Summary
Background
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a frequent severe disease. Disease-management programmes, which contain a therapeutic patient education component, will play a central role in improving delivery of care and reducing mortality and hospitalizations for CHF.
Aims
In order to have an up-to-date overview of medical treatment of CHF in France implemented by hospital and clinic cardiologists especially interested in CHF and therapeutic patient education, we described the prescription of cardiovascular drugs in the large ODIN cohort of CHF patients, according to age and type of CHF.
Methods
From 2007 to 2010 (median follow-up 27.2 months), CHF patients were prospectively enrolled in a multicentre ‘real-world’ French cohort by centres previously trained in therapeutic patient education. Patients were grouped according to age (< 60 years, 60 to < 70 years, 70 to < 80 years and ≥ 80 years) and type of CHF (characterized by level of LVEF: reduced, borderline or preserved). Medical prescription was described and mortality was assessed at long-term follow-up.
Results
The cohort consisted of 3237 patients (67.6 years; 69.4% men). The oldest age group had the highest LVEF. Blockers of the angiotensin-aldosterone system were prescribed progressively and significantly less frequently as the population advanced in age or as LVEF was more preserved. The mean dosages of the main prescribed CHF drugs remained ≥ 50% lower than those recommended for most drugs in all age and LVEF groups. Drug prescriptions were related to aetiology of reduced or preserved CHF. A global decrease in CHF drug prescription was observed for all medication classes except calcium blockers, according to maintenance of relatively or totally preserved LVEF. Survival was related to age but not to type of CHF.
Conclusion
In CHF, and despite management by cardiologists particularly interested in CHF and specifically trained to deliver therapeutic patient education, medical prescription differed substantially from guidelines. Age and type of CHF (reduced versus preserved) appeared to be important factors in lack of adherence to guidelines. However, only age influenced mortality; the type of CHF did not affect survival.
Résumé
Contexte
L’insuffisance cardiaque (IC) est une maladie fréquente et sévère. Les programmes de prise en charge de la maladie, qui contiennent une composante d’éducation thérapeutique du patient, jouent un rôle central dans l’amélioration des soins et la réduction de la mortalité et des hospitalisations liées à l’IC.
Objectif
Afin d’avoir un aperçu récent du traitement médical de l’IC en France, mis en place par des cardiologues d’hôpitaux ou de cliniques spécialement intéressés par l’IC et l’éducation thérapeutique du patient, nous avons décrit la prescription des médicaments cardiovasculaires au sein de la grande cohorte ODIN de patients IC selon l’âge et le type d’IC déterminé par le niveau de fraction d’éjection ventriculaire gauche (FEVG).
Méthodes
De 2007 à 2010 (suivi médian 27,2 mois), les patients IC étaient prospectivement inclus dans une cohorte française multicentrique sur la base de la pratique réelle, par des centres ayant été formés à l’éducation thérapeutique du patient. Les patients étaient regroupés selon leur âge (< 60 ans ; 60 à < 70 ans ; 70 à < 80 ans ; et ≥ 80 ans) et le type d’IC caractérisé par le niveau de FEVG (réduite, borderline ou préservée). La prescription médicale était décrite et la mortalité était évaluée à long terme.
Résultats
La cohorte comprenait 3237 patients (67,5 ans ; 69,5% d’hommes). Le groupe d’âge le plus âgé avait la FEVG la plus haute. Les bloqueurs du système angiotensine-aldostérone étaient progressivement et significativement moins prescrits alors que la population avançait en âge ou que la FEVG était plus préservée. Le dosage moyen des drogues principalement prescrites dans l’IC restait au moins 50 % plus bas que celui recommandé pour la majorité des substances dans tous les groupes d’âge ou de FEVG. La prescription des médicaments était liée à l’étiologie de l’IC avec FEVG réduite ou préservée. Une diminution globale de la prescription des médicaments de l’IC était observée en fonction du maintien d’une FEVG relativement ou totalement préservée, pour toutes les classes de médicaments à l’exception des inhibiteurs calciques. La survie était liée à l’âge mais pas au type d’IC.
Conclusions
Dans l’IC et malgré une prise en charge par des cardiologues particulièrement intéressés à l’IC et spécifiquement formés pour pratiquer une éducation thérapeutique du patient, la prescription médicale différait sensiblement des recommandations. L’âge et le type d’IC (systolique vs à fonction systolique préservée) étaient d’importants facteurs d’inadéquation à la prescription médicale recommandée. Cependant, seul l’âge influençait la mortalité; le type d’IC défini par le niveau de FEVG ne jouait aucun rôle dans la survie.
Introduction
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a frequent severe disease that has become a major public health problem in industrialized countries . In this context, disease management programmes appear geared up to play a central role in improving delivery of care and reducing mortality and CHF hospitalizations, as established by meta-analyses . As an integral part of disease management programmes, therapeutic patient education has been recognized in most industrialized countries and is recommended in European guidelines . Following this format, the insuffisance cardiaque : éducation thérapeutique (I-CARE) programme was developed in France to promote the establishment of therapeutic patient education units in all types of cardiology centres, based on a voluntary approach by the medical team . A large prospective multicentre French cohort of CHF patients (ODIN: observatoire de l’insuffisance cardiaque ) enrolled in I-CARE centres trained in therapeutic patient education for CHF was constituted from 2007 to 2010 to assess the role of therapeutic patient education applied in routine practice; therapeutic patient education by trained health professionals appeared to be associated with a decrease in all-cause mortality . Among multivariable independent prognostic factors of survival, younger age and prescription of recommended neurohormonal blockers appeared to play an important role.
In order to have an up-to-date overview of medical treatment of CHF in France implemented by hospital and clinic cardiologists especially interested by CHF and trained in therapeutic patient education, we decided to describe the prescription of cardiovascular drugs in the large ODIN cohort of CHF patients, according to age and type of CHF.
Methods
Patient population
Selection of centres has been described in detail previously . Briefly, centres had to have fulfilled the requirements for participation in the I-CARE programme , thereby validating their specialization in CHF management. Training was completed for 110 centres in 2007 and for more than 220 in 2010. Among the first 110 trained centres throughout France, 61 (55.5%) volunteered to contribute patients to the ODIN cohort.
Patients were enrolled prospectively between 2007 and 2010; during this period the therapeutic guidelines for CHF remained largely stable . Enrolment in the study was consecutive. To increase the external validity, exclusion criteria were deliberately kept to a minimum: patients were excluded only if they attended sites not participating in the I-CARE programme or if they declined to participate.
All patients received usual care, which consisted of care management according to European guidelines . Medical therapy was adjusted as judged necessary by the investigator. Patients completed a full education programme in addition to receiving usual care.
Four patient groups were defined according to age: < 60 years (Age 1); 60 to < 70 years (Age 2); 70 to < 80 years (Age 3); and ≥ 80 years (Age 4).
The initial clinical questionnaire did not take into account the pathophysiological type of CHF ( i.e . systolic or diastolic CHF); however, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was available in 92.3% of the patients, with a mean value of 39.8 ± 14.2% (range 6–88%). The threshold for defining LVEF groups has been discussed in European and American heart failure guidelines . We chose the usual 45% threshold for defining reduced LVEF and the 50% threshold for defining preserved LVEF. In accordance with the American guidelines , we preferred to create a borderline group to see if patients with an LVEF between 45 and 50% presented a similar profile to one of the other usual LVEF groups. It was therefore decided to create three groups according to LVEF: < 45% (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, HF-REF); 45–50% (heart failure with borderline ejection fraction, HF-BEF); and > 50% (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, HF-PEF).
Data collection
The investigation conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Commission nationale informatique et liberté – as required by French law for any patient cohort study in France – and the institutional independent ethical committee of the French Society of Cardiology. All patients gave informed consent before their inclusion in the cohort. Declarations of inclusion were made by centres on both nominative 1-page and medical 2-page record forms for each patient after being given an anonymous number by the centre; these were mailed separately to the French Society of Cardiology. Data were then recorded on two types of computerized case record forms according to the procedure requested and approved by the Commission nationale informatique et liberté.
Data were collected on the main cardiovascular classes of drugs administered by the oral route: all recommended CHF classes (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEIs], beta-blockers, angiotensin-receptor blockers [ARBs], diuretics, mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists [MRAs], digoxin and nitrates) and all other main non-CHF cardiovascular classes usually prescribed for the treatment of CHF causes or complications (amiodarone, antiplatelet therapies [aspirin and clopidogrel], anticoagulant drugs [antivitamin K therapies only], calcium blockers and statins). Furthermore, for all main CHF classes, the types of drugs used most frequently were listed with their daily dosage (perindopril and ramipril for ACEIs; bisoprolol, carvedilol, metoprolol and nebivolol for beta-blockers; candesartan and valsartan for ARBs; furosemide for loop diuretics; and eplerenone and spironolactone for MRAs) .
Follow-up data were collected through contact with the attending physicians, the patients or their families. If missing, vital status was assessed from the registries of the patients’ birthplaces. Only 4.9% ( n = 158) of patients were lost to follow-up.
Statistical analysis
All continuous variables are described as means ± standard deviations, except for time variables, which are expressed as medians [interquartile ranges]. All categorical variables are described with absolute and relative frequency distributions. Comparisons between groups used one-way analysis of variance and unpaired t tests for continuous variables and χ 2 tests for discrete variables. The Bonferroni test was used for comparisons between LVEF groups. Survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Prognostic factors for mortality, including age-defined groups, LVEF-defined groups, risk factors, heart failure aetiology, biological variables and main CHF drug treatments, were analysed with bivariate and multivariable Cox models. Biological variables were categorized into quartiles for serum creatinine (< 9.5 mg/L; 9.5–11.5 mg/L; > 11.5–15.0 mg/L; > 15 mg/L) or divided according to their median value for serum glucose (≤ and > 0.99 g/L) and serum haemoglobin (≤ and > 13.0 g/L). Serum natriuretic peptides were organized as non-decompensated (defined as B-type natriuretic peptide ≤ 400 pg/mL and/or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ≤ 450 pg/mL if the patient was aged < 50 years, ≤ 900 pg/mL if aged between 50 and 75 years and ≤ 1800 pg/mL if aged > 75 years) or decompensated levels. For multivariable models, a stepwise variable selection with sle = 0.1 and sls = 0.05 was applied. Results are expressed as hazard ratios with a 95% confidence interval.
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version PASW 18.0 software. For all tests, P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Cardiovascular medications in the whole population
The ODIN population has been detailed previously . In summary, a total of 3248 patients were included in the ODIN cohort, 11 of whom were declared twice ( i.e . by two different centres). For these patients, the first declaration was considered as the inclusion in the cohort and the second declaration was considered as a follow-up visit. The ODIN cohort therefore comprised 3237 patients with a mean age of 67.6 ± 14.2 years (range 16–97 years); 69.4% were men. Baseline clinical and biological main variables according to age-defined and LVEF-defined groups are reported in Table 1 . For CHF-dedicated medications, the large majority of patients received blockers of the renin-angiotensin system (69.9% received ACEIs and 20.3% received ARBs, which were always prescribed for ACEI intolerance), beta-blockers (80.6%), and loop diuretics (80.1%). Fewer patients were treated with MRAs (32.7%), digoxin (12.6%) and nitrates (8.7%).
Age 1 | Age 2 | Age 3 | Age 4 | P | HF-REF | HF-BEF | HF-PEF | P | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women | 26 | 24 | 30 | 44 | < 0.001 | 24 | 35 | 45 | < 0.001 |
Age (years) | 50.2 ± 8.1 | 64.9 ± 3.0 | 75.3 ± 2.9 | 84.7 ± 3.3 | < 0.001 | 65.6 ± 13.9 | 68.6 ± 14.2 | 72.3 ± 12.9 | < 0.001 |
Ischaemic heart disease | 38 | 48 | 53 | 50 | < 0.001 | 52 | 45 | 34 | < 0.001 |
DCM | 37 | 28 | 19 | 12 | < 0.001 | 32 | 20 | 11 | < 0.001 |
Hypertension | 36 | 56 | 65 | 67 | < 0.001 | 49 | 57 | 71 | < 0.001 |
Diabetes | 25 | 39 | 43 | 27 | < 0.001 | 31 | 35 | 38 | 0.006 |
Hypercholesterolaemia | 46 | 58 | 58 | 43 | < 0.001 | 53 | 52 | 47 | ns |
Smoking | 55 | 44 | 34 | 22 | < 0.001 | 45 | 39 | 31 | < 0.001 |
NYHA III/IV class | 13.5 | 17.0 | 22.7 | 36.5 | < 0.001 | 22.5 | 19.1 | 17.2 | 0.010 |
LVEF (%) | 36.0 ± 12.3 | 38.3 ± 13.9 | 41.2 ± 14.7 | 44.8 ± 14.7 | < 0.001 | 31.1 ± 7.4 | 47.2 ± 2.3 | 62.0 ± 7.0 | < 0.001 |
Atrial fibrillation | 9.3 | 20.5 | 36.6 | 48.9 | < 0.001 | 22.5 | 30.3 | 40.7 | < 0.001 |
LBBB | 21.8 | 27.4 | 26.6 | 23.7 | ns | 29.9 | 17.8 | 13.8 | < 0.001 |
Biventricular pacemaker | 5.7 | 11.7 | 11.2 | 5.2 | < 0.001 | 11.5 | 5.4 | 1.7 | < 0.001 |
ICD | 16.8 | 19.1 | 11.7 | 1.7 | < 0.001 | 18.9 | 3.9 | 1.3 | < 0.001 |
BMI (%) | 27.8 ± 6.2 | 28.1 ± 5.8 | 27.6 ± 5.5 | 25.3 ± 4.2 | < 0.001 | 26.8 ± 5.4 | 27.8 ± 5.9 | 28.7 ± 6.3 | < 0.001 |
Serum glucose (g/L) | 1.07 ± 0.43 | 1.13 ± 0.42 | 1.13 ± 0.38 | 1.09 ± 0.42 | 0.028 | 1.07 ± 0.38 | 1.09 ± 0.38 | 1.16 ± 0.44 | 0.002 |
Serum creatinine (mg/L) | 11.2 ± 5.3 | 13.1 ± 6.2 | 13.9 ± 5.8 | 14.4 ± 6.2 | < 0.001 | 12.8 ±5.7 | 13.3 ± 7.2 | 13.3 ± 5.8 | ns |
Serum haemoglobin (g/L) | 13.5 ± 1.9 | 13.1 ± 1.9 | 12.6 ± 1.8 | 12.4 ± 1.8 | < 0.001 | 13.1 ± 1.9 | 12.7 ± 1.9 | 12.7 ± 1.9 | < 0.001 |
BNP (pg/mL) | 415 ± 582 | 574 ± 874 | 816 ± 1374 | 1158 ± 1404 | < 0.001 | 764 ± 1259 | 565 ± 735 | 550 ± 708 | 0.003 |
NT-BNP (pg/mL) | 2370 ± 3831 | 2875 ± 5149 | 4115 ± 5420 | 6047 ± 7003 | < 0.001 | 4323 ± 6058 | 3803 ± 5697 | 2504 ± 3986 | 0.003 |
Follow-up deaths | 9.4 | 14.5 | 25.9 | 37.4 | < 0.001 | 20.3 | 22.8 | 20.5 | ns |