meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy


A meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy


Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA, et al (Central Manchester Univ Hosps, UK; Democritus Univ of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece; Philipps Univ Marburg, Germany) J Vasc Surg 57:527-538, 2013§



B.W. Starnes, MD



Evidence Ranking


B



Expert Rating


2



Abstract





Results


Seven observational studies reporting on 1559 patients (hostile anatomy group, 714 patients; friendly anatomy group, 845 patients) were included. Patients with hostile anatomy required an increased number of adjunctive procedures to achieve proximal seal compared with patients with friendly anatomy (odds ratio [OR], 3.050; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.884-4.938). Although patients with unfavorable neck anatomy had an increased risk of developing 30-day morbidity (OR, 2.278; 95% CI, 1.025-5.063), no significant differences in the incidence of type I endoleak and reintervention rates within 30 days of treatment between the two groups were identified (OR, 2.467 and 1.082; 95% CI, 0.562-10.823 and 0.096-12.186). Patients with hostile anatomy had a fourfold increased risk of developing type I endoleak (OR, 4.563; 95% CI, 1.430-14.558) and a ninefold increased risk of aneurysm-related mortality within 1 year of treatment (OR, 9.378; 95% CI, 1.595-55.137).

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 3, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access