Current guidelines recommend intravascular imaging guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While both optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are endorsed, comparative data in STEMI remain limited. To compare clinical outcomes between OCT and IVUS guidance for primary PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). From a multicenter registry of 2,777 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI within 24 hours from onset at 12 Japanese hospitals, we analyzed 2,291 patients who received OCT-guided (n = 244, 10.7%) or IVUS-guided (n = 2,047, 89.3%) PCI. The primary endpoint was target vessel-related major adverse cardiac events (TV-MACE): cardiovascular death, target vessel revascularization, and target vessel-related myocardial infarction. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline differences. During median follow-up of 722 days, TV-MACE rates tended to be lower in the OCT group in unmatched analysis (9.8% vs 14.5%; p = 0.051). After propensity matching (187 pairs), this difference disappeared (8.6% vs 10.2%; p = 0.723). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant differences for TV-MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.42 to 1.59, p = 0.552), cardiovascular death (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.32, p = 0.150), or target vessel revascularization (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.63, p = 0.891). OCT guidance was associated with more frequent procedures without stenting (12.8% vs 5.3%, p = 0.027) and fewer stents per patient (0.99 ± 0.52 vs 1.15 ± 0.56, p = 0.006). In conclusion, OCT-guided PCI demonstrated comparable outcomes to IVUS-guided PCI in STEMI patients, supporting the use of either imaging modality for primary PCI.
Condensed abstract: This multicenter registry compared optical coherence tomography (OCT) versus intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Clinical outcomes were compared between the patients undergoing OCT-guided PCI (n = 244) and those with IVUS-guided PCI (n = 2,047). After propensity score matching (187 pairs), target vessel-related major adverse cardiac events rates were similar between OCT and IVUS groups (8.6% vs 10.2%, p = 0.723) during median 722-day follow-up. No significant differences were observed in cardiovascular death or target vessel revascularization. OCT guidance was associated with more frequent procedures without stenting and fewer stents per patient. Both imaging modalities demonstrated comparable clinical outcomes.
Perspectives
What Is Known
Intravascular imaging with OCT or IVUS improves PCI outcomes compared to angiography alone, but direct comparative data between these modalities specifically in STEMI patients remain limited, with most prior studies focusing on stable CAD or mixed ACS populations.
What Is New
This large multicenter registry of 2,291 STEMI patients, using propensity score matching, demonstrates that OCT-guided primary PCI achieves clinical outcomes comparable to IVUS-guided PCI, with OCT guidance associated with more stent-less procedures and fewer stents per patient, suggesting more selective treatment strategies.
What Is Next
Prospective randomized trials in STEMI populations with established expertise in both imaging modalities are warranted to definitively establish the optimal intravascular imaging strategy and identify specific patient or lesion characteristics that may predict differential benefit from OCT versus IVUS guidance.
ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a life-threatening manifestation of acute coronary syndromes and remains a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality worldwide. Rapid and effective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is crucial to restore coronary perfusion and minimize myocardial damage. However, achieving optimal clinical outcomes from PCI relies not solely on the promptness of intervention but also on optimal stent deployment and minimized procedural complications, guided by precise visualization of coronary anatomy.
Although conventional coronary angiography is widely employed, it exhibits inherent limitations in the assessment of plaque morphology, stent apposition, and residual thrombus burden, which are important information during primary PCI. Intravascular imaging modalities such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) have the potential to overcome these limitations. OCT provides high-resolution images (10 to 15 µm) that enhance lesion characterization, while IVUS offers greater tissue penetration, which is advantageous in large vessels. , In STEMI, superior resolution of OCT allows for better thrombus characterization and identification of underlying plaque morphologies such as plaque rupture and plaque erosion, while IVUS may be advantageous to assess vessel size and side branch involvement without the need for blood clearance, making it particularly valuable in hemodynamically unstable patients or those with contrast nephropathy risk.
Despite guideline recommendations in the U.S, Europe, and Japan supporting the use of intravascular imaging including both OCT and IVUS in PCI, ,, direct comparative data between those modalities remain limited in the setting of STEMI. Most existing investigations have primarily addressed chronic coronary syndrome or heterogeneous acute coronary syndrome populations. , Given the urgent and highly thrombotic nature of STEMI, the optimal intravascular imaging modality has not been sufficiently investigated. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of OCT-guided versus IVUS-guided PCI in STEMI patients, using data from a large, multicenter registry of STEMI in Japan.
Methods
Study population
This study was a sub-analysis of the ST-Elevation myocardial infarction treated with Laser Atherectomy (STELA) registry, which was a retrospectively collected, multicenter registry of consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI within 24 hours of the onset of myocardial infarction from January 2015 to December 2019. Twelve regional healthcare centers in Japan providing continuous emergency care, including primary PCI for STEMI, participated in the registry. Details of the registry protocol are described elsewhere. From a total of 2,777 patients enrolled in the registry, 184 patients were excluded due to insufficient image quality of angiography (n = 3), loss of clinical follow-up information within 30 days (n = 134), unidentifiable culprit lesion (n = 40), and bypass graft failure (n = 7), and the remaining 2,593 patients with sufficient image and clinical data were investigated ( Figure 1 ). For the present analysis, we selected the patients who were treated with intravascular image guidance, specifically with OCT guidance or IVUS guidance, excluding those who underwent multiple intravascular imaging modalities (n = 244) or patients with angiography guidance alone (n = 58). STEMI was diagnosed according to the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the intravascular imaging modality used: OCT guidance group and IVUS guidance group, and the clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. The study protocol was approved by Institute of Science Tokyo ethics committee (M2020-342) and by each participating hospital, and registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry of Japan (UMIN-CTR number: 000043818). This study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Figure 1. Study flow diagram. Flow diagram illustrating patient selection from the STELA (ST-Elevation myocardial infarction treated with laser atherectomy) registry. Of 2,777 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI within 24 hours of symptom onset at 12 Japanese centers (2015 to 2019), 184 patients were excluded due to insufficient data or technical issues. From the remaining 2,593 patients, 302 were further excluded for using multiple imaging modalities (n = 244) or angiography-only guidance (n = 58), resulting in 2,291 patients in the total cohort (244 OCT-guided, 2,047 IVUS-guided). Propensity score (PS) matching yielded 187 matched pairs for the primary analysis. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a median follow-up of 2.0 years.
Data collection
Clinical information, encompassing baseline characteristics, laboratory data, medications at discharge, procedural details, outpatient visit records, and subsequent adverse events were obtained from medical records and anonymized at each participating institution. Cardiac enzymes were measured every 3 to 6 hours until their levels began to decline, and maximum results are marked as peak values. The anonymized data were entered into password-protected electronic spreadsheets and securely transferred to the research laboratory at the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Institute of Science Tokyo (IST). Angiographical and intravascular imaging results were saved and sent to the laboratory for further investigation.
PCI and imaging procedures
All PCI procedures were performed fundamentally according to the operator’s discretion, including the use of intravascular imaging modalities and the selection of stents, complying with the social and institutional guidelines. Workflow of OCT-guided PCI and IVUS-guided PCI were dependent on the institutional protocol as well. OCT was performed using frequency domain-OCT (AptiVue imaging system and Dragonfly OPTIS imaging catheter, Abbott Medical Japan, Tokyo, Japan) or optical frequency-domain imaging (LUNAWAVE imaging system and FastView imaging catheter) based on institutional availability. IVUS was performed according to the institutional protocol and the devices were chosen per their availability, in which AltaView imaging catheter with VISICUBE imaging system (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) or OptiCross imaging catheter with iLab imaging system (Boston Scientific Japan, Tokyo, Japan) were predominantly used.
Angiographic analysis
Coronary angiograms were analyzed by independent observers blinded to the clinical characteristics or outcomes at the imaging laboratory of IST. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed on the baseline and final angiograms for each patient using QAngio software (Medis, The Netherlands). The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade was determined at baseline and on final angiography. Slow flow phenomenon was defined as TIMI flow grade ≤2 on final angiography. The corrected TIMI frame count was evaluated adjusted by the frame rate to 30 frames per second in the final angiograms. The TIMI thrombus grade was assessed in baseline angiograms.
Endpoints
The primary endpoint was the incidence of target vessel-related major adverse cardiac events (TV-MACE) defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target vessel nonfatal myocardial infarction (TV-AMI) during the follow-up period. The secondary endpoints included individual components of TV-MACE, peak cardiac enzyme levels, and angiographic outcomes immediately after primary PCI including final TIMI flow grade, corrected TIMI frame count, and myocardial blush grade (MBG).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (version 4.4.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Categorical variables are summarized as frequencies and percentages and were compared between groups using the χ 2 test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range) and were compared between groups using 2-tailed, unpaired t-tests or the Mann–Whitney U test according to the distribution. Kaplan–Meier analysis with Log-rank test was used to determine the difference in event-free survival between groups. Cox proportional hazard model was utilized to determine the predictors of adverse cardiac events. A 2-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The propensity score was derived based on the variables showing statistically significant differences between OCT guidance and IVUS guidance groups, and clinically relevant variables at baseline. Propensity score matching was then performed with a 1:1 algorithm using nearest-neighbor matching with a caliper width of 0.2 of the standard deviation of the logit of the propensity score, without replacement.
Results
Baseline patient and angiographic characteristics in the total cohort
Of the 2,291 patients in the final analysis after excluding angiography-guided PCI and cases using multiple imaging modalities, 244 patients (10.7%) received OCT-guided PCI and 2,047 patients (89.3%) received IVUS-guided PCI ( Figure 1 ). Table 1 shows the baseline patient characteristics of both groups in the total cohort (n = 2,291). Compared to the IVUS group, the OCT group had higher rates of prior myocardial infarction (10.7% vs 6.1%, p = 0.013), prior PCI (13.9% vs 8.1%, p = 0.004), and prior statin use (32.0% vs 19.7%, p <0.001). Demographics and comorbidities were similar between groups. The OCT group showed less frequent presentation with Killip class IV (6.6% vs 12.6%, p = 0.029) and better baseline coronary flow (TIMI 3: 20.9% vs 14.8%, p <0.001). In terms of angiographic findings, culprit lesions in the OCT group were more frequently located in LAD (59.8% vs 48.8%, p = 0.009), had smaller percent diameter stenosis (83.4% vs 88.5%, p <0.001), and lower thrombus burden (grade 4 to 5: 74.6% vs 85.4%, p <0.001), while multivessel disease was less common (31.6% vs 40.8%, p = 0.006) ( Table 1 ).
Table 1
Patient and angiographic characteristics in the total cohort
|
IVUS
N = 2,047 |
OCT
N = 244 |
p value | SMD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, year | 68.2 ± 12.8 | 69.1 ± 12.6 | 0.325 | 0.067 |
| Male | 1,578 (77.1) | 181 (74.2) | 0.336 | 0.068 |
| BMI, kg/m 2 | 23.8 ± 3.9 | 23.9 ± 3.8 | 0.881 | 0.010 |
| Door to balloon time, hour | 1.52 ± 1.22 | 1.58 ± 1.80 | 0.513 | 0.037 |
| Onset to balloon time, hour | 5.06 ± 4.43 | 5.49 ± 4.33 | 0.152 | 0.098 |
| Current smoking | 708 (34.6) | 76 (31.1) | 0.344 | 0.078 |
| Hypertension | 1,236 (60.4) | 146 (59.8) | 0.890 | 0.011 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 652 (31.9) | 82 (33.6) | 0.611 | 0.037 |
| Dyslipidemia | 935 (45.7) | 128 (52.5) | 0.049 | 0.136 |
| Hemodialysis | 42 (2.1) | 9 (3.7) | 0.107 | 0.098 |
| Prior MI | 125 (6.1) | 26 (10.7) | 0.013 | 0.165 |
| Prior CABG | 17 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0.245 | 0.129 |
| Prior PCI | 166 (8.1) | 34 (13.9) | 0.004 | 0.187 |
| Prior Statin use | 403 (19.7) | 78 (32.0) | <0.001 | 0.288 |
| Anticoagulant use | 74 (3.6) | 10 (4.1) | 0.718 | 0.025 |
| Prior aspirin use | 254 (12.4) | 45 (18.4) | 0.012 | 0.167 |
| Creatinine kinase, U/L | 458.1 ± 937.3 | 439.1 ± 915.9 | 0.764 | 0.021 |
| Creatinine kinase-MB, ng/ml | 41.6 ± 87.0 | 38.2 ± 84.3 | 0.573 | 0.039 |
| Cardiac troponin I, pg/ml | 12994.8 ± 81533.3 | 14084.4 ± 73627.9 | 0.843 | 0.014 |
| Creatinine, mg/dl | 1.12 ± 1.17 | 1.13 ± 1.31 | 0.911 | 0.007 |
| CRP, mg/dl | 0.97 ± 2.78 | 0.72 ± 2.01 | 0.169 | 0.104 |
| eGFR, ml/min/1.73m 2 | 63.47 ± 23.08 | 64.87 ± 23.44 | 0.371 | 0.060 |
| Hemoglobin, g/dl | 14.2 ± 2.0 | 14.1 ± 2.0 | 0.582 | 0.037 |
| HbA1c, % | 6.4 ± 1.3 | 6.4 ± 1.2 | 0.563 | 0.042 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dl | 47.5 ± 13.1 | 48.4 ± 13.1 | 0.353 | 0.063 |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dl | 119.4 ± 39.0 | 118.9 ± 39.5 | 0.862 | 0.012 |
| Triglyceride, mg/dl | 126.8 ± 114.7 | 117.3 ± 82.1 | 0.216 | 0.095 |
| ECMO before PCI | 28 (1.4) | 1 (0.4) | 0.358 | 0.102 |
| IABP before PCI | 108 (5.3) | 7 (2.8) | 0.120 | 0.123 |
| Killip class | ||||
| I | 1,467 (71.7) | 191 (78.3) | 0.029 | 0.214 |
| II | 246 (12.0) | 27 (11.1) | ||
| III | 76 (3.7) | 10 (4.1) | ||
| IV | 258 (12.6) | 16 (6.6) | ||
| CPAOA | 123 (6.0) | 12 (4.9) | 0.567 | 0.049 |
| Culprit vessel | ||||
| LAD | 1,001 (48.8) | 147 (59.8) | 0.009 | 0.242 |
| LCX | 179 (8.7) | 16 (6.5) | ||
| LMT | 48 (2.3) | 2 (0.8) | ||
| RCA | 823 (40.1) | 81 (32.9) | ||
| Bifurcation | 595 (29.1) | 57 (23.4) | 0.071 | 0.130 |
| Multivessel disease | 815 (40.8) | 77 (31.6) | 0.006 | 0.192 |
| Severe calcification | 323 (15.8) | 45 (18.4) | <0.001 | 0.250 |
| Baseline TIMI flow grade | ||||
| 0 | 1,204 (58.8) | 114 (46.7) | <0.001 | 0.293 |
| 1 | 206 (10.1) | 21 (8.6) | ||
| 2 | 334 (16.3) | 57 (23.4) | ||
| 3 | 303 (14.8) | 51 (20.9) | ||
| Diameter stenosis, % | 88.5 ± 16.3 | 83.4 ± 18.0 | <0.001 | 0.298 |
| Lesion length, mm | 13.75 ± 8.30 | 12.71 ± 8.31 | 0.066 | 0.125 |
| Minimal lumen diameter, mm | 0.33 ± 0.48 | 0.43 ± 0.46 | 0.004 | 0.199 |
| Reference diameter, mm | 2.68 ± 0.76 | 2.59 ± 0.73 | 0.087 | 0.118 |
| Thrombus grade 0 to 3 | 298 (14.6) | 62 (25.4) | <0.001 | 0.274 |
| Thrombus grade 4 or 5 | 1,749 (85.4) | 182 (74.6) | <0.001 | 0.274 |
Values shown are n (%) or mean ± standard deviation.
BMI = body mass index; CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; CRP = C-reactive protein; CPAOA = cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival; ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; ELCA = excimer laser coronary atherectomy; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; IABP = intra-aortic balloon pump; LAD = left anterior descending artery; LCX = left circumflex coronary artery; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LMT = left main trunk; MI = myocardial infarction; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; RCA = right coronary artery; SMD = standardized mean difference; TIMI = thrombolysis in myocardial infarction.
Variation in imaging modalities utilization across hospitals and years
There was substantial variation in the selection of intravascular imaging modalities across the 12 participating hospitals ( Supplementary Figure 1 ). IVUS predominated at most centers, while OCT usage was concentrated in a limited number of institutions with the usage rate of OCT ranging from 0% to 30%. Notably, 2 hospitals did not utilize OCT during the study period, highlighting the heterogeneous adoption of this technology across institutions. Analysis of temporal trends revealed dynamic changes in imaging modality utilization over the 5-year study period ( Supplementary Figure 2 ). IVUS usage showed a gradual decline from 91% in 2015 to 84% in 2019, while OCT utilization nearly doubled from 12% to 23% during the same period.
Clinical endpoints in the total cohort
Angiographic and in-hospital clinical outcomes are summarized in Table 2 . Regarding angiographic findings, corrected TIMI frame count was significantly lower in the OCT group compared to the IVUS group, whereas no significant difference was observed in TIMI flow grade or MBG. Peak values of cardiac enzymes, including CK-MB and cardiac troponin, were significantly greater in the IVUS group than in the OCT group. During the median follow-up period of 722 (322 to 1,268) days, TV-MACE occurred in 320 patients (13.9%), which included 169 cardiovascular deaths (7.4%), 141 TVR (6.1%) and 19 TV-AMI (0.8%) ( Table 2 ). A multivariable Cox proportional-hazard model demonstrated that culprit lesions in left main trunk (LMT), severe angiographic calcification, a smaller reference vessel diameter, Killip class IV, maintenance hemodialysis, a history of prior PCI, and the need for ECMO before PCI were independent predictors of TV-MACE. OCT guidance was associated with lower TV-MACE rate in the univariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.43 to 1.00; p = 0.049), although it did not reach statistical significance after multivariable adjustment (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.13; p = 0.140) ( Table 3 ).
Table 2
Postprocedural angiographic findings and clinical outcomes in the total cohort
|
IVUS
N = 2,047 |
OCT
N = 244 |
p-value | SMD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Postprocedural angiographic findings | ||||
| Diameter stenosis, % | 19.1 ± 12.0 | 16.7 ± 11.5 | 0.003 | 0.206 |
| Minimal lumen diameter, mm | 2.56 ± 0.61 | 2.49 ± 0.60 | 0.066 | 0.126 |
| Reference diameter, mm | 3.12 ± 0.61 | 2.96 ± 0.59 | <0.001 | 0.254 |
| Corrected TIMI frame count | 30.99 ± 20.68 | 27.75 ± 18.24 | 0.020 | 0.166 |
| Slow flow | 348 (17.0) | 35 (14.3) | 0.319 | 0.073 |
| TIMI flow grade | 0.863 | 0.072 | ||
| 0 | 13 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| 1 | 41 (2.0) | 4 (1.6) | ||
| 2 | 289 (14.1) | 31 (12.7) | ||
| 3 | 1,699 (83.0) | 209 (85.7) | ||
| Myocardial blush grade | 0.697 | 0.128 | ||
| 0 | 15 (0.7) | 3 (1.2) | ||
| 1 | 68 (3.3) | 7 (2.9) | ||
| 2 | 491 (24.0) | 55 (22.5) | ||
| 3 | 1,461 (71.4) | 179 (73.4) | ||
| Cardiac enzymes | ||||
| Peak CK, U/l | 3269.8 ± 3335.2 | 2791.3 ± 3021.4 | 0.033 | 0.150 |
| Peak CK-MB, ng/ml | 293.8 ± 286.3 | 261.6 ± 254.2 | 0.095 | 0.119 |
| Peak troponin I, pg/ml | 108784.2 ± 305982.1 | 106299.7 ± 181857.6 | 0.931 | 0.010 |
| Clinical events | ||||
| TV-MACE | 296 (14.5) | 24 (9.8) | 0.051 | 0.142 |
| Cardiovascular death | 158 (7.7) | 11 (4.5) | 0.070 | 0.134 |
| TVR | 130 (6.4) | 11 (4.5) | 0.323 | 0.036 |
| Target vessel AMI | 16 (0.8) | 3 (1.2) | 0.446 | 0.045 |
| Nontarget vessel-related revascularization | 144 (7.0) | 15 (6.1) | 0.690 | 0.036 |
| Any nonfatal MI | 37 (1.8) | 4 (1.6) | 1.000 | 0.013 |
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree