Abstract
Objectives
To analyze the effect of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment on patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) restenosis.
Background
In the Valentines I trial, treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis was effective and safe with the second-generation DIOR® PCB.
Methods
Valentines I prospectively enrolled 250 patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR); 76 patients (30.4%) had restenosis of a previous paclitaxel or limus DES. Patients underwent balloon angioplasty followed by PCB treatment. Clinical outcomes of patients with paclitaxel-eluting DES restenosis (n = 34; 41 lesions) and limus-eluting (sirolimus, everolimus and zotarolimus) DES restenosis (n = 42; 43 lesions) treated with DIOR® PCB were compared.
Results
Baseline characteristics were similar. There were more diffuse lesions > 20 mm treated in paclitaxel- compared to limus-eluting DES restenosis (50% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.032). Number of PCB used per patient (1.08 ± 0.31 overall), mean PCB diameter (2.99 ± 0.42 mm overall), mean PCB length (24.4 ± 11.9 mm overall), and bailout stenting (2.4% vs. 4.7%) were similar (p = NS). At mean follow-up of 231 ± 43 days, major adverse cardiac events was 0% vs. 23.8% in paclitaxel- vs. limus-eluting DES restenosis (p = 0.002), driven mainly by less target vessel revascularization (0% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.004). Target lesion revascularization was 0% vs. 16.7% for paclitaxel- vs. limus-eluting DES restenosis (p = 0.015).
Conclusion
In Valentines I, PCB use was more effective in patients with paclitaxel DES restenosis compared to limus DES restenosis, achieving better mid-term clinical outcomes. This suggests the efficacy of localized paclitaxel delivery to overcome paclitaxel resistance but not limus resistance due to different mechanisms of DES failure.
1
Introduction
Despite the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) compared to bare metal stents (BMS) in preventing coronary restenosis, DES failure is not uncommon and presents more frequently in complex lesion subsets . Treatment of DES restenosis remains challenging, and the optimal treatment option is unclear . Several percutaneous treatment options are available. These include balloon angioplasty with regular or cutting/scoring balloons, repeat stenting with DES, vascular brachytherapy, and paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty. PCB is an attractive option to treat in-stent restenosis (ISR) as it avoids another added layer of stent, and has the potential of shortened dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration without increasing the thrombosis risk . PCB has been shown to be superior to plain old balloon angioplasty in both BMS and DES ISR , and non-inferior to paclitaxel-eluting DES . However, not much is known about the differential effects of PCB on paclitaxel-eluting and limus-eluting DES restenosis. In the Valentines I trial, we demonstrated the safety and feasibility of the DIOR® (Eurocor GmbH, Bonn, Germany) PCB in treating BMS and DES restenosis . We analyzed from the Valentines I cohort the clinical outcomes of using the DIOR PCB on paclitaxel-eluting DES and limus-eluting DES restenosis.
2
Methods
The Valentines I trial has been previously described and the main results published . Briefly, the trial was an international, multicenter, prospective registry that enrolled patients over a short time frame (2/14/10–2/23/10) via an online Web-based system. Patient data from 104 centers in 26 countries were entered into an electronic data capture system, and a data monitoring structure ensured that > 50% of data were verified. The study was conducted in accordance with international healthcare guidelines, as well as local laws and regulations.
2.1
Patient selection
Valentines I included 250 patients who presented with stable or unstable angina pectoris and/or documented ischemia due to an ISR (> 50%) of a previously placed BMS or DES. Excluded were patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI), short life expectancy (< 12 months), lesions requiring additional stenting prior to PCB treatment, prior radiation therapy to target vessel, and patients unable to take dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for ≥ 3 months. In this analysis, we included 76 patients from the Valentines I cohort who presented with DES restenosis (identified as either paclitaxel DES or limus DES restenosis), were treated with the DIOR PCB, and had clinical follow-up data.
2.2
Interventional procedure
Enrolled patients received peri- and post-procedural aspirin (80–325 mg per day) and clopidogrel (300–600 mg loading dose, followed by 75 mg per day). Intravenous heparin was used as anticoagulation during the procedure maintained at targeted activated clotting time. The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was left to the operator’s discretion. Post procedure, DAPT was recommended for ≥ 3 months, followed by aspirin indefinitely.
Following coronary angiography, predilatation of the ISR lesion was recommended with regular short-length balloons sized to the original stent diameter in a 0.7–0.8:1 ratio. If a good angiographic result was obtained [e.g., thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow and residual stenosis < 30%], the DIOR balloon was inflated for ≥ 30 seconds at the lesion with an overlap of ≥ 2 mm on each edge of the predilatation balloon-treated segment. The DIOR balloon was sized to the original stent diameter in a 1:1 ratio. Special emphasis was placed on avoiding geographical miss (i.e. predilated area not covered by the PCB). Additional bailout stenting using a BMS was left to the operator’s discretion in cases of suboptimal angiographic result (TIMI flow grade < 3 and/or residual stenosis > 30%).
The second-generation DIOR PCB used in the Valentines trial contains paclitaxel as the active drug, in a concentration of 3 μg/mm 2 of balloon surface using a shellac coating method. The un-inflated balloon is thrice-folded which protects the drug from early wash-off during balloon catheter insertion and tracking. The recommended inflation time is 30–45 seconds to achieve adequate paclitaxel delivery to the vessel wall. The DIOR balloon is available in lengths of 15–30 mm, and diameters of 2.0–4.0 mm.
2.3
Follow-up/end points
Clinical follow-up was performed 6–9 months after the index procedure. Outcomes were reported based on definitions included in the study protocol. The primary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, MI and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Vessel thrombosis follows the Academic Research Consortium criteria for stent thrombosis. MI was defined as any elevation of troponin (or other cardiac enzymes if troponin was not recorded) in combination with ischemic chest pain. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was defined as any repeat revascularization (percutaneous or surgical) due to a restenosis in the PCB-treated segment (which includes 5 mm beyond the treated segments proximally and distally). TVR was defined as any repeat revascularization of the PCB-treated vessel. Device success was defined as without bailout stenting and/or without device complications; procedural success was defined as TIMI 3 flow and final residual stenosis of < 30% after PCB treatment and possible bailout stenting.
2.4
Statistical analysis and manuscript preparation
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD. Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. For continuous variables, the groups were compared with a parametric Student’s t test or a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared with chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Event-free survival from MACE was shown as Kaplan–Meier curves and compared using log-rank tests.
The data acquisition, data analysis and writing of the manuscript were independently generated by the principal investigators and their teams. Eurocor GmbH was involved in the clinical monitoring of recruiting sites and the review of data accuracy.
2
Methods
The Valentines I trial has been previously described and the main results published . Briefly, the trial was an international, multicenter, prospective registry that enrolled patients over a short time frame (2/14/10–2/23/10) via an online Web-based system. Patient data from 104 centers in 26 countries were entered into an electronic data capture system, and a data monitoring structure ensured that > 50% of data were verified. The study was conducted in accordance with international healthcare guidelines, as well as local laws and regulations.
2.1
Patient selection
Valentines I included 250 patients who presented with stable or unstable angina pectoris and/or documented ischemia due to an ISR (> 50%) of a previously placed BMS or DES. Excluded were patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI), short life expectancy (< 12 months), lesions requiring additional stenting prior to PCB treatment, prior radiation therapy to target vessel, and patients unable to take dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for ≥ 3 months. In this analysis, we included 76 patients from the Valentines I cohort who presented with DES restenosis (identified as either paclitaxel DES or limus DES restenosis), were treated with the DIOR PCB, and had clinical follow-up data.
2.2
Interventional procedure
Enrolled patients received peri- and post-procedural aspirin (80–325 mg per day) and clopidogrel (300–600 mg loading dose, followed by 75 mg per day). Intravenous heparin was used as anticoagulation during the procedure maintained at targeted activated clotting time. The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was left to the operator’s discretion. Post procedure, DAPT was recommended for ≥ 3 months, followed by aspirin indefinitely.
Following coronary angiography, predilatation of the ISR lesion was recommended with regular short-length balloons sized to the original stent diameter in a 0.7–0.8:1 ratio. If a good angiographic result was obtained [e.g., thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow and residual stenosis < 30%], the DIOR balloon was inflated for ≥ 30 seconds at the lesion with an overlap of ≥ 2 mm on each edge of the predilatation balloon-treated segment. The DIOR balloon was sized to the original stent diameter in a 1:1 ratio. Special emphasis was placed on avoiding geographical miss (i.e. predilated area not covered by the PCB). Additional bailout stenting using a BMS was left to the operator’s discretion in cases of suboptimal angiographic result (TIMI flow grade < 3 and/or residual stenosis > 30%).
The second-generation DIOR PCB used in the Valentines trial contains paclitaxel as the active drug, in a concentration of 3 μg/mm 2 of balloon surface using a shellac coating method. The un-inflated balloon is thrice-folded which protects the drug from early wash-off during balloon catheter insertion and tracking. The recommended inflation time is 30–45 seconds to achieve adequate paclitaxel delivery to the vessel wall. The DIOR balloon is available in lengths of 15–30 mm, and diameters of 2.0–4.0 mm.
2.3
Follow-up/end points
Clinical follow-up was performed 6–9 months after the index procedure. Outcomes were reported based on definitions included in the study protocol. The primary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, MI and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Vessel thrombosis follows the Academic Research Consortium criteria for stent thrombosis. MI was defined as any elevation of troponin (or other cardiac enzymes if troponin was not recorded) in combination with ischemic chest pain. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was defined as any repeat revascularization (percutaneous or surgical) due to a restenosis in the PCB-treated segment (which includes 5 mm beyond the treated segments proximally and distally). TVR was defined as any repeat revascularization of the PCB-treated vessel. Device success was defined as without bailout stenting and/or without device complications; procedural success was defined as TIMI 3 flow and final residual stenosis of < 30% after PCB treatment and possible bailout stenting.
2.4
Statistical analysis and manuscript preparation
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD. Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. For continuous variables, the groups were compared with a parametric Student’s t test or a nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared with chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Event-free survival from MACE was shown as Kaplan–Meier curves and compared using log-rank tests.
The data acquisition, data analysis and writing of the manuscript were independently generated by the principal investigators and their teams. Eurocor GmbH was involved in the clinical monitoring of recruiting sites and the review of data accuracy.
3
Results
3.1
Patient and procedural characteristics
A total of 76 patients with DES restenosis treated with DIOR PCB were analyzed. There were 34 patients (with 41 lesions) with paclitaxel-eluting DES restenosis and 42 patients (with 43 lesions) with limus-eluting DES restenosis. The limus-eluting DES restenosis group consisted of sirolimus-eluting (n = 19), zotarolimus-eluting (n = 9), and everolimus-eluting (n = 14) DES. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of the study population, which were similar between groups. Table 2 describes the groups’ lesion characteristics. There were numerically more left anterior descending artery lesions with paclitaxel DES restenosis and more circumflex artery lesions with limus DES restenosis treated. The majority of lesions treated were in the proximal and mid segments of the target vessel. There were significantly more diffuse lesions > 20 mm with paclitaxel DES restenosis compared to limus DES restenosis (50% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.032) treated with PCB. One-third of lesions treated with PCB had focal or multifocal restenosis. Proliferative and occlusive restenosis morphology constitutes a small percentage of cases treated. The majority of ISR occurred beyond 6 months of stent implantation, and the majority of lesions had one prior intervention for ISR before this current procedure. There were no differences between the 2 groups with regard to timing of restenosis and number of prior ISR interventions. Table 3 describes the procedural characteristics, which were similar between the 2 groups. Predilatation before PCB treatment was 75%. Procedural success was 100%, and device success was 96% overall. Bailout stenting occurred in 1 patient with paclitaxel DES restenosis for residual stenosis, and in 2 patients with limus DES restenosis for residual stenosis and coronary dissection.
Variable (patient-based) | All (n = 76) | Paclitaxel DES restenosis (n = 34) | Limus DES restenosis (n = 42) | p value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 61.8 ± 10.3 | 62.6 ± 11.6 | 61.1 ± 9.1 | 0.55 |
Men | 60 (78.9%) | 29 (85.3%) | 31 (73.8%) | 0.22 |
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) | 54.3 ± 11.8 | 52.9 ± 9.9 | 55.5 ± 13.2 | 0.40 |
Risk factors | ||||
Diabetes mellitus | 29 (38.2%) | 10 (29.4%) | 19 (45.2%) | 0.16 |
Insulin-treated diabetes mellitus | 5 (6.6%) | 2 (5.9%) | 3 (7.1%) | 1.00 |
Hypertension | 61 (80.3%) | 29 (85.3%) | 32 (76.2%) | 0.32 |
Hyperlipidemia | 49 (64.5%) | 18 (52.9%) | 31 (73.8%) | 0.06 |
Smoking (current or previous) | 11 (14.5%) | 7 (20.6%) | 4 (9.5%) | 0.20 |
Renal insufficiency | 5 (6.6%) | 4 (11.8%) | 1 (2.4%) | 0.17 |
Peripheral vascular disease | 1 (1.3%) | 1 (2.9%) | 0 | 0.45 |
Previous myocardial infarction | 23 (30.3%) | 11 (32.4%) | 12 (28.6%) | 0.72 |
Previous coronary bypass surgery | 11 (14.5%) | 5 (14.7%) | 6 (14.3%) | 1.00 |
Clinical presentation | ||||
Stable angina pectoris | 40 (52.6%) | 19 (55.9%) | 21 (50.0%) | 0.61 |
Unstable angina pectoris | 18 (23.7%) | 8 (23.5%) | 10 (23.8%) | 0.98 |
Positive functional stress test | 19 (25.0%) | 6 (17.6%) | 13 (31.0%) | 0.18 |