Optimal antiplatelet strategy in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation: Design and rationale of the randomized ADAPT-CKD trial

ABSTRACT

Background

Although shortened dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies have demonstrated favorable outcomes in the general percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) population, patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. The optimal duration of DAPT after PCI remains uncertain in patients with CKD, who are at increased risk for both ischemic and bleeding events.

Methods

The ADAPT-CKD trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized, superiority study designed to compare an abbreviated vs a standard DAPT strategy in patients with advanced CKD undergoing PCI with contemporary drug-eluting stents. A total of 900 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m² will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to abbreviated DAPT (<3 months of DAPT after PCI) or standard DAPT (≥6 months). The primary endpoint is net adverse clinical events at 1 year, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. The primary hypothesis is that abbreviated DAPT is superior to standard DAPT in reducing net adverse clinical events at 1 year after randomization.

Conclusions

The ADAPT-CKD trial will provide randomized evidence on the efficacy and safety of an abbreviated DAPT strategy compared with a standard DAPT strategy in patients with advanced CKD undergoing PCI. The results are expected to inform clinical decision-making regarding optimal antiplatelet therapy in this high-risk population.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT04708587.

Key Points

  • Patients with CKD have competing risks of ischemia and bleeding, with limited randomized evidence to guide optimal antithrombotic strategies.

  • Randomized comparison of abbreviated (<3 months) versus standard (≤6 months) DAPT followed by P2Y 12 monotherapy after PCI in patients with advanced CKD.

  • Primary endpoint: 1-year NACE integrating ischemic and bleeding outcomes.

  • This study will inform optimal DAPT duration in this high-risk population.

Background

With the advent of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies—including new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) and intravascular imaging—the recommended duration of mandatory dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI has been substantially shortened, particularly in patients at high risk of bleeding. ,,, These recommendations are based on balancing ischemic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing PCI.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) shares key pathophysiological mechanisms with coronary artery disease, including accelerated atherosclerosis, therefore patients with CKD experience a higher incidence of ischemic adverse events compared with those without CKD. , At the same time, CKD is also associated with uremic platelet dysfunction and alteration of the coagulation cascade, resulting in a bleeding diathesis and categorizing CKD as a high bleeding-risk condition. This bi-risk profile underscores a major challenge in optimizing antithrombotic therapy after PCI in patients with CKD. Despite this unmet clinical need, no specific strategies for the optimal duration of DAPT has been recommended in patients with CKD. This gap largely reflects the absence of randomized controlled trials specifically designed to evaluate DAPT strategies in this population, as patients with advanced CKD are commonly excluded from major PCI trials.

Hence, Appropriate Duration of Anti-Platelet Strategy in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease after New Generation Drug Eluting Stents (ADAPT-CKD) trial is designed to compare an abbreviated DAPT strategy with a standard DAPT strategy in patients with advanced CKD undergoing PCI with contemporary DES.

Methods

Study design

The ADAPT-CKD trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized, superiority trial conducted in South Korea. The ADAPT-CKD trial aims to determine the optimal duration of DAPT in patients with advanced CKD undergoing PCI with contemporary DES implantation by comparing abbreviated DAPT strategy with standard DAPT strategy. The study flowchart is presented in Figure 1 . Enrollment began in March 2021 and is expected to be completed by mid-2026. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04708587). Data is reviewed by an independent data and safety monitoring board at regular intervals. The trial is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all participants provided written informed consent before randomization. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board of each participating center.

Figure 1

The study flowchart. Patients with advanced CKD undergoing PCI with contemporary DES implantation are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to an abbreviated DAPT strategy (<3 months) or a standard DAPT strategy (≥6 months), each followed by P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy with either clopidogrel or prasugrel. The primary endpoint is NACE at 1 year after randomization, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding. Major bleeding is defined as type 3 or 5 bleeding according to the BARC definition. BARC , Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; CKD , chronic kidney disease; DAPT , dual antiplatelet therapy; DES , drug-eluting stent; MI , myocardial infarction; NACE , net adverse clinical events; PCI , percutaneous coronary intervention.

Study population and enrollment criteria

Patients will be eligible for inclusion if they meet all of the following criteria: (1) age >18 years; (2) advanced CKD defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation or dialysis dependence ; and (3) undergoing PCI with contemporary DES implantation. Patients undergoing PCI for any clinical presentation, including chronic coronary syndrome and acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction), will be considered eligible provided the above criteria are satisfied. The key exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) age >85 years; (2) conditions conferring unacceptable hemorrhagic risk; or (3) a requirement for oral anticoagulant agents. Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria are summarized in Table 1 .

Table 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria
Age >18 years
Advanced CKD, as defined an eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 calculated by the CKD-EPI equation or dialysis-dependent
Underwent PCI with contemporary DES implantation
Written informed consent provided
Exclusion criteria
Age >85 years
Conditions conferring unacceptable hemorrhagic risk
History of intracranial hemorrhage
History of hemorrhagic stroke
Ischemic stroke, dementia, or significant central nervous system injury within 12 months
Major head trauma or intracranial surgery within 6 months
Presence of an intracranial neoplasm
Suspected aortic dissection
Active internal bleeding within 6 weeks
Active bleeding or a bleeding diathesis
Major surgery, trauma, or bleeding within 3 weeks
Requirement of long-term oral anticoagulant therapy
Pregnancy or potential pregnancy
Expected life expectancy less than 1 year

CKD , chronic kidney disease; CKD-EPI , Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; DES , drug-eluting stent; eGFR , estimated glomerular filtration rate; PCI , percutaneous coronary intervention.

Randomization and study procedures

Eligible patients are randomly assigned to either the abbreviated DAPT group or the standard DAPT group in a 1:1 ratio using a web-based permuted-block randomization system with block sizes of four or six. Assignment is performed immediately after successful completion of the index PCI. In patients undergoing planned staged PCI, the index PCI is defined as the final installment of the planned staged intervention. Randomization is performed at each participating center. Randomization is stratified by CKD grade (stage IIIb [eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2] vs stage IV or V [eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 or dialysis-dependent]), clinical presentation (chronic coronary syndrome vs acute coronary syndrome), and DES type (polymer-free vs durable-polymer).

Patients who did not previously receive antiplatelet therapy before PCI receive loading doses of aspirin (300 mg) with either clopidogrel (300 mg) or prasugrel (60 mg) at the time of PCI. After PCI, DAPT consisting of aspirin 100 mg daily with either clopidogrel 75 mg or prasugrel 10 mg daily is prescribed. For the standard DAPT group, DAPT is continued for at least 6 months after PCI in accordance with the contemporary guideline recommendation. ,,, This duration was selected as a predefined, guideline-based strategy rather than an individualized bleeding risk-guided approach. For the abbreviated DAPT group, DAPT is administered for less than 3 months after PCI; specifically, 1 month of DAPT is recommended for patients presenting with chronic coronary syndrome, and 3 months of DAPT for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. The exact duration of DAPT within each assigned strategy is determined at the treating physicians’ discretion in both groups. After DAPT discontinuation, P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy with clopidogrel or prasugrel is continued after DAPT in both groups. Prasugrel is preferred (but, left to the physicians’ discretion) over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome unless contraindicated. Prasugrel dose reduction to 5 mg daily is permitted at the physicians’ discretion to mitigate bleeding risk. , Switching between P2Y 12 inhibitor or use of other P2Y 12 inhibitor (e.g., ticagrelor) is permitted based on a justified decision by the treating physician. Accordingly, switching between P2Y 12 inhibitors will not be considered a protocol violation, provided that the duration of DAPT remains consistent with the assigned randomization. The trial exclusively uses polymer-free biolimus-coated stents (Biofreedom, Biosensors Europe SA, Morges, Switzerland), sirolimus-coated stents (Cre8 EVO, CID S.p.A., Saluggia, Italy), or durable-polymer novolimus-eluting stents (DESyne X2, Elixir Medical Corporation, Milpitas, CA) according to the operators’ preference.

Study endpoints and follow-up

The primary endpoint is net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding. Major bleeding is defined as the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 bleeding. Given the competing ischemic and bleeding risks characteristic of advanced CKD, NACE was selected to provide a comprehensive assessment of balancing the trade-off between ischemic and bleeding events. The secondary endpoints including the separate ischemic and bleeding events are listed in Table 2 . Detailed definitions of the study endpoints are provided in Supplementary Material.

Table 2

Study endpoints.

Primary endpoint
Net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding (BARC type 3 or 5)
Secondary endpoints
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or target-vessel revascularization
Composite ischemic events, defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke
All-cause death
Cardiovascular death
Myocardial infarction
Stent thrombosis
All stroke
Ischemic stroke
Hemorrhagic stroke
A composite of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (BARC type 2, 3, or 5)
Major bleeding (BARC type 3 or 5)
Target-vessel revascularization
Target-lesion revascularization

BARC , Bleeding Academic Research Consortium.

Given the open-label design of the trial, all study endpoints will be independently evaluated by a clinical event adjudication committee. The committee consists of experienced clinicians who are not participating in the trial and are blinded to treatment assignments. The committee will review all investigator-reported endpoints and perform independent confirmation and classification of clinical endpoints according to prespecified definitions based on original source documentation.

Patients will be followed up as scheduled according to the study protocol, with visits at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after randomization. At each follow-up visit, general health status, medication use, and the occurrence of study endpoints or adverse events will be assessed. Study drug adherence will be assessed at each follow-up visit based on site-reported medication use, with adherence ≥80% considered adequate. Additional laboratory and imaging studies will be obtained according to usual care, and coronary angiography will not be routinely performed unless myocardial ischemia is suspected. All follow-up procedures and clinical assessments are conducted according to a standardized protocol in both randomized groups.

Jun 27, 2026 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Optimal antiplatelet strategy in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation: Design and rationale of the randomized ADAPT-CKD trial

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access