Fig. 11.1
Algorhythm for the diagnosis and management of PD catheter dysfunction
Isolated outflow obstruction often improves with use of laxatives to induce diarrhea as the vigorous peristalsis can move the catheter and reduce extrinsic compression of the catheter lumen. Patients are often reluctant to take laxatives and argue that they are not constipated so the intervention is better explained as induction of diarrhea. Appropriate bowel regimes in PD have already been discussed, but it is important to highlight that a larger dose of laxative is required for acute catheter malfunction. If catheter drainage does not improve after induction of diarrhea then an abdominal radiograph should be performed to assess for PD catheter position. A PD catheter is considered migrated if the tip of the catheter lies outside of the true pelvis. A migrated catheter may return to the true pelvis after treatment with laxatives which is why a radiograph should be performed only after the obstruction has proven refractory to laxatives. If the radiograph indicates migration then a guidewire manipulation should be performed under fluoroscopic guidance. If the catheter is not migrated on the radiograph then a trial of tidal automated PD (APD) or CAPD with upright drainage is worthwhile. Tidal APD, where a residual volume of a few hundred millilitres of fluid is left in the abdomen after each exchange, can be particularly useful for catheters that drain well initially and then slow as the residual dialysate volume contracts [60].
Fluoroscopic guide-wire manipulations are an important adjunctive procedure for salvage of poorly functioning PD catheters [52]. The radiologist inserts a stiff guide-wire through the catheter and clears out any fibrin or other intraluminal debris. The wire also serves to straighten a coiled catheter and can remedy the malposition of the catheter with respect to bowels or adhesions. The wire can also be used to reposition a migrated catheter, though this can be technically challenging and the risk of repeat migration is high and repeat malfunction is high (Table 11.1) [52, 61–67] The largest case series of fluoroscopic manipulations was reported in 2010 [66]. In this case series of 70 catheters manipulated for flow obstruction, 63% were functional at 30 days. Predictors of a successful outcome included pelvic location of catheter (i.e. a non-migrated catheter) and secondary catheter malfunction (i.e. catheter became obstructed after a period of good function). Fluoroscopic manipulation can be associated with some abdominal discomfort and the patient should be aware of this prior to the procedure. There are no guidelines for the use of prophylactic antibiotics with this procedure but some centers recommend post- procedure intraperitoneal antibiotics and change of the catheter transfer set.
Table 11.1
Summary of published results of fluroscopic wire manipulation
N subjects | Initial function | >30 day function | |
---|---|---|---|
Moss et al. (Am J Kidney Dis 1990) | 48 | 78% | 25% |
Kappel et al. (Adv Perit Dial 1995) | 47 | 67% | |
Simons et al. (Perit Dial Int 1999) | 33 | 85% | 55% |
Diax-Buxo et al. (Clin Nephrol 1997) | 69 | 61% | |
Savader et al. (J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997) | 12 | 58% | |
Plaza et al. (Perit Dial Int 2001) | 14 | 64% | 26% |
Miller et al. (Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013) | 70 | 63% | |
Kwon et al. (J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014) | 68 | 47% |
Obstruction that does not resolve with fluoroscopic guide wire manipulation requires surgical intervention. Traditionally, a persistently obstructed catheter would be replaced and a new one inserted, but over the past few decades there is increased interest in laparoscopic salvage for refractory drainage failure. Laparascopic salvage has a number of advantages over removal and reinsertion. It allows for direct visualization of the intra-abdominal anatomy and diagnosis as well as treatment of the precise cause of the malfunction whereas simple removal/reinsertion runs the risk of the same problem recurring with the new catheter [48]. Omental wrapping of the catheter, often due to a low lying omentum, is the most frequent cause of malfunction found at laparoscopy [68–71]. Omental wrapping of the catheter can cause migration as the omentum may pull the catheter out of the pelvis. In these cases, the catheter can be freed from the omentum and returned to the pelvis and the redundant omentum tacked up with an omentopexy. Catheter migration without omental wrapping, presumably due to excessive torque on the catheter during insertion, is also a common finding and treatment may require suturing of the catheter in the pelvis. Other frequent findings include compartmentalization of the catheter due to adhesions, wrapping of the catheter from the fimbrae of fallopian tubes, as well as intraluminal obstruction due to blood and fibrin clots [72]. Laparoscopic salvage of PD catheters is associated with a high published rate of immediate success, typically greater than 80% although there is considerable variability in the rates of recurrent obstruction [68–71]. PD can typically be restarted soon after laparoscopic manipulation in keeping with the principles described above in the section on early use of the PD catheter.
Filling and Drain Pain
Infusion pain is reported by some patients immediately after initiation of PD. The pain may be referred to the rectum or bladder, and may cause significant discomfort, especially at the beginning of the infusion. The pain is usually attributed to the jet effect of the relatively rapid infusion of dialysate into the peritoneum but may also be related to the acidity of the PD fluid [73].
The phenomenon is seen more commonly in catheters with a straight intraperitoneal segment than in coiled catheters likely due to the more diffuse nature of the spray with coiled catheters. In addition, the tip of a coiled catheter is much more flexible and less likely to abut bowel or bladder in a manner that would cause jet pain. Helpful interventions to reduce jet pain include decreasing the rate of dialysate infusion, changing the patient to tidal PD where there is always a residual pool of dialysis fluid, and the use of laxatives to induce peristalsis and alter the position of the catheter [74]. Refractory cases of jet pain may improve with fluoroscopic guide-wire manipulation and only very rarely is removal and reinsertion of the catheter required.
Abdominal pain occurring during and after infusion may also be due to the effect of acidic PD fluid. Traditional PD solutions are lactate-buffered and acidic because the greater stability of glucose in low pH prolongs the shelf life of the dialysate. Despite the low pH, the glucose is not entirely stable in these solutions and glucose degradation products form readily. The typical pH of these solutions is 5.5 and it rises after infusion and within an hour reaches 7.2, and by 2 h is at equilibrium with the systemic pH of 7.4 [75]. The symptoms associated with acidic PD fluid are not universal and are often described more as a feeling of discomfort or unwellness rather than pain. These symptoms typically last longer than the discomfort associated with jet pain, but should subside by 1 h after the intraperitoneal pH has risen. Newer PD solutions with neutral pH and lower concentrations of GDPs are now available in the US (Balance, Fresenius, Bad Homberg, Germany) and may be helpful among those patients with acid mediated abdominal discomfort.
Pain on drainage, also referred to as dry pain, is also a frequent problem. It is usually ascribed to irritation of the peritoneal membrane by the catheter and by the negative pressure generated by the PD cycler while on drain cycle [76]. The most common solution for this problem is to avoid complete drainage of the abdomen by keeping the catheter surrounded by, or floating in, peritoneal fluid. One retrospective study reported a prevalence rate of pain on filling or draining of 13% at baseline and that the institution of tidal PD, with 25–50% tidal volume, eliminated pain in all the patients [77]. The use of tidal programs may reduce adequacy or require more frequent exchanges to maintain the clearances so this needs to be taken into account when changing to a tidal program. Alternatively, those experiencing drain pains on APD may have resolution of symptoms with CAPD as the gravity driven drainage means less negative pressure is transmitted through the catheter compared with the hydraulic suction on a cycler. Different brands of cycler also have differing amounts of negative pressure and trialing a different brand of cycler may be helpful in refractory cases.
References
1.
Gadahhah MF, Torres-Rivera C, Ramdeen G, et al. Relationship between intraperitoneal bleeding, adhesions, and peritoneal dialysis catheter failure: a method of prevention. Adv Perit Dial. 2001;17:127–9.
2.
3.
Wallace E, Fissell RB, Golper TA, Blake PG, Lewin AM, Oliver MJ, Quinn RR. Catheter insertion and perioperative practices within the ISPD North American research consortium. Perit Dial Int. 2016;36(4):382–6. pdi-2015.
4.
Dombros N, Dratwa M, Gokal R, Heimbürger O, Krediet R, Plum J, Rodrigues A, Selgas R, Struijk D, Verger C. European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis. 3 Peritoneal access. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:x8–ix12.
5.
Warady BA, Bakkaloglu S, Newland J, Cantwell M, Verrina E, Neu A, Chadha V, Yap HK, Schaefer F. Consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of catheter-related infections and peritonitis in pediatric patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: 2012 update. Perit Dial Int. 2012;32(Supplement 2):32–86.CrossRef
6.
Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF. Appearance and classification of healing peritoneal catheter exit sites. Perit Dial Int. 1996;16(3):S71.PubMed
7.
Twardowski ZJ, Prowant BF. Exit-site healing post catheter implantation. Perit Dial Int. 1996;16(Suppl 3):S51–70.PubMed
8.
Newman LN, Tessman M, Hanslik T, Schulak J, Mayes J, Friedlander M. A retrospective view of factors that affect catheter healing: four years of experience. Adv Perit Dial. 1993;9:217.PubMed
9.
Waite NM, Webster N, Laurel M, Johnson M, Fong IW. The efficacy of exit site povidone-iodine ointment in the prevention of early peritoneal dialysis-related infections. Am J Kidney Dis Off J National Kidney Foundation. 1997;29(5):763–8.
10.
Luzar MA, Brown CB, Balf D, Hill L, Issad B, Monnier B, Moulart J, Sabatier JC, Wauquier JP, Peluso F. Exit-site care and exit-site infection in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD): results of a randomized multicenter trial. Perit Dial Int. 1990;10(1):25–9.PubMed
11.
Findlay A, Serrano C, Punzalan S, Fan SL. Increased peritoneal dialysis exit site infections using topical antiseptic polyhexamethylene biguanide compared to mupirocin: results of a safety interim analysis of an open-label prospective randomized study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(5):2026–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Bernardini J, Bender F, Florio T, Sloand J, PalmMontalbano L, Fried L, Piraino B. Randomized, double-blind trial of antibiotic exit site cream for prevention of exit site infection in peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(2):539–45.CrossRefPubMed