Pericardial Diseases in Children





The pericardium derives its name from the Greek term peri, meaning “around,” and kardia, meaning “heart.” It is composed of two layers. The inner layer (visceral pericardium) consists of a single layer of mesothelial cells, collagen, and elastin fibers separated from epicardium by fat. The outer layer (parietal pericardium) is mostly acellular and consists of collagen and elastin fibers. The pericardial space between these two layers contains a small amount of serous fluid. The pericardium surrounds all the cardiac chambers except the left atrium, which is extrapericardial. Superiorly, the fibrous envelope extends to the base of great vessels.


Although not essential for survival, the pericardium has some important functions. It acts as a barrier to prevent spread of infections, inflammation, and neoplasia. The fluid in the pericardial space allows free movement of the heart throughout the cardiac cycle, limits its acute distension, and helps in ventricular coupling. The parietal layer imparts characteristic physical properties to the pericardium. At low level of stretch, it is very elastic but as the stretch increases, the tissue stiffens abruptly and become resistant to further stretch. As a result, the pericardium exhibits a nonlinear pressure-volume curve with an initial flat portion and a steep ascent later ( Fig. 57 . 1 ).




Fig. 57.1


Pressure volume loop of the pericardium.

(Courtesy Dr. Preetam Krishnamurthy, Cardiology Fellow, AIIMS, New Delhi.)


The pericardium is afflicted in variety of diseases, both localized to the heart and as part of systemic illnesses. Pericardial diseases cause distinctive hemodynamic changes and some of the classic physical findings in cardiology. Although clinical overlap is common, most of the cases can be categorized as having pericarditis, pericardial effusion with or without tamponade, and pericardial constriction. Other structural abnormalities such as congenital absence of pericardium and pericardial cysts are rare ( Table 57 . 1 ). This chapter provides an overview of common pericardial diseases in children.



Table 57.1

Common Causes of Pericardial Diseases in Children












Pericarditis and Pericardial Effusion Pericardial Constriction Congenital
Infectious
Viral
Bacterial
Mycobacterial
HIV associated
Fungal
Noninfectious
Inflammatory
Connective tissue disorder
Postpericardiotomy
Autoinflammatory disorders
Drug induced
Neoplastic
Primary
Secondary
Radiation induced
Traumatic
Iatrogenic
Postcardiac intervention
Postradiofrequency ablation
Miscellaneous
Chronic renal failure
Hypothyroidism
Tubercular pericarditis
Bacterial pericarditis
Radiation induced
Postcardiac surgery
Autoimmune disorder
Idiopathic
Pericardial cyst
Absent pericardium


Pericarditis


Pericarditis is the most common pericardial pathology encountered in clinical practice. Based on the duration of illness, it can be classified as acute, recurrent, or chronic. Acute pericarditis is usually self-limiting, lasting less than 2 weeks. In some cases, the inflammation may continue up to 3 months beyond which it is labelled as chronic pericarditis. Concomitant involvement of the myocardium is referred to as “myopericarditis.”


Acute Pericarditis


Acute pericarditis is an acute inflammation of the pericardium. The exact incidence of acute pericarditis in childhood is not known. Most cases of acute pericarditis are idiopathic or due to viral infections. Some cases labeled as idiopathic pericarditis may actually be due to viral infections.


Older children and adolescents present with acute onset of sharp, substernal chest pain radiating to the trapezius ridge. The pain worsens with inspiration and on lying down and subsides with leaning forward. The pain in young children is variable though postural and respiratory variation is preserved. Pericardial friction rub is the most characteristic physical finding. This high frequency, superficial scratching sound is similar to the sound made when walking on crunchy snow. It results from the friction between inflamed pericardial layers and typically consists of three components corresponding to ventricular systole and early and late diastolic filling. It is best heard during inspiration, along the left sternal border with the patient leaning forward. The rub is often intermittent necessitating frequent auscultation. It disappears with the accumulation of significant pericardial fluid. Nonspecific symptoms and obvious difficulties in eliciting clinical signs make the diagnosis challenging in infants and young children.


Diagnostic Evaluation


Electrocardiography (ECG) is perhaps the most important diagnostic tool. It is useful in the diagnosis at an early stage of the disease. ECG shows sequential changes in ST and PR segments. The ST-segment elevation is usually concave upwards and is seen in all the leads except in leads V1 and aVR, which show depressed ST-segment ( Fig. 57.2 ). There is generalized PR-segment depression except in leads V 1 and aVR. Based on ECG findings, four stages of acute pericarditis are described, although each patient may not have this stage-wise transition. In stage 1, ST-segment is elevated with PR depression. In stage 2, ST-segment normalizes and T wave is flattened. T wave is inverted in stage 3, while in stage 4, ECG is nearly normalized. In some patients, ST-segment changes are limited to only a few leads. Occasionally, PR-segment depression is the only ECG manifestation. The ECG may be completely normal in 10% of patients with acute pericarditis. The ECG also sometimes provides clues toward specific diagnosis of acute pericarditis. For example, presence of atrioventricular block may indicate Lyme disease, while low voltage complexes and electrical alternans indicate significant pericardial effusion. Chest radiograph is essentially normal in an uncomplicated acute pericarditis. Echocardiogram is done mainly to detect pericardial effusion. Pericardial effusion is present in about two-thirds of patients with pericarditis. In the vast majority, the effusion is small and is of no concern. Large pericardial effusion is seen in about 3% of patients. A new onset of left ventricular dysfunction should alert to the possibility of myopericarditis.




Fig. 57.2


Twelve-lead ECG in acute pericarditis showing coved up ST-segment elevation in all the leads except leads V 1 and aVR, which show ST depression. PR depression is seen in inferior leads. Lead aVR shows elevated PR segment.


Acute pericarditis is diagnosed clinically if any two of the following abnormalities are present: pericarditic chest pain, pericardial rub, new onset ST-T changes on ECG, and new onset or worsening of pericardial effusion. In addition, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, leucocyte count, and other markers of inflammation indicate acute inflammation of the pericardium. Elevated troponin and other markers of myocardial injury suggest concomitant myocarditis. Data from adults suggest that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is elevated in three-fourths of patients with acute pericarditis and predicts a higher rate of recurrence. In most cases, hs-CRP levels normalize within a week and in almost all cases by 4 weeks. The level of hs-CRP is useful in guiding the duration of therapy.


Treatment


There remains a paucity of randomized controlled trials to guide management of childhood pericarditis. Routine testing for detecting viral etiology is not recommended as the yield is low and it is not cost effective. A specific cause is identifiable in only 17% of patients and is more frequently found in cases having a subacute course with fever, large pericardial effusion, and poor response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Initial management should focus on screening for specific causes, prompt detection of pericardial effusion, and alleviation of symptoms. For symptomatic relief, the patient should receive NSAIDs. There are no studies comparing different NSAIDs for the treatment of acute pericarditis in children. Ibuprofen in a dose of 20 to 30 mg/kg per day in 2 to 3 divided doses is preferred considering its better side-effect profile. Indomethacin, naproxen, and acetylsalicylic acid are other alternatives. Children with prompt response to NSAIDs and having mild pericardial effusion can be managed on an out-patient basis. Others with severe symptoms, poor response to therapy, or those having large pericardial effusion should be hospitalized.


Patients with poor response to NSAIDs have traditionally been treated with corticosteroids. Their use, however, is associated with higher rate of recurrence, particularly if a short course of high-dose steroid with rapid tapering is used. Therefore a lower initial dose of 0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg per day of prednisolone with gradual tapering over 8 to 12 weeks is preferred. Colchicine is more effective than corticosteroids in reducing the risk of recurrences. The recommended dose of colchicine is 0.5 to 1 mg/day for 3 months. These doses are generally well tolerated. Gastrointestinal side effects result in drug discontinuation in approximately 10% of patients. Some authors recommend using both corticosteroid and colchicine in patients with poor response to NSAIDs. In such cases, NSAIDs are initially withheld and are resumed once corticosteroids are tapered.


Acute idiopathic pericarditis is usually self-limiting and complete resolution is expected within 2 to 3 weeks. Female gender, presence of large effusion, and failure of NSAIDs predict a higher risk of complications. In a large series of 453 adult patients with acute pericarditis, 3.1% developed cardiac tamponade and 1.5% developed pericardial constriction.




Recurrent Pericarditis


Recurrent pericarditis is defined as the reappearance of pericardial inflammation after an initial attack of acute pericarditis with an asymptomatic period of 4 weeks or longer. The recurrence is thought to be related to a repeat episode of acute pericarditis or an autoimmune response. While recurrent pericarditis is seen in 15% to 30% adults, it is uncommon among children. Symptoms are usually not as severe and findings of pericardial rub, ECG changes, and pericardial effusion are less frequent.


The pericardial pain is treated using NSAIDs. Colchicine or corticosteroids are used for pericardial inflammation. The risk of future recurrences increases to 50% after the first recurrence if treated with corticosteroids. Colchicine, on the other hand, is useful in preventing future recurrences. A longer course of colchicine therapy for 6 to 12 months is usually recommended. Pericarditis refractory to NSAIDs, steroids, and colchicine is challenging and may need immunosuppressive agents such as azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, or intravenous immunoglobulins. Newer agents such as interleukin-1β inhibitor, anakinra, and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors are also effective in refractory pericarditis. Pericardiectomy may be considered for debilitating symptoms despite advanced immunosuppression.


Recurrent pericarditis may be part of a generalized autoinflammatory disease resulting from abnormal activation of the immune system. Most extensively studied autoinflammatory syndromes are familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) and tumor necrosis factor receptor-1–associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS). Clinically, both the conditions present with fever, rash, polyserositis, arthralgia, and arthritis. FMF is an autosomal-recessive disorder due to mutation in a gene on chromosome 16p13 and presents during adolescence and adulthood. Colchicine is effective in aborting and preventing its recurrence.


TRAPS result from mutation in tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFRSF1A) gene located on chromosome 12p13 and has an autosomal-dominant inheritance. TRAPS typically has childhood onset. Unlike FMF, the inflammation in TRAPS is mediated by tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1. Steroids may be useful in treating an episode but the inflammation responds poorly to colchicine. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (etanercept) is shown to reduce frequency and severity of flares. Refractory cases respond to interleukin-1 inhibitors (anakinra).




Pericardial Effusion and Cardiac Tamponade


All causes of pericarditis can potentially result in pericardial effusion. Pericardial effusions can be classified based on its onset (acute, subacute, or chronic), distribution (loculated or circumferential), composition (exudative, transudative, blood, or pus), and hemodynamic impact (none, cardiac tamponade, or effusion constrictive).


Pathophysiology


In most clinical conditions with inflammation, infection, or injury, the pericardial fluid is exudative while in cases with fluid overload and elevated systemic venous pressure, it is transudative. The hemodynamic consequences of pericardial effusion are determined by the amount of fluid and rapidity of accumulation. Gradual accumulation of fluid shifts the pericardial pressure-volume curve to the right. As a result, even large effusion has no compressive effect on cardiac chambers and consequently may remain asymptomatic. The nonlinear pressure-volume curve of pericardium results in an almost vertical rise in pericardial pressure after an initial slow ascent (see Fig. 57.1 ). This late steep rise in pressure is responsible for “last drop” phenomenon: the final increment of fluid producing critical cardiac compression while the first decrement during pericardial drainage leads to the largest relative decompression.


Cardiac filling is altered as the cardiac chambers compete with the pericardial fluid in the relatively fixed pericardial space. The filling pressures in cardiac chambers are elevated and are equal to intrapericardial pressure. Elevated filling pressures limit the early diastolic filling of the ventricles and manifests as a distinctive loss of “y” descent in jugular venous pressure (JVP). Due to fixed cardiac volume, the atriums can fill only during the phase of ventricular systole when the blood exits the heart. This explains preserved “x” descent in JVP in patients with cardiac tamponade.


Pericardial fluid allows normal transmission of thoracic pressure to cardiac chambers. As a result, during inspiration, the right ventricle is preferentially filled while constrains of fixed cardiac volume limit left ventricular filling. The filling of the left and right ventricle, therefore, is 180 degrees out of phase with each other (exaggerated ventricular interdependence). The left ventricular systolic pressure falls when the systolic pressure in the right ventricle rises during inspiration and the reverse happens during expiration (ventricular discordance). The presence of an atrial septal defect, ventricular dysfunction, and aortic regurgitation may mask the findings of ventricular interdependence by nullifying the effect of respiration on ventricular preload.


Experimental and clinical studies have shown that cardiac tamponade is not an “all-or-none” phenomenon. Instead, it represents a continuum from minimal hemodynamic impairment to a state of hemodynamic collapse. Clinical examination is sufficient to recognize hemodynamic collapse but is inadequate in identifying milder hemodynamic compromise. Usually, left- and right-sided filling pressures are elevated to 20 to 25 mm Hg. In cases with hypovolemia, filling pressure may be less than 10 mm Hg. Occasionally, cardiac tamponade may be regional, resulting from localized clot or loculated effusion when typical physical, hemodynamic, and echocardiographic findings are absent. Rarely, large pleural effusion and pneumopericardium can compress the heart mimicking tamponade physiology.


Clinical Presentation


The clinical presentation depends on the speed of accumulation of pericardial fluid. Slowly accumulating effusion is often asymptomatic and detected incidentally. Rapid accumulation of even small amounts of fluid can cause symptoms. Initially, compensatory sympathetic stimulation causes tachycardia, diaphoresis, and peripheral vasoconstriction. With progressive accumulation of fluid, compensatory mechanisms prove inadequate and cardiac output declines. Patients who are unable to mount a normal adrenergic response, such as those receiving β-blocking agents, are more susceptible to acute hemodynamic collapse. Dyspnea is common though the exact mechanism remains unknown.


The JVP is markedly elevated with blunted “y” and preserved “x” descent. Unimpeded transmission of thoracic pressure to cardiac chambers and consequent preferential right ventricular filling permits normal inspiratory fall in JVP. Pulsus paradoxus, characterized by an abnormally large (>10 mm Hg) decline in blood pressure during inspiration, is another distinctive clinical feature. In reality, there is no paradox and it only reflects exaggerated ventricular interdependence. The fall in blood pressure provides an estimate of ventricular interdependence and is proportionate to the severity of cardiac tamponade. Pulsus paradoxus is not unique to tamponade, and may be present in pericardial constriction, pulmonary embolism, and other pulmonary diseases with wide respiratory variation in thoracic pressures. Clinical recognition of paradoxical pulse relies on respiratory variation in Korotkoff sounds and therefore cannot be measured by currently available oscillometric sphygmomanometers. As such, the measurement of paradoxical pulse is difficult in children due to high heart and respiratory rates. Respiratory variations in plethysmography waveform on pulse oximetry correlates well with invasive assessment of pulsus paradoxus and can be used at the bedside to ascertain the diagnosis and severity of tamponade.


The heart sounds are muffled. Cardiac impulse is difficult to localize. In some cases, compression of the lower part of the lungs causes bronchial breathing and dullness to percussion (Ewart’s sign). In its severe form, cardiac tamponade is characterized by Beck’s triad, which includes distant heart sounds, hypotension, and distended neck veins.


Investigations


Electrocardiogram shows compensatory sinus tachycardia, low QRS voltages, and electrical alternans ( Fig. 57.3 ). Low QRS voltages are a nonspecific sign and may be seen in patients with emphysema, pneumothorax, and infiltrative myocardial diseases. Electrical alternans, on the other hand, is specific for large effusion albeit with poor sensitivity. Nonspecific ST-T changes may be present with coexisting pericarditis. The chest radiograph may be normal in patients with mild pericardial effusion. Large pericardial effusion present with a symmetrically enlarged cardiac silhouette with distinct margins assuming round, flask-like “water bottle” configuration. Lateral view radiograph shows a linear lucency separating the posterior chest wall and epicardial fat (fat pad sign).




Fig. 57.3


Twelve-lead ECG from a child with large pericardial effusion showing sinus tachycardia and beat-to-beat change in QRS axis (electrical alternans).


Echocardiography detects pericardial effusion with very high accuracy. In adults and adolescents, based on the width of echo-free space between visceral and parietal pericardium at end-diastole, circumferential pericardial effusion is classified as small (<10 mm), moderate (10 to 20 mm), large (>20 mm), and very large (>25 mm). There is no such standard for children. Occasionally, left-sided pleural effusion can mimic pericardial effusion. The presence of fluid between the heart and descending thoracic aorta in parasternal long-axis view localizes fluid to the pericardium ( Fig. 57.4 ; ). Echocardiography also aids in the assessment of hemodynamic impact of pericardial effusion. A dilated inferior caval vein with less than 50% inspiratory collapse is highly suggestive of cardiac tamponade. This finding may be absent in patients with hypovolemia and low-pressure tamponade. Echogenicity of pericardial fluid provides important information about the possible cause of effusion. Fibrinous strands within the fluid suggest acute inflammation and are common with bacterial pericarditis.




Fig. 57.4


Transthoracic echocardiogram in modified parasternal long-axis view showing mild pericardial effusion. The accumulation of fluid between cardiac chamber and descending thoracic aorta (DTA) localizes fluid to the pericardium.


Pericardial fluid compresses cardiac chambers when pressure within the chamber falls below pericardial pressure. The collapse of right-sided chambers occurs earlier than the clinical detection of pulsus paradoxus. A brief collapse of thin-walled right atrium during late ventricular diastole may be normal. Nonetheless, right atrial collapse exceeding one-third of the cardiac cycle is nearly 100% sensitive and specific for cardiac tamponade. There can be right ventricle collapse during early diastole. The duration of right ventricular collapse is proportionate to the severity of tamponade, initially occurring only during inspiration and extending to expiration at later stages. The collapse of right-sided chambers may be absent in conditions with elevated pressure in the right ventricle as in pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary stenosis, or left ventricular dysfunction. Conversely, collapse may occur earlier in the setting of hypovolemia. In patients with posteriorly loculated pericardial effusion or pulmonary hypertension, there can be collapse of left atrium or left ventricle instead of right-sided chambers. A large pericardial effusion may cause beat-to-beat swinging of the heart.


Doppler interrogation provides direct demonstration of altered ventricular filling. Doppler abnormalities are more sensitive than M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiographic abnormalities. Exaggerated ventricular interdependence on Doppler interrogation manifests as marked respiratory variation in mitral and tricuspid inflow velocities. The mitral inflow velocity, measured at the peak of the E wave, increases greater than 25% during expiration than during inspiration. On the other hand, the tricuspid inflow velocity increases during inspiration. Reduced filling of the right ventricle during expiration is also reflected as accentuated expiratory diastolic flow reversal in hepatic vein Doppler ( Fig. 57.5 ).




Fig. 57.5


Hepatic vein Doppler in a child with cardiac tamponade showing prominent expiratory diastolic flow reversal. D, Diastolic forward wave; DR, diastolic reversal; S, systolic forward wave; SR, systolic reversal.


Cardiac computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are not required routinely. Pericardial thickening and contrast enhancement suggests active inflammation. Attenuation values of pericardial fluid on CT allows distinction of transudate from exudate. An attenuation value of less than 10 Hounsfield units (HU) suggests transudate; 20 to 60 HU indicates purulent, malignant, or myxedematous collection; while greater than 60 HU suggests hemopericardium.


Management


Established or impending tamponade is an emergency, with most patients requiring urgent pericardial drainage. Intravenous hydration with normal saline should be started immediately. Inotropic agents should be started in those with hypotension although their efficacy is limited.


Patients with no or minimal symptoms, even with a large collection, can be carefully observed without pericardial drainage. Even if drainage of pericardial effusion is needed, one-time closed pericardiocentesis is generally sufficient. The decision of pericardiocentesis must be individualized after careful clinical judgement. Medical therapy may be sufficient in some cases. For example, an effusion related to acute pericarditis and connective tissue disorder may respond promptly to NSAIDs and corticosteroids, respectively. Hypothyroidism-related effusion also responds quickly to thyroid replacement therapy. The use of NSAIDs and/or colchicine may be useful in children with recurrent large but asymptomatic pericardial effusion. A detailed evaluation for specific etiology helps in disease-specific management. However, similar to acute pericarditis, extensive testing is not cost effective.


The standard technique for closed pericardiocentesis involves subxiphoid insertion of needle into the pericardial space keeping the needle tip toward the left shoulder. Alternatively, based on the site of maximum pericardial effusion, an apical or left parasternal approach may be used. Aspiration of the pericardial fluid confirms correct positioning of the needle. Needle position can also be confirmed by echocardiographic visualization of microbubbles in the pericardial space following an injection of agitated saline ( Fig. 57.6 ; ). An injection of iodinated contrast under fluoroscopic vision is also useful for confirmation of needle position. Once the position is confirmed, an appropriate-diameter guidewire is placed through the needle over which a pigtail catheter is inserted. The catheter is manipulated to achieve the most dependent position for continuous drainage of pericardial fluid. The procedural success rate is 97% and major complications are seen in 1% to 2% of cases. Typically, the intrapericardial pigtail catheter is left in-situ for a variable period of time, sometimes several days, for continued drainage. The frequency of aspiration is dictated by the rate of reaccumulation. Open pericardiocentesis and creation of a pericardial window is preferable for refractory, recurrent pericardial effusions and hemopericardium.




Fig. 57.6


Transthoracic echocardiography in apical four-chamber view during pericardiocentesis. The appearance of microbubbles (asterisk) in the pericardial space after an injection of agitated saline contrast confirms intrapericardial position of the pericardiocentesis needle. LA, Left atrial; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrial; RV, right ventricle.


A careful analysis of pericardial fluid is rewarding in most cases. Drainage of pus confirms the diagnosis of bacterial pericarditis, while serosanguinous fluid has limited diagnostic utility. Chylous effusion, rich in triglycerides, occurs after traumatic or surgical injury to the thoracic duct. Typical gold-paint cholesterol-rich effusion is seen in severe hypothyroidism. In addition to routine measurement of hematocrit, cell counts, sugar, and protein, the pericardial fluid is subjected to special tests based on possible etiology. In cases with a high suspicion of tuberculosis, pericardial fluid analysis should include measurement of adenosine deaminase and polymerase chain reaction–based detection of mycobacterium. In the appropriate clinical setting, pericardial fluid should also be subjected to measurement of tumor markers and malignant cells. Based on local expertise, fluoroscopy or pericardioscopy guided pericardial biopsy may be performed if the diagnosis is crucial for management.




Specific Pericardial Diseases


Viral Pericarditis


Viral infection is the most common cause of pericarditis in children. Coxsackie virus is the commonest causative agent. The clinical symptoms and course are similar to other viral illnesses. Patients with viral pericarditis are less toxic than those with bacterial pericarditis, unless there is associated myocarditis. Pericardial effusion is common but tamponade is rare. The pericardial fluid is serous or serosanguinous with lymphocytic predominance. PCR studies are useful in determining a specific viral cause.


Bacterial Pericarditis


Bacterial pericarditis is a serious, life-threatening disease occurring in children younger than 2 years. The lung is the most common source of infection. Septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, meningitis, or other soft tissue infection may also cause hematogenous spread to the pericardium. Broad-spectrum antibiotics are mandatory and should be directed toward the most common causative organisms, that is, Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae . In general, initial treatment should include an intravenous penicillinase-resistant penicillin or vancomycin and a third-generation cephalosporin. An aminoglycoside may be added in sick and immunocompromised children. Antibiotics may be changed based on the culture and sensitivity pattern. All children with bacterial pericarditis should be treated with intravenous antibiotics for at least 3 to 4 weeks, irrespective of the initial response in clinical status. The penetration of antibiotics to the pericardial space is limited and therefore antibiotics alone may not be sufficient. An early pericardiocentesis and continuous drainage reduces pericardial inflammation and promptly resolves acute illness.


In most centers worldwide, surgical drainage by creating a pericardial window is the standard treatment for purulent pericarditis. An alternative strategy of intrapericardial fibrinolysis for thick effusion with strands and loculations is effective in complete drainage of pericardial collection. Pericardial fibrinolysis is also shown to reduce pericardial constriction. There is no consensus on dosing, duration, and type of fibrinolytic agent. In our unit, depending on echocardiographic appearance and consistency of pericardial collection, streptokinase is instilled at an initial dose of 5000 U/kg. The dose and frequency of instillation is adjusted according to the liquefaction of pericardial collection, with most children requiring once daily dose of 5000 U/Kg. A single dose should not exceed a total of 100,000 U. The pericardial collection is aspirated frequently. Careful clinical and echocardiographic monitoring is necessary to avoid rare yet potentially serious complications such as cardiac rupture and pericardial hemorrhage. Hemoglobin content of the fluid is measured if the aspirate is hemorrhagic. Complication related to systemic fibrinolysis is generally not seen with intrapericardial fibrinolysis. A duration of 8 to 10 days is generally sufficient. Pigtail catheter is removed once daily pericardial aspirate is less than 5 to 10 mL and there is no reaccumulation on echocardiography. If the fluid cannot be aspirated percutaneously, a surgical creation of pericardial window or pericardiectomy is considered. Those developing pericardial constriction warrant pericardiectomy.


In the current era, the survival of patients having bacterial pericarditis is greater than 90%. Younger age at diagnosis, septicemia, tamponade, delay in diagnosis and treatment, concurrent myocarditis, and staphylococcal pericarditis portend poorer prognosis. The exact incidence of pericardial constriction following bacterial pericarditis is not known but is common with Staphylococcus aureus , Haemophilus influenzae , and Streptococcus pneumoniae pericarditis.


Tubercular Pericarditis


Tubercular pericarditis accounts for approximately 4% of pericardial diseases in developed countries, but continues to remain a common problem in developing countries. It typically presents with insidious onset of low-grade fever, night sweats, weight loss, malaise, dyspnea, and nonspecific chest pain. It is often due to direct extension of pulmonary tuberculosis but can also result from hematogenous spread from other foci. In the appropriate clinical setting, lymphocytic predominance, positive stain for acid-fast bacilli, and elevated adenosine deaminase levels greater than 50 U/L in pericardial fluid are diagnostic of tubercular pericarditis and is sufficient to initiate antitubercular therapy. Antitubercular therapy includes 2 months of an intensive phase consisting of four drugs—rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol—followed by 4 months of maintenance phase with isoniazid and rifampicin. In cases with relapse of tuberculosis or multidrug resistance, a combination of second-line antitubercular drugs for a longer duration is recommended. There is no consensus about the use of corticosteroids in tubercular pericarditis. In a recent randomized controlled trial in adults, steroid therapy did not show any beneficial effect on the composite endpoints of death, tamponade, or pericardial constriction. Although less number of patients developed pericardial constriction with the use of steroids, there was an increased risk of cancer in patients with HIV. The recommended dose of oral prednisolone is 1 to 2 mg/kg per day. It should be continued for 10 to 12 weeks with slow tapering after 4 weeks. Colchicine therapy is not useful. Children with large effusion benefit from pericardiocentesis. Despite adequate treatment, a significant number of children develop pericardial constriction and worldwide tubercular pericarditis remains one of the leading cause of pericardial constriction. As in bacterial pericarditis, intrapericardial fibrinolysis is shown to be effective in reducing pericardial constriction. However, it is not routinely recommended as the evidence is limited. In cases requiring pericardiectomy, it should be deferred for at least 6 weeks of initiating antitubercular therapy, allowing time for the surgical cleavage plane to develop.


HIV-Related Pericarditis


Pericardial effusions are common and are seen in up to 25% children with HIV infection. Cardiac tamponade is rare. In an immunocompromised state, these patients are at higher risk of developing parasitic and fungal infections of the pericardium. The presence of HIV is a risk factor for developing tuberculous pericarditis.


Renal Failure


Renal failure accounts for approximately 8% of pericardial effusion in children. It is more common in patients with concurrent connective tissue disorders. These patients present as either uremic pericarditis, dialysis-associated pericarditis, or as pericardial constriction. ECG abnormalities are absent in the majority. The pericardial fluid is serous and responds quickly to dialysis. Pericardiocentesis should be performed in those with progressive increase in effusion and hemodynamic compromise. Pericardiectomy is reserved for rare cases with pericardial constriction.


Hypothyroidism


Pericardial effusion is common in severe hypothyroidism. Owing to slow accumulation of fluid, tamponade is uncommon. Unlike other causes of pericardial effusion, patients may present with bradycardia. Most effusions resolve gradually after initiation of thyroid hormone replacement therapy and pericardiocentesis is generally not required. Pericardial fluid, if aspirated, contains elevated protein and mucopolysaccharides. High cholesterol content sometimes give it a characteristic gold paint appearance.


Neoplastic Disease


Primary tumors of the pericardium are rare. The majority of patients have metastatic tumors. Neoplasm-related pericardial effusion is more frequent in developed countries and may account for up to one-third of patients requiring pericardial drainage. Primary tumors include lymphoma, mesothelioma, teratoma, and angiosarcoma. Common metastatic tumors are Hodgkin disease, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, leukemia, malignant melanoma, Wilms tumor, neuroblastoma, and other HIV-related malignancies. Intrapericardial cisplatin has been shown to be effective in preventing recurrence of neoplastic pericardial effusion in adults.


Postpericardiotomy Syndrome


Pleural and pericardial inflammation following cardiac surgery result in postpericardiotomy syndrome. It is suspected if any two of the following are present: fever beyond first postoperative week without infection; pleuritic chest pain; pericardial rub; new or worsening pleural effusion; and new or worsening pericardial effusion. Pericardial effusion typically presents 1 to 2 weeks after surgery and peaks around the tenth postoperative day, though recurrences months later are not uncommon. The exact mechanism of postpericardiotomy syndrome is not known and is hypothesized to be an autoimmune reaction. Handling of the pericardium during cardiac surgery also contributes to the inflammation. It is more common in older children than in infants and toddlers, possibly related to their robust immunologic response. Postpericardiotomy syndrome is reported in up to 30% of patients following cardiac surgery. However, recent reports have shown much lower prevalence. In a recent review of 1.4 million cardiac surgeries in patients aged less than 18 years, pericardial effusion was seen in 1.1%. Heart transplant, systemic-to-pulmonary shunt, and atrial septal defect were independent risk factors for its development in children. It is usually self-limiting and the majority of patients respond to NSAIDs or steroids. Patients with symptomatic or recurrent effusion require pericardiocentesis or pericardiectomy.


Chylopericardium


Chylous pericardial effusion is typically seen following thoracic duct injury during cardiac surgery and is usually associated with chylous pleural effusion. Chylopericardium can also occur in patients with mediastinal masses obstructing lymphatic drainage or following radiation therapy. The pericardial fluid is milky colored and has elevated levels of triglycerides and proteins. Initial management includes a low-fat or medium-chain triglyceride diet. Some children may require total parenteral nutrition. Octreotide, a long-acting somatostatin analog, has also been shown to be effective. Children with persistent chylous effusion require thoracic duct ligation or pericardioperitoneal shunt.




Pericardial Constriction


Pericardial constriction is characterized by a thickened, inelastic, and a noncompliant pericardium that limits diastolic expansion of the ventricles. Constriction generally involves the entire pericardium although localized constriction is occasionally seen. It is also known as chronic constrictive pericarditis. In reality, chronic constrictive pericarditis is a misnomer as the constriction is not necessarily chronic and pericardium is hardly ever inflamed. Hence, it is preferable to use the term “pericardial constriction.”


Tuberculosis is the most common cause of pericardial constriction worldwide. Idiopathic or viral pericarditis and constriction following cardiac surgery are increasingly becoming common in developed countries (see Table 57.1 ). Radiation-induced pericardial constriction may present after a long latency of 2 decades.


Pathophysiology


In pericardial constriction, similar to tamponade physiology, the left and right ventricles compete for filling in a “fixed” and noncompliant space. As a result, filling pressures in all the cardiac chambers and in systemic as well as pulmonary veins are elevated. Unlike tamponade, however, early ventricular filling is exaggerated. In mid-diastole, stiff pericardium abruptly halts ventricular filling when the cardiac volume exceeds pericardial reserve volume (see Fig. 57.1 ). Severely restricted ventricular filling leads to elevated systemic venous pressure and a relatively fixed cardiac output. Subsequent neurohormonal changes contribute to fluid retention. Despite elevated pressure in pulmonary veins, dyspnea is rare. This is possibly related to the lack of rise in atrial natriuretic peptide levels in pericardial constriction. Significant ascites by interfering with the movement of the diaphragm can sometimes cause orthopnea.


Thickened pericardium, unlike pericardial effusion, impedes transmission of thoracic pressure to the cardiac chambers. As a result, pressure in the pulmonary veins falls with no simultaneous reduction in left ventricular diastolic pressure. Consequently, pulmonary vein-to-left-ventricle pressure gradient is reduced or completely abolished during inspiration, causing marked reduction in left ventricular filling. This impaired left ventricular filling during inspiration allows preferential filling of the right ventricle with the opposite happening during expiration (exaggerated ventricular interdependence). Accentuated early diastolic ventricular filling and nontransmission of thoracic pressure accounts for most of the hemodynamic differences in pericardial constriction compared with cardiac tamponade.


Clinical Presentation


Pericardial constriction typically presents with symptoms and signs of right-sided heart failure. Pedal edema is the rule with varying degrees of ascites and pleural effusion. The enlarged liver may be tender and may have systolic pulsations of tricuspid regurgitation. If left untreated, patients present with recurrent pleural effusion, ascites, and anasarca. Chronic malnutrition and high metabolic rate lead to muscle wasting and cachexia. In advance stages, cardiac cirrhosis may ensue.


Physical examination shows markedly elevated JVP. Exaggerated ventricular filling during early diastole allows rapid “y” descent (Friedreich sign). A combination of prominent “y” descent and normal “x,” along with nearly equal “a” and “v” waves, gives JVP a typical “M” or “W” contour. The JVP fails to fall or may paradoxically rise during inspiration (Kussmaul sign). Paradoxical pulse, which is present in almost all cases of established tamponade, is seen in only one-third patients with pericardial constriction. Pericardial knock, an early diastolic high-frequency sound, is the auscultatory hallmark of pericardial constriction and coincides with the mid-diastolic pericardial restrain. The signs and symptoms of pulmonary venous hypertension are rarely present. Varying degrees of tricuspid regurgitation may appear. The development of atrial fibrillation is seen in one-third of patients and can cause further hemodynamic compromise.


Investigations


ECG shows nonspecific T wave changes and reduced voltage. As highlighted before, atrial fibrillation is seen in up to one-third of patients. On chest x-ray, cardiac silhouette is usually normal. Cardiomegaly may be seen in patients with coexisting pericardial effusion. Pericardial calcification is seen in a minority of patients. It is commonly seen over the right atrium, atrioventricular groove, and diaphragmatic surface of the cardiac silhouette ( Fig. 57.7 ). Pleural effusion is common and pulmonary venous redistribution may be seen in a few cases with markedly elevated left-sided filling pressure.


Jan 19, 2020 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Pericardial Diseases in Children

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access