Multidisciplinary strategies
The cost of managing patients with heart failure (HF) is substantial and continues to grow, with the main area of expenditure being high rehospitalization rates (see Chapter 1). In order to improve patient care and reduce healthcare costs, multidisciplinary HF management programs have been designed for patients with severe symptomatic HF, which unify and coordinate their care throughout their illness and within the various service-delivery systems (i.e. the hospital, outpatient clinic and community setting). The mode of intervention varies from direct face-to-face contact to telephone consultation and the use of telemedicine. In general, management programs do not include diagnosed patients with mild symptoms (no effect on outcomes), those with HF and preserved systolic function (no available evidence) or severely ill patients at the end stage of the disease (in need of a palliative care approach – see Chapter 9).
Integral to all HF management programs are:
• prompt assessment of disease activity and the interventions required
• supervised medical treatment, including drug titration
• improved access to care
• comprehensive patient education
• psychosocial support.
Most programs involve nurses and physicians specialized in HF. Input from pharmacists, allied health staff (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, nutritionists, social workers) or psychologists varies; some of the programs incorporate all of these services.
Effectiveness. The available evidence suggests the following.
• Strategies that incorporate follow-up by a specialized multidisciplinary team (either in a clinic or non-clinic setting) reduce mortality, HF hospitalizations and all-cause hospitalizations.
• Programs that focus on enhancing patient self-care activities, reduce HF and all-cause hospitalizations but have no effect on mortality.
• Remote monitoring programs (including telemonitoring or structured telephone support – see below) reduce the rates of admission to hospital for chronic HF and all-cause mortality.
• Most of the programs are cost-effective or cost-neutral.
Telemonitoring and telehomecare. Keeping patients in their own environment is preferable, and the use of telehomecare (follow-up by telephone) and telemonitoring (using wireless technology) has been developed with this aim in mind. Information such as daily weight, heart rate, blood pressure and adherence to treatment can be assessed over the telephone or transmitted wirelessly to allow rapid and serial review. The results from a number of studies looking at both intensive home-care assessment and remote analysis have been variable. In a Cochrane review of 25 studies involving more than 8000 patients, telemonitoring significantly reduced mortality and HF rehospitalization. However, other studies have indicated more neutral outcomes and, overall, current evidence does not support a strong effect on patient outcomes.
Although implantable devices, such as pacemakers and defibrillators, are capable of providing real-time information on a daily basis, such as heart-rate variability, patient-activity status and assessment of lung fluid volume, they have yet to provide sufficiently accurate predictive data. Newer devices currently under intensive study may be able to monitor hemodynamic changes either directly (left atrial pressures) or indirectly (via the pulmonary circulation or by transthoracic or intracardiac impedance). Early signs are promising but there is still too great a variation in outcome for results to be predictive.
General principles of non-pharmacological management
General non-pharmacological management may be as important as the prescription of HF-specific medications. The majority of HF care is conducted in the home by either the patient and/or the caregiver. It is therefore essential that all patients with HF and those who care for them receive comprehensive education and counseling to develop the knowledge, skills, strategies, problem-solving approaches and motivation required to adhere to a complex treatment plan and effectively participate in HF self-care. It is important to include carers and family members in this education as patients with HF often experience difficulties with cognition, functional ability and other conditions that may limit their understanding of what is required. Non-adherence to HF management plans can be related to patient and/or caregiver misconceptions and lack of knowledge.
Self-care involves active participation in the maintenance and management of HF. Included within self-care maintenance are healthy lifestyle choices, treatment adherence and monitoring of behaviors. Self-care management is a cognitive process that involves the recognition of signs and symptoms of worsening HF, evaluation of the importance of a change in symptoms, implementation of a self-care strategy (such as increasing diuretic medication) and evaluating the effectiveness of any changes.
Education should be structured and individualized to the patient’s specific situation (e.g. literacy level, cultural background) (Table 6.1).
• Understanding the pathology and treatment of heart failure, the underlying condition and comorbidities • Understanding the importance of adherence to pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments and beneficial lifestyle modifications • Monitoring own condition and recognizing deterioration • Seeking assistance when signs and symptoms worsen • Understanding the function of the medication and possible side effects • Inclusion of family, friends and caregivers as part of the educational intervention • Use of a skills-based approach rather than only providing information (e.g. demonstration on how to read sodium content on a food label) • Use of multimedia resources (DVDs, books, brochures, verbal education, support groups, computer-based programs) |
Treatment adherence. Although good adherence to HF management regimens is associated with a decrease in morbidity and mortality, and improvement in wellbeing, only 20–60% of patients with HF adhere to their prescribed medical and non-medical treatment plan. It has been demonstrated that some patients either misunderstand or have trouble recalling information provided on HF self-management (such as instructions on dietary changes).
In order to promote increased adherence for patients with HF, the following are recommended:
• a strong relationship between the healthcare team and patients
• adequate social support and participation by the family in education programs and decisions regarding treatment and care
• provision of adequate knowledge of all aspects of treatment including effects, side effects and titration of medications.
Patients and/or caregivers should understand the variable nature of HF symptoms and learn to recognize decompensation warning symptoms early in order to take appropriate action.
Weight monitoring, and fluid and sodium management. The maintenance of a normal blood volume is paramount in the management of HF. Increases in bodyweight are often associated with fluid retention and therefore deterioration in HF and possible hospital admission. The management of volume overload in HF patients frequently requires intravenous diuretics and modification to fluid and sodium intake. However, hypovolemia due to increased fluid loss from diarrhea, vomiting or overuse of diuretics, or insufficient fluid intake, brings different but equally debilitating symptoms such as hypotension, electrolyte disturbances and changes to renal function.
Patients should be encouraged to weigh themselves daily, each morning after emptying their bladder, in order to detect either rapid weight gain, which might indicate they are retaining too much fluid, or rapid weight loss of a similar amount in the same period, which might indicate dehydration. Ideally, these weights should be recorded in a weight diary so that trends can be monitored over time. This is also advantageous to those with cognitive impairment. Patients and their carers should be instructed to contact their healthcare practitioner or HF nurse if weight increases or decreases unexpectedly by more than 2 kg over 2 or 3 consecutive days as they may need further assessment or a change to their diuretic regimen.
If patients have demonstrated the ability to self-care, it may be appropriate for them to regulate their own diuretic dose based on daily weight monitoring and assessment of HF symptoms. Initially, the increased dose should be a single multiple of the previous dose (e.g. if the usual dose is 40 mg daily, the increase should be to 80 mg daily) for a period of 3 days or until euvolemia is achieved. If there is no change in status the patient should be encouraged to seek the assistance of the healthcare provider or HF nurse.
Patients with severe symptoms of HF should be encouraged to limit their fluid intake to 1.5–2 L/day (except in warmer weather), particularly if they have associated hyponatremia. There is no evidence to suggest fluid limitation is useful in patients with mild-to-moderate HF. Excessive dietary sodium intake contributes to fluid overload and is a major cause of preventable admission to hospital. It has been suggested that excessive sodium intake may also contribute to diuretic resistance. When combined with a diuretic regimen, a low-sodium diet can result in beneficial hemodynamic and clinical effects. In patients with mild symptoms, a sodium restriction to 3 g per day is sufficient to control extracellular fluid volume, while those with more severe symptoms should reduce sodium intake to 2 g/day.
Patients should be assessed on their knowledge of sodium content in the foods they consume and then educated on how to identify and measure sodium intake.
Healthy lifestyle choices
Physical activity. Multiple factors contribute to physical deconditioning in patients with HF. Effort-related dyspnea and fatigue dominate the clinical picture, thus reducing functional capacity. In general, exercise limitation is caused by a combination of low cardiac output and non-cardiac causes such as peripheral vasoconstriction/endothelial dysfunction, ventilatory limitation and skeletal muscle changes. The presence of multiple medical comorbidities (e.g. depression, sleep-disordered breathing, arthritis) further limits physical performance in this group.
Benefits of regular exercise. Physical activity has been shown to improve functional capacity, symptoms and neurohormonal abnormalities. Provisional evidence also suggests that regular exercise, which is considered a safe and cost-effective intervention, may reduce hospital admissions and improve survival. The benefits of regular exercise in patients with HF include peripheral adaptation of the skeletal muscles and autonomic nervous system, and a significant increase in exercise capacity (by about 15% maximum oxygen consumption [VO2max]). Exercise also leads to improvement in overall quality-of-life scores.
Contraindications. Regular physical activity is strongly recommended for all medically stable patients with HF unless they are in NYHA class IV or have other limiting symptoms such as angina (Table 6.2). Implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) settings must be reviewed before any exercise is undertaken.
Absolute contraindications • Progressive worsening of exercise tolerance or dyspnea at rest or on exertion over previous 3–5 days • Significant ischemia at low exercise intensities (< 2 METs or ∼50 Watts) • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus • Acute systemic illness or fever • Recent embolism • Thrombophlebitis • Active pericarditis or myocarditis • Severe aortic stenosis • Valvular heart disease requiring surgery • Myocardial infarction within previous 3 weeks • New-onset atrial fibrillation • Resting heart rate > 120 bpm Relative contraindications • ≥ 2 kg increase in body mass over previous 1–3 days • Concurrent continuous or intermittent dobutamine therapy • > 10 mmHg drop in systolic blood pressure with exercise • Class IV (NYHA) dyspnea • Complex ventricular arrhythmia at rest or appearing with exertion • Supine resting heart rate ≥ 100 bpm • Pre-existing comorbidities • Moderate aortic stenosis • BP > 180/110 mmHg (evaluated on a case-by-case basis) BP, blood pressure; bpm, beats per minute; MET, metabolic equivalent of task – a physiological measure expressing the energy cost of physical activities (< 3 METs = light exercise/rest, > 6 METs = vigorous exercise); NYHA, New York Heart Association. |