Left Ventricular Systolic Function
Vikram Fielding-Singh
Emily Methangkool
A. Isovolumic contraction
B. Systolic ejection
C. Isovolumic relaxation
D. Diastolic filling
View Answer
1. Correct Answer: B. Systolic ejection
Rationale: The image depicts the Doppler interrogation of transmitral inflow. This image was taken in the apical four-chamber view, with the sample volume at the coaptation of the mitral valve leaflets. The time period marked 1 indicates the diastolic filling phase, comprised of a large peak due to early diastolic filling (referred to as the E wave) and a smaller peak due to atrial contraction (referred to as the A wave). This is followed by isovolumic contraction (2), systolic ejection (3), and isovolumic relaxation (4).
Selected References
1. Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
A. Isovolumic contraction
B. Systolic ejection
C. Isovolumic relaxation
D. Diastolic filling
View Answer
2. Correct Answer: A. Isovolumic contraction
Rationale: The phase of the cardiac cycle seen in this image is isovolumic contraction. The ventricle is in an isovolumic state because the aortic and mitral valves are closed. The ventricle is in a contractile state (compared to relaxation) because the electrocardiogram (ECG) is at the QRS complex. Figure 22.8 outlines the relationship between phases of the cardiac cycle and the ECG tracing.
Selected Reference
1. Sheth PJ, Danton GH, Siegel Y, et al. Cardiac physiology for radiologists: review of relevant physiology for interpretation of cardiac MR imaging and CT. Radiographics. 2015;35(5):1335-1351.
A. A
B. B
C. C
D. D
View Answer
3. Correct Answer: B.
Rationale: Internal linear dimensions of the left ventricle (such as the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter) are typically obtained from the parasternal long-axis view. Electronic calipers are positioned at the interface of the myocardial wall and cavity, with the axis of measurement perpendicular to the long axis of the left ventricle. The measurement is made at or immediately below the level of the mitral valve leaflet tips. Linear measures of left ventricular systolic function use this view. Use of M-mode to obtain internal linear dimensions offers improved spatial and temporal resolution but may not allow measurement perpendicular to the long axis of the left ventricle. Of note, E-point Septal Separation (EPSS) is measured from the parasternal longaxis view at the level of the mitral valve leaflet tips. EPSS measures the distance separating the anterior mitral valve leaflet at maximal excursion during systole and the septal wall, and an EPSS of >7 mm has been shown to be 87% sensitive and 75% specific at identifying reduced EF (<50%). EPSS has limited accuracy when there is significant aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis, or inferior wall motion abnormalities present. Answer A is the posterior wall, answer C is the interventricular septum, and answer D is the aortic root. Figure 22.9 shows examples of EPSS in patients with anterior and inferior myocardial infarction.
Selected References
1. Ahmadpour H, Shah AA, Allen JW, et al. Mitral E point septal separation: a reliable index of left ventricular performance in coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 1983;106(1 Pt 1):21-28.
2. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14.
4. A patient has the following left ventricular chamber dimensions measured at end diastole with transthoracic echocardiography:
Posterior wall thickness: 1.4 cm
Septal wall thickness: 2.0 cm
End-diastolic diameter: 4.3 cm
How would you describe these left ventricular chamber dimensions?
A. Normal left ventricular geometry
B. Eccentric hypertrophy
C. Concentric hypertrophy
D. Concentric remodeling
View Answer
4. Correct Answer: C. Concentric hypertrophy
Rationale/Critique: Hypertrophy (vs. normal geometry or concentric remodeling) is defined as elevated left ventricular mass, which can be estimated from linear measurements using formulas that you should not be expected to memorize. Practically speaking, knowledge of normal chamber dimensions may be used to diagnose hypertrophy. Normal values for both septal and posterior wall thickness are generally about 0.6 to 0.9 cm. This patient clearly has significant hypertrophy, particularly of the septal wall.
To then characterize the hypertrophy as concentric or eccentric, relative wall thickness may be used. Relative wall thickness is calculated as:
(2 × posterior wall thickness)/end-diastolic diameter
Concentric hypertrophy is defined as a relative wall thickness >0.42 and eccentric hypertrophy is defined as a relative wall thickness ≤0.42. This patient has a relative wall thickness of 0.65, so the hypertrophy is concentric. Note that the relationship between the posterior and septal walls is not used in characterizing hypertrophy as concentric versus eccentric.
Selected References
1. Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
2. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14.
5. How would you describe the left ventricular chamber dimensions of the ventricle in Box 4 of Figure 22.4?
A. Normal left ventricular geometry
B. Eccentric hypertrophy
C. Concentric hypertrophy
D. Concentric remodeling
View Answer
5. Correct Answer: B. Eccentric hypertrophy
Rationale: Hypertrophy (vs. normal geometry or concentric remodeling) is defined as elevated left ventricular mass. Boxes 2 and 4 show enlarged ventricles with increased left ventricular mass, so Boxes 1 (concentric remodeling) and 3 (normal left ventricular geometry) can be eliminated. To then characterize the hypertrophy as concentric versus eccentric, the relative wall thickness is used. A relative wall thickness >0.42 defines concentric hypertrophy and a relative wall thickness ≤0.42 defines eccentric hypertrophy. Box 4 shows eccentric hypertrophy.
Selected References
1. Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
2. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14.
6. In the transthoracic apical four-chamber image shown in Figure 22.5, which line(s) represent(s) the correct tracing of the left ventricular end-diastolic area from which left ventricular diastolic volume may be calculated?
A. Green
B. Yellow
C. Pink
D. Green and pink
View Answer
6. Correct Answer: A. White
Rationale: An apical four-chamber view is shown in Figure 22.5. Quantification of the left ventricular ejection fraction using a biplane method of discs involves estimating left ventricular end-diastolic volume using an area tracing. The endocardial border should be traced, while papillary muscles (red line) and trabeculations (yellow line) should not be included in the tracing. This method of tracing results in volume estimates that most closely match magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. For illustrative purposes, another example is provided in Figure 22.10. The left panel shows a tracing that does not track the endocardial border for the lateral wall, resulting in an underestimation of left ventricular volume. The right panel shows a corrected tracing that does not involve tracing the borders of either trabeculations or papillary muscles.
Selected Reference
1. Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
7. A transthoracic echocardiogram shows no significant valvular abnormalities and no left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities. The left ventricular end-diastolic diameter is 55 mm and the end-systolic diameter is 48 mm. How would you describe the left ventricular systolic function?
A. Hyperdynamic
B. Normal
C. Reduced
D. Unable to determine
View Answer
7. Correct Answer: C. Reduced
Rationale: Fractional shortening is defined as:
(Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter – left ventricular end-systolic diameter)/left ventricular end-systolic diameter
The measurements required may be obtained from a parasternal long axis as shown in Figure 22.15 or from an M-mode tracing if the M-mode interrogation beam is perpendicular to the long axis of the left ventricle. Fractional shortening may be a useful way to assess left ventricular systolic function in the absence of regional wall motion abnormalities, conduction abnormalities, and abnormal left ventricular geometry. A fractional shortening ≥25% implies normal left ventricular function. A value <25% implies reduced function. This patient’s fractional shortening is 12.7%, suggesting reduced left ventricular systolic function.
Selected References
1. Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
2. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18(12):1440-1463.
8. When comparing M-mode and 2D echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular systolic function using a parasternal long-axis view, 2D offers what advantages?
A. Superior temporal resolution
B. Superior spatial resolution
C. Avoidance of measurements oblique to the long axis of the ventricle
D. 2D does not offer any advantages
View Answer
8. Correct Answer: C. Avoidance of measurements oblique to the long axis of the ventricle
Rationale: M-mode offers superior temporal and spatial resolution compared to 2D echocardiography. However, these advantages are becoming less pronounced as 2D echocardiography has improved. In general, 2D echocardiography on modern echocardiography machines offer sufficient resolution to make linear measurements in different phases of the cardiac cycle. The advantages of M-mode are more pronounced when interrogating rapidly moving objects such as valve leaflets. 2D echocardiography offers the advantage of being able to ensure linear measurements are taken in the correct axis. As illustrated in Figure 22.11, the M-mode interrogation beam may not be perpendicular to the left ventricular long axis.
Selected References
1. Armstrong WF, Ryan T. Feigenbaum’s Echocardiography. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2019.
2. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14.
9. In a patient experiencing a myocardial infarction, which method of assessment of left ventricular systolic function is likely to overestimate the true function?
A. Qualitative assessment using the apical four-chamber view
B. Biplane method of disks
C. Three-dimensional volumetric assessment
D. Global longitudinal strain
View Answer
9. Correct Answer: A. Qualitative assessment using the apical four-chamber view
Rationale: Although qualitative assessment of left ventricular systolic function by experienced echocardiographers is felt to be accurate, in the context of a myocardial infarction, a single view may not accurately assess the systolic function. In particular, the apical four-chamber view typically shows the anterolateral and inferoseptal walls. However, severe hypokinesis or akinesis of the inferior or anterior walls (such as a right coronary artery or left anterior descending [LAD] infarct) may not be completely appreciated in this view, leading to an overestimation of left ventricular systolic function. See Figure 22.12 for additional details.
Selected Reference
1. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14.
A. A
B. B
C. C
D. D
View Answer
10. Correct Answer: A.
Rationale: This is a parasternal short-axis view of the left ventricle. Arrow A points to the posteromedial papillary muscle. Arrow B points to the anterolateral papillary muscle. Arrow C points to the right ventricular free wall, and arrow D points to the interventricular septum.
Although coronary blood supply may vary in individual patients, the anterolateral papillary muscle most commonly draws its blood supply from both the left anterior descending and the left circumflex coronary arteries. In contrast, the posteromedial papillary muscle most commonly draws its blood supply from the right coronary artery. The posteromedial papillary muscle is more likely to rupture in the context of a myocardial infarction because of its single coronary blood supply compared to the dual blood supply of the anterolateral papillary muscle. Rupture of the interventricular spectrum or right ventricular free wall is a rarer event. See Figure 22.12 for additional details.
Selected Reference
1. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14.
11. Using the American Society of Echocardiography’s 17-segment model, which transthoracic view allows assessment of the mid-anterior wall?
A. Apical four chamber
B. Apical two chamber
C. Parasternal long axis
D. Apical long axis
View Answer
11. Correct Answer: B. Apical two chamber
Rationale: As shown in Figure 22.13, the apical two-chamber view typically allows visualization of the mid-anterior wall.
Selected Reference
1. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14.
12. A patient in the intensive care unit is experiencing chest pain on postoperative day 2 after a Whipple procedure. The echocardiogram (Figure 22.7) shows hypokinesis in the region indicated by the white arrow.
According to the American Society of Echocardiography’s 17-segment model, the name of the wall segment and the coronary blood supply that is likely impaired are:
A. Mid-inferior wall; right coronary artery
B. Mid-posterior wall; right coronary artery
C. Mid-posterior wall; left circumflex artery
D. Mid-anterolateral wall; left circumflex artery
View Answer
12. Correct Answer: A. Mid-inferior wall; right coronary artery
Rationale/Critique: Figure 22.7 is an apical two-chamber view. It is apical because the apex of the left ventricle is at the top of the image. The papillary muscle on the left of the image (as well as the absence of the right ventricle from Figure 22.7) is a clue that it is an apical two chamber. The arrow points to a papillary muscle, which by definition is at a “mid”-level of the ventricle. The papillary muscle in Figure 22.7 is the posteromedial papillary muscle. In the American Society of Echocardiography’s 17-segment model (Figure 22.13), there is no posterior wall (answer choices B and C). The wall segment designated by the arrow is the mid-inferior wall, which is supplied by the right coronary artery. The mid-anterolateral wall (answer choice D) is supplied by both the left anterior descending and left circumflex and the arrow does not point to this wall segment in Figure 22.7.
Selected Reference
1. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1-39.e14.