Platelet effect of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction




Summary


Background


Recent studies have suggested that ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily provides stronger platelet inhibition than prasugrel 10 mg once daily in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.


Objectives


To compare the effects of ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily and prasugrel 10 mg once daily on platelet reactivity in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), using: the VerifyNow ® P2Y 12 (VN-P2Y 12 ) assay, expressed in P2Y 12 reaction units (PRU); measurement of the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI; %); and light transmission aggregometry (LTA), expressed as residual platelet aggregation (RPA; %).


Methods


Platelet reactivity was evaluated prospectively using the three assays 30 days after primary PCI in 118 patients with STEMI on a maintenance dose of prasugrel 10 mg once daily ( n = 60) or ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily ( n = 58).


Results


On-treatment platelet reactivity, assessed by the VN-P2Y 12 assay, was lower for ticagrelor compared with prasugrel (20.91 ± 4.59 PRU vs. 43.50 ± 6.98 PRU; P = 0.008) but was not significantly different when using the more specific VASP-PRI assay (13.05 ± 1.61% vs. 17.44 ± 1.97%; P = 0.09) or RPA assessed by LTA (10.49 ± 1.44% vs. 7.20 ± 1.27%; P = 0.09).


Conclusions


The difference in platelet reactivity between ticagrelor and prasugrel varies according to the platelet function test in patients with STEMI. The differences observed may be related more to the tests than to the drugs used.


Résumé


Contexte


Des études récentes ont suggéré que le ticagrelor 90 mg en deux prises par jour entraînait une inhibition plaquettaire plus forte que le prasugrel 10 mg chez les patients admis pour SCA et traités par angioplastie.


Objectifs


Comparer l’effet sur la réactivité plaquettaire du ticagrelor 90 mg en deux prises par jour et du prasugrel 10 mg en une prise par jour chez des patients présentant un SCA avec sus-décalage du segment ST en utilisant la mesure du PRU par le VerifyNow ® (VN)-P2Y 12 , la mesure de l’index de réactivité plaquettaire (IRP ; %) par la phosphorylation de la protéine VASP et la mesure de l’agrégation plaquettaire résiduelle (APR ; %) par l’agrégométrie par transmission lumineuse (LTA).


Méthodes


La réactivité plaquettaire a été évaluée prospectivement à 30 jours de l’angioplastie primaire chez 118 patients ayant présenté un SCA avec sus-décalage du segment ST ; 60 sous une dose d’entretien de prasugrel et 58 sous ticagrelor.


Résultats


Le niveau de réactivité plaquettaire évaluée par le VN-P2Y 12 était plus faible sous ticagrelor en comparaison au prasugrel (20,91 ± 4,59 PRU vs 43,50 ± 6,98 PRU ; p = 0,008) mais pas significativement différent avec un test plus spécifique comme le VASP (13,05 ± 1,61 % vs 17,44 ± 1,97 % ; p = 0,09) ou plus global comme l’APR évaluée par LTA (10,49 ± 1,44 % vs 7,20 ± 1,27 % ; p = 0,09).


Conclusions


La mesure de la réactivité plaquettaire par le VASP et la LTA sous ticagrelor en comparaison au prasugrel diffèrent des données du VerifyNow ® . Les différences observées pourraient être plus liées aux tests utilisés qu’aux molécules elles-mêmes.


Background


New P2Y 12 inhibitors are now recommended as the first-line antiplatelet therapies in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); both prasugrel and ticagrelor provide greater platelet inhibition than clopidogrel and overcome high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HRP), leading to a better outcome .


In daily clinical practice, the choice between these two drugs for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary PCI, in the absence of a head-to-head comparison, is driven by contraindications or subgroup analyses of pivotal trials . In addition, pharmacodynamic studies also support the decision-making process . Prasugrel and ticagrelor display similar pharmacodynamic profiles after loading doses in patients with STEMI . However, stronger platelet inhibition, assessed by the VerifyNow ® P2Y 12 assay (VN-P2Y 12 ; Accumetrics, San Diego, CA, USA) during the maintenance phase, has been reported for ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily compared with prasugrel 10 mg once daily . This finding was also found in one study when using the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein platelet reactivity index (VASP-PRI) measurement, an assay that specifically measures the drug effect .


The aim of our study was to compare the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily and prasugrel 10 mg once daily in post-STEMI patients, using three different platelet function tests (PFTs) (VASP-PRI, VN-P2Y 12 and light transmission aggregometry [LTA]).




Methods


Population


Patients with STEMI on a maintenance dose of ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or prasugrel 10 mg once daily following primary PCI were enrolled prospectively. Treatment was left at the physician’s discretion. One month after discharge, platelet reactivity was evaluated using VASP-PRI, VN-P2Y 12 and LTA assays on the same blood sample. Patients with a low platelet count (< 150,000/mL) were excluded. Patient characteristics were entered into a prospective web-based registry, including drug intake to evaluate potential drug-drug interaction. The Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital Ethics Committee approved the protocol and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.


Laboratory procedures


Blood was collected into Becton-Dickinson 3.2% citrate vacuette tubes by venous puncture after discarding the first mL of blood. Pharmacodynamic evaluation was performed simultaneously for the three PFTs.


Phosphorylation of the VASP was measured with a Beckman Coulter FC500 cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Villepinte, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and previous studies . Blood samples were incubated in vitro with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and prostaglandin E 1 (PGE 1 ) before fixation. The VASP-PRI measured by a flow cytometer was calculated from the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) for each condition according to the formula: VASP-PRI = ([MFI (PGE 1 ) – MFI (PGE 1 + ADP)]/MFI [PGE 1 ]) × 100.


For the VN-P2Y 12 assay, samples were run according to the package insert. Results were expressed in P2Y 12 reaction units (PRU), in response to iso-thrombin receptor activating peptide (iso-TRAP) and ADP-PGE 1 , and as percentage of inhibition, corresponding to the ratio of the results of the ADP-PGE 1 and iso-TRAP channels.


For LTA, platelet-rich plasma was obtained by centrifugation of citrated whole-blood at 100 g for 10 minutes at 20 °C. Platelet-poor plasma was obtained by further centrifugation at 2250 g for 15 minutes. In vitro platelet aggregation in platelet-rich plasma was measured at 37 °C by LTA (model 490-4D; Chrono-Log Corp., Kordia, The Netherlands) and was induced by the addition of ADP (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France) at a final concentration of 20 μmol/L. All measurements were performed in duplicate and results were expressed in terms of maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) and residual platelet aggregation (RPA) measured at 6 minutes. Prespecified criteria used to define non-evaluable samples were: lack of sufficient signal, haemolysis, platelet count < 150,000/mL and an unstable baseline.


Study objective


The primary objective of the study was to compare the level of platelet inhibition 30 days after the acute event during maintenance therapy with ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or prasugrel 10 mg once daily, using three validated PFTs. The secondary objectives were to compare the proportions of patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) and low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR), using the established cut-offs of VASP-PRI > 50%, PRU > 208 (VN-P2Y 12 ) and RPA > 46.2% (LTA) for HPR and VASP-PRI < 16%, PRU < 85 (VN-P2Y 12 ) and RPA < 10% (LTA) for LPR . Based on previous platelet function studies , 55 patients in each group were needed to yield 90% power with an alpha risk error of 0.05, assuming a 20% standard deviation, to demonstrate that one of the two drugs is superior to the other.


Statistical analysis


Continuous variables following a normal distribution are presented as means ± standard deviations and were compared using Student’s t -test. Categorical variables are presented as counts and percentages and were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results are reported as means ± standard errors of the mean for the detailed analyses. All P values are two-sided and a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. The relationship between the three assays was assessed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Normal distribution of the variables was evaluated for continuous variables using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. All analyses were performed with the use of PRISM, version 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., LA Jolla, CA, USA). All the authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data.




Results


Study population


A total of 118 patients with STEMI exposed to a 10 mg maintenance dose of prasugrel once daily ( n = 60) or a 90 mg maintenance dose of ticagrelor twice daily ( n = 58) agreed to participate in the study and were assessed for platelet function testing at the 1-month follow-up visit. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1 .



Table 1

Baseline characteristics.














































































































































Characteristic All patients ( n = 118) Ticagrelor group ( n = 58) Prasugrel group ( n = 60) P
Age (years) 58.86 ± 1.03 59.97 ± 1.54 57.78 ± 1.37 0.29
Men (%) 83.05 ± 3.47 84.48 ± 4.80 81.67 ± 5.04 0.69
Weight (kg) 76.69 ± 1.34 75.64 ± 1.95 77.74 ± 1.84 0.43
BMI 26.24 ± 0.38 25.98 ± 0.50 26.50 ± 0.57 0.49
Low weight < 60 kg (%) 12.71 ± 3.08 18.97 ± 5.19 6.67 ± 3.28 0.05 a
BMI > 30 (%) 16.10 ± 3.40 10.34 ± 4.03 21.67 ± 5.36 0.10
Diabetes (%) 16.95 ± 3.47 15.52 ± 4.80 18.33 ± 5.04 0.69
Dyslipidaemia (%) 38.98 ± 4.51 44.83 ± 6.59 33.33 ± 6.14 0.20
Smoker (%) 72.03 ± 4.15 74.14 ± 5.80 70.00 ± 5.97 0.62
High blood pressure (%) 36.44 ± 4.45 39.66 ± 6.48 33.33 ± 6.14 0.48
Family history of CAD (%) 27.12 ± 4.11 31.03 ± 6.13 23.33 ± 5.51 0.35
One-vessel disease (%) 62.71 ± 4.47 68.97 ± 6.13 56.67 ± 6.45 0.17
Two-vessel disease (%) 22.88 ± 3.88 17.24 ± 5.00 28.33 ± 5.87 0.15
Three-vessel disease (%) 15.25 ± 3.32 15.52 ± 4.78 15.00 ± 4.65 0.93
Creatinine clearance (mL/min) 97.65 ± 3.10 88.69 ± 3.96 106.6 ± 4.51 0.003 a
Ejection fraction (%) 51.29 ± 9.16 49.13 ± 1.41 53.34 ± 1.13 0.02 a
Aspirin (mg) 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 1.00
Beta-blockers (%) 91.53 ± 2.57 91.38 ± 3.72 91.67 ± 3.60 0.95
ACE inhibitors (%) 92.37 ± 2.45 91.38 ± 3.72 93.33 ± 3.25 0.69
Calcium antagonists (%) 8.47 ± 2.57 5.17 ± 2.93 11.67 ± 4.18 0.21
Statins (%) 99.15 ± 0.84 98.28 ± 1.72 100 ± 0 0.99
Proton pump inhibitors (%) 83.90 ± 3.398 79.31 ± 5.36 88.33 ± 4.18 0.18

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 11, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Platelet effect of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access