Management of Hernias in the Context of Peritoneal Dialysis


Modifiable

Non modifiable

BMI

Age

Sedentary lifestyle

Gender

Smoking

Ethnicity

Modality of PD – CAPD

Polycystic kidney disease

Comorbidities (i.e. diabetes, steroid use, BPCO)
 


Retrospective studies reported a prevalence of abdominal wall hernias in polycystic kidney disease between 45% and 61% [7, 19]. The increased intra-abdominal pressure or the increased inside-out pressure on the abdominal wall due to large polycystic kidneys and/or primary collagen anomalies have been all postulated as being responsible for hernia formation [7, 19]. Interestingly, Modi et al. [19] showed a higher prevalence of inguinal hernias in patients with polycystic kidney disease treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), compared with CAPD patients with other renal diseases. In contrast, Hadimeri et al. found no increased incidence of hernias among patients with polycystic kidney disease [20]. In retrospective studies, patients treated with automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) seem to have a lower prevalence of hernias compared those treated with CAPD [7, 21]. It was originally observed that patients who are at risk for hernias include those with higher body mass index, due to higher intra-abdominal pressure for a given dwell volume [22]; other studies have found the opposite result when the height and weight are adjusted for sex [8, 9]. The pathophysiological role of intra-abdominal pressure on the development of hernias has been often advocated but not been thoroughly studied in PD patients. In fact, in all the studies, the intra-abdominal pressure has been measured at rest and in a supine position and not during the patient’s daily physical activities [13, 22, 23]. Since the intra-abdominal pressure varies greatly from patient to patient according to their daily physical activities, the current methodology of intra-abdominal pressure determination might be inadequate to detect patients at risk [22]. However, until the existence of a putative relation between intra-abdominal pressure and the development of hernias in PD patients has been thoroughly studied, it is prudent to continue teaching our PD patients to refrain from physical activities, which could cause straining, such as pushing, pulling and jumping. In addition, they should avoid straining with bowel movements by eating a high fiber diet or taking stool softeners to avoid constipation, without draining the peritoneal cavity first. This is particularly important postoperatively following PD catheter insertion in order to minimize the occurrence of incisional hernias.

Incisional hernia, a known complication of previous surgery, has different definitions; the most widely accepted is any abdominal wall defect, with or without a bulge, identified on clinical examination or imaging by 1 year after the index operation [24, 25]. The incidence of this complication in the literature ranges between 0% and 44%, reflecting the heterogeneity of definitions, patients, operations and follow up [26]. The discussion on the best surgical technique, type of sutures to use for which abdominal operation in order to minimize this complication is beyond the scope of this chapter [27, 28]. Incisional hernia can develop after any type of abdominal wall incision. The incidence depends upon the location and size of the incision [2937]. Based on a recent meta-analysis on the general surgical population, midline incisions have a significantly increased risk of incisional hernia compared to transverse (relative risk [RR] 1.77, 95% CI, 1.09–2.87) and paramedian incisions (RR 3.41, 95% CI 1.02–11.45, respectively) [36]. The highest reported incidence is with midline abdominal incisions (3–20%) [31, 32]. Muscle-splitting incisions (para-median) have a cumulative incidence of incisional hernia ranging from 1% to 6% [38, 39]. Laparoscopic port sites can also develop incisional hernia, with a reported incidence between 0% and 5% [4042]. The highest risk being 10 mm or larger ports and below the umbilicus. These findings in the general surgical population, showing the importance of the operative technique as a determinant of incisional hernia occurrence, can be applied to the PD population. We believe that in the PD population, where, unfortunately, comparative studies are missing and the incidence of all types of hernia is very high, the laparoscopic insertion technique has to be considered the gold standard since it decreases the risk of incisional hernia. The effect of hernias and their management on PD technique survival remains poorly characterized in the literature. Furthermore, the effect of hernia occurrence and treatment on residual renal function (RRF), which is known to confer significant prognostic benefit in PD, remains unknown [43].


Diagnosis


The diagnosis of hernia during the assessment for PD catheter insertion is clinical, based on the history and thorough physical examination [4446]. The most common presentation is of a lump or a bulge (usually upon Valsalva manoeuvre); less frequently and particularly in overweight patients, the hernia may not be clinically evident with only a vague discomfort in the area. In these situations, the clinical use of ultrasonography is promising with a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 85%, respectively [4749]; higher resolution axial computed tomography (can be without contrast to preserve urinary output) and magnetic resonance imaging might be useful with sensitivity and specificity greater than 95% [50].

The diagnosis of hernia in patients on PD is also made on clinical ground; although rarely needed, ancillary tests used are ultrasound, CT scan or radionuclide imaging. The diagnostic accuracy of the CT scan is improved by the use of intraperitoneal dye, infused with the peritoneal fluid [5154]. An alternative diagnostic test, described in clinical practice but rarely needed in the modern diagnostic armamentarium, is the radionuclide imaging using technetium-labelled or sulphur colloid with subsequent scanning by gamma camera to track the movement of dialysate [55, 56].


Treatment


The original technique of inguinal hernia repair, first described by Bassini more than 100 years ago, has as a major drawback the risk of recurrence [57]. Despite several modifications, introduced over the years by by Shouldice, McVay and others, the recurrence rate for primary hernia repair, according to annual statistics from various countries, is still 10–15% [58]. In the recent years, the availability of prosthetic meshes has led to an increase in the number of ‘tension-free’ methods of reinforcing the inguinal region to prevent recurrences [5962]. The use of mesh is associated with a 30–50% reduction in the risk of hernia recurrence in comparison with non-mesh methods of hernia repair [60, 61]. Open mesh methods of repair are classified as open flat mesh (i.e. the Lichtenstein method), open preperitoneal mesh (i.e. the Stoppa and Nyhus methods) and open plug and mesh repair (i.e. the Rutkow method). There are two main approaches for the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias. Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair involves access to the hernia through the peritoneal cavity. Mesh is inserted through the peritoneum and placed over all potential hernia sites in the inguinal region. The peritoneum is then closed above the mesh. Totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair is the newer laparoscopic technique, in which the hernia site is accessed via the preperitoneal plane without entering the peritoneal cavity. TEP repair is considered to be technically more difficult than the TAPP technique, but it may reduce the risk of damage to intra-abdominal organs.

The gold standard is thought to be the Lichtenstein method, although this is still a matter of debate. According to recent guidelines, laparoscopic surgery would be the preferred technique for the repair of recurrent hernias (as scar tissue from previous open repairs may be avoided) and bilateral hernias (repaired during the same operation) and should also be an option for primary repair of unilateral hernias because of the reduced incidence of long-term pain and numbness and the potential for earlier return to normal activities. [6369]

The overall recurrence rates for primary hernia repair in the PD population range from 0% to 25%, depending upon the hernia site (direct, indirect, femoral), type of repair (mesh, no mesh, open, laparoscopic) and clinical circumstances (elective, emergent) [9, 12, 14, 7075], which is higher than the general population (0.5–15%) [58, 61, 76]. Considering that 5–10% of PD patients undergoing surgery for recurrent hernia has to convert permanently to hemodialysis [11, 14, 73], the use of mesh in this setting is strongly advocated.

There is general agreement that all hernias should be repaired in patients considered for PD and already established on PD due to risks of bowel complications (i.e. bowel incarceration and/or strangulation) and PD failure or dialysate leak [11, 7781].

There are a few possible scenarios for repair, depending on the residual kidney function, comorbidities and surgical technique:



  • Hernia repair in patients considered for PD – before PD catheter insertion


  • Hernia repair during PD catheter insertion


  • Hernia repair in patients on PD – after PD catheter insertion


Hernia Repair in Patients Considered for PD – Before PD Catheter Insertion


The repair before PD catheter insertion follows the approach described above and does not differ from the treatment of the general population (Table 15.2).


Table 15.2
Hernia repair before PD catheter insertion




















Pros

Cons

More time for the peritoneum to heal

Two operations

More time for the mesh to grow in

Twice anaesthesia

May delay the start of PD

For umbilical hernia – potential interference of the mesh for optimal PD catheter insertion


Hernia Repair During PD Catheter Insertion


Special consideration is given to this approach of concomitant hernia repair and PD catheter placement. This has been described in case series with both open and laparoscopic techniques and the authors define this surgical procedure reliable and safe [7880, 8284]. The use of laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh placement in this setting has not been extensively studied but has some risk of damanging the peritoneal membrane. Further comparative trials are necessary to clarifty the best approach to concomititant laparocscopic insertion of PD catheter and inguinal hernia repair. Given the widespread use of laparoscopy for PD catheter insertion, which allows inspection and identification of occult inguinal hernias or a patent processus vaginalis (potential site of future herniation) recent guidelines suggest fixing these defects when found (81) during the insertion. It is therefore important to counsel and consent patients for possible hernia repair prior to the laparoscopic insertion procedure (Table 15.3).


Table 15.3
Hernia repair during PD catheter insertion















Pros

Cons

One operation

Potential complications (i.e. dialysate leak, recurrence) if PD treatment started early

No guidelines on when to start PD


Hernia Repair in Patients on PD


The management of dialysis requirements depends on the residual function; the vast majority of patients can carry out the usual dialysis until the morning of the surgery [11, 71, 8587]. Comparative trials of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in PD patients do not exist. Several reports have used open polypropylene mesh repair of inguinal hernias and shown very low recurrence and leak rates, despite resuming PD within a few days [74, 75, 8488] and some authors advocate the use of mesh for a faster return to PD, thus avoiding the need for a change in dialysis modality and offering advantages both to patients and to hard-pressed haemodialysis programs [74, 75, 84, 88]. In a single centre experience, tension-free hernia repair with polypropylene mesh reinforcement allowed the patient to commence or continue PD as early as 24 h after surgery [74]. For incisional hernias, open anterior repair with inversion of the hernia sac without disrupting it, and placing a mesh has been shown to have low recurrence and leak rates in adults [11, 74]. If the peritoneum is bridged, it is recommended to close it in a watertight manner [79].

There are no guidelines as to whether PD treatment can be safely continued after hernioplasty or should be withheld postoperatively to allow proper healing, to avoid postoperative dialysate leakage from hernia repair site or early hernia recurrence. Several authors proposed different strategies [72, 75, 84]. A common strategy is to restart PD almost immediately after surgery (between 12 and 72 h) with low-volume high-frequency exchanges, avoiding temporary haemodialysis [73, 84, 88]. Shah et al. recommended continuation on standard PD therapy until the morning of the surgery, followed by no dialysis for the first 48 h and intermittent PD 3 times per week (1 L exchange for 10 h) for 2 weeks, low-volume CAPD for another 2 weeks, and resumption of the preoperative PD prescription after 4–5 weeks, with excellent results [71]. Another PD management protocol had been suggested by Crabtree et al. in which low-volume automated PD exchanges were used, with an initial fill volume of 1 L, which was gradually increased to 1.5 L the second week, and with resumption of usual dialysis regimen thereafter [79]. The above-mentioned strategies expose the patient to “under-dialysis” which has to be balanced against the risk of insertion of a temporary hemodialysis line and the hemodialysis procedure itself. Dialysis is usually restarted under conditions of low abdominal pressure and small volumes after elective hernia repair; treatment is commonly withheld for several days or even weeks in case of incarcerated or strangulated hernias, which can lead to significant morbidity in this setting [89].


Conclusions

Abdominal wall hernias are common mechanical complications of peritoneal dialysis and their management has not been standardized. Contrary to the general population where some authors propose a strategy of watchful waiting for asymptomatic hernias [90]; in the PD setting, guidelines suggest to fix these defects to avoid complications of dialysate leak and bowel strangulation [81]. Due to the elevated recurrence rate, a mesh repair is preferred. This strategy appears to be safe, not increasing the incidence of peritonitis, and effective, reducing the recurrence rate and can be performed without temporarily converting to hemodialysis.

In our practice, we perform primary hernia repair and PD insertion during the same operation in candidates for PD. Our preferred approach in this scenario is the laparoscopic technique with sublay mesh and careful closure of the peritoneum. Following the operation peritoneal dialysis can be started as early as 12–24 hours with rapid exchange technique (low volumes, rapid frequency). For hernia repair in patients on PD our preferred approach is with open technique with mesh, reserving the laparoscopy for bilateral or recurrent hernias. Our approach to the treatment of incisional hernias, either with open or laparoscopic technique, depending on size, site and reducibility, is by applying a sublay mesh. In most cases the rapid exchange technique allows to restart PD early, avoiding temporary hemodialysis.

It is of paramount importance to adequately manage abdominal wall hernias in patients on PD since patients not successfully treated may no longer be candidates for PD. Trials are lacking to determine the best strategy towards hernia repair in PD patients, regarding timing, technique, and material. These trials should be set up nationally in multiple centers, given the relatively small numbers of PD insertions all centres are doing.


Bibliography



1.

Rains AJH, Capper WM. Bailey & love’s short practice of surgery. 15th ed. London: Lewis; 1971.


2.

David C, Sabiston JR. Davis-christopher textbook of surgery. 12th ed. London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 1981.


3.

Kingsworth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003;362:1561–71.CrossRef


4.

Rutkow IM. Epidemiologic, economic, and socio-logic aspects of hernia surgery in the United States in the 1990s. Surg Clin North Am. 1998;78:941.CrossRefPubMed

Jul 18, 2017 | Posted by in CARDIOLOGY | Comments Off on Management of Hernias in the Context of Peritoneal Dialysis

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access