of Blood Pressure Measurement – Current Techniques, Office vs Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.


Category

Systolic BP
 
Diastolic BP

Optimal

<120

and

<80

Normal

120–129

and/or

80–84

High normal

130–139

and/or

85–89

Grade 1 hypertension

140–159

and/or

90–99

Grade 2 hypertension

160–179

and/or

100–109

Grade 3 hypertension

≥180

and/or

≥110

Isolated systolic hypertension

≥140

and

<90



Data on a classification of hypertension based on ABPM and home blood pressure measurements (HBPM) are scarce and there is no widely accepted classification beyond the cut-off values for the diagnosis of hypertension, which are provided in Table 2. The National Institute for Health Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the management of hypertension advocate a classification based on mean daytime ABPM or HBPM values, derived from a study which directly compared directly OBPM and ABPM measurements in 8529 patients [9, 10]. This may have the limitation that the corresponding stages of the measurement types may not reflect the same cardiovascular risk because of different blood pressure patterns (e.g. white coat hypertension) and different prognostic values of the measurement techniques. Both will later be discussed in detail.


Table 2
Cut-off values for office, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements (mmHg)
































Modality

Systolic BP

Diastolic BP

OBPM

140

90

ABPM: 24 h-mean

130

80

ABPM: Awake

135

85

ABPM: Sleep

120

70

HBPM

135

85


Modified after [7]

By NICE, stage 1 hypertension is suggested as OBPM ≥140/90 mmHg and daytime ABPM/HBPM ≥135/85 mmHg and stage 2 as OBPM ≥ 160/100 mmHg and daytime ABPM/HBPM ≥ 150/95 mmHg [9, 10]. There is no equivalent for stage 3 hypertension proposed [10].


2.1 White Coat Hypertension


White coat hypertension (WCH) is defined as a BP pattern where OBP values are elevated at repeated visits, but within normal limits out of the office, either on ABPM or HBPM (Table 3 and Fig. 1) [7]. The prevalence of WCH has been described in about 5–65 % of patients with newly diagnosed hypertension [11, 12]. There is an ongoing debate on whether patients with WCH have the same long-term cardiovascular risk as truly normotensive subjects, underlining the importance of its detection [7].


Table 3
Definition of white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension

























White-coat hypertension

Masked hypertension

Treated or untreated patients with office BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg AND

Treated or untreated patients with office BP < 140/90 mmHg AND

24-h ABPM < 130/80 mmHg AND

24-h ABPM ≥ 130/80 mmHg AND/OR

Awake ABPM < 135/85 mmHg AND

Awake ABPM ≥ 135/85 mmHg AND/OR

Sleep measurement < 120/70 mmHg OR

Sleep measurement ≥ 120/70 mmHg OR

Home BP < 135/85 mmHg

Home BP ≥ 135/85 mmHg


Modified after [37]


A978-3-319-44251-8_49_Fig1_HTML.gif


Fig. 1
Definition of different blood pressure (BP) patters when combining in-office and out-of-office BP measurements (Modified after [13])


2.2 Masked Hypertension


Masked hypertension is defined as normal BP in the office, with elevated BP values out of the medical environment, shown by ABPM or HBPM (Table 3 and Fig. 1). The phenomenon of masked hypertension has been described in up to 37 % of patients with arterial hypertension under an intensified therapy [13]. Masked hypertension is frequently associated with other risk factors such as asymptomatic organ damage and increased risk of diabetes and sustained hypertension [7]. The cardiovascular risk seems to be as high as in patients with sustained hypertension [14].



3 Office Blood Pressure Measurement


As common practice over decades and until today, OBPM is measured using a brachial pressure cuff and auscultation of the brachial artery to identify the appearance and disappearance of Korotkoff sounds. Over the last years, automated BP measurement devices have reached the market and are now widely accepted in guidelines and used in outpatient clinics, hospitals and by people at home [7, 10].


3.1 Manual Blood Pressure Measurement Technique


In order to receive comparable results, the environment should be standardised as much as possible [10]. The technique is accurately described in the National Institute for Health Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH) guidelines [10] and summarised in the following:

The patient should be rested and relaxed in a seated position for at least 3–5 min and rested before beginning BP measurements [7, 10]. The arm is out-stretched, in line with the mid-sternum and supported [10]. Further requirements for the environment are shown in Table 4. An appropriately sized cuff (as indicated by markings, see also the paragraph on Cuffs) is wrapped around the upper arm and connected to a manometer [10]. While palpating the brachial pulse, the cuff is rapidly inflated to 20 mmHg above the point where the brachial pulse disappears [10]. This pressure should be noted, as it is the approximate systolic pressure [10]. The cuff should then be re-inflated to 20 mmHg above this point [10]. The stethoscope should be placed over the brachial artery ensuring complete skin contact without clothing in between [10]. Then, the cuff is slowly deflated at 2–3 mmHg per second listening for the Korotkoff sounds [10]. The first sound appearing with the brachial pulse (phase I Korotkoff sound) is the systolic pressure [10]. At this point, the pulse pressure wave overcomes the obstruction caused by the cuff with its maximal pressure [10]. Intermediate sounds follow as the cuff pressure drops, with muffling and then complete disappearance of sounds (phase V Korotkoff sounds) indicating the diastolic pressure [10]. At this point the residual diastolic arterial pressure is sufficient to overcome the pressure caused by the cuff, leading to a normal arterial diameter without systolic blood flow murmurs [10]. The cuff is then quickly deflated completely [7, 10]. At least two BP measurements should be taken in the sitting position, spaced 1–2 min apart, adding more measurements if the first two are quite different (in daily practice more than 2–5 mmHg difference) and the average of the measurements should be used [7]. More measurements are recommended in patients with arrhythmia (i.e. atrial fibrillation) [7]. In case of elevated OBPM, the diagnosis of hypertension should be confirmed in a second visit, usually 1–4 weeks after the initial investigation or preferably with the use of ABPM [10, 15, 16].


Table 4
Principles of office and home blood pressure measurement




















Conditions for blood pressure measurements

5 min rest, 30 min without smoking/caffeine

Seated, back supported, arm outstretched, resting on the table

Correct cuff bladder placement

Immobile, legs uncrossed, not talking, relaxing

Repeated readings at 1–2 min intervals

Results written down (if device without memory)


Modified after [10, 32]

In case of a significant (>10 mmHg) and consistent systolic BP difference between the arms, the arm with the higher BP values should be used [7]. A BP difference of >10 mmHg may help to identify patients in need of further vascular assessment, whereas a BP difference of ≥ 15 mmHg may be an indicator of peripheral vascular disease, pre-existing cerebrovascular disease, increased cardiovascular mortality and increased all-cause mortality [17].


3.2 Conditions and Environment


BP is maintained through a combination of mechanical, neuronal and endocrine self-regulating systems in the body [10]. There is a considerable variability of BP due to respiration, emotion, exercise, meals, tobacco, alcohol, temperature, bladder distension, etc. [18]. Additionally, BP is influenced by age, race, and circadian variation [18]. Therefore attention should be paid to these circumstances.


3.3 Cuffs


A cuff is an inelastic cloth that encircles the arm and encloses an inflatable rubber bladder [18]. Present-day cuffs consist of an inflatable cloth-enclosed bladder which encircles the arm and is secured by Velcro or by tucking in the tapering end [10]. The width of the bladder is recommended to be about 40 %, and its length 80 % of the arm circumference [10]. Both cuffs that are too narrow and cuffs that are too short will lead to falsely high BP measurements [19]. A bladder which is too large will lead to an underestimation of BP [18]. Recommended cuff sizes are stated in Table 5 [20]. Arm cuffs are preferred, as cuffs fitting on the finger or wrist are often inaccurate and should therefore not be recommended [15].


Table 5
Recommended cuff sizes [20]




























Arm circumference

Cuff size

Cuff measurement

22–26 cm

Small adult

12 × 22 cm

27–34 cm

Adult

16 × 30 cm

35–44 cm

Large adult

16 × 36 cm

45–52 cm

Adult thigh

16 × 42 cm


3.4 Devices


There is a range of manual and automatic BP measurement devices available. For clinical decision making devices need to be validated according to standardised protocols and their accuracy should be checked on a regular basis through calibration in a technical laboratory [7, 21]. A list of currently recommended devices can be found online [22].


3.4.1 Mercury Sphygmomanometers


Mercury sphygmomanometers have traditionally been used to measure BP [10]. They are reliable and provide the reference standard for indirect BP measurement [10]. However, there are significant safety and economic concerns about the toxic effects of mercury [10]. Therefore, in most European countries, mercury sphygmomanometers are no longer available – but still are used as reference devices for the validation of automated measurement devices e.g. in the international protocol for the validation of BP measuring devices by the ESH [7, 23, 24].

Non-mercury devices working with a similar system are available and provide a suitable alternative to mercury devices when manual measurement is required [10].


3.4.2 Aneroid Sphygmomanometers


Aneroid sphygmomanometers measure pressure through a lever and bellows system [10]. In general, they are less accurate than mercury sphygmomanometers and their alternatives, especially over time [10].


3.4.3 Automated Blood Pressure Measurement Devices


Auscultatory or oscillometric automated devices are now commonly used in hospitals and primary care [7, 10]. Certified devices are listed on the webpage of the Dabl Educational Trust [22].


3.4.4 Comparison of Auscultatory and Oscillometric Techniques


Automated devices are easy to use and less error-prone. Techniques using manual devices are more complex and time consuming. Failure to accurately identify the Korotkoff sounds, tendency of physicians to round readings up or down and observer prejudice are common mistakes with manual readings [10].

Mercury manometer technique tend to result in higher BP values than oscillometric devices [25]. This may be due to the fact that oscillometric devices calculate BP from oscillations based on “maximum buckling” of the brachial artery under the cuff, which is nearly equal to the mean arterial pressure. Systolic and diastolic BP values are thus calculated from this mean by device-specific algorithms, rather than directly measured [26]. Therefore it is crucial for clinical decision making to use automated devices which are validated according to a standardised protocol [24]. With thus validated devices the abovementioned effects are clinically not significant.


3.5 Advantages


OBPM has been the cornerstone of hypertension diagnosis and management for over 100 years and is the basis for most studies on hypertension [27]. Even the most recent BP outcome studies like the SPRINT trial and the HOPE-3 trial rely on OBPM with specific measurement procedures in each study [28, 29]. Elevated OBPM predicts cardiovascular events (Fig. 2) [30]. Automated OBPM means to take the mean of multiple BP readings recorded with a fully automated device with the patient resting quietly, alone, in the office or clinic, which was reported to deliver results closer to ABPM [31].

A978-3-319-44251-8_49_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 2
Adjusted 5-year risk of cardiovascular death in the study cohort of 5292 patients for OBPM and ABPM. Multiple Cox regression was used to calculate the relative risk with adjustment for baseline characteristics including gender, age, presence of diabetes mellitus, history of cardiovascular events, and smoking status (Reprinted with permission from [42])


3.6 Disadvantages


A single office BP reading does not represent a patient’s true BP [32]. Errors may be due to patients’ alerting reaction to the measurement procedure and setting (i.e. white coat effect). With OBPM there is a lack of relevant information on BP during usual daytime activities and during sleep [32].


3.7 Caveats


There is a high variability with a mean difference of approximately +20 mmHg sBP between OBPM measurements of primary care physicians and specifically trained research assistants, even after short training [33]. Possible pitfalls in daily practice may be faulty position such as legs crossed, back or arm unsupported, talking during the measurement or insufficient number of readings [33]. The influence of different pitfalls is summarised in Table 6.


Table 6
Common mistakes during routine in-hospital BP measurements and their possible influence











Error

Frequency %

Variation in mmHg

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 12, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on of Blood Pressure Measurement – Current Techniques, Office vs Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement.

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access