Fig. 16.1
(a) Coherex WaveCrest LAA Occluder (proximal side). This shows the PTFE surface on the LA with a polyurethane cuff. (b) Coherex WaveCrest LAA Occluder (anchors). Each anchor is connected with a hinge and marked with a tantalum marker. Each of the ten anchors has a single and double-pronged microtine for 20 microtines in total
The occluder comes in three sizes (22, 27, and 32 mm). As with other devices, size selection is based upon measurements performed at 0, 45, 90, and 135° on transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). The smallest device size is chosen so that the longest measured diameter does not exceed the nominal device size and the average of the longest and shortest diameters is at least 3 mm below the nominal device size. The sizing table is included in the instructions for use and is unique to other LAA occluder devices in that it incorporates both the short and long axis of the LAA in the sizing strategy (Fig. 16.2).
Fig. 16.2
Coherex WaveCrest LAA Closure sizing algorithm. This incorporates both short and long axis diameter of the LAA landing zone
Implantation of the Coherex WaveCrest LAA Occluder is shown in Fig. 16.3. The optimal landing zone is determined by the line of widest measurement of the ostium, using the circumflex artery medially and a point at least 10–15 mm into the LAA from the tip of the lateral edge for reference, leaving room distally for the anchors to deploy. The landing zone is generally more proximal than other devices, which is meant to allow treatment of proximal lobe bifurcations and acutely angulated appendages. Distal injection is a unique feature of this device that allows visualization of contrast extravasation to assess leak.
Fig. 16.3
Coherex implantation. LAA with proximal bifurcation seen on echocardiography (a) and angiography (b). Implanted Coherex device is seen on echocardiography (c) and fluoroscopy (d). Distal injection within the LAA showed no evidence of leak into the left atrium (e)
The device was first implanted in June 2012. The first results of the device were presented by Dr. Vivek Reddy at Congenital and Structural Interventions (CSI) 2013, with successful deployment in 96 % of patients (n = 73); 45-day data showed primary efficacy of 92 and 97 % with an intention-to-treat and as-treated protocol, respectively. The total major adverse event rate was 2.7 %, consisting of two pericardial effusions treated by percutaneous drainage. There were no reports of stroke, device embolization, or associated thrombus. One-year follow-up will conclude in August 2014.
CE Mark was obtained in 2013. Next steps include a US investigational device exemption (IDE) trial with plans for start of enrollment in the end of 2014.
Occlutech LAA Occluder
The Occlutech LAA Occluder (Occlutech International AB, Helsingborg, Sweden) is a self-expanding nitinol wire mesh that uses distal closed loops for anchoring. The device has a sprayed polyurethane layer cover that is meant to seal off the LAA and allow fast cell adhesion and implant ingrowth. Of note, the occluder is conical in shape and tapers distally from the ostium. The connection to the delivery system is via a ball-shaped hub that allows full pivoting capability. The implant is flexible and self-adjusting (Fig. 16.4).
Fig. 16.4
Occlutech LAA Occluder with a nitinol wire mesh and distal closed loops for anchoring, as well as a ball-shaped hub for full pivoting capability
Deployment of the device is similar to other endocardial LAA devices. An example of deployment is seen in Fig. 16.5. Device sizing is performed using the height and landing zone of the LAA. Sheath size ranges from 12 to 14 Fr. The delivery pusher comes in three colors (yellow, purple, and blue), depending on device and sheath size (Fig. 16.6).
Fig. 16.5
Occlutech LAA occluder implantation. The device is placed in the LAA before being released from the pusher and seen on echocardiography (a). The device is then released and seen on fluoroscopy (b) and echocardiography (c). Left atrial angiography shows no leak around the device on fluoroscopic evaluation (d)