Predictors of Reperfusion Delay in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial




Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the optimal method of reperfusion when performed expeditiously. Factors contributing to delays in PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have not been thoroughly characterized or quantified. We sought to identify the factors associated with the delays to reperfusion in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Primary PCI was performed in 3,340 patients with STEMI in the international, multicenter Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent predictors of delay in achieving reperfusion from 38 baseline and procedural variables. A total of 905 patients (27.1%) presented to non-PCI hospitals and were subsequently transferred; the remainder presented to PCI hospitals. The most powerful independent predictor of the interval from symptom onset to arrival at the PCI hospital and the first door-to-balloon time was an initial presentation at a non-PCI hospital (median incremental 58- and 54-minute delay, respectively, both p <0.001). Other independent predictors of prolonged door-to-balloon times included presentation with respiratory failure (42-minute incremental delay, p = 0.003), presentation during off-work hours (11-minute incremental delay, p <0.001), and co-morbid conditions such as diabetes and heart failure. In conclusion, among patients undergoing primary PCI, presentation to a non-PCI hospital was the variable associated with the greatest delay to reperfusion. Systems of care that encourage ambulance diagnosis and direct delivery of patients with STEMI to a PCI hospital might shorten the overall door-to-balloon times and improve the clinical outcomes.


Compared to fibrinolytic therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results in superior clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when both reperfusion modalities are available at the presenting hospital. When patients with STEMI present to a non-PCI hospital, prompt transfer to a PCI hospital results in superior outcomes compared to on-site fibrinolytic therapy or fibrinolysis followed by transfer for PCI. However, delays in transfer for primary PCI might negate its benefits. Recent studies have identified strategies to allow individual PCI hospitals and larger healthcare systems to decrease the delays to reperfusion by PCI but have involved patient populations limited in size or geography. We therefore attempted to identify the factors associated with delays to reperfusion by primary PCI in a large international trial, the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) study.


Methods


The HORIZONS-AMI was a prospective, open-label, dual-arm factorial randomized, multicenter trial in which bivalirudin alone was compared to heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor and paclitaxel-eluting stents were compared to bare metal stents in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. The study enrollment of 3,602 patients occurred from March 25, 2005 to May 7, 2007 at 123 hospitals in 11 countries (United States, Europe, South America, and Israel). Consecutive patients ≥18 years who presented within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms and who had ST-segment elevation of ≥1 mm in ≥2 contiguous leads, new left bundle branch block, or true posterior myocardial infarction were considered for enrollment. The exclusion criteria have been previously reported and included contraindications to the study medications, bleeding diathesis, planned surgery within 6 months that would require interruption of thienopyridine therapy, previous (within 30 days) stenting, or life expectancy <1 year. The patients were not excluded for cardiogenic shock, previous cardiac arrest, or other high-risk conditions. The study was approved by the institutional review board or ethics committee at each participating hospital, and all patients provided written informed consent.


The patients enrolled in the present study either presented directly to a tertiary PCI hospital or to a non-PCI hospital with subsequent transferral to a PCI hospital (where randomization occurred). No study-mandated protocols were in place for transfer or pre-enrollment treatment. After assessment at the study PCI hospital and screening for exclusion criteria, the patients provided informed consent and were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with unfractionated heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor or to bivalirudin alone. Telephone randomization was performed using a computerized, interactive voice-response system. Aspirin (324 mg) and clopidogrel (300 or 600 mg) were given before angiography. Emergency coronary angiography with left ventriculography was performed after randomization followed by immediate primary PCI (n = 3,340, 92.7%), delayed PCI (n = 8, 0.2%), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 63, 1.7%), or medical management (n = 191, 5.3%). After restoration of patency to the infarct vessel, the eligible patients undergoing primary PCI were randomized again in a 3:1 ratio to either a paclitaxel-eluting stent (Taxus Express, Boston Scientific) or bare metal stent (Express, Boston Scientific). The 3,340 patients who underwent PCI constituted the study cohort for the present retrospective substudy.


Of the 3,340 PCI patients, 905 (27.1%) had presented at non-PCI hospitals and were subsequently transferred to undergo immediate angiography and primary PCI, and the remaining 2,435 patients had presented and were enrolled at the PCI hospital. Missing time data included symptom onset times (n = 29), arrival times at the non-PCI hospital (n = 80), PCI hospital arrival times (n = 946 patients, including 386 transferred and 580 nontransferred patients), catheterization laboratory arrival times (n = 5), and time of first balloon inflation (n = 113). Thus, symptom onset to first hospital door time data were available for 2,716 patients, first hospital door-to-balloon time data were available for 2,639, non-PCI hospital to PCI hospital door time data were available for 448, PCI hospital door to catheterization laboratory arrival time data were available for 2,372, and catheterization laboratory arrival to balloon time data were available for 3,222 patients.


The raw time data were used to calculate the intervals between symptom onset and balloon inflation. Categorical outcomes were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous data are reported as the median (interquartile ranges) and were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The univariate associations between 29 baseline demographic variables ( Table 1 ), 10 preprocedural adverse events ( Table 1 ), and 3 procedural variables (infarct-related artery, ejection fraction, and number of stents implanted) and each of the intervals were examined. Linear regression analysis was then performed to identify the independent correlates of each interval. Statistical significance was assumed at p = 0.05.



Table 1

Demographic and procedural variables for patients with first door-to-balloon time data available versus missing








































































































































































































































Variable All Patients (n = 3,340) Patients With Door-to-Balloon Time Data (n = 2,639) Patients Without Door-to-Balloon Time Data (n = 701) p Value
Age (years) 60.1 (52.5–69.7) 59.7 (52.3–69.7) 61.2 (53.7–69.8) 0.06
Men 77.2% 76.7% 79.0% 0.18
Diabetes mellitus 16.3% 16.1% 17.1% 0.41
Diabetes mellitus requiring insulin 4.4% 4.3% 5.0% 0.41
Hypertension 52.7% 51.9% 55.9% 0.06
Hyperlipidemia 42.8% 42.6% 43.7% 0.59
Smoker 64.4% 64.1% 65.5% 0.50
Previous coronary intervention 10.5% 10.6% 10.4% 0.91
Previous bypass surgery 2.6% 2.5% 3.0% 0.50
Previous angina pectoris 21.9% 21.2% 24.4% 0.07
Previous myocardial infarction 10.5% 10.4% 11.1% 0.56
Previous heart failure 2.6% 2.7% 2.6% 0.91
Peripheral vascular disease 4.4% 3.9% 6.3% 0.007
Previous major cardiac rhythm/rate disturbance 2.9% 2.8% 3.1% 0.63
Enrolled in United States 21.8% 25.4% 8.4% <0.0001
Presentation to noncoronary angioplasty hospital 27.1% 29.6% 7.6% <0.0001
Presentation during daytime 53.0% 53.7% 41.1% 0.004
Weight (kg) 80.0 (71.0–90.0) 80.0 (71.0–90.7) 80.0 (70.0–90.0) 0.23
Body mass index (kg/m 2 ) 27.1 (24.5–30.2) 27.1 (24.6–30.3) 27.0 (24.5–30.1) 0.29
Anemia (hematocrit <39% [men] or <36% [women]) 10.4% 9.9% 12.4% 0.06
Platelet count (cells/mm 3 ) 248 (208–292) 248 (209–292) 245 (204–291) 0.28
Creatinine clearance (ml/min) 88.7 (68.2–113.5) 89.4 (68.3–114.1) 87.4 (68.1, 111.8) 0.26
Killip class 2–4 8.6% 8.7% 8.4% 0.83
Ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation 2.2% 2.2% 2.4% 0.67
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.91
Bradycardia (<40 beats/min) 3.9% 3.9% 4.1% 0.74
Respiratory failure 0.5% 0.6% 0.3% 0.35
Complete heart block 1.6% 1.3% 2.7% 0.007
Atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia 1.5% 1.4% 2.0% 0.22
Hypotension 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 0.83
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 50 (42–59) 50 (42–57) 50 (45–61) <0.0001
Culprit artery
Left anterior descending 42.2% 41.9% 43.3% 0.52
Left circumflex 16.4% 17.4% 12.6% 0.003
Left main coronary artery 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.78
Right 45.5% 44.8% 48.0% 0.13
Number of stents implanted 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2) 1 (1–2) 0.03

Continuous variables are presented as median (twenty-fifth to seventy-fifth percentile).




Results


The baseline and procedural characteristics of all patients who underwent PCI for STEMI are listed in Table 1 . Presentation occurred during workday hours (Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. ) for 53% of patients, and 75% presented directly to a PCI-capable hospital. The baseline and procedural characteristics of the patients for whom the first door-to-balloon time was (n = 2,639) versus was not (n = 701) available were similar in most, but not all, respects ( Table 1 ).


The median first hospital door-to-balloon time was 99 minutes (interquartile range 73 to 135), and varied widely across the 123 PCI hospitals in the present study ( Figure 1 ). The median first hospital door-to-balloon time was longer for patients presenting first to a non-PCI hospital and then transferred to a PCI hospital (n = 781) than for to the patients presenting directly to a PCI hospital (n = 1,858; median 136 minutes, interquartile range 108 to 178, vs median 86 minutes, interquartile range 65 to 113, p <0.0001). Of the patients transferred from a non-PCI to a PCI hospital, the median first hospital door-to-balloon times in the United States (n = 150) were similar to those outside (n = 631) the United States (median 135.5 minutes, interquartile range 111 to 171, vs 136 minutes, interquartile range 108 to 179; p = 0.92). For patients presenting to a PCI hospital, the median first hospital door-to-balloon times in the United States (n = 520) were similar to those outside (n = 1,338) the United States (median 83 minutes, interquartile range 67 to 106, vs 89 minutes, interquartile range 65 to 115; p = 0.30).




Figure 1


Cumulative distribution of median first door-to-balloon times (n = 2,639) for 123 study sites enrolling in HORIZONS-AMI trial. Each hospital represented on X-axis in ascending median door to balloon times.


The univariate and multivariate correlates of first hospital door-to-balloon time among patients with complete time data are listed in Tables 2 and 3 . The strongest correlate of delay in the door-to-balloon time was presentation to a non-PCI hospital requiring transfer, which, on linear regression analysis, was associated with a 54-minute incremental delay to reperfusion. Other important independent correlates of prolonged door-to-balloon times were presentation with respiratory failure (42-minute incremental delay), previous congestive heart failure (15-minute incremental delay), and hospital arrival during off-work hours (11-minute incremental delay).



Table 2

Factors associated with longer first hospital door-to-balloon time in 2,639 patients (univariate analysis)


















































































































Variable Estimate Standard Error p Value
Demographic
Age (years) 0.26 0.09 0.005
Women 4.71 2.52 0.06
Body mass index 0.47 0.23 0.04
Enrolled outside United States 7.00 2.45 0.004
Hypertension 3.52 2.13 0.099
Diabetes mellitus 10.72 2.90 <0.001
Previous bypass surgery 12.99 6.77 0.06
Previous angina 12.33 2.60 <0.001
Previous myocardial infarction 7.98 3.49 0.02
Previous heart failure 23.01 6.62 <0.001
Peripheral vascular disease 11.77 5.48 0.03
Creatinine clearance <60 ml/min 5.77 2.98 0.053
Preprocedural status
Ventricular fibrillation −15.01 7.33 0.04
Respiratory failure 38.48 14.17 0.007
Presentation to non-PCI hospital 52.81 2.10 <0.001
Presentation during off-hours 11.89 2.13 <0.001
Procedural data
Infarct-related artery: circumflex 7.36 2.15 <0.001
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) −0.21 0.10 0.03

For continuous variables, differences are expressed as per-single-unit.

All variables from Table 1 with p <0.10 are listed.

Estimate was increase (positive numbers) or decrease (negative numbers) in minutes of door-to-balloon time associated with covariate compared to absence of covariate.


Table 3

Multivariate predictors of longer first hospital door-to-balloon time in 2,298 patients






















































Variable Estimate Standard Error p Value
Presentation to nonangioplasty hospital 53.94 2.18 <0.001
Respiratory failure 41.55 13.79 0.003
Previous congestive heart failure 15.17 6.57 0.02
Presentation during daytime weekday hours −10.52 1.99 <0.001
Diabetes mellitus 9.30 2.75 <0.001
Previous angina 8.02 2.44 0.001
Men −7.08 2.36 0.003
Infarct-related artery: circumflex 6.26 2.02 0.002
Left ventricular ejection fraction −0.25 0.09 0.003

For continuous variables, differences are expressed as per-single-unit.

Estimate was increase (positive numbers) or decrease (negative numbers) in minutes of door-to-balloon time associated with covariate compared to absence of covariate.


Independent correlates of delayed symptom onset to the first hospital arrival time included the presence of diabetes (associated with a 28-minute incremental delay) and previous angina (23-minute incremental delay), enrollment outside the United States (22-minute incremental delay) and presentation during daytime weekday hours (13-minute incremental delay; Table 4 ). Many of the same factors were also independent correlates of delay from symptom onset to arrival at the PCI hospital ( Table 4 ). However, by far, the most important variable correlating with a delay to arrival at the PCI hospital was previous presentation at a non-PCI hospital (59-minute incremental delay).



Table 4

Multivariate predictors of longer symptom onset to first hospital arrival time








































































































Variable Estimate Standard Error p Value
Symptom onset to first hospital door (n = 2,522)
Diabetes mellitus 28.27 7.46 <0.001
Previous angioplasty −27.95 8.75 0.001
Previous angina pectoris 23.12 6.47 <0.001
Enrolled in United States −21.94 6.27 <0.001
Hypertension 13.50 5.53 0.02
Presentation during daytime weekday hours 13.31 5.29 0.01
Age (years) 1.80 0.30 <0.001
Weight (kg) −0.77 0.22 <0.001
Creatinine clearance (ml/min) 0.65 0.12 <0.001
Symptom onset to angioplasty hospital door (n = 2,169)
Presentation to nonangioplasty hospital 58.79 7.55 <0.001
Diabetes mellitus 32.68 8.06 <0.001
Previous coronary angioplasty −29.87 9.11 0.001
Previous angina pectoris 26.65 7.14 <0.001
Enrolled in United States −19.27 6.85 0.005
Age (years) 2.02 0.33 <0.001
Weight (kg) −0.77 0.24 0.001
Creatinine clearance (ml/min) 0.67 0.13 <0.001

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 22, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Predictors of Reperfusion Delay in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access