Predictors of Progression to Low Cardiac Output or Cardiogenic Shock in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure

During hospitalization, patients with acute heart failure (AHF) may progress to low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) or cardiogenic shock (CS). However, the predictive factors for this evolution are not clearly defined. To evaluate the frequency of progression to LCOS or CS in patients hospitalized for AHF and to identify predictive factors of this progression among clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters obtained at admission. A single-center cohort study was conducted, performing a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients admitted for AHF between 2015 and 2020. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of LCOS or SCAI (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions) stage C to E CS during the index hospitalization. Logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex were used to determine the association between predictive factors and the occurrence of the primary endpoint. A total of 748 patients were included, with a mean age of 76 ± 11.7 years, 63.6% of whom were men. Coronary artery disease accounted for 34.5% of the etiology of heart failure (HF), and 36.9% of the patients had a previous hospitalization for HF. The median left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 46% (interquartile range 41, 60), and reduced LVEF <40% accounted for 40.5% of cases. The primary endpoint occurred in 22.33% of the cohort ( n = 167). In-hospital mortality was 38.9% in patients who developed LCOS or CS, compared to 4.5% in those who did not (p < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure at admission for every 10 mmHg decrease (odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.12–1.40, p < 0.001), estimated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min/m 2 (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.27–3.13, p = 0.003), LVEF <40% (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.11–2.45, p = 0.013), and TAPSE (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion) <18 mm (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.39–3.02, p < 0.001) were significant predictors of progression to LCOS or CS. In a cohort of patients hospitalized for AHF, systolic blood pressure, estimated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min/m 2, LVEF <40%, and TAPSE <18 mm were identified as predictive factors for progression to CS or LCOS. These simple, widely available parameters obtained at the time of admission may allow for early identification of at-risk patients and could impact management and treatment strategies. However, additional prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and confirm their clinical utility in routine practice.

Acute heart failure (AHF) refers to a sudden or rapidly progressive onset of symptoms and signs of HF. It may represent the first manifestation of previously undiagnosed heart failure or result from the worsening of a preexisting cardiac condition in a patient with an established diagnosis of heart failure (HF). It remains a growing global health burden. Recent data indicate increasing HF-related hospitalizations and persistently high mortality rates, particularly among patients requiring recurrent admissions, underscoring the urgent need for further studies aimed at improving risk stratification and clinical outcomes. In this context, AHF is a common cause of emergency department visits, the leading cause of hospitalization in individuals over 65 years of age and carries significant prognostic implications due to its association with rehospitalizations and mortality. Approximately 7% to 10% of patients hospitalized for AHF die during their hospital stay, and one-year mortality rates range from 20% to 36% in different series.

During hospitalization, patients with AHF may follow 2 main adverse clinical trajectories. Some experience initial improvement followed by clinical deterioration requiring intensification of therapy, whereas others remain refractory to initial treatment and require escalation of therapeutic interventions. It is estimated that 5% to 25% of patients hospitalized for AHF develop in-hospital worsening (IHW). , Although there is no universal definition, IHW is generally described as the worsening of HF symptoms and signs requiring intensification of intravenous diuretics, initiation of inotropes, or mechanical circulatory support. ,, Regardless of the definition used, IHW consistently predicts worse outcomes, including increased mortality, longer hospital stays, higher readmission rates, and greater healthcare resource utilization. While the initial clinical presentation of AHF may vary widely, some patients progress to low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) or cardiogenic shock (CS) during hospitalization, even when initially presenting with less severe forms. CS is characterized by tissue hypoperfusion due to insufficient cardiac output to maintain adequate organ perfusion. Clinically, it manifests as oliguria, cold extremities, altered mental status, and, in some cases, hypotension, potentially culminating in circulatory collapse, multiorgan failure, and death. Despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, CS remains a severe clinical condition with mortality exceeding 40%.

Data from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) have reinforced the concept of a continuum from preshock states to overt cardiogenic shock, demonstrating a gradient increase in mortality across phenotypes. Importantly, a substantial proportion of patients presenting without overt shock (isolated LCOS or HF with isolated hypotension) subsequently developed hypoperfusion, highlighting early hemodynamic compromise as a dynamic and high-risk phase rather than a stable condition. However, these observations derive from critically ill populations managed in specialized cardiac intensive care units with invasive monitoring, and their applicability to patients hospitalized primarily for AHF in conventional settings remains uncertain. Early identification of patients at risk of progression to LCOS or CS may improve outcomes. However, the ability to predict clinical deterioration during hospitalization remains limited, and although several biomarkers have been proposed, a simple and widely accessible method for risk stratification is lacking.

Therefore, the primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the frequency of progression to LCOS or CS—defined as stages C to E according to the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) classification—in patients hospitalized for AHF, and to identify predictors of such progression based on clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory parameters obtained at admission. The secondary objective was to assess the association between IHW and mortality.

Methods

Study design and population

A single-center cohort study was conducted using a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Adult patients consecutively admitted to a cardiovascular specialty hospital with a primary diagnosis of AHF (acute or acute-on-chronic) between January 2015 and January 2020 were included. The diagnosis was independently confirmed by 2 HF specialist cardiologists based on clinical history, physical examination, and complementary studies. Patients with AHF secondary to acute myocardial infarction, severe sepsis, or pulmonary thromboembolism, as well as those in LCOS or CS at the time of hospital admission, were excluded.

Primary endpoint

The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of LCOS or CS, defined as stages C to E of the SCAI classification.

Secondary endpoint

The secondary endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality.

Data collection

Data were prospectively collected from the hospital’s electronic health records and manually reviewed in the clinical histories. Initial demographic data, comorbidities, physical examination findings at admission, clinical presentation type, previous medical treatment, implemented therapy, and clinical outcomes were recorded in a dedicated institutional database. Laboratory values were assessed at admission. Echocardiographic data were evaluated from echocardiograms performed within 3 months before hospitalization. Functional class before admission was assessed as part of the patient history in those with HF.

SCAI classification

Patients were categorized using the SCAI classification for CS based on the consensus statement at the time of admission and subsequently during hospitalization, with the most advanced stage during their clinical course recorded in the database:

  • Stage A (“At risk”) : Patients without current signs or symptoms of CS but at risk of developing it. This includes patients with large acute myocardial infarctions or previous myocardial infarctions and/or HF symptoms.

  • Stage B (“Beginning”) : Patients with clinical evidence of relative hypotension or tachycardia without hypoperfusion.

  • Stage C (“Classic”) : Patients with hypoperfusion requiring initial interventions (inotropes, vasopressors, mechanical support, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]) beyond volume resuscitation to restore perfusion.

  • Stage D (“Deteriorating”) : Patients who fail to stabilize despite initial intensive efforts, requiring further escalation. Classification in this stage requires adequate previous medical treatment/stabilization. At least one hour must have elapsed without resolution of hypotension or target organ hypoperfusion.

  • Stage E (“Extremis”) : Patients in circulatory collapse, often with refractory cardiac arrest requiring ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or supported by multiple acute simultaneous interventions, including ECMO-facilitated CPR (eCPR).

Definition of variables

  • Age and sex: Patient age at the time of admission was recorded in years, and sex was classified as male or female.

  • Cardiovascular risk factors: Included hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and body mass index (BMI).

  • Cardiovascular history: Documented the presence of coronary artery disease (history of coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack, and peripheral vascular disease (e.g., peripheral angioplasty or surgeries).

  • Systolic and diastolic blood pressure at admission: Continuous variables, expressed in mmHg.

  • Creatinine clearance (CrCl): Calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, categorized as ≥60 ml/min/m² or <60 ml/min/m².

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): Assessed via echocardiography, categorized as ≥40% or <40%.

  • Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE): An echocardiographic measure of right ventricular systolic function, categorized as ≥18 mm or <18 mm.

  • Previous hospitalizations for HF: Categorical (yes/no).

  • HF etiology: Classified as coronary artery disease, hypertension, valvular disease, idiopathic, infiltrative, or other.

  • Cardiogenic shock (CS): Defined according to the SCAI criteria as CS stages C to E.

  • LCOS or CS: Identified as the need for vasoactive drugs during hospitalization, including dobutamine, dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, milrinone, isoproterenol, levosimendan, vasopressin, and/or phenylephrine, or the use of mechanical circulatory support such as an intra-aortic balloon pump or ECMO.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range (IQR), depending on their distribution. Categorical variables were reported as numbers and percentages. Comparisons of continuous variables were performed using the Student’s t -test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, based on their distribution. Comparisons of proportions were conducted using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, depending on the expected frequency of values. A two-tailed alpha error of less than 5% was assumed to determine statistical significance.

A two-step analysis was used to evaluate factors associated with the primary endpoint. First, a univariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Clinically relevant variables, determined a priori, along with those with a p-value <0.10, were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Two-tailed p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

All statistical analyses were performed using STATA software, version 14.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas).

Ethical considerations

The study was approved by the institutional ethics and research committee and registered on the PRIISA.BA platform of the Ministry of Health of Buenos Aires City. At the time of hospitalization, patients signed consent forms for the use of personal data for scientific purposes. The study adhered to national and international standards for the protection of research subjects, including the Declaration of Helsinki, Resolution 1480/2011 of the National Ministry of Health, Buenos Aires City Law 3301, and ANMAT Resolutions 6677/10 and amendments 4008 and 4009.

Results

A total of 748 patients hospitalized for AHF were consecutively included. The mean age of the cohort was 76 ± 12.29 years, with 62.4% being male. Coronary artery disease accounted for 34.5% of HF etiology, and 37% of patients had a previous HF hospitalization. The median LVEF was 46% (IQR 31–60), with reduced LVEF (<40%) present in 40.5% of cases. A significant percentage of patients exhibited impaired renal function at admission, with 65.5% having an estimated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min/1.73 m². The mean creatinine clearance for the cohort was 54 ml/min/1.73 m² (±24.66).

The most common clinical presentation was systemic congestion, observed in 85.6% of cases. Echocardiographic data showed that 14.7% of patients had moderate or severe mitral regurgitation, while 7.9% had moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation. The mean estimated pulmonary systolic pressure by Doppler echocardiography was 46.54 mmHg (IQR 15–32). Additionally, 32.7% of the cohort had a TAPSE <18 mm. Lactate levels were obtained only from 281 (37.5%) patients with a mean value of 2.81 mM/L (±2.4). No significant difference in lactate levels was observed among the different clinical profiles at admission (p = 0.21), while a significant difference was observed in mean lactate levels among those who developed LCOS/CS compared with those who did not 2.3 (1.72) versus 3.40 (3.35), p = 0.003. Unfortunately, since less than half of the cohort had lactate levels evaluated at admission, it was not included in the primary analysis. Baseline characteristics of the included patients are detailed in Table 1 .

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the General cohort

Variables General cohort = 748
Male sex 467 (62.4%)
Age, years 76.03 (±12.29)
BMI, kg/m² 28.63 (±5.66)
Hypertension 235 (30.1%)
Diabetes mellitus 223 (29.8%)
Dyslipidemia 467 (62.4%)
Current or former smoking habit 378 (50.5%)
COPD 103 (13.8%)
Previous revascularization 290 (38.3%)
Atrial fibrillation 336 (44.9%)
Etiology of the cardiomyopathy
Ischemic cardiomyopathy 100 (34.5%)
Valvular 63 (21.7%)
Infiltrative 13 (4.5%)
Idiopathic 25 (5.2%)
Other 547 (34.1%)
• Cardiotoxicity 5 (0.66%)
• Hypertensive 27 (3.6%)
• Non-compaction 6 (0.8%)
• Pericarditis 6(0.8%)
• Restrictive 20 (2.6%)
• Chagas disease 10 (1.3%)
• Hypertrophic 25 (3.3%)
• Peripartum 3 (0.4%)
• Myocarditis 8 (1%)
• Unknown (incomplete diagnostic workup or unknown etiology) 437
Clinical profile at admission
Systemic congestion 640 (85.6%)
Acute pulmonary edema 86 (11.5%)
Right heart failure 22 (2.9%)
Systolic blood pressure, median (IQR) 120 (110, 140)
Diastolic blood pressure, median (IQR) 70 (60, 80)
Heart rate, bpm, median (IQR) 80 (70, 96)
Ejection fraction < 40 303 (40.5%)
Ejection fraction, median (IQR) 46 (31, 60)
Moderate/severe mitral insufficiency 110 (14.7%)
Moderate/severe tricuspid insufficiency 59 (7.9%)
PAPs, mmHg (IQR) 46.54 (15, 32)
Previous hospitalization for HF 277 (37%)
Creatinine clearance, ml/min/m² 54 (±24.66)
Creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min/m² 453 (65.5%)
Total bilirubin, mg/dl (IQR) 1.02 (0.67, 1.65)
AST, U/L (IQR) 23 (16, 36)
ALT, U/L (IQR) 27 (20, 38)
Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 8, 2026 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Predictors of Progression to Low Cardiac Output or Cardiogenic Shock in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Heart Failure

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access