Abstract
Backgrounds
Few reports have primarily focused on long-term clinical outcomes in three-vessel disease when patients were treated with either first- or new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES). The purpose of this study was to investigate different clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for three-vessel disease with first- or new-generation DES.
Methods
Between January 2007 and December 2013, a total of 200 patients who received complete revascularization of three-vessel disease with either first-generation DES ( n = 85) or new-generation DES ( n = 115) were analyzed in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as composite endpoints of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 3 years.
Results
The event-free survival rate of MACE at 3 years in the new-generation DES group was significantly higher than that in the first-generation group (62% vs. 77%, log rank p = 0.02). The Cox regression multivariate analysis revealed that renal dysfunction [hazard ratio (HR): 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09–4.22; p = 0.03], use of statins (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.32–0.90; p = 0.02) and first-generation DES (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.22–3.49; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of MACE.
Conclusions
These findings indicated that in patients with three-vessel disease, PCI with new-generation DES is associated with a significantly increased event-free survival rate of MACE at 3 years as compared to first-generation DES.
Highlights
- •
The purpose of this study was to investigate different clinical long term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for three-vessel disease with first- or new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES).
- •
This study showed that new-generation DES were associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes after PCI for three-vessel coronary disease compared with the first-generation DES
- •
Independent predictors of major cardiac events after treatment of three-vessel disease were renal dysfunction defined as eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , use of statins, and first-generation DES.
1
Introduction
In the 2014 European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery guidelines on myocardial revascularization of three-vessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is recommended as the standard therapy based on the SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) score of patients . This recommendation was based primarily on the results of the SYNTAX trial that randomly assigned patients with left main and/or three-vessel disease to undergo either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a first-generation paclitaxel-eluting stent or CABG, which demonstrated that CABG resulted in lower rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) than PCI . However, new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown better efficacy and safety than first-generation DES ; while first-generation DES have been replaced by new-generation DES, few reports have primarily focused on long-term clinical outcomes in three-vessel disease among patients treated with either first- or new-generation DES. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of first- and new-generation DES and to investigate the predictors of MACE during PCI for three-vessel disease.
2
Methods
2.1
Study patients
Between January 2007 and December 2013, 622 consecutive patients with de novo three-vessel coronary artery disease underwent PCI at our center (New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan). All patients were treated to achieve complete revascularization of all vessels with at least 2.5 mm in diameter with at least 70% stenosis.
Of these patients, those who underwent PCI with incomplete revascularization and were treated with BMS or both first- and new-generation DES were excluded. Therefore, 200 patients who received complete revascularization of three-vessel disease with either first-generation DES ( n = 85) or new-generation DES ( n = 115) were included in this retrospective study.
2.2
Definitions
First-generation DES included sirolimus-eluting stents [SES, Cypher family (Cordis Corp., Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ)] and paclitaxel-eluting stents [PES, Taxus family (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA)], whereas new-generation DES included everolimus-eluting stents [EES, XIENCE V®, and XIENCE PRIME™ (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) and PROMUS® and PROMUS Element™ (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, MA)], biolimus-eluting stents [BES, Nobori® (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan)], and zotarolimus-eluting stents [ZES, Resolute Integrity (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA)]. First-generation DES were used between 2007 and 2010, and new-generation DES were used between 2010 and 2013.
The decision to perform PCI for three-vessel disease depended on the physician’s assessment of high surgical risk as defined by the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) ≥ 6 and/or patient refusal of surgery.
Clinical data were collected during hospital visits or by telephone. In both cohorts, angiographic follow-up examinations were scheduled between 6 and 12 months after PCI or when clinical presentation suggested the presence of ischemia. Data on medication regimens were collected at the time of initial PCI.
The primary study endpoint was the incidence of MACE defined as the composite endpoints of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 3 years. Cardiac death was defined as death without an identifiable non-cardiac cause. MI was defined as the presence of pathological and new Q waves on electrocardiography or an increase in creatine kinase-myocardial band level to more than three times the normal limit. TLR was defined as any repeat intervention of the target lesion.
The secondary study endpoints were the individual components of MACE, all-cause death, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) based on the Academic Research Consortium definitions . TVR was defined as any repeat intervention of any treated vessel segment.
SYNTAX score was calculated from diagnostic angiograms according to the previously defined algorithm . Renal dysfunction was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , as patients with an eGFR in that range were more likely to have physical symptoms associated with kidney disease . eGFR measured immediately before the index PCI was included in the final analyses in this study.
2.3
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as either frequencies (%) or means ± standard deviation. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s unpaired t test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-square analysis or Fisher’s exact test. Event-free survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent predictors of MACE. Variables that were associated with outcomes during univariate analysis, those variables with previously shown clinical significance, and baseline characteristics that differed between the first- and new-generation DES patients groups were selected as covariates for multivariate analysis. To avoid overfitting the data, the number of covariates was limited to a maximum of 1 for every 8 to 10 events. The results were reported as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was defined as a p value of less than 0.05. Analyses were confirmed using SPSS version 18.0 (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL).
2
Methods
2.1
Study patients
Between January 2007 and December 2013, 622 consecutive patients with de novo three-vessel coronary artery disease underwent PCI at our center (New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan). All patients were treated to achieve complete revascularization of all vessels with at least 2.5 mm in diameter with at least 70% stenosis.
Of these patients, those who underwent PCI with incomplete revascularization and were treated with BMS or both first- and new-generation DES were excluded. Therefore, 200 patients who received complete revascularization of three-vessel disease with either first-generation DES ( n = 85) or new-generation DES ( n = 115) were included in this retrospective study.
2.2
Definitions
First-generation DES included sirolimus-eluting stents [SES, Cypher family (Cordis Corp., Johnson & Johnson, Warren, NJ)] and paclitaxel-eluting stents [PES, Taxus family (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA)], whereas new-generation DES included everolimus-eluting stents [EES, XIENCE V®, and XIENCE PRIME™ (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) and PROMUS® and PROMUS Element™ (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, MA)], biolimus-eluting stents [BES, Nobori® (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan)], and zotarolimus-eluting stents [ZES, Resolute Integrity (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA)]. First-generation DES were used between 2007 and 2010, and new-generation DES were used between 2010 and 2013.
The decision to perform PCI for three-vessel disease depended on the physician’s assessment of high surgical risk as defined by the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) ≥ 6 and/or patient refusal of surgery.
Clinical data were collected during hospital visits or by telephone. In both cohorts, angiographic follow-up examinations were scheduled between 6 and 12 months after PCI or when clinical presentation suggested the presence of ischemia. Data on medication regimens were collected at the time of initial PCI.
The primary study endpoint was the incidence of MACE defined as the composite endpoints of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 3 years. Cardiac death was defined as death without an identifiable non-cardiac cause. MI was defined as the presence of pathological and new Q waves on electrocardiography or an increase in creatine kinase-myocardial band level to more than three times the normal limit. TLR was defined as any repeat intervention of the target lesion.
The secondary study endpoints were the individual components of MACE, all-cause death, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) based on the Academic Research Consortium definitions . TVR was defined as any repeat intervention of any treated vessel segment.
SYNTAX score was calculated from diagnostic angiograms according to the previously defined algorithm . Renal dysfunction was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 , as patients with an eGFR in that range were more likely to have physical symptoms associated with kidney disease . eGFR measured immediately before the index PCI was included in the final analyses in this study.
2.3
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as either frequencies (%) or means ± standard deviation. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s unpaired t test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-square analysis or Fisher’s exact test. Event-free survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent predictors of MACE. Variables that were associated with outcomes during univariate analysis, those variables with previously shown clinical significance, and baseline characteristics that differed between the first- and new-generation DES patients groups were selected as covariates for multivariate analysis. To avoid overfitting the data, the number of covariates was limited to a maximum of 1 for every 8 to 10 events. The results were reported as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was defined as a p value of less than 0.05. Analyses were confirmed using SPSS version 18.0 (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL).
3
Results
3.1
Comparisons of baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics and medications after the procedure
The clinical characteristics of patients that underwent PCI with first- and new-generation DES are shown in Table 1 . There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics except for the higher insulin use rate and EuroSCORE (4.7% vs. 15%, p = 0.04, 3.6 ± 2.4 vs. 4.6 ± 2.7, p < 0.01, respectively) as well as the lower current smoking rate (33% vs. 18%, p = 0.03) in the new-generation DES group compared with the first-generation DES group.
First-Generation DES | New-Generation DES | ||
---|---|---|---|
Variables | n = 85 | n = 115 | p value |
Patient demographics | |||
Age, years | 66 ± 10 | 69 ± 11 | 0.07 |
Male | 67 (79) | 89 (77) | 0.86 |
BMI | 25 ± 2.6 | 24 ± 3.4 | 0.57 |
Risk factors | |||
Diabetes mellitus | 42 (49) | 64 (56) | 0.46 |
Use of insulin | 4 (4.7) | 17 (15) | 0.04 |
Hypertension | 61 (72) | 83 (73) | 0.99 |
Dyslipidemia | 57 (67) | 71 (62) | 0.58 |
Current smoker | 28 (33) | 21 (18) | 0.03 |
Comorbidities | |||
PAD | 10 (12) | 23 (20) | 0.17 |
CKD on HD | 4 (5.0) | 11 (10) | 0.31 |
EuroSCORE | 3.6 ± 2.4 | 4.6 ± 2.7 | < 0.01 |
Clinical Presentation | |||
AMI | 2 (2.3) | 8 (7.0) | 0.25 |
Unstable angina | 15 (18) | 14 (12) | 0.38 |
Stable angina | 68 (80) | 93 (81) | 0.99 |
Clinical data | |||
eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m 2 | 70 ± 27 | 63 ± 29 | 0.08 |
Renal dysfuntion | 7 (8.2) | 14 (12) | 0.37 |
LVEF, % | 57 ± 11 | 54 ± 13 | 0.06 |