OP-107 Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies




Aim


The aim of the current meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy between radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablations by analyzing published randomized clinical studies.




Methods


Published studies were extracted from the MEDLINE until December 2014. A total of 229 patients, 120 for radiofrequency ablation and 109 for cryoballoon ablation, from 3 randomized trials were included in the meta-analysis.




Methods


Published studies were extracted from the MEDLINE until December 2014. A total of 229 patients, 120 for radiofrequency ablation and 109 for cryoballoon ablation, from 3 randomized trials were included in the meta-analysis.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Related posts:

  1. OP-001 An Under-estimated Complication ff Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Gastroparesis
  2. OP-038 Reduction of Eosinophil Percentage may Predict the Mortality from Acute Coronary Syndromes
  3. OP-065 Increased Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio is Related to Slow Coronary Flow
  4. OP-100 Pulmonary Function after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with High Risk Aortic Stenosis

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Tags:
Nov 30, 2016 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on OP-107 Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies

Full access? Get Clinical Tree
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access