Pericardial disease






Pericardial effusion


Examples of pericardial effusions seen on intraoperative TEE in several different patients are shown.



Fig 9.1


From high transesophageal position, echo-free space is seen adjacent to right atrium in four-chamber view. Patient is in diastole; right atrial free wall (left) shows normal convex contour. In early ventricular systole (right), right atrial “collapse” is present with concave appearance of RA free wall because pericardial pressure is higher than RA pressure during atrial diastole.



Fig 9.2


In midesophageal commissural view, left atrial appendage (LAA) is surrounded by pericardial effusion within transverse pericardial sinus.



Fig 9.3


This series of transgastric images in short-axis view from left to right shows pericardial effusion (PE) of diminishing size as fluid is removed by percutaneous needle pericardiocentesis. Note that size of left and right ventricles increases as pericardial fluid is removed, suggesting that high intrapericardial pressures prevented normal diastolic ventricular filling, such as in pericardial tamponade physiology.



Fig 9.4


This patient presented with ascending aortic dissection, and signs of pericardial tamponade. In transgastric short-axis views (top left) and long-axis view (top right), pericardial effusion is present. Although effusion is only small to moderate in size, pericardial pressure may be high due to rapid accumulation of pericardial fluid. Tamponade physiology is confirmed in two bottom frames, which show right ventricular diastolic “collapse” due to pericardial pressure higher than RV diastolic pressure. This phenomenon is better appreciated in the video. Compression of RV results in low forward stroke volume and hypotension.



Fig 9.5


In same patient as Fig 9.1d , right atrial collapse is seen in right image (arrows).



Fig 9.6


Next five images are from patient in whom heart transplant had been performed three weeks earlier. Pericardial effusion had been detected on TTE follow-up. Two attempts at subxiphoid drainage had been attempted with unsatisfactory results. In order to avoid redo sternotomy, left-sided, video-assisted thoracic surgical approach to draining effusion was planned. Biplane TEE from transgastric position revealed massive pericardial effusion; on left, long-axis view shows extremely small LV cavity, and on right, small ventricles are seen at level of apex. Fibrinous strands are seen within effusion (arrow).



Fig 9.7


Same view as Fig 9.6 , with use of 3D imaging. Large posterior pericardial effusion is appreciated.



Fig 9.8


On the left is a drawing of typical view from thoracoscope showing grasper, which is placed through same thoracoscope incision at 6 o’clock on this picture, and additional grasper placed through third intercostal incision port at 1 o’clock. These two graspers are used to elevate and separate pericardium, which is divided using standard dissecting scissors placed through more anterior fifth intercostal incision. Care is taken to avoid left phrenic nerve during this dissection. On the right is the surgeon’s view with the thoracoscope.

(From Oper Techniques Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 6:132–139. With permission.)



Fig 9.9


Biplane transgastric imaging, short-axis on left. Surgeon manually indented pericardial sac at level of red arrows, confirming direct approach to effusion; he then incised pericardium and drained over 1 L of pericardial fluid.



Fig 9.10


Postdrainage, right and left ventricular volumes are restored, with no evidence of RV compression. Patient’s hemodynamics responded appropriately with increase in cardiac output and blood pressure. These changes are not reliable in patients receiving positive pressure ventilation.




Comments


A pericardial effusion is diagnosed based on the echocardiographic finding of an echo-lucent area around the heart. Pericardial effusions are usually circumferential, with fluid filling the entire pericardial space around the right and left ventricles, although pericardial effusions may also be asymmetric due to adhesions resulting in areas of loculated fluid, especially in patients with prior cardiac surgical procedures.


The pericardial space extends to the origin of the great vessels, with the narrow transverse sinus of the pericardium extending posterior to the aorta and pulmonary artery, and adjacent to the left atrial appendage. Fluid in the transverse sinus is uncommon but may be seen on TEE as in the example here. The pericardial space also encloses the right atrium, with pericardial reflections at the junctions of the SVC and IVC with the right atrium, so that fluid adjacent to the right atrium is commonly seen. A small pocket of pericardial fluid also may be seen posterior to the left atrium, where the oblique sinus of the pericardium extends into the region between the four pulmonary veins.


A pericardial effusion is distinguished from a pleural effusion by its location. Pericardial fluid is seen posterior to the left ventricle and left atrium but anterior to the descending thoracic aorta, whereas pleural fluid extends posterior to the descending aorta. Fluid adjacent to the right atrium may be either pleural or pericardial, with the latter inferred from the presence of a pericardial effusion in other views. The presence of a compressed lung in the echo-lucent space helps confirm a diagnosis of pleural effusion.


Pericardial fluid may be well tolerated if the pressure within the pericardial space is low, for example with a chronic effusion that has accumulated slowly. Even very large chronic effusions may be associated with normal hemodynamics. However, if the pressure in the pericardial space exceeds the diastolic pressure in the cardiac chambers, hemodynamic changes are seen. When pericardial pressure exceeds right atrial pressure, the free wall of the right atrium inverts or “collapses” and right atrial filling volumes are reduced. Similarly, the left atrium and right ventricle can be compressed when pericardial pressure exceeds the pressure in that cardiac chamber. Tamponade physiology can even occur with loculated effusions if there is compression of one of the cardiac chambers. The diagnosis of tamponade due to a loculated effusion can be challenging. In addition, chamber collapse may not be seen, even when pericardial pressures are high, if the wall of the chamber is thickened or fibrotic.


Along with chamber collapse, a high pericardial pressure restricts the total cardiac volume. Thus, as the right-sided chambers increase in size with inspiration, due to negative intrathoracic pressures and increased venous return, the left-sided chambers are compressed with a reduction in forward cardiac output. These reciprocal inspiratory changes in right and left ventricular diastolic filling result in the drop in blood pressure seen with inspiration, or pulsus paradoxus. These changes are not reliable in patients receiving positive pressure ventilation.


Suggested reading




  • 1.

    Welch T: Pericardial disease. In Otto CM, editor: The practice of clinical echocardiography, ed 5, Philadelphia, 2016, Elsevier.


  • 2.

    Klein AL, Abbara S, Agler DA, et al: American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26(9):965–1012, e15, 2013.


  • 3.

    Silbiger JJ, Garg V, Moss N, et al: Protruding fat from the posterior atrioventricular groove: a novel echocardiographic finding useful in distinguishing pericardial effusions from left pleural effusions, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(1):116–117, 2015.


Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Dec 30, 2019 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Pericardial disease

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access