Site-reported

Randomized trial (99 centres)

100

64

18 moderate or severe

Indication for CABG + EF < 35 %


* probably including trivial MR, CABG coronary artery bypass grafting, EF left ventricular ejection fraction, ERO effective regurgitant orifice, MR mitral regurgitation


The only population-based study was performed in a prospective cohort of 1,331 patients who experienced a first myocardial infarction [7]. Echocardiographic examination was performed a mean of 3.0 ± 4.5 days following myocardial infarction in 773 patients (58 %). Ischaemic MR was present in 386 patients (50 %) and graded mild in 297 (38 %) and moderate or severe in 89 (12 %). Patients who did not undergo echocardiography were younger, had a lower Killip class and a smaller infarction size. Patients with MR were older, more frequently women, had more frequent comorbidities, more severe impairment of left ventricular function, higher pulmonary pressures and a greater Killip class than patients without MR. Conversely, there was no relationship between the presence of ischaemic MR and the extent and location of myocardial infarction (anterior or inferior). The frequency of ischaemic MR did not significantly differ between ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (46 % vs. 52 % respectively, p = 0.10).

An estimation based on a literature search and extrapolation to the US adult population concluded that restrictive MR (Carpentier type III) was the most frequent mechanism of MR and estimated a prevalence of moderate-to-severe ischaemic MR between 7.5 and 9 per 1,000 [27].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 4, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Prevalence and Definition of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access