Background
Many studies have shown that a pharmacoinvasive strategy of urgent percutaneous coronary intervention following thrombolytic therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients is associated with better outcomes than thrombolytics alone. Some studies used full-dose thrombolytics and some used half-dose thrombolytics with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The comparative efficacy and safety of these regimens remain unclear.
Methods
We prospectively enrolled 1632 patients from 2001 to 2009 into a single-center STEMI registry. We limited the cohort to STEMI patients who had thrombolytics at an outside hospital and were transferred for urgent cardiac catheterization at our center ( N =715). Patients received either full-dose thrombolytics or half-dose thrombolytics plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Patients were propensity matched into blocks by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score. Logistic regression (OR) and Cox’s proportional hazard modeling (HR) on propensity-matched patients were conducted for clinical end points with 95% confidence intervals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97ee7/97ee72ea3ad15a33028437e4106b370d0315b433" alt=""
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d98ab/d98ab0100d6b84663ef4d648a1ee0b9942a9d2b8" alt=""
Full access? Get Clinical Tree
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81495/81495a71c7aa81bce3fa50478f4798b4eb2961d4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78ccd/78ccda9dfcb29e4561f829950522ca75b4251463" alt=""