Highlights
-
•
Obesity-induced hemodynamic and myocardial changes, along with increased predisposition to other risk factors, can lead to heart failure.
-
•
Innovations in medical therapy to optimize heart failure and metabolic syndrome may increase native cardiac recovery, or allow for consideration of advanced therapies.
-
•
Bariatric surgery (MBS) serves as a pathway to consideration for heart transplantation or post-LVAD, with successful heart transplantation achieved in 33% of patients listed for transplant after MBS.
Abstract
Obesity, characterized by excessive accumulation of adipose tissue, is associated with numerous health risks including diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension. Obesity affects a massive portion of the global population, with a projected increase in prevalence by 2035. It leads to various cardiovascular events, insulin resistance, and increased inflammation, all of which predispose individuals to heart failure. Addressing obesity can significantly improve these patients’ functional status and quality of life. Effective management of obesity in heart failure patients requires a multidisciplinary approach. Management strategies for obesity in heart failure patients include physical therapy, nutritional therapy, pharmacotherapy, and metabolic bariatric surgery. In conclusion, this review summarizes current evidence in the management of obesity and related complications in patients with end-stage heart failure and explores candidacy for advanced therapies such as heart transplants or durable left ventricular assist devices if native heart recovery is not feasible.
Obesity refers to the excessive or abnormal accumulation of fat or adipose tissue within the body, leading to health impairments due to its association with the development of conditions such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, sleep apnea, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. It is a chronic complex multifactorial relapsing disease that stems from an imbalance between daily energy intake and expenditure, resulting in excessive weight gain. ,, Obesity is currently defined as a BMI greater than or equal to 30 ( Table 1 ). Obesity affects 70% of the US population and 50% of the population worldwide. By 2030, 1 in 7 men and 1 in 5 women will be living with obesity globally. Objectively, obesity is classified into three categories, where class 1 obese patients has BMI of 30 to <35, class 2 obese patients has BMI of 35 to <40 and class 3 obese patients has BMI of 40 or higher. Obesity is a complex condition influenced by a variety of genetic, cultural, and societal factors. Genetic studies have demonstrated a strong hereditary component to obesity, with numerous genes implicated in adiposity and weight gain. Additionally, factors such as reduced physical activity, sleep disturbances, endocrine disorders, medications, easy access to and consumption of high-carbohydrate and high-sugar foods, and diminished energy metabolism contribute to the progression of obesity in patients.
Table 1
Classification of obesity by BMI
| Classification | Body mass index (Kg/m 2) | Class |
|---|---|---|
| Under-weight | <18.5 | – |
| Normal healthy weight | 18.5 to <25 | – |
| Overweight | 25 to < 30 | Overweight |
| Obese class I | 30 to <35 | Obese |
| Obese class II | 35 to <40 | Severe obesity |
| Obese class III | 40 or higher | Morbid obesity |
| – | 50 or higher | Super obesity |
With the recent global awareness and emphasis on public health, it is important to recognize that obesity has a fourfold increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection which can disproportionately affect patients with heart failure (HF). Increased body fat is an important risk factor for the eventual onset of heart failure. The association between BMI and the development of heart failure is most pronounced for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In individuals with both obesity and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), managing obesity through lifestyle modifications, pharmacological interventions, and bariatric surgery approaches has the potential to mitigate symptoms, improve functional status, alleviate comorbidities, and increase eligibility for advanced therapies if needed. ,
Effective management of obesity necessitates a multifaceted approach and may require lifelong intervention and a focus on both physical and mental health. Here we present the current multidisciplinary evidence on the management of obesity in patients with heart failure.
Methodology
A comprehensive review was performed using PubMed, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar to assess the total publications related to obesity and heart failure utilizing the terms “obesity,” “heart failure,” “body mass index,” “GLP”, “leptin” and “bariatric surgery.” This review adopted a systematic approach to explore contemporary evidence on managing obesity in heart failure patients. A thorough literature search targeted 74 recent articles within the last decade (2014 to present). Inclusion criteria encompassed various study types, including randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, narrative reviews, guidelines, expert analyses, and case studies. Data extraction focused on epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, and evidence-based management strategies for obesity in heart failure patients.
Epidemiology
The prevalence and global burden of high BMI are increasing globally. Prevalence of obesity in 2020 was 38% and projected prevalence in 2035 would be 50%, affecting half of the world population. Looking at the global impact of obesity, the resultant debilitation, and limitation of a patient’s societal contribution combined with the chronic healthcare costs is estimated to result in a loss of 4 trillion USD (3% of current world GDP) by 2035. 3 According to NHANES 2017-2020, 6.7 million of the US population above 20 years of age had heart failure which would be projected to be 8.5 million in 2030. 33% of the adult population in the United States has Stage A HF (at risk of HF) and 24% to 34% of United States Populations have medical conditions that increase the risk of stage B heart failure (preheart failure). Increasing your BMI by 1 is known to increase the risk of heart failure by 7% in men and 5 % in women. The high burden of obesity in the United States motivates one to focus on treatment strategies to optimize body weight and decrease the risk of heart failure and associated comorbid health conditions.
Pathogenesis
Obesity causes increased levels of leptin and c-reactive protein (CRP) which are involved in leptin resistance and cardiovascular events. , Cardiovascular events like hypertension, thrombosis, myocardial injury, insulin resistance and diabetes all predispose individuals to developing heart failure. Obesity also leads to increased circulating galectin-3 protein, leading to myocardial inflammation and fibrosis both of which increase the risk of heart failure. In addition, obesity leads to pulmonary hypertension and may subsequently lead to right heart failure due to sleep apnea or obesity hypoventilation syndrome ( Figure 1 ). A study done in Northern China by Wang et al. found that high BMI with proteinuria significantly increases the risk of heart failure. Initially, obese patients have increased metabolic demand of body tissue which leads to increased stroke volume and heart rate (HR) due to increased sympathetic activity, both of which increase cardiac output (CO). The increase in CO and HR also contributes to increased blood pressure. Obesity causes vascular abnormalities such as endothelial dysfunction and vascular stiffening which increases the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Obesity-related vascular abnormalities further increase the risk of hypertension which further increases the risk of cardiovascular abnormalities including heart failure. These changes in hemodynamic parameters lead to LV remodeling which predisposes the heart to a decline in cardiac function and other cardiovascular pathologies, including coronary artery disease and arrhythmias. ,,, Therefore, management and preventive strategies for reducing obesity decrease the risk of heart disease.
Pathogenesis of Obesity and its association with heart failure.
Management of Heart Failure in Obesity
Addressing obesity in heart failure significantly improves the functional status of patients. The patient-centered approach includes weight management- physical therapy, nutritional therapy, pharmacotherapy, and metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) ( Figure 2 ).
Management strategies of obesity in heart failure.
Weight management
Encouraging lifestyle modifications, such as adopting a nutritious eating regimen and boosting physical activity, can aid in safely achieving weight loss to combat obesity. These changes assist in reducing calorie intake from food and beverages while enhancing calorie expenditure through activity. Achieving a 5% to 10% weight reduction is widely recognized as clinically significant due to the resulting improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors. According to the most recent ACC/AHA guidelines, ≥5% weight loss is associated with a moderate reduction in blood pressure, improvements in LDL levels and improved glucose levels in overweight individuals. Current guidelines recommend this weight loss target for individuals classified as overweight or obese.
Physical therapy
Physical activity in heart failure is associated with decreased cardiovascular risk and mortality, rehospitalization, improved functional capacity, and quality of life. Stable heart failure patients on optimal guidelines-directed medical therapy are candidates for exercise rehabilitation programs. Obese elder populations and heart failure patients are prone to physical frailty. Physical therapy helps to decrease adipose tissue and increase the lean body mass in these populations. However, the combination of physical therapy with nutritional therapy has shown more benefits in mitigating the frailty in obese patients or elderly with heart failure and improving their physical functional status.
Exercise to prevent advanced heart failure
Individualized interval exercise training at various intensities for example: 50%, 70%, and 80% of maximal capacity show benefits in chronic heart failure patients. For patients with chronic heart failure, physical therapy includes aerobic and resistive exercise which may include inspiratory muscle exercise. ,, In stable patients with heart failure, aerobic exercise such as running on a treadmill, dancing or using a cycle ergometer should be included for 20 to 60 min/d, for 3 to 5 d/wk for at least 8 to 12 weeks. Resistive exercise in these patients should focus on major muscle groups of the upper and lower body with 2 to 3 sets in each muscle group lasting for 45 to 60 minutes/sessions and for 3 sessions/week for at least 8 to 12 weeks. Clinicians should also focus on inspiratory muscle exercise independent of baseline inspiratory muscle weakness by using nonflow dependent resistive devices for 30 min/d reaching more than 30% of maximum inspiratory pressure for 5 to 7 d/wk for at least 8 to 12 weeks.
Exercise after heart transplantation
For patients after heart transplantation, an alternate day walking program from 4 to 6 weeks up to 6 months can be instituted to increase the functional capacity of the patients.
Exercise after LVAD
LVAD patients are ambulated in 7 to 10 days after surgery with treadmill training at day 21 which is followed by 6-8 weeks of 20 to 30 min/day of treadmill training.
Nutritional therapy
A vegetarian-style diet or low-fat diet has benefits for patients with obesity and cardiovascular disease. It enhances weight loss and decreases the risk of cardiometabolic factors. Cardiometabolic factors such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia increase insulin and leptin sensitivity and reduce calorie intake by delaying gastric emptying along with improving gut microbiota. A plant-based diet has also been shown to reduce the production of trimethylamine-N-oxide, which is responsible for inhibiting cholesterol reuptake in the liver from the blood and increasing the risk for atherosclerosis. The Mediterranean diet has the additional benefit of reducing the environmental impact of obesity.
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy should be used in nonpregnant patients who are obese or overweight (BMI ≥27) with weight-related complications. If lifestyle modification is ineffective, antiobesity medication should be used in conjunction with a reduced-calorie diet and physical activity to maintain long-term weight loss. , While choosing antiobesity medication, the clinician should focus on the additional benefits of the prescribed drug. Below we describe in detail short and long-term FDA-approved antiobesity drugs, mechanism of action, dose, and adverse reactions to help make the clinical application of multiple categories of pharmacotherapy straightforward in these complex patients.
FDA defines short-term antiobesity drug use as less than 12 weeks and more than 12 weeks for long-term antiobesity drugs. FDA-approved antiobesity drugs for long-term use include GLP-1 agonist- Tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, retatrutide, and other drugs, including, orlistat, orlforglipron, phentermine/topiramate, naltrexone-bupropion and setmelanotide. antiobesity drugs for short-term use (12 weeks) include diethylpropion, phentermine and phendimetrazine. In some instances, even though not FDA-approved for obesity, some drugs are known to have weight loss as a side effect that is well tolerated. These commonly prescribed off-label drugs include semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, topiramate, bupropion and metformin. ,,,, Mechanism of action, dosage, adverse reactions and contraindications are described in Table 2 and notable characteristics are described below.
Table 2
Summary of anti-obesity drugs
| FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved drugs for long term use | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-obesity drugs | Mechanism of action | Dose | Adverse reactions | Contraindications |
| Tirzepatide | Both GLP-1 and GIP-1 agonist regulating energy balance by stimulating CNS and adipose tissue | 2.5 mg/wk up to 15 mg/wk subcutaneously (SC) | GI side effects-Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, etc. | Personal or family history of medullary carcinoma of thyroid and MEN-2 syndrome |
| Semaglutide | GLP-1 agonist increasing insulin sensitivity and delaying gastric emptying | 0.25 mg/wk up to 2.4 mg/wk SC | GI side effects. | Personal or family history of medullary carcinoma of thyroid and MEN-2 syndrome and pancreatitis |
| Liraglutide | GLP-1 agonist increasing insulin sensitivity and delaying gastric emptying | 0.6 mg/d up to 3mg/d SC | GI side effects. | Personal or family history of medullary carcinoma of thyroid, MEN-2 syndrome, and pancreatitis |
| Orlistat | Inhibits Lipase and decrease absorption of triglycerides | 60/120 mg TID | GI side effects and fat-soluble vitamin deficiency | Chronic malabsorption, fat-soluble vitamin deficiency, cholestasis, and calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis |
|
Phentermine
/Topiramate |
Phentermine increases nor adrenaline release in CNS and topiramate modulates GABA, decreasing appetite | 3.75 mg/23 mg OD to 15 mg/92 mg OD | Paresthesia, dry mouth, constipation, headache, insomnia | CVD, uncontrolled hypertension, hyperthyroidism, history of glaucoma, about 2 weeks of MAO inhibitor use, calcium phosphate nephrolithiasis. |
|
Naltrexone
/Bupropion |
Acts on proopiomelanocortin neurons and cause decrease food intake and increase energy expenditure | 8 mg/90 mg OD to 16/180 mg BID | GI side effects, insomnia, dizziness, headache | Uncontrolled hypertension, long term opioid use, eating disorder, history of seizure and within 14 days of MAO inhibitor use |
| Setmelanotide | Acts of MC-4R and decrease obesity in POMC deficiency or leptin receptor deficiency | 2mg/d SC up to 3mg/d | Local reactions, skin hyperpigmentation and change in hair color | Hypersensitivity reactions to setmelanotide |
| FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved drugs for short term use (<12 wk) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-obesity drugs | Mechanism of action | Dose | Adverse reactions | Contraindications |
| Phentermine | Phentermine increases nor adrenaline release in CNS and decrease appetite | 8 mg/d tablet or 15mg/day capsule up to to 37.5 mg/d | Paresthesia, dry mouth, constipation, headache, insomnia | CVD, uncontrolled hypertension, hyperthyroidism, history of glaucoma, about 2 weeks of MAO inhibitor use, |
| Diethylpropion | Increase Noradrenaline release in CNS | IR 25 mg TID or ER 75 mg/d | Dry mouth, constipation, insomnia, headache, dizziness. | CVD, avoid use with alcohol, amphetamines and sedatives, avoid use within 1 year of weight loss medication. |
| Phendimetrazine | Increase noradrenaline in CNS and decrease food intake |
ER 150 mg/d
IR 17.5 mg to 35 mg BID or TID up to 75 mg TID |
Dry mouth, constipation, insomnia, headache, dizziness and palpitations. | Heart failure and uncontrolled hypertension |
| Commonly used off-label drugs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-obesity drugs | Mechanism of action | Dose | Adverse reactions | Contraindications |
| Semaglutide | GLP-1 agonist increasing insulin sensitivity and delaying gastric emptying | 3 mg/d orally up to 50 mg/d or 0.25mg/week SC up to 2mg/week | GI side-effects | Not reported |
| Liraglutide | GLP-1 agonist increasing insulin sensitivity and delaying gastric emptying | 0.6 mg/d SC up to 1.8 mg/d | GI side-effects | Precaution- pancreatitis |
| Topiramate | topiramate modulates GABA in CNS and decrease appetite | 12.5 mg/d to 25 mg/d up to 200 mg BID | Paresthesia, dry mouth, constipation, headache, insomnia | History of glaucoma, calcium phosphate nephrolithiasis |
| Bupropion | Activate proopiomelanocortin neurons in CNS | 100 mg/d up to 450 mg/d | Insomnia, dry mouth, rash | Uncontrolled hypertension, eating disorder, history of seizure and within 14 days of MAO inhibitor use. |
| Metformin | Increases insulin and leptin sensitivity | 500 mg/d to 2500 mg/d | GI adverse effects |
Advanced cirrhosis
Heart failure, chronic kidney disease with GFR <30 ml/min |
| Dulaglutide | GLP-1 agonist | 0.75 mg/week SC up to 4.5 mg/week in patient with obesity and type 2 diabetes | GI adverse effects | Personal or family history of medullary carcinoma of thyroid, MEN 2 syndrome, pancreatitis |
Tirzepatide: It can be used in NYHA-III heart failure with overweight and obesity. Tirzepatide has also been shown to reduce systolic blood pressure significantly but its effect due to medication itself or weight loss is still unknown. It should be noted that patients experience substantial regain of weight after the stoppage of the drug. ,
Semaglutide: It improves weight and reduces heart failure symptoms in patients with NYHA II-IV heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with obesity. This drug also has better cardiovascular outcomes in NYHA II-III chronic heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes. ,
Liraglutide: It decreases cardiometabolic markers like systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting lipid levels, plasminogen activator inhibitor, adiponectin and C-reactive protein. ,
Orlistat: Orlistat inhibits gastrointestinal lipase to hydrolyze triglyceride to monoacylglycerol and free fatty acid and one-third of triacylglycerol remains unexcreted in stool decreasing the amount of cholesterol and fat-soluble vitamin absorption. The most common side effects are GI-like flatulence with discharge, steatorrhea, fecal urgency, fecal incontinence and oily spotting, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiency- primarily vitamin D, so it is advised to administer multivitamins 2 hours before or 2 hours after orlistat dose. ,
Phentermine/topiramate: The phentermine/topiramate combination has a more favorable outcome than monotherapy in long term management of obesity in both adults and adolescence. , Phentermine monotherapy is used for less than 12 weeks for obesity management. Topiramate had additional benefits in obese patients with migraine headaches, antipsychotic drug induced weight again, binge eating disorder and alcohol induced disorder. The most common side effects include paresthesia, dry mouth, constipation, headache, dizziness, insomnia, dysgyeusia. Phentermine/topiramate combination should not be used in patients with cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled hyperthyroidism, history of glaucoma due to the noradrenergic properties of phentermine and it is also contraindicated within 14 days of mono-amine oxidase inhibitor and calcium phosphate nephrolithiasis.
Naltrexone/Bupropion: Bupropion stimulates hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin neurons while naltrexone blocks opioid-mediated proopiomelanocortin autoinhibition which causes decreased food intake and increases energy expenditure and weight loss. Naltrexone and bupropion are commonly used for smoking cessation and obesity. ,
Setmelanotide: The result is a substantial reduction of hyperphagia and obesity in patients with proopiomelanocortin deficiency (POMC) or leptin receptor deficiency. ,,
Diethylpropion : It is used for less than 12 weeks along with a controlled diet for substantial weight loss. It is a sympathomimetic drug, which increases noradrenaline release in the central nervous system and reduces the food intake. Diethylpropion causes direct cardiomyocyte injury, so it is contraindicated in obese patients with cardiovascular disease.
Phendimetrazine: It has a high potency for abuse. It should be cautiously used in patients with heart failure, hypertension due to its potency to increase in adrenergic activity, like other sympathomimetic drugs.
Metformin: It has been shown to reduce visceral fat by adaptive thermogenesis and weight gain associated with antipsychotic medications. Metformin has been shown to reduce weight in obese women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Metformin is contraindicated in patients with heart failure with low ejection fraction, chronic kidney disease with glomerular filtration rate less than 30 and patients with advanced cirrhosis due to elevated risk of anionic gap metabolic lactic acidosis. ,,
Dulaglutide : Dulaglutide is GLP-1 agonist like semaglutide administered once weekly for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in adults and youths. Dulagludie is also commonly used as an off label drug to manage obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes but dulaglutide is found to be inferior compared to semaglutide in terms of lowering BMI in obese patients and found to have higher gastrointestinal adverse effects than semaglutide. Contraindications are that of other GLP-1 analogues.
Orforglipron : It acts on the GLP-1 receptor but leads to low activation of beta-arrestin, which is responsible for receptor internalization. It decreases systolic blood pressure, and fasting lipid profiles with an increase in pulse. No event of pancreatitis was found in the GZGI trial and other side effects are similar to GLP- 1 analogues.
Retatrutide : It acts on glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), glucagon (GCG), amylin, oxyntomodulin, and peptide YY- receptors and signals to reduce energy intake, increase energy expenditure and help in weight loss. It decreases cardiometabolic risk factors for patients with obesity and heart failure. The most common side effects are GI- Nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea. GLP-1 receptor agonist increases heart rate by increasing intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate which influx cardiomyocytes with calcium and increases the risk of cardiomyocyte death in patients with HFrEF. Furthermore, some patients of HFrEF have cachexia and substantial weight loss in which GLP-1 agonists may not be favorable for them.
Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS)
Patients with heart failure are often bridged with a durable LVAD or percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices such as the Impella until they can receive a heart transplant. At most institutions, obese patients with a BMI> 35 are not eligible for heart transplant. Additionally, in patients with heart failure, LVAD often increases body weight and again further interrupts time to bridge in heart transplant.
Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS)- laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass improved LVEF in patients with obesity and heart failure. NYHA class also improves after surgery and heart transplantation is successful in 33 % of patients who were listed for transplant after metabolic bariatric surgery. MBS acts as a bridge to transplant in patients with advanced heart failure with left ventricular assisted devices. ,,,, A case of Impella-supported robotic sleeve gastrectomy has also been reported. The patient experienced significant weight loss after the procedure and was later implanted with an LVAD while awaiting a suitable donor match. Four months after the surgery, his BMI remains stable at 34 kg/m². In the patients undergoing MBS in an obese patient with pulmonary hypertension, there is evidence that they have a higher risk of atrial fibrillation and acute pulmonary embolism, but patients should not be excluded from metabolic surgery. ,,
Careful preoperative assessment should be done before bariatric surgery in obese patients with heart failure due to early risk of 90 days cardiovascular mortality. MBS is also associated with decreased vasodilator, diuretic, and anticoagulant medication requirements in heart failure patients with LVAD. Thus, MBS is a safe and effective approach to bridge patients with obesity and heart failure for definitive cardiac transplantation ( Figure 3 ).
Metabolic Bariatric surgery as a bridge to heart transplant in patients with obesity and advanced heart failure. LVAD = left ventricular assist device.
Obesity and Cardiogenic Shock
Heart failure complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) is increasing along with the use of both durable and temporary mechanical circulatory support devices in addition to consideration for orthotopic heart transplants. Despite the known benefit of these interventions to reduce mortality and improve survival in patients with advanced heart failure, obesity is a significant barrier to consideration for many of these therapies due to other comorbidities (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immobility, peripheral vascular disease, stroke). , Currently, percutaneous left or right mechanical circulatory support devices have been used in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute heart failure or other debilitating cardiovascular disease :
Left mechanical circulatory support devices include:
-
1.
IABP and Impella- left ventricle to aorta assist device
-
2.
Tandem heart- left atrium to systemic artery assist device
Right mechanical circulatory devices include:
-
1.
VA- ECMO- right atrium to systemic artery assist device
-
2.
Impella RP and adapted tandem heart- right atrium to pulmonary artery assist device.
Obesity is a significant risk factor for in-hospital mortality and complication following the use of Mechanical circulatory support devices such as V-A ECMO, Impella/tandem heart or IABP in patients with post-MI CS or heart failure CS. In patients aged <60 with class II obesity and patients age >60 with class II and class III obesity, inpatient hospital mortality is higher than in nonobese patients. Consequently, complications of MCS like major bleeding, infection, right heart failure, DVT, PE, stroke, acute respiratory failure, and requirements of invasive mechanical ventilation are also more prevalent in class II and class III obesity compared to class I and nonobese populations. Morbidly obese patients face a higher risk of complications and 30-day post-transplant mortality than overweight and nonobese patients. , Obesity increases basal metabolic demand, total blood volume and cardiac output leading to hyperdynamic circulation and increased wall tension of the left ventricle. This causes dilation and hypertrophy of the left ventricle progressing to systolic and diastolic dysfunction. High blood pressure, coronary artery disease and arrhythmias in obese individuals further lead to structural and functional abnormalities of the heart which collectively add to obese patients physiologically incompatible with surviving cardiogenic shock despite mechanical circulatory support. Therefore, class III obese in some institutions have a relative contraindication from receiving advanced heart failure therapies, such as LVAD and heart transplants, due to elevated risk of mortality and postprocedural complications with limited likelihood of meaningful improvement in their quality of life.
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree