Outcomes of Open Operation for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease After Failed Endovascular Therapy

Danczyk RC, Mitchell EL, Petersen BD, et al (Oregon Health and Science Univ, Portland) Arch Surg 147:841-845, 2012^§

Abstract

Objectives

To compare patient outcomes of primary open operation for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) with those of secondary open operations for failed endovascular therapy (ET) of AIOD.

Design

A retrospective cohort study was performed analyzing demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes.

Setting

Affiliated Veterans Affairs Hospital from January 1, 1998, through March 31, 2010.

Patients

Patients who underwent primary open operation for AIOD or secondary open operation for failed ET of AIOD.

Main Outcome Measures

Overall survival and limb salvage.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Related posts:

1. Muscle Adaptation in Response to Supervised Exercise Training for Intermittent Claudication
2. Follow-Up of Endovascular Treatment for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II Type B Iliac Lesions in Patients Aged <50 Years
3. multicenter experience evaluating chronic total occlusion crossing with the Wildcat catheter (the CONNECT study)
4. of Descending Aortic Pathology and Evaluation of the Impact of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Population-based Study in England and Wales from 1999 to 2010

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join