Mirror Artifacts in Two-Dimensional Echocardiography: Don’t Forget Objects in the Third Dimension




Echocardiography is the most widely used noninvasive imaging modality for the evaluation and diagnosis of cardiac pathology. However, because of the physical properties of ultrasound waves, cardiologists are often confronted with specific image artifacts. It is of particular importance to adequately recognize such artifacts and avoid misdiagnosis arising from their presence. A typical artifact seen in clinical practice is a “mirror artifact,” caused by the reflection of ultrasound waves on a strong reflector (pericardium, aortic wall, pleura, diaphragm). These artifacts are usually easy to identify in two-dimensional images, as they present below a strong reflector as copies of objects that are located above the reflector and move in the opposite direction.


We present a mirror artifact in a transthoracic parasternal short-axis window in which the mirrored objects (the mitral valve leaflets) are not present in the two-dimensional image above the reflector but are located in the third dimension, outside the two-dimensional scanning plane ( Figure 1 B). A key issue is the three-dimensional morphology of the strong reflector (the pericardium) and the fact that the short-axis scanning direction is not truly perpendicular to the long-axis direction of the heart (and thus the pericardium). As a result of this, ultrasound waves in the short-axis imaging direction are reflected outside of the imaging plane toward the mitral valve leaflets (reflection angle α; Figure 1 C), where they are reflected back into the imaging plane at the same angle and reach the transducer after some time period. Because of the assumption of wave propagation, these valve leaflets are thought to be located in the imaging plane below the reflector and move in the opposite direction as the actual valve leaflets. Some might misdiagnose these findings as a loculated pleural effusion. Cross-correlating the images with the long-axis view, or using the simultaneous biplanar imaging mode of a three-dimensional probe, certainly helps in identifying the findings as a normal imaging artifact ( Figures 1D and 1E ).




Figure 1


(A) The theoretical genesis of a mirror artifact. A strong reflector in the imaging field causes transmitted ultrasound waves to be reflected to objects above the reflector. As these objects reflect the waves back to the transducer (via the strong reflector), a mirror image is created below the reflector because of the assumption of wave propagation (short animation in Video 1 ; available at www.onlinejase.com ). (B) Parasternal short-axis (SAX) image ( Video 2 ; available at www.onlinejase.com ) with moving structures ( arrows ) below the pericardium that cannot be visualized above the pericardium in this imaging window. (C) In the long-axis window ( Video 3 ; available at www.onlinejase.com ), these structures are identified as a mirror artifact of the mitral valve leaflets, visible within this imaging plane. Because the scanning direction of the short-axis images is not perpendicular to the direction of the strong reflecting pericardium, ultrasound waves will be reflected outside the short-axis scanning plane with angle α. Similarly, returning waves from the objects (the mitral leaflets) above the pericardium reflect with the same angle α to find their way back to the transducer. (D,E) Visualization of the three-dimensional relationship between the long-axis and short-axis imaging windows and how the mirror artifact is generated in both imaging planes (short animation in Video 4 ; available at www.onlinejase.com ).

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 21, 2018 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Mirror Artifacts in Two-Dimensional Echocardiography: Don’t Forget Objects in the Third Dimension

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access